Car Forum / BMW Cars / September 2004
BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Tyler - 02 Jul 2004 20:51 GMT After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this. Needless to say, I want to make sure I make the correct decision regarding which car to purchase. I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. Every time I see these cars, I melt. I am utterly obsessed with the M3. My friend has one and it is one of the most beautiful cars I have ever seen. Then there's the Porsche. How can you not love a car with the reputation of the 911. I love the looks of this car to the point of obsession as well. Now here's the dilemma...which to buy. I have a test drive of both scheduled for next week in Atlanta and will have to test both before making my decision, but what would you guys choose? I know they are both sports cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least hassle? The Porsche's engine compartment appears to be very difficult to get at (from nonmechanics POV). I love both of these cars but only have enough $ for one. Could anyone provide some suggestions please? I know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of something I have worked so hard for. Thanks for your assistance.
Tyler
fbloogyudsr - 02 Jul 2004 21:13 GMT "Tyler" <tuber1487@hotmail.com> wrote
> ... I know they are both sports > cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least hassle? The [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of > something I have worked so hard for. Thanks for your assistance. IME, the BMW will be less expensive to care for. You probably won't be able to work on either, in any case.
The Porsche drives like nothing else; the BMW is much more like other cars in it's driving characteristics.
Floyd
Weekend Guru - 02 Jul 2004 21:33 GMT The M3 is a more practical car with a half way reasonable back seat. There's not much work you can do on either car; however, it's probably true that when you need work done by a mechanic, it's going to be less expensive to work on the M3, because they won't have to drop the engine to do anything but change oil, filters and coolant...as in the 911.
The 911 is more "sports car", with a lower center of gravity, it will probably feel more sporting, but the M3 is no slouch either.
Depends on what you're looking for...either way, you can't go wrong.
Choose and don't look back! Enjoy!
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler Jess Englewood - 02 Jul 2004 22:24 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > looks of this car to the point of obsession as well. Now here's the > dilemma...which to buy. I don't know what your needs are, but here are my thoughts: I drive BMW's (currently a 545i) but, in general, because I need a sedan that seats four. If that was not a requirement in my life I would be in a 911 (996 platform).
While the M3 is an unbelievably capable car, I think it's a fence sitter. Too small to be a functional 4 seater but a bit bloated to be a real sports car (400+ lb. heavier than the 911). By comparison to the 911 the M3 is almost a muscle car in that it will go straight faster, but won't keep up in the twisties.
For my money, and for what is available in the US today, I think nothing beats a 911 with a stick for pure driving fun. I've got a 3 car garage, but between me, my wife and daughter...it's full. But as soon as my daughter heads to college I'll have a 911 in that newly vacated garage spot.
That way I get the needed sedan and the desired sports car.
John Carrier - 02 Jul 2004 23:12 GMT Snip
> For my money, and for what is available in the US today, I think nothing > beats a 911 with a stick for pure driving fun. I've got a 3 car garage, but > between me, my wife and daughter...it's full. But as soon as my daughter > heads to college I'll have a 911 in that newly vacated garage spot. Unless you can spring for the Ferrari 360 Modena. There's more than a little truth to the saying, "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting other showrooms."
Two different (and great) cars. The M3 is a highly capable sports sedan. The Porsche (two syllables BTW) is very much a sports car (and with few peers at that). The Bimmer is more comfortable (great seats), has somewhat better ergonomics and has more room ... it can genuinely seat four adults, if only for relatively short runs. The Porsche has superb handling and probably the best curb recognition on the planet.
Cost is a factor. The M3 runs in the mid 50's with most of its options. The Porsche starts around $75K, and you can easily run up another $5-10K or even more on the extensive option list.
Assuming your wallet doesn't care, let the test drive be your guide. The cars' character are easily discerned. Neither will disappoint.
R / John
Devils944S2 - 02 Jul 2004 23:43 GMT < "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting other showrooms.">
I have spent many hours in the seat of a 308GTSi and a 348 Spyder. Not very impressive. Unless the very high priced Ferraris are completely different than the lower priced models, the phrase that comes to mind is the Ferrari is definitely "style over substance". They were two very pretty cars, but, very noisy and slower than you might think. Of every Italian car I have owned/driven, I had this rebuilt '73 Alfa Spyder that chirped in all 4 gears and was a rip to drive...
> Snip > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > R / John Jess Englewood - 02 Jul 2004 23:48 GMT > Snip > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > little truth to the saying, "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting > other showrooms." I like different cars for a lot of reasons, and one of them is quality of build and craftsmanship. My 308, while admittedly a more pedestrian Ferrari, was an eyesore with welds that wouldn't pass an apprentice test at your local Union hall. I haven't driven a Modena, but I have certainly crawled in and around one and the Italians still don't seem to have learned the art of craftsmanship, even though they have learned the art of automobile performance. To me all things have to go together though and passing the Ferrari showroom is easy given my history as a one time owner.
Some cars are simply too much, and Ferrari falls into this category for me. Porsche and select BMW's, Audi's and Merc's stay just this side of the "too much" line.
Paul Spencer - 03 Jul 2004 17:29 GMT >The Porsche (two syllables BTW) Which reminds me of a cartoon I saw somewhere. A notice on the side of a workshop: "Porsh servicing: $45/hr Porscha servicing $60/hr".
 Signature P
Princess Morgiah - 03 Jul 2004 20:55 GMT > Snip Indeed
> The Porsche (two syllables BTW) ... Since when is that? It's always been Porsche, never Porscha (or however one would try to pronounce it).
Princess Morgiah
someone@somewhere.net - 03 Jul 2004 21:01 GMT Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche:
"It's a "Porsh" if you bought it with your money and a "Porsh-uh" if you bought it with your daddies money."
I say call it what you want, just don't an attitude about being "right."
Reminds me of traveling in Europe and being surprised that Braun appliances are sold as "brown" there but "brawn" here.
Going so it is.
>>Snip > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Princess Morgiah Princess Morgiah - 03 Jul 2004 21:12 GMT > Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche: > > "It's a "Porsh" if you bought it with your money and a "Porsh-uh" if you > bought it with your daddies money." > > I say call it what you want, just don't an attitude about being "right." Mine wasn't a right-or-wrong issue - it's just that I've never heard a dealer or for that matter a Porsche owner refer to the car as anything like what some people try to make of the name.
But as you so rightly pointed out - call it what you want.
Princess Morgiah
Proud Yankee - 04 Jul 2004 01:32 GMT > Mine wasn't a right-or-wrong issue - it's just that I've never heard a > dealer or for that matter a Porsche owner refer to the car as anything like > what some people try to make of the name. Porsche TV commercials say it with 2 syllables. I assume the factory knows how to pronounce it correctly.
Jonathan2s6 - 04 Jul 2004 10:59 GMT you can buy cheap BMW or Mercedes at
www.shopeuro.biz
fbloogyudsr - 04 Jul 2004 15:45 GMT "Jonathan2s6" <jonathan2s6@aol.com> wrote
> you can buy cheap BMW or Mercedes at > > www.shopeuro.biz What an intelligent spammer. Why would the OP want to buy a Mercedes? Why would he want to buy an M3 from someone who has... NONE?
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 22:51 GMT Braun has been owned by Gillette for quite a while, so "brawn" is a pretty reasonable pronunciation. http://www.braun.com/na/company/facts.html
Here in the UK I long ago gave up trying to tell people it's similar to "brown", where official pronunciation is "brawn" for the linguistically challenged Brits.
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
> Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > > > Princess Morgiah Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:08 GMT > Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Reminds me of traveling in Europe and being surprised that Braun > appliances are sold as "brown" there but "brawn" here. And they say "bee, emm, vee" for BMW here. :)
Dori A Schmetterling - 05 Jul 2004 19:10 GMT Where's "here"?
Is that supposed to be German or English?
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
[.........]
> And they say "bee, emm, vee" for BMW here. :) Wingman - 06 Jul 2004 12:02 GMT "Dori A Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in news:40e99983$1$6451 $cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com:
> Where's "here"? > > Is that supposed to be German or English? Deutschland
Dori A Schmetterling - 07 Jul 2004 10:11 GMT In that case the pronunciation rendered into English is, of course, closer to beh em veh.
(And, BTW, what is so remarkable about that?)
:-) DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
> "Dori A Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in news:40e99983$1$6451 > $cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Deutschland Viper - 03 Jul 2004 21:16 GMT > > Snip > Indeed [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Princess Morgiah It's been two syllables since at least my 1977 911S with the heat exchangers that Automotion made a pipe replacement for.
E Brown - 04 Jul 2004 00:13 GMT >> Snip >Indeed [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Since when is that? It's always been Porsche, never Porscha (or however one >would try to pronounce it). Since always - German doesn't have silent letters, so you pronounce the e. It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia. Some Porsche owners correct people, most don't bother. No way is a dealership salesman going to risk blowing a deal by correcting someone's grammar - they'll follow your lead. :) As for the original question: if the car is to be used as a daily driver year 'round, I'd recommend the M3. Otherwise, get the Carrera. And I'd recommend waiting for the new model (type 997) rather than getting a current model (996). Of course, with the original poster's money, I'd get a 72 or 73 Carrera RS. More exclusive, more fun, cheaper to maintain, and depreciation proof (hell, they'll likely go UP in price). Emanuel
 Signature "All everybody wants is a normal life and a cool car... most people settle for the car." Chris Titus 1983 Porsche 911/944/928
Jess Englewood - 04 Jul 2004 00:23 GMT > >> Snip > >Indeed [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the e. It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia. Some > Porsche owners correct people, most don't bother. I think most people know how to pronounce it, if really pushed by pickiness. But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes and Caddies etc. In America we like to lose a syllable or two whenever possible.
daytripper - 04 Jul 2004 02:05 GMT >> >> Snip >> >Indeed [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same >way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes and Caddies etc. No, it hasn't. It's still two syllables to anyone with a clue...
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 23:04 GMT Mercedes is an abbreviation for...?
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
[..........]
> I think most people know how to pronounce it, if really pushed by pickiness. > But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same > way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes ...........................
Scott M - 05 Jul 2004 13:45 GMT
> Mercedes is an abbreviation for...? From Mercedes-Benz, rather than a bona-fide shrinking, is presumably what he was thinking.
 Signature Scott
Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:28 GMT > Mercedes is an abbreviation for...? Mercedes-Benz.
Dori A Schmetterling - 05 Jul 2004 19:08 GMT A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany :-)
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
> > Mercedes is an abbreviation for...? > > Mercedes-Benz. Viper - 05 Jul 2004 20:03 GMT > A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany :-) > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > > > Mercedes-Benz. Didn't someone start a magazine called Benz-O? I have a Benz, but I just call it "daily transportation".
: - ) Jess Englewood - 06 Jul 2004 16:07 GMT > I have a Benz, Now you are reinforcing the "stupid American stereotype". You have a Mercedes-Benz. Three syllables....and don't you forget it :^)
Jess Englewood - 06 Jul 2004 16:02 GMT > A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany :-) Say "Merc" in the US and people will generally think you are speaking about a Mercury product.
Dori A Schmetterling - 07 Jul 2004 10:14 GMT Yes, so I have heard. Can't help those people's problems.. :-))
Re your previous post, Mercedes-Benz contains four syllables, doesn't it ...
Can we now move to discussing the number of angels dancing on a pinhead..?...
:-) DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
[........]
> Say "Merc" in the US and people will generally think you are speaking about > a Mercury product. Jess Englewood - 07 Jul 2004 16:49 GMT > Yes, so I have heard. Can't help those people's problems.. :-)) > > Re your previous post, Mercedes-Benz contains four syllables, doesn't it ... Oh oh! I didn't leave the telling 3 dots of sarcasm.
> Can we now move to discussing the number of angels dancing on a > pinhead..?... You see Angels dancing on Jack?
Just joking, just joking :^)
Jack Baruth - 12 Jul 2004 14:13 GMT > You see Angels dancing on Jack? > > Just joking, just joking :^) I *knew* there was a reason I was skipping this thread... "Mercedes" is short for "Emil J.'s daughter".
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 23:03 GMT Actually it's not, not in German, anyway, though 'Portia' (or Porsha as has been proposed elsewhere) is close enough for most English speakers. I would say it's closer to Porsh-uh as has been suggested by another poster. The final letter is an e, not an a which, believe it or not, are pronounced differently in German... :-)
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
[......] It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia. ................
CJS - 16 Aug 2004 17:53 GMT > >> Snip > >Indeed [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > dealership salesman going to risk blowing a deal by correcting > someone's grammar - they'll follow your lead. :) Reminds me of being at Rose Angeli's over on Wrightwood with several Italian colleagues. The American waiter, ahem, "corrected" pronunciation of three people from Milan and an American who speaks the language. "Riz-ah-toe" and "bru-she-tah" my a.s.
Cheers...Craig craig(underscore)shields@yahoo.C O M http://www.vabene.net --- I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information. - Calvin (and Hobbes)
All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power. - Ashleigh Brilliant
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me. - Fred Allen
Devils944S2 - 04 Jul 2004 04:30 GMT I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables.
> > Snip > Indeed [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Princess Morgiah Jess Englewood - 04 Jul 2004 17:07 GMT > I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables. I don't believe there was ever any question that "German" has two syllables.
Devils944S2 - 04 Jul 2004 21:01 GMT Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a (ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those of you Americans that think it is right to take a proper name and pronounce it anyway you want. Rather than fight the ignorance, she made it easy for you. Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype.
> > I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables. > > I don't believe there was ever any question that "German" has two syllables. Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:24 GMT > Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a > (ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those of > you Americans that think it is right to take a proper name and pronounce it > anyway you want. Rather than fight the ignorance, she made it easy for you. > Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of > Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype. Didn't take your Midol today?
Devils944S2 - 05 Jul 2004 18:29 GMT Bad night in the doublewide?
> > Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a > > (ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Didn't take your Midol today? Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:46 GMT > Bad night in the doublewide? And you're concerned for the reinforcement of the "stupid American stereotype" because to pronunciation!!! HAH ha HA HA ha ha...what a pinhead! So long Hawkings :^)
> > > Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an > a [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > > > Didn't take your Midol today? Devils944S2 - 06 Jul 2004 07:58 GMT <because to pronunciation>
Sorry, no Ebonics spoken here. No wonder you can't pronounce Porsche.
dizzy - 05 Jul 2004 22:21 GMT >Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of >Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype. Ironic, from a top poster.
someone@somewhere.net - 05 Jul 2004 22:41 GMT I was surprised how long this stayed on topic.
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 22:56 GMT I think it's just a case of trying to render the short final e into English for pronunciation purposes. For some it's 'Porscha' for others it's 'Porsch-uh'. Personally I think the latter gets closer.
However incorrect it may be, quite a few in the UK say "Porsch". Maybe they think the e is silent because it is in English and French...
DAS
 Signature For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling ---
> > Snip > Indeed [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Princess Morgiah Phil - 02 Jul 2004 23:08 GMT There is one HUGE thing not being talked about. Price! The M3 is $47,100, while the 911 is $21,500 more at $68,600. The M3 can be boosted to $60k with every single option selected, including the sequential gearbox, but could not do this with the Porsche since this portion of their site doesn't work. But, when I have looked at option prices for Porsche before, the cost is frightening.
I have a '98 M3 and found two surprises. One, if you buy parts on-line, the prices are cheap. Cheaper than for the same parts for my Honda. I needed a new radiator and that was less than $200. Synthetic oil from the dealer is about $5 a quart, the same as my local Wal-Mart. Some parts are expensive, but many are not. Secondly, I replaced the thermostat, waterpump, and radiator in my car, and it is not that hard. Some things are definitely shop-only, but the Porsche looks like it is shop all the time.
Both are excellent cars, but for $20,000 less, a likelihood of reduced maintenance costs, and roughly equal performance, I'd take the M3. By the way, the Porsche is 395 lbs. less than the M3.
- Phil
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler Devils944S2 - 02 Jul 2004 23:10 GMT Practicality is probably the only issue. Both will be fun, both will be fast, both will retain their values longer, it just depends on how much room you need. Dropping the Mrs. and kids off at the airport will be much easier in the BMW. My son is 4 months old, he won't be able to ride in my Porsche for at least another 3 years. I bet you can get a seat in the BMW.
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler daytripper - 03 Jul 2004 01:38 GMT >After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy >a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of >something I have worked so hard for. Thanks for your assistance. 2005 may be the last year for the E46 M3. If resale value is any concern to you, there's some measurable risk that BMW *might* just get the next body design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which would surgically remove a good chunk of value from the old design...
Rein - 03 Jul 2004 04:05 GMT >>After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy >>a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which would surgically remove >a good chunk of value from the old design... or.... They bangelize it to hell and prices for used M3's will be higher than when they were new........ :-)
Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:15 GMT > 2005 may be the last year for the E46 M3. If resale value is any > concern to you, there's some measurable risk that BMW *might* just get > the next body design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which > would surgically remove a good chunk of value from the old design... Or they could go in the 7- and 5-series design with the eyebrow lights. Or the Z4 with the goofy shoulder and dove tail. Ewww..
berj - 03 Jul 2004 07:25 GMT dollars wise, fully loaded the M3 comes out to around 65k, whereas the 911 starts out in that price range. you can easily spend another 10-15k just to personalize it........and you will want to do this. if you can afford it, go for the 911.
my brother has a 2003 M3 bought in 12/2002. it needed a new transmission during the first 6 months. then the stick shift BROKE off in his hand while shifting. yes, BROKE off. the BMW service center said this is the first they have seen this. they said they have seen stick shifts come out of their place before, but never brake off. he has also had other small problems with the power windows and power door locks.
the car has been in for service at least once every 2 months. he decided to call BMW to complain, but they did not give a sh.t. their answer was "not all of our cars have problems like this."
i am not a BMW basher. i own a 2001 530i and my wife drives a 2002 X5. we have had no problems with these cars.
berj
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler Jack D. Russell, Sr. - 03 Jul 2004 13:01 GMT ====================================================================== * Reply by Jack D. Russell, Sr. <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com> * Newsgroup: alt.autos.bmw,alt.autos.porsche * Reply to: All; "Tyler" <tuber1487@hotmail.com> * Date: 2 Jul 2004 12:51:30 -0700 * Subj: BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe ======================================================================
T> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to T> buy a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have T> anticipated the day I would have enough money to spend on a car T> like this. Needless to say, I want to make sure I make the T> correct decision regarding which car to purchase. I have it T> narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. T> Every time I see these cars, I melt. I am utterly obsessed with T> the M3. My friend has one and it is one of the most beautiful T> cars I have ever seen. Then there's the Porsche. How can you not T> love a car with the reputation of the 911. I love the looks of T> this car to the point of obsession as well. Now here's the T> dilemma...which to buy. I have a test drive of both scheduled for T> next week in Atlanta and will have to test both before making my T> decision, but what would you guys choose? I know they are both T> sports cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least T> hassle? The Porsche's engine compartment appears to be very T> difficult to get at (from nonmechanics POV). I love both of these T> cars but only have enough $ for one. Could anyone provide some T> suggestions please? I know both are great cars, I just want to be T> sure to make the most of something I have worked so hard for. T> Thanks for your assistance.
While I can't speak for the BMW anything, having always owned Porsches, I can say that with the Porsche, you will have access to many online resources for parts, technical assistance, and lower priced, high quality OEM parts. The many Porsche tech groups and forums provide information and repair assistance for all models thus making turning your own wrenches and routine repairs an easy almost fun experience. The camaraderie among Porsche groups and owners creates a vast technical resource for the new owner.
 Signature Jack
someone@somewhere.net - 03 Jul 2004 13:15 GMT I'm sure we all pity you in the predicament you've found yourself.
Drive each car and pick the one you get the biggest rush from and that fits youre personal style. Then don't spend the next few years second-guessing the choice. Unless you've done _really_ well and can get a new fun car every two years. Then what the heck?
Viper - 03 Jul 2004 17:43 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the > day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this <snip>
I love both of these cars but only have
> enough $ for one. Could anyone provide some suggestions please? I > know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of > something I have worked so hard for. Thanks for your assistance. Tyler: I've owned a BMW 325i and 3 Porsche 911s over the past few decades. I currently am perfectly happy driving a much less reliable, oversized kitcar, but you have defined your choice, and I'll address that in a minute. But first, I have a suggestion.
Looking at the tone of your post, it appears that you've worked hard for ten years, and have come up with a $70,000 budget or so. While that's admirable, I'm not reading that this will be easy money for you to replace. New cars depreciate generally speaking. Certain cars have different resale values, in case your dream doesn't measure up to your future wants or needs, and you need/want to re-sell.
I suggest you buy a newer pre-owned (used) vehicle, and let someone else take the "hit" of the initial depreciation.
Having said that, I believe that many people (I'm one of them) prefer an air cooled Porsche 911 over a water cooled. And while EXCELLENCE magazine has preached for years to purchase the latest model 911 you can afford, I would suggest buying the latest model of the discontinued air cooled 911 you can afford. That model line is the 993, and I personally believe it's re-sale value will hold up better than the 996 line over the next decade. I also believe that Porsche will be changing their body style, and going back to a 994 appearance, thereby differentiating the 911 line from the "poorer" Boxster (try a Boxster S on some twisty roads and the "poorer" part isn't quite as clear). I think this will further hurt the 996 line.
I'm a bit biased on the 3 series BMW. My 1988 325i's engine literally blew up at 38,000 miles, just 2 thousand miles outside of warranty, because the cam belt broke. Since the car was in for "everything" just before the warranty expired, at the dealer, and I could prove it, they covered most of the repairs (not fluids and belts). But I've always worried just a bit about the 3 series. I would think that for new M3 money, you could get a used M5. When you test drive the M3, why not see if the dealer has a three year old M5 on the lot, that you could purchase an extended warranty on? The M5 could grow with you if you have a family, or start to carry people as business customers, but has perhaps the best balance of any of the sedans in the world.
I used to buy new cars all the time. It made me feel good. This time around I bought my S Class Mercedes as a lease return, and my 96 Viper from a collector friend when it was time for him to update his collection. Both of my cars cost about what one of the new 911s will cost you (maybe slightly more but under $100,000 for both). Unless you badly desire to buy new, if money takes you a decade to come by, I'd stretch it as far as I could.
And if you DO want to spend $85,000 --- why not get a used Porsche 911 Turbo?? Faster than my Viper, with all the modern conveniences thrown in......... what a car!
Regards, 1996 Viper
Rein - 04 Jul 2004 05:43 GMT >> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy >> a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] >Regards, >1996 Viper Good advice BUT... have you looked at resale values of M3's lately ?? You might as well buy a new one, their used sale prices are incredibly high.
Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Tyler - 04 Jul 2004 23:50 GMT While in the process of saving money like crazy, it became very obvious that it is much easier to earn interest if you are starting with a larger amount of money. Consequently, I have continued saving past the point of just being able to afford the car so that when I do purchase, it won't wipe me out.
You have all made very good arguments for one or the other. My original suspicion that the 911 is a purer sports car with less practicality seems to have been confirmed. It won't be seen how much of an impact this will play until I test out each car for myself.
Please keep the opinions coming in. They have been very helpful and are giving me ideas of what to think about before making the purchase.
Regarding negotiations, are higher end dealerships just as willing to bargain (albeit resonably) on the price, or will I be pretty lucky to get sticker price on these more exclusive cars? I know I've heard that the M3 used to sell at quite a premium compared with the window price.
By the way, I'll be sure to pronounce it Por-scha when I meet the overly pushy salesman.
Tyler
> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > Regards, > 1996 Viper Darren Hall - 04 Jul 2004 20:46 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler After a decade of saving, you cannot invest in something mundane, like a 3 series BMW, even one with a powerful engine. The M3 is not a true sports car - try 10 laps of a track and see if the brakes can cope! It is a hugely successful marketing gimmick, an icon without substance.
The 911 is the real thing. No amount of advice (and well done for stimulating such fervent debate) will matter after the test drives. The Porsche steering alone when compared with the BMW will illustrate the essential differences.
In order of preference, I'd get a Carrera 2 new, used Carrera 4S or a 996 GT3 Mk 1 - the best of the bunch, apart from the unhelpfully expensive GT3 RS. You may want to wait for the 997 as it will make current cars just that little bit cheaper.
Hope you enjoy the 911.
Princess Morgiah - 05 Jul 2004 01:06 GMT > > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > car - try 10 laps of a track and see if the brakes can cope! It is a hugely > successful marketing gimmick, an icon without substance. I wouldn't quite call the M3 a mundane car. As for the fact whether or not it's a true sports car - the original poster said nothing about racing the car on a track, so I think he's trying to decide more on looks and practical issues, rather than true track performance.
> The 911 is the real thing. No amount of advice (and well done for > stimulating such fervent debate) will matter after the test drives. The [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > RS. You may want to wait for the 997 as it will make current cars just that > little bit cheaper. (I know I'm going to be shot for saying this but) I've yet to see a Porsche I like - I'd prefer the M3 over just about every Porsche out there. But that is a matter of opinion, of course - I simply do not think of Porsches as beautiful cars, as opposed to most BMWs (except the latest Bangles).
Princess Morgiah
Randall Smith - 04 Jul 2004 22:45 GMT The other posts have covered a lot of valid issues around cost, price, weight, durability, etc. I am also a fan of the 993 version of the Porsche 911 series and would recommend that you at least take a look at the 1997-98 models. The 1998 C4-S is a beautiful car that can be purchased with relatively low miles. From my perspective, if you can live with a car that does not have a useful back seat, the 911 is the way to go. BMW can be counted on to make significant changes to the apperance of the M3 periodically, while the 911 series is easily identifiable as part of the same family... To some this is good, to others, newness is better. Good luck.
Ron - 05 Jul 2004 04:53 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the > day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this. Needless > to say, I want to make sure I make the correct decision regarding > which car to purchase. I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or > Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son. more power, more performance, less money. you must be a young gun, learn from the experienced....chevrolet corvette, a good decision. if not a z06, the c6 equals any german in quality and performance, might just be a little better too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket. go drive one, you'll love it, buy american, happy july 4th son.
Deep - 05 Jul 2004 05:20 GMT Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter...
Ya right...
Deep
> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket. go drive one, you'll love > it, buy american, happy july 4th son. Viper - 05 Jul 2004 08:08 GMT > Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter... > > Ya right... > > Deep Run what you brung. I'm willing to give it a shot against my old, tired American heap of bolts. And I LOVED my Porsches...... I just don't love having people laugh at other people's choice of rides. The Z06 is about the most bang for the buck anyone can buy these days. And my kit car will hold its own against some of Germany's finest, as well.
Don't get me wrong. I dearly love the Porsche 911, and particularly the 993. But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much anything.
Devils944S2 - 05 Jul 2004 08:48 GMT Viper-
I don't believe he was laughing at the Corvette per se...he was laughing at the writers "equals any german in quality" statement. Yes the Corvette is a nice little ride and like a Mustang Cobra, can go real fast, but, quality-wise and driver/synergy-wise it is still years behind. Mis-matched panels, dodgy interior materials and resale value about as good as grandma's Impala make it a great car in the short term, but if the money is available, why not upgrade? Hell, I think the new Z-06 has an identity crisis...Looks like they broke into Dodge and stole the Viper front end! I am sure you could smoke a 1955 550 Spyder also, but, sometimes top end is only a small factor in owning a great car.
> > Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter... > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > 993. But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much > anything. Viper - 05 Jul 2004 19:56 GMT > Viper- > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I am sure you could smoke a 1955 550 Spyder also, but, sometimes top end > is only a small factor in owning a great car. On this we can agree. Probably why someday I will own a Ferrari, even though I completely understand them to be money pits. And no, I don't think you can give away $22,000 in price, and put the same quality into build on a Vette as the 911.
On the other hand, if ever I buy another Porsche it will be a 993. I'm not impressed that by saving 2/3rds the build time on the 996 by cutting down on hand fitting, that Porsche has taken a step in the right direction, either.
I have a 99 S420 Mercedes. I'd like to get a newer one than my car which was designed in 1991 (I have the last production year, 99), but I won't because of declining build quality. Mercedes was once thought of as the "bank vault" built car of the world. In recent years, that build quality has suffered.
I think Porsche is going down the same path as Mercedes. Cost cutting has become more important than build quality. Not as bad at Porsche as Mercedes, but still a disturbing trend.
Still better than Corvette, but the trade off is "bang for the buck". My 99 C5 Corvette was built better than my current 1996 Dodge Viper (not hard to do- the Viper is a great engine that someone attached seats to), but not up to Porsche build standards. I don't think they can get there without increasing the price above the market. Still, the C5 was an amazing technological move forward for Corvette. I don't know how good the C6 is going to be, but if it is a step up from the C5, it will be a very good car. 400 hp 400 ft. lbs of torque, stock, in a hydroformed frame chassis. Some work on interior appointments. Could be pretty nice.
And yes, they did steal the Viper front lights. But then the 2003-2004 Viper stole the Ferrari Maranello look. One of the things I like about my 96 Viper in Black with Silver Stripes is the outrageous appearance. Nothing else is as notable on the road, short of a Ferrari Testarossa. Of course, anyone who is "into" build quality, can forget the Viper. My interior is plastic, modified by leather, no windows, and a leave it at home top. No legends of build quality are going to grow surrounding Vipers.
On the other hand, when I took the Viper race class at Laguna Seca (Skip Barber) I was ASTOUNDED at what these cars can do when unleashed. Mine, in current trim puts out around 440 hp, and about 490 ft lbs of torque. If you don't mind a little bit of wheel spin, and sudden transitions from understeer to oversteer, the Vipers are amazing toys.
Deep - 05 Jul 2004 23:43 GMT Thanks - precisely what I meant...
Deep
> Viper- > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > 993. But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much > > anything. Gabri - 05 Jul 2004 15:30 GMT >are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son. more power, >more performance, less money. you must be a young gun, learn from the >experienced....chevrolet corvette, a good decision. if not a z06, the c6 >equals any german in quality and performance, might just be a little better >too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket. go drive one, you'll love >it, buy american, The regular 911 beats the Corvette even if she has (or so they say) more power. in any case I challenge any corvette against my 911 TT any day. Corvette owners are so intimidated by the sight of a TT that I never found one testing their car against mine, they just give the way. The corvette is a lot of value for the car but she look like a pimp-mobile, in any case you are right, Porsche, Ferrari etc are not for everybody if the only thing you can buy is a Corvette, that could be a good choice.
Viper - 05 Jul 2004 19:59 GMT > >are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son. more power, > >more performance, less money. you must be a young gun, learn from the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > for everybody if the only thing you can buy is a Corvette, that could > be a good choice. My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California, and would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put my 96 Viper up against your Porsche on either Laguna Seca or Infineon raceway. Interested? It would be fun. Of course I bought mine used for less than 1/2 the price of your car..... so if I lose, I'll just use that as an excuse.
But I suspect I might not lose. Just a suspicion.
: - ) Gabri - 06 Jul 2004 06:29 GMT >My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California, and >would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >But I suspect I might not lose. Just a suspicion. I wouldn't drive 500 miles for that and in any case at 46 I'm not into the duel business, particularly when I've invested almost 150K in my hardware. I've a lot of respect for the Viper, it uses a truck engine but it is faster than normally aspirated Porsche 911 in the le-mans category. Don't put it against a TT though, the 911 tt is another animal and many tt out there are a way more powerful than what a viper engine can generate. A standard 911tt does 0-60 in 3.9s and has a maximum speed of 305 Km/h. A standard 911 tt kick your viper butt, it is mathematics not sci-fi. Of a modified tt you can see only the exhaust pipes when the 600hp kick in. btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy?
fbloogyudsr - 06 Jul 2004 06:39 GMT "Gabri" <nomail@nomail.com> wrote
> I've a lot of respect for the Viper, it uses a truck engine but it is > faster than normally aspirated Porsche 911 in the le-mans category. You're showing your ignorance. Other than both being V10's and having the same cylinder spacing, the Magnum truck engine and Viper's V10 have less in common than, say, the engines in the Boxster and 911.
> btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy? Look at the headers - he's actually posting from the BMW group.
Floyd
Viper - 06 Jul 2004 07:54 GMT > > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:59:58 GMT, "Viper" <Viper@nospam.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Viper's V10 have less in common than, say, the engines in the > Boxster and 911. It was a slam. I doubt someone sophisticated enough to put $150,000 into a Porsche 911 tt didn't know better. Who cares? Great cars all the way around. We're lucky to have them. I keep my Porsche hat and buttons. Never know when I'll want my 4th 911. : - )
> > btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy? > > Look at the headers - he's actually posting from the BMW group. But I do subscribe to the Porsche newsgroup as well, and quite a few others as well. I absolutely love cars, and in over 30 years of car ownership have been blessed to own quite a number of them. Porsches, BMWs, Corvettes, Vipers, etc. included. Gives me a fair amount of comparison background.
> Floyd Viper - 06 Jul 2004 07:49 GMT > >My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California, and > >would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > the 600hp kick in. > btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy? General car enthusiast. I've owned 3 Porsche 911s, and have driver's seat time in both the Turbo and the Boxster S.
I've owned most marques over the years in cars and motorcycles, and tend to follow newsgroups across a number of both.
Nothing I've been near is faster than my prior Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3 ( 0 - 60 in 2.8 seconds) but I find that track expertise has more to do with the pilot than the machinery.
If you're not racing, why exactly did you put $150,000 into a car bred for racing? What can you possibly do on the streets that a Subaru WRX Sti can't do just as well?
And don't forget that the "truck engine" was engineered by a true Italian race engine developer, and has a fair amount of additional power capabilities.
Enjoy your Porsche. Wonderful marque.
Gabri - 10 Jul 2004 16:55 GMT >If you're not racing, why exactly did you put $150,000 into a car bred for >racing? What can you possibly do on the streets that a Subaru WRX Sti >can't do just as well? Toys? Passion? Aren't these motivations strong enough if you can afford? I owned many Porsche, I had Ferraris and I was close to buy a Viper if it wasn't for the incredible attituted of the salesmen. Unfortunately (I'm sure there are exception) buying a VIper is like buying a Chevy with a sleazy salesman all over you telling lies as fast as his mouth can open. BTW, I found an Italian article that I've on PDF and I could email to you where it shows the TT clearly winning over the RT10. THey were cars w/o modifications.
G.
Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:29 GMT > > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son. more power, > more performance, less money. Yes, but the gold chain cost is prohibitive.
Adam Schwartz - 06 Jul 2004 03:32 GMT > > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket. go drive one, you'll love > it, buy american, happy july 4th son. HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA......
Rob Munach - 05 Jul 2004 12:30 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler If it took you a decade to come up with $50k, why blow it ALL on a sports car? For $15k you can buy a nice used E30, M3 - (the "real" M3) and keep the rest for later. It sounds like that is more in your *affordable* price range, anyhow. FWIW, my buddy just bought a 996. He spent 10 times more for it than I spent on my E30 325is. While it was a nice car, I can have just as much fun in my E30 for 1/10th the price.
-Rob
T - 16 Sep 2004 17:35 GMT >>While it was a nice car, I can have just as much fun in my E30 for >>1/10th the price. I always crack up when I hear this argument. I hope this justification makes you feel better. ...snicker... And the E30 "real M3?" Let it go already. Fun? Sure it was. If you really value old technology, go buy a horse.
Sorry to chime in late but I have been trying to decide the exact same question as you for the past couple of months. I always take a long, well-researched approach to a new car purchase. I have narrowed my choices down to either a 2005 or 2006 Porsche 911 Carerra S (the 997) or an E46 M3 Coupe. I also considered a new BMW 6-series or the new Mercedes AMG roadster. A Corvette is just, uh, not on my radar. Did someone someone actually say this was a good "bang for the buck?" Sheesh.
I have always owned (daily drivers and racing) BMWs (with the exception of those few "first" cars which were hand-me-downs or other freebies) since I was ever able to buy for myself. I have had two E30s, an M6, an M Coupe (by far, *THE* most fun car I have ever had - I still regret giving this up!) and currently an E36 M3 convertible. Through family and friends, I have been involved first-hand with about 10-12 others. There were no complaints from any of them. The first two E30s I owned were traded in at 365,000 and 264,000 miles respectively. Maintenance and reliability for BMW is not an issue for me.
With all of that said, I am leaning toward the 997 for a few reasons. 1) I like toys and technology and the new 911 is full of them. 2) I now know the difference between a true sports-car (the M Coupe) and a sport-sedan (the M3). While both are tremendous fun, the M Coupe had the performance characteristics I crave. 3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is a true sports car. 4) The 911 seems like a step up from BMW in engineering, features, options and performance (and price!!) 5) The Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds better than the SMG-II in the M3. Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San Francisco terrain can be frustrating with a manual transmission. 6) The 911 is at the start of the new model release cycle and BMW M3 is at the end. This will keep my "new model lust" to a minimum.
Tyler, have you made any decision yet? If you haven't, I will just echo what several others have said - test drive them both and your preference (needs for room, fit and finish, performance, personality) will be instantly clear.
I hope this helps and good luck with your search!
>> Tyler > If it took you a decade to come up with $50k, why blow it ALL on a [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > -Rob Fred W. - 16 Sep 2004 19:11 GMT > Sorry to chime in late but I have been trying to decide the exact same > question as you for the past couple of months. <<snipped a bunch of stuff>>
> With all of that said, I am leaning toward the 997 for a few reasons. 1) > I like toys and technology and the new 911 is full of them. 2) I now know > the difference between a true sports-car (the M Coupe) and a sport-sedan > (the M3). While both are tremendous fun, the M Coupe had the performance > characteristics I crave. 3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is > a true sports car. What is the Z4 then? Certainly it does not have as much power as your old M-coupe but it is most certainly a true sports car. In fact "True Sports Cars" came with small 4 cylinder engines and drove like a go kart.
> 4) The 911 seems like a step up from BMW in > engineering, features, options and performance (and price!!) 5) The > Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds better than the > SMG-II in the M3. You are comparing apples to oranges. Tiptronic is a manually operated automatic (complete with torque convertor) and the SMG is an automatically operated manual transmission (complete with a clutch but no pedal). The tiptronic is most similar to steptronic in a BMW.
> Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she > does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San > Francisco terrain can be frustrating with a manual transmission. So let's get this straight... you are dissing the BMW offerings because they don't make a "true sports car" (in your opinion) but you intend to order said "sports car" with an automatic so your SO can drive it comfortably around in the city? Man... get your priorities straight. Get the pork-chop or the M car (or whatever "true sports car" you decide on) but by all means get it with a real (read manual) transmission and then go get the girl-toy an automatic VW bug or something disposable that she can drive around in the city. Just reducing the wear and tear on your "true sports car" will probably make having the second car almost a financial wash.
"True sports cars" have clutches. ;-)
-Fred W
T - 17 Sep 2004 18:44 GMT >...3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is a true sports car. > > What is the Z4 then? Certainly it does not have as much power as your > old M-coupe but it is most certainly a true sports car. In fact "True > Sports Cars" came with small 4 cylinder engines and drove like a go > kart. *I* would certainly not characterize a Z4 as a true sports car. While I think it is a very capable car, loads of fun to drive and "sporty," it most certainly isn't in the league (or purpose) of what *I* consider to be a sports car. (some examples being the 911, M Coupe, Lotus Elise, etc.) The M3, which I love, is also not the same as it is a sports sedan. So, for you, if a true sports car must have a small 4-cyl engine then I guess you agree since the Z4 is only offered with a 6. We have different definitions of what a sports car consists of but it's clear that a Z4 doesn't fit either of them. :)
Maybe I will restate my point in another way, which will be less susceptible to a literal interpretation. BMW's current lineup doesn't offer anything that excites me performance-wise. Although I have been a loyal BMW owner for many years, I think I was spoiled by the M Coupe. As a friend of mine said when I got the coupe, "You're screwed. Where do you go from here?" He was right, at least with BMW.
>...5) The Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds > better than [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > automatically operated manual transmission (complete with a clutch but > no pedal). The tiptronic is most similar to steptronic in a BMW. Thanks for the clarification. I am not familiar enough with the technology and was just comparing the respective alternatives to manual transmissions. My observation was based on how each of these felt when I test-drove them. Also not knowing the particulars, I wonder if DSG will be a better alternative? I have heard it's pretty snazzy.
>> Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she >> does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > "True sports cars" have clutches. ;-) Agreed. The *plan* is to find a way for me to be happy with a car and to accommodate her driving preference. The "girl-toy" (whatever that means) can drive a manual quite well and has proven herself on the track. The auto option was a preference since, as I already said, it would be more convenient in the city. I think she is coming around though. :)
I completely agree that my plan is flawed. I've been wrestling with this and I'm now convinced that the sacrifice is just not worth it. It makes much better sense to get the manual thant I want, in the car that I want and to get her a more convenient, comfortable girly ride...maybe a Z4. ;)
Fred W. - 17 Sep 2004 21:51 GMT > >...3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is a true sports car. > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > definitions of what a sports car consists of but it's clear that a Z4 > doesn't fit either of them. :) No you missed my point. The earliest true sports cars, like MGBs, Triumphs, Austin Healeys etc. all had small engines and tremendous (for their day) handling. This is what a sports car is all about. Tooling down the back roads and "feeling" you are going fast even if you really aren't breaking the speed of sound.
So considering that I would say the definition of a sports car is: "A 2 seat roaster or coupe (preferably with minimal frills) that handles like it's on rails. Said sports car should have a manual transmission because the only real purpose for a sports car is the total engagement and enjoyment of the total driving experience FOR THE DRIVER!!" I don't thing either SMG or Steptronic or full automatic allow the total engagement of the driver. Or to put it another way, my left foot has to be part of the deal...
8< 8< 8< 8<
> Agreed. The *plan* is to find a way for me to be happy with a car and to > accommodate her driving preference. The "girl-toy" (whatever that means) [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > much better sense to get the manual thant I want, in the car that I want > and to get her a more convenient, comfortable girly ride...maybe a Z4. ;) That's all good. Two (good) cars are always better than one. And one good one and a not so good one is still better.
I just hate to see Z4's (or any decent perfomance cars for that matter) with automagic transmissions. It really does contort what is the closest thing (IMO) to a BMW sports car into, as you say, "a girly ride". Have you driven a Z4 3.0 with a stick? I can't imagine it would come up too short of your old M-coupe, though I'll admit I've never driven the coupe.
-Fred W
T - 20 Sep 2004 23:00 GMT > No you missed my point. The earliest true sports cars, like MGBs, > Triumphs, Austin Healeys etc. all had small engines and tremendous > (for their day) handling. This is what a sports car is all about. > Tooling down the back roads and "feeling" you are going fast even if > you really aren't breaking the speed of sound. Ok, I see where you are coming from. Tossable, fun cars. I wish there were more of them now. Maybe our disconnect was a (I'm guessing here) generational thing. I certainly know much less about MGBs, Triumphs, Austin Healeys etc. than about E30 M3s.
> So considering that I would say the definition of a sports car is: "A > 2 seat roaster or coupe (preferably with minimal frills) that handles [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > engagement of the driver. Or to put it another way, my left foot has > to be part of the deal... Agreed.
> I just hate to see Z4's (or any decent perfomance cars for that > matter) with automagic transmissions. It really does contort what is > the closest thing (IMO) to a BMW sports car into, as you say, "a girly > ride". And we agree on this too. I knew the idea of Step/Tiptronic was a major sacrifice. I'm happy to say that it's one I'm not prepared to make.
> Have you driven a Z4 3.0 with a stick? I can't imagine it > would come up too short of your old M-coupe, though I'll admit I've > never driven the coupe. I have driven a manual 3.0 Z4. It is very fun, quick and does meet your criteria. My "girly-ride" comment was tongue-in-cheek. It just did not provide the fun factor of the coupe. Maybe it was power, structural rigidity or suspension but it just wasn't the same. The coupe really had that go-kart feel. I know that power can be addictive and sometimes anything slower than the fastest you've experienced is "slow." I was ruined for many years after a particulary spirited 993TT ride.
Thanks for your very constructive and critical input. I'll be sure to keep your email address handy so I can solicit future advice on car purchases.
:) Fred W. - 21 Sep 2004 17:41 GMT > Thanks for your very constructive and critical input. I'll be sure to keep > your email address handy so I can solicit future advice on car purchases. > :) No problem. The next best thing to contemplating spending my own money is contemplating spending someone elses...
Happy shopping, -Fred W
TonyK - 05 Jul 2004 12:55 GMT > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler If I didn't have a wife & 2 kids I'd go for a 911.
Tony (M3 Conv. being delivered on Friday this week).
Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:00 GMT tuber1487@hotmail.com (Tyler) wrote in news:5e584fa7.0407021151.3b08eef1 @posting.google.com:
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of > something I have worked so hard for. Thanks for your assistance. Oh to have the dilemma! Your two choices makes it somewhat difficult to compare since it is an apples to oranges comparo. Two seats or four? Stealth or head-turning attention?
I'm somewhat in your same category. For the two seat coupe, I would say it's difficult to beat the price/performance ratio of a Corvette Z06. If you'd like to carry four of your friends, a Lancer Evo, Subaru STi, or the M3 or S4 would be a good choice. Either way, the cost of living with the two German cars would be slightly higher since it's difficult to do your own maintenance.
FYI, I'm going to buy an M3 here and when I get back home to the States, get an Evo. I can have my fun car and then my going to the opera car too!
:) dizzy - 05 Jul 2004 18:27 GMT >I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or >Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911.
Adam Schwartz - 06 Jul 2004 03:29 GMT > >I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or > >Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe. > > The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it > will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911. The 911 996 is NOT that much more own... Oil changes are maybe a little more expensive, but the reliablity of a Porsche is realllllly good...
Also I was very surprised at the cost of insurance on the 996. It isnt all that much more expensive than a 'normal' car... Say my Audi... And M3's insurance is very high, at least in my area. I guess based on statistics M3 drivers are worse.. or maybe they get stolen more.
Maybe its worth checking if you are looking at both cars, but I am pretty sure the 996 will cost less to insure than an M3. I live in MA, USA.
Also, I must say - I have had my 996 for about 8 to 10 weeks. I love this car. Its by far the absolute best car I have ever had... Sure, I cant haul home sheet rock - but just for driving.. I love it.
Cheers,
Adam
dizzy - 07 Jul 2004 02:29 GMT >> The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it >> will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911. > > The 911 996 is NOT that much more own... Oil changes are maybe a little > more expensive, but the reliablity of a Porsche is realllllly good... Depreciation costs, however... And I gotta believe maintenance (beyond oil changes) is significantly more.
> Also I was very surprised at the cost of insurance on the 996. It isnt > all that much more expensive than a 'normal' car... Say my Audi... And [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > this car. Its by far the absolute best car I have ever had... Sure, I > cant haul home sheet rock - but just for driving.. I love it. Cool.
Sam Wang - 06 Jul 2004 02:58 GMT Tyler, If you had to invest for a decade to afford one of these two great cars, you have to work even harder to keep your dream car running. You may want to check with you local tax department if you need to pay 5 percent property tax every year on the car. It's not so much that you can afford to buy it, it's more that you can afford to keep it.
For the performance, go to buy a WRX. Good luck.
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy > a sports car. You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Tyler |
|