Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

tyre info, 2 brands

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alexander :-\) - 27 May 2004 15:18 GMT
Hi all

Had a 98 328i convertible for 5 years and always fitted the continental
conti sports to the 16" rims, used to get around 16k tyre use on the rears
and 20k on the front and overall the noise and wet/dry road manners was
quite good.

On my new 330 sport 2002 model I have the 18" rims that had the Michelin
Pilot sports fitted.
the rears ran out at 12k and the price for the Michelins was a shocking ?240
a corner for the rears, so I thought I would fit a pair of continentals on
the rears only as the front Michelins have at least a further 5k of road
use.

What a big mistake the handling is down around 40% and the car feels
dreadful. The pair of continentals cost around ?370 which I thought was a
good price, boy have I wasted that cash. Car is so much more noisy, wet road
use is dangerous and I just cant push the car in the corners like I could
before.

So word of warning through my findings.

Alexander
Phil - 27 May 2004 18:10 GMT
Look at www.tirerack.com for reviews, tests, and owner ratings.  I had
Continentals earlier on my '98 M3 and they did OK in the dry, but not at all
in the wet.  They also got very noisy toward end of life.  As Tirerack
shows, the Goodyears F1 GS-D3 are well regarded.  I installed them, and they
ride better, are quieter (so far), and have good wear.  The most shocking
thing is wet weather grip.  They really stick!

- Phil

> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Alexander
Dan Krueger - 29 May 2004 01:45 GMT
I agree 100%.  The Goodyear F1's are a bargain and their performance is at least
as good as the Pilot's.  Too early for a wear report however...

Dan

> Look at www.tirerack.com for reviews, tests, and owner ratings.  I had
> Continentals earlier on my '98 M3 and they did OK in the dry, but not at all
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>>Alexander
Dan Krueger - 29 May 2004 01:46 GMT
One more thing - two thumbs up for the rim protection!

Dan

> Look at www.tirerack.com for reviews, tests, and owner ratings.  I had
> Continentals earlier on my '98 M3 and they did OK in the dry, but not at all
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>>Alexander
Nate Nagel - 27 May 2004 20:50 GMT
> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Alexander

Unless the Conti Sports are better than the Sport Contact (all season
version) I'm surprised you stuck with them that long.  I had a set
that came stock on my last new VW, I couldn't wait until they wore
out.  They basically flat out sucked, and I wouldn't recommend them to
my worst enemy.  I'd get inadvertant wheel chirping/traction control
activation just backing out of parking spaces if I gave it a little
too much gas, and handling was nonexistant.  I "fixed" the "problem"
by replacing them with Michelins.

nate
Tom Korth - 27 May 2004 22:24 GMT
> Unless the Conti Sports are better than the Sport Contact (all season
> version) I'm surprised you stuck with them that long.  I had a set
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> too much gas, and handling was nonexistant.  I "fixed" the "problem"
> by replacing them with Michelins.

If they are "all seasons", you must be thinking of the Touring Contacts.
The Conti SportContacts are summer performance tires which have been
supplanted by the SportContact 2 - a tire which has greatly improved my
E46's wet pavement traction over the OEM SportContacts.

Tom
Nate Nagel - 28 May 2004 02:48 GMT
>>Unless the Conti Sports are better than the Sport Contact (all season
>>version) I'm surprised you stuck with them that long.  I had a set
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Tom

They were all seasons, but I thought the sidewall said "sport contact."
 It's quite possible I'm mistaken though.  I just hated those tires so
much that I probably will never buy another set of Contis, I seriously
got better traction out of the $99/4 set of pep boys no-names that were
on my '56 Stude when I bought it.  They really were, no lie, that piss
poor.  They were all right (not good, just all right) when new but as
they wore (quickly) all traction in all conditions just went away.

nate

Signature

go dry to reply.
http://www.toad.net/~njnagel

Tom Korth - 27 May 2004 22:27 GMT
> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> So word of warning through my findings.

Different tires on front & rear is seldom a good idea.  If the Contis are
SportContact 2, you may want to invest in a pair for the front.

Tom
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.