Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tyler - 02 Jul 2004 20:51 GMT
After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this.  Needless
to say, I want to make sure I make the correct decision regarding
which car to purchase.  I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or
Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe.  Every time I see these cars, I melt.  I am
utterly obsessed with the M3.  My friend has one and it is one of the
most beautiful cars I have ever seen.  Then there's the Porsche.  How
can you not love a car with the reputation of the 911.  I love the
looks of this car to the point of obsession as well.  Now here's the
dilemma...which to buy.  I have a test drive of both scheduled for
next week in Atlanta and will have to test both before making my
decision, but what would you guys choose?  I know they are both sports
cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least hassle?  The
Porsche's engine compartment appears to be very difficult to get at
(from nonmechanics POV).  I love both of these cars but only have
enough $ for one.  Could anyone provide some suggestions please?  I
know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of
something I have worked so hard for.  Thanks for your assistance.

Tyler
fbloogyudsr - 02 Jul 2004 21:13 GMT
"Tyler" <tuber1487@hotmail.com> wrote
> ... I know they are both sports
> cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least hassle?  The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of
> something I have worked so hard for.  Thanks for your assistance.

IME, the BMW will be less expensive to care for.  You probably
won't be able to work on either, in any case.

The Porsche drives like nothing else; the BMW is much more
like other cars in it's driving characteristics.

Floyd
Weekend Guru - 02 Jul 2004 21:33 GMT
The M3 is a more practical car with a half way reasonable back seat.
There's not much work you can do on either car; however, it's probably true
that when you need work done by a mechanic, it's going to be less expensive
to work on the M3, because they won't have to drop the engine to do anything
but change oil, filters and coolant...as in the 911.

The 911 is more "sports car", with a lower center of gravity, it will
probably feel more sporting, but the M3 is no slouch either.

Depends on what you're looking for...either way, you can't go wrong.

Choose and don't look back!  Enjoy!

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler
Jess Englewood - 02 Jul 2004 22:24 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> looks of this car to the point of obsession as well.  Now here's the
> dilemma...which to buy.

I don't know what your needs are, but here are my thoughts:
I drive BMW's (currently a 545i) but, in general, because I need a sedan
that seats four. If that was not a requirement in my life I would be in a
911 (996 platform).

While the M3 is an unbelievably capable car, I think it's a fence sitter.
Too small to be a functional 4 seater but a bit bloated to be a real sports
car (400+ lb. heavier than the 911). By comparison to the 911 the M3 is
almost a muscle car in that it will go straight faster, but won't keep up in
the twisties.

For my money, and for what is available in the US today, I think nothing
beats a 911 with a stick for pure driving fun. I've got a 3 car garage, but
between me, my wife and daughter...it's full. But as soon as my daughter
heads to college I'll have a 911 in that newly vacated garage spot.

That way I get the needed sedan and the desired sports car.
John Carrier - 02 Jul 2004 23:12 GMT
Snip

> For my money, and for what is available in the US today, I think nothing
> beats a 911 with a stick for pure driving fun. I've got a 3 car garage, but
> between me, my wife and daughter...it's full. But as soon as my daughter
> heads to college I'll have a 911 in that newly vacated garage spot.

Unless you can spring for the Ferrari 360 Modena.  There's more than a
little truth to the saying, "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting
other showrooms."

Two different (and great) cars.  The M3 is a highly capable sports sedan.
The Porsche (two syllables BTW) is very much a sports car (and with few
peers at that).  The Bimmer is more comfortable (great seats), has somewhat
better ergonomics and has more room ... it can genuinely seat four adults,
if only for relatively short runs.  The Porsche has superb handling and
probably the best curb recognition on the planet.

Cost is a factor.  The M3 runs in the mid 50's with most of its options.
The Porsche starts around $75K, and you can easily run up another $5-10K or
even more on the extensive option list.

Assuming your wallet doesn't care, let the test drive be your guide.  The
cars' character are easily discerned.  Neither will disappoint.

R / John
Devils944S2 - 02 Jul 2004 23:43 GMT
< "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting
other showrooms.">

I have spent many hours in the seat of a 308GTSi and a 348 Spyder. Not very
impressive. Unless the very high priced Ferraris are completely different
than the lower priced models, the phrase that comes to mind is the Ferrari
is definitely "style over substance". They were two very pretty cars, but,
very noisy and slower than you might think. Of every Italian car I have
owned/driven, I had this rebuilt '73 Alfa Spyder that chirped in all 4 gears
and was a rip to drive...

> Snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> R / John
Jess Englewood - 02 Jul 2004 23:48 GMT
> Snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> little truth to the saying, "Once you drive a Ferrari, you stop visiting
> other showrooms."

I like different cars for a lot of reasons, and one of them is quality of
build and craftsmanship. My 308, while admittedly a more pedestrian Ferrari,
was an eyesore with welds that wouldn't pass an apprentice test at your
local Union hall. I haven't driven a Modena, but I have certainly crawled in
and around one and the Italians still don't seem to have learned the art of
craftsmanship, even though they have learned the art of automobile
performance. To me all things have to go together though and passing the
Ferrari showroom is easy given my history as a one time owner.

Some cars are simply too much, and Ferrari falls into this category for me.
Porsche and select BMW's, Audi's and Merc's stay just this side of the "too
much" line.
Paul Spencer - 03 Jul 2004 17:29 GMT
>The Porsche (two syllables BTW)

Which reminds me of a cartoon I saw somewhere. A notice on the side of
a workshop: "Porsh servicing: $45/hr Porscha servicing $60/hr".

Signature

P

Princess Morgiah - 03 Jul 2004 20:55 GMT
> Snip
Indeed

> The Porsche (two syllables BTW) ...

Since when is that? It's always been Porsche, never Porscha (or however one
would try to pronounce it).

Princess Morgiah
someone@somewhere.net - 03 Jul 2004 21:01 GMT
Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche:

"It's a "Porsh" if you bought it with your money and a "Porsh-uh" if you
bought it with your daddies money."

I say call it what you want, just don't an attitude about being "right."

Reminds me of traveling in Europe and being surprised that Braun
appliances are sold as "brown" there but "brawn" here.

Going so it is.

>>Snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Princess Morgiah
Princess Morgiah - 03 Jul 2004 21:12 GMT
> Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche:
>
> "It's a "Porsh" if you bought it with your money and a "Porsh-uh" if you
> bought it with your daddies money."
>
> I say call it what you want, just don't an attitude about being "right."

Mine wasn't a right-or-wrong issue - it's just that I've never heard a
dealer or for that matter a Porsche owner refer to the car as anything like
what some people try to make of the name.

But as you so rightly pointed out - call it what you want.

Princess Morgiah
Proud Yankee - 04 Jul 2004 01:32 GMT
> Mine wasn't a right-or-wrong issue - it's just that I've never heard a
> dealer or for that matter a Porsche owner refer to the car as anything like
> what some people try to make of the name.

Porsche TV commercials say it with 2 syllables.  I assume
the factory knows how to pronounce it correctly.
Jonathan2s6 - 04 Jul 2004 10:59 GMT
you can buy cheap BMW or Mercedes at

www.shopeuro.biz
fbloogyudsr - 04 Jul 2004 15:45 GMT
"Jonathan2s6" <jonathan2s6@aol.com> wrote
> you can buy cheap BMW or Mercedes at
>
> www.shopeuro.biz

What an intelligent spammer.  Why would the OP
want to buy a Mercedes?  Why would he want to buy
an M3 from someone who has... NONE?
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 22:51 GMT
Braun has been owned by Gillette for quite a while, so "brawn" is a pretty
reasonable pronunciation.
http://www.braun.com/na/company/facts.html

Here in the UK I long ago gave up trying to tell people it's similar to
"brown", where official pronunciation is "brawn" for the linguistically
challenged Brits.

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

> Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Princess Morgiah
Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:08 GMT
> Reminds me of a joke I heard long before I got a Porsche:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Reminds me of traveling in Europe and being surprised that Braun
> appliances are sold as "brown" there but "brawn" here.

And they say "bee, emm, vee" for BMW here. :)
Dori A Schmetterling - 05 Jul 2004 19:10 GMT
Where's "here"?

Is that supposed to be German or English?

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[.........]

> And they say "bee, emm, vee" for BMW here. :)
Wingman - 06 Jul 2004 12:02 GMT
"Dori A Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in news:40e99983$1$6451
$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com:

> Where's "here"?
>
> Is that supposed to be German or English?

Deutschland
Dori A Schmetterling - 07 Jul 2004 10:11 GMT
In that case the pronunciation rendered into English is, of course, closer
to beh em veh.

(And, BTW, what is so remarkable about that?)

:-)
DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

> "Dori A Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in news:40e99983$1$6451
> $cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Deutschland
Viper - 03 Jul 2004 21:16 GMT
> > Snip
> Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Princess Morgiah

It's been two syllables since at least my 1977 911S with the heat exchangers
that Automotion made a pipe replacement for.
E Brown - 04 Jul 2004 00:13 GMT
>> Snip
>Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Since when is that? It's always been Porsche, never Porscha (or however one
>would try to pronounce it).

    Since always - German doesn't have silent letters, so you pronounce
the e. It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia. Some
Porsche owners correct people, most don't bother. No way is a
dealership salesman going to risk blowing a deal by correcting
someone's grammar - they'll follow your lead. :)
    As for the original question: if the car is to be used as a daily
driver year 'round, I'd recommend the M3. Otherwise, get the Carrera.
And I'd recommend waiting for the new model (type 997) rather than
getting a current model (996). Of course, with the original poster's
money, I'd get a 72 or 73 Carrera RS. More exclusive, more fun,
cheaper to maintain, and depreciation proof (hell, they'll likely go
UP in price).
    Emanuel
Signature

"All everybody wants is a normal life and a cool car...
most people settle for the car." Chris Titus
1983 Porsche 911/944/928

Jess Englewood - 04 Jul 2004 00:23 GMT
> >> Snip
> >Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the e. It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia. Some
> Porsche owners correct people, most don't bother.

I think most people know how to pronounce it, if really pushed by pickiness.
But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same
way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes and Caddies etc. In America we like
to lose a syllable or two whenever possible.
daytripper - 04 Jul 2004 02:05 GMT
>> >> Snip
>> >Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same
>way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes and Caddies etc.

No, it hasn't. It's still two syllables to anyone with a clue...
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 23:04 GMT
Mercedes is an abbreviation for...?

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[..........]
> I think most people know how to pronounce it, if really pushed by pickiness.
> But I also think in the popular lexicon it has been shortened in the same
> way there are Vettes, Chevys, Mercedes
...........................
Scott M - 05 Jul 2004 13:45 GMT

> Mercedes is an abbreviation for...?

From Mercedes-Benz, rather than a bona-fide shrinking, is presumably
what he was thinking.

Signature

Scott

Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:28 GMT
> Mercedes is an abbreviation for...?

Mercedes-Benz.
Dori A Schmetterling - 05 Jul 2004 19:08 GMT
A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany   :-)

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

> > Mercedes is an abbreviation for...?
>
> Mercedes-Benz.
Viper - 05 Jul 2004 20:03 GMT
> A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany   :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> > Mercedes-Benz.

Didn't someone start a magazine called Benz-O?
I have a Benz, but I just call it "daily transportation".

: - )
Jess Englewood - 06 Jul 2004 16:07 GMT
> I have a Benz,

Now you are reinforcing the "stupid American stereotype". You have a
Mercedes-Benz. Three syllables....and don't you forget it :^)
Jess Englewood - 06 Jul 2004 16:02 GMT
> A better abbreviation is Merc, but that's not known in Germany   :-)

Say "Merc" in the US and people will generally think you are speaking about
a Mercury product.
Dori A Schmetterling - 07 Jul 2004 10:14 GMT
Yes, so I have heard.  Can't help those people's problems..  :-))

Re your previous post, Mercedes-Benz contains four syllables, doesn't it ...

Can we now move to discussing the number of angels dancing on a
pinhead..?...

:-)
DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[........]

> Say "Merc" in the US and people will generally think you are speaking about
> a Mercury product.
Jess Englewood - 07 Jul 2004 16:49 GMT
> Yes, so I have heard.  Can't help those people's problems..  :-))
>
> Re your previous post, Mercedes-Benz contains four syllables, doesn't it ...

Oh oh! I didn't leave the telling 3 dots of sarcasm.

> Can we now move to discussing the number of angels dancing on a
> pinhead..?...

You see Angels dancing on Jack?

Just joking, just joking :^)
Jack Baruth - 12 Jul 2004 14:13 GMT
> You see Angels dancing on Jack?
>
> Just joking, just joking :^)

I *knew* there was a reason I was skipping this thread...
"Mercedes" is short for "Emil J.'s daughter".
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 23:03 GMT
Actually it's not, not in German, anyway, though 'Portia' (or Porsha as has
been proposed elsewhere)  is close enough for most English speakers.  I
would say it's closer to Porsh-uh as has been suggested by another poster.
The final letter is an e, not an a which, believe it or not, are pronounced
differently in German... :-)

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[......]
It's pronounced the same as the female name Portia.
................
CJS - 16 Aug 2004 17:53 GMT
> >> Snip
> >Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> dealership salesman going to risk blowing a deal by correcting
> someone's grammar - they'll follow your lead. :)

Reminds me of being at Rose Angeli's over on Wrightwood with several
Italian colleagues.  The American waiter, ahem, "corrected"
pronunciation of three people from Milan and an American who speaks the
language.  "Riz-ah-toe" and "bru-she-tah" my a.s.

Cheers...Craig
craig(underscore)shields@yahoo.C O M
http://www.vabene.net
---
I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless
information.
- Calvin (and Hobbes)

All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited
power.
- Ashleigh Brilliant

I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people
who annoy me.
- Fred Allen
Devils944S2 - 04 Jul 2004 04:30 GMT
I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables.

> > Snip
> Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Princess Morgiah
Jess Englewood - 04 Jul 2004 17:07 GMT
> I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables.

I don't believe there was ever any question that "German" has two syllables.
Devils944S2 - 04 Jul 2004 21:01 GMT
Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a
(ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those of
you Americans that think it is right to take a proper name and pronounce it
anyway you want. Rather than fight the ignorance, she made it easy for you.
Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of
Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype.

> > I am married to a German...believe me, it's two syllables.
>
> I don't believe there was ever any question that "German" has two syllables.
Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:24 GMT
> Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a
> (ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those of
> you Americans that think it is right to take a proper name and pronounce it
> anyway you want. Rather than fight the ignorance, she made it easy for you.
> Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of
> Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype.

Didn't take your Midol today?
Devils944S2 - 05 Jul 2004 18:29 GMT
Bad night in the doublewide?

> > Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an a
> > (ah to be exact), but, she now spells it with an "a" at the end for those
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Didn't take your Midol today?
Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:46 GMT
> Bad night in the doublewide?

And you're concerned for the reinforcement of the "stupid American
stereotype" because to pronunciation!!! HAH ha HA HA ha ha...what a pinhead!
So long Hawkings :^)

> > > Yeah, Funny...My wife's name ends with an "e" and it is pronounced as an
> a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > Didn't take your Midol today?
Devils944S2 - 06 Jul 2004 07:58 GMT
<because to pronunciation>

Sorry, no Ebonics spoken here. No wonder you can't pronounce Porsche.
dizzy - 05 Jul 2004 22:21 GMT
>Pronounce it anyway you want, but if you insist on Pors-shhh instead of
>Pors-sha it just reinforces the stupid American stereotype.

Ironic, from a top poster.
someone@somewhere.net - 05 Jul 2004 22:41 GMT
I was surprised how long this stayed on topic.
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Jul 2004 22:56 GMT
I think it's just a case of trying to render the short final e into English
for pronunciation purposes.  For some it's 'Porscha' for others it's
'Porsch-uh'.  Personally I think the latter gets closer.

However incorrect it may be, quite a few in the UK say "Porsch".  Maybe they
think the e is silent because it is in English and French...

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

> > Snip
> Indeed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Princess Morgiah
Phil - 02 Jul 2004 23:08 GMT
There is one HUGE thing not being talked about.  Price!  The M3 is $47,100,
while the 911 is $21,500 more at $68,600.  The M3 can be boosted to $60k
with every single option selected, including the sequential gearbox, but
could not do this with the Porsche since this portion of their site doesn't
work.  But, when I have looked at option prices for Porsche before, the cost
is frightening.

I have a '98 M3 and found two surprises.  One, if you buy parts on-line, the
prices are cheap.  Cheaper than for the same parts for my Honda.  I needed a
new radiator and that was less than $200.  Synthetic oil from the dealer is
about $5 a quart, the same as my local Wal-Mart.  Some parts are expensive,
but many are not.  Secondly, I replaced the thermostat, waterpump, and
radiator in my car, and it is not that hard.  Some things are definitely
shop-only, but the Porsche looks like it is shop all the time.

Both are excellent cars, but for $20,000 less, a likelihood of reduced
maintenance costs, and roughly equal performance, I'd take the M3.  By the
way, the Porsche is 395 lbs. less than the M3.

- Phil

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler
Devils944S2 - 02 Jul 2004 23:10 GMT
Practicality is probably the only issue. Both will be fun, both will be
fast, both will retain their values longer, it just depends on how much room
you need. Dropping the Mrs. and kids off at the airport will be much easier
in the BMW. My son is 4 months old, he won't be able to ride in my Porsche
for at least another 3 years. I bet you can get a seat in the BMW.

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler
daytripper - 03 Jul 2004 01:38 GMT
>After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
>a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of
>something I have worked so hard for.  Thanks for your assistance.

2005 may be the last year for the E46 M3. If resale value is any concern to
you, there's some measurable risk that BMW *might* just get the next body
design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which would surgically remove
a good chunk of value from the old design...
Rein - 03 Jul 2004 04:05 GMT
>>After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
>>a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which would surgically remove
>a good chunk of value from the old design...

or.... They bangelize it to hell and prices for used M3's will be
higher than when they were new........ :-)

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:15 GMT
> 2005 may be the last year for the E46 M3. If resale value is any
> concern to you, there's some measurable risk that BMW *might* just get
> the next body design right (hey - they're *clearly* over due) which
> would surgically remove a good chunk of value from the old design...

Or they could go in the 7- and 5-series design with the eyebrow lights. Or
the Z4 with the goofy shoulder and dove tail. Ewww..
berj - 03 Jul 2004 07:25 GMT
dollars wise, fully loaded the M3 comes out to around 65k, whereas the 911
starts out in that price range.  you can easily spend another 10-15k just to
personalize it........and you will want to do this.  if you can afford it,
go for the 911.

my brother has a 2003 M3 bought in 12/2002.  it needed a new transmission
during the first 6 months.  then the stick shift BROKE off in his hand while
shifting.  yes, BROKE off.  the BMW service center said this is the first
they have seen this.  they said they have seen stick shifts come out of
their place before, but never brake off.  he has also had other small
problems with the power windows and power door locks.

the car has been in for service at least once every 2 months.  he decided to
call BMW to complain, but they did not give a sh.t.  their answer was "not
all of our cars have problems like this."

i am not a BMW basher.  i own a 2001 530i and my wife drives a 2002 X5.  we
have had no problems with these cars.

berj

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler
Jack D. Russell, Sr. - 03 Jul 2004 13:01 GMT
======================================================================
* Reply by Jack D. Russell, Sr. <jackru$$ell2@notmail.com>
* Newsgroup: alt.autos.bmw,alt.autos.porsche
* Reply to: All;  "Tyler" <tuber1487@hotmail.com>
* Date: 2 Jul 2004 12:51:30 -0700
* Subj: BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe
======================================================================

T> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to
T> buy a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have
T> anticipated the day I would have enough money to spend on a car
T> like this.  Needless to say, I want to make sure I make the
T> correct decision regarding which car to purchase.  I have it
T> narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe.
T> Every time I see these cars, I melt.  I am utterly obsessed with
T> the M3.  My friend has one and it is one of the most beautiful
T> cars I have ever seen.  Then there's the Porsche.  How can you not
T> love a car with the reputation of the 911.  I love the looks of
T> this car to the point of obsession as well.  Now here's the
T> dilemma...which to buy.  I have a test drive of both scheduled for
T> next week in Atlanta and will have to test both before making my
T> decision, but what would you guys choose?  I know they are both
T> sports cars but, in terms of upkeep, which would be the least
T> hassle?  The Porsche's engine compartment appears to be very
T> difficult to get at (from nonmechanics POV).  I love both of these
T> cars but only have enough $ for one.  Could anyone provide some
T> suggestions please?  I know both are great cars, I just want to be
T> sure to make the most of something I have worked so hard for.
T> Thanks for your assistance.

While I can't speak for the BMW anything, having always owned
Porsches,
I can say that with the Porsche, you will have access to many online
resources for parts, technical assistance, and lower priced, high
quality OEM parts. The many Porsche tech groups and forums provide
information and repair assistance for all models thus making turning
your own wrenches and routine repairs an easy almost fun experience.
The camaraderie among Porsche groups and owners creates a vast
technical resource for the new owner.
Signature

Jack

someone@somewhere.net - 03 Jul 2004 13:15 GMT
I'm sure we all pity you in the predicament you've found yourself.

Drive each car and pick the one you get the biggest rush from and that
fits youre personal style. Then don't spend the next few years
second-guessing the choice. Unless you've done _really_ well and can get
a new fun car every two years. Then what the heck?
Viper - 03 Jul 2004 17:43 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
> day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this

<snip>

I love both of these cars but only have
> enough $ for one.  Could anyone provide some suggestions please?  I
> know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of
> something I have worked so hard for.  Thanks for your assistance.

Tyler:  I've owned a BMW 325i and 3 Porsche 911s over the past few decades.
I currently am perfectly happy driving a much less reliable, oversized
kitcar,  but you have defined your choice, and I'll address that in a
minute.  But first, I have a suggestion.

Looking at the tone of your post, it appears that you've worked hard for ten
years, and have come up with a $70,000 budget or so.  While that's
admirable, I'm not reading that this will be  easy money for you to replace.
New cars depreciate generally speaking.  Certain cars have different resale
values, in case your dream doesn't measure up to your future wants or needs,
and you need/want to re-sell.

I suggest you buy a newer pre-owned (used) vehicle, and let someone else
take the "hit" of the initial depreciation.

Having said that, I believe that many people  (I'm one of them) prefer an
air cooled Porsche 911 over a water cooled.  And while EXCELLENCE magazine
has preached for years to purchase the latest model 911 you can afford, I
would suggest buying the latest model of the discontinued air cooled 911 you
can afford.  That model line is the 993, and I personally believe it's
re-sale value will hold up better than the 996 line over the next decade.  I
also believe that Porsche will be changing their body style, and going back
to a 994 appearance, thereby differentiating the 911 line from the "poorer"
Boxster  (try a Boxster S on some twisty roads and the "poorer" part isn't
quite as clear).    I think this will further hurt the 996 line.

I'm a bit biased on the 3 series BMW.  My 1988 325i's engine literally blew
up at 38,000 miles, just 2 thousand miles outside of warranty, because the
cam belt broke.  Since the car was in for "everything" just before the
warranty expired, at the dealer, and  I could  prove it, they covered most
of the repairs (not fluids and belts).  But I've always worried just a bit
about the 3 series.    I would think that for new M3 money, you could get a
used M5.   When you test drive the M3, why not see if the dealer has a three
year old M5 on the lot, that you could purchase an extended warranty on?
The M5 could grow with you if you have a family, or start to carry people as
business customers, but has perhaps the best balance of any of the sedans in
the world.

I used to buy new cars all the time.   It made me feel good.      This time
around I bought my S Class Mercedes as a lease return, and my 96 Viper from
a collector friend when it was time for him to update his collection.   Both
of my cars cost about what one of the new 911s will cost you (maybe slightly
more but under $100,000 for both).   Unless you badly desire to buy new,  if
money takes you a decade to come by, I'd stretch it as far as I could.

And if you DO want to spend $85,000 --- why not get a used Porsche 911
Turbo??  Faster than my Viper, with all the modern conveniences thrown
in......... what a car!

Regards,
1996 Viper
Rein - 04 Jul 2004 05:43 GMT
>> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
>> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>Regards,
>1996 Viper

Good advice BUT... have you looked at resale values of M3's lately ??
You might as well buy a new one, their used sale prices are incredibly
high.

Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
Tyler - 04 Jul 2004 23:50 GMT
While in the process of saving money like crazy, it became very
obvious that it is much easier to earn interest if you are starting
with a larger amount of money.  Consequently, I have continued saving
past the point of just being able to afford the car so that when I do
purchase, it won't wipe me out.

You have all made very good arguments for one or the other.  My
original suspicion that the 911 is a purer sports car with less
practicality seems to have been confirmed.  It won't be seen how much
of an impact this will play until I test out each car for myself.

Please keep the opinions coming in.  They have been very helpful and
are giving me ideas of what to think about before making the purchase.

Regarding negotiations, are higher end dealerships just as willing to
bargain (albeit resonably) on the price, or will I be pretty lucky to
get sticker price on these more exclusive cars?  I know I've heard
that the M3 used to sell at quite a premium compared with the window
price.

By the way, I'll be sure to pronounce it Por-scha when I meet the
overly pushy salesman.

Tyler

> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> > a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> Regards,
> 1996 Viper
Darren Hall - 04 Jul 2004 20:46 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler

After a decade of saving, you cannot invest in something mundane, like a 3
series BMW, even one with a powerful engine.  The M3 is not a true sports
car - try 10 laps of a track and see if the brakes can cope!  It is a hugely
successful marketing gimmick, an icon without substance.

The 911 is the real thing.  No amount of advice (and well done for
stimulating such fervent debate) will matter after the test drives.  The
Porsche steering alone when compared with the BMW will illustrate the
essential differences.

In order of preference, I'd get a Carrera 2 new, used Carrera 4S or a 996
GT3 Mk 1 - the best of the bunch, apart from the unhelpfully expensive GT3
RS.  You may want to wait for the 997 as it will make current cars just that
little bit cheaper.

Hope you enjoy the 911.
Princess Morgiah - 05 Jul 2004 01:06 GMT
> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> > a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> car - try 10 laps of a track and see if the brakes can cope!  It is a hugely
> successful marketing gimmick, an icon without substance.

I wouldn't quite call the M3 a mundane car. As for the fact whether or not
it's a true sports car - the original poster said nothing about racing the
car on a track, so I think he's trying to decide more on looks and practical
issues, rather than true track performance.

> The 911 is the real thing.  No amount of advice (and well done for
> stimulating such fervent debate) will matter after the test drives.  The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> RS.  You may want to wait for the 997 as it will make current cars just that
> little bit cheaper.

(I know I'm going to be shot for saying this but) I've yet to see a Porsche
I like - I'd prefer the M3 over just about every Porsche out there. But that
is a matter of opinion, of course - I simply do not think of Porsches as
beautiful cars, as opposed to most BMWs (except the latest Bangles).

Princess Morgiah
Randall Smith - 04 Jul 2004 22:45 GMT
The other posts have covered a lot of valid issues around cost, price,
weight, durability, etc. I am also a fan of the 993 version of the
Porsche 911 series and would recommend that you at least take a look
at the 1997-98 models. The 1998 C4-S is a beautiful car that can be
purchased with relatively low miles.  From my perspective, if you can
live with a car that does not have a useful back seat, the 911 is the
way to go. BMW can be counted on to make significant changes to the
apperance of the M3 periodically, while the 911 series is easily
identifiable as part of the same family... To some this is good, to
others, newness is better. Good luck.
Ron - 05 Jul 2004 04:53 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
> day I would have enough money to spend on a car like this.  Needless
> to say, I want to make sure I make the correct decision regarding
> which car to purchase.  I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or
> Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe.

are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son.  more power,
more performance, less money.  you must be a young gun, learn from the
experienced....chevrolet corvette, a good decision.  if not a z06, the c6
equals any german in quality and performance, might just be a little better
too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket.  go drive one, you'll love
it, buy american, happy july 4th son.
Deep - 05 Jul 2004 05:20 GMT
Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter...

Ya right...

Deep

> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> > a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket.  go drive one, you'll love
> it, buy american, happy july 4th son.
Viper - 05 Jul 2004 08:08 GMT
> Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter...
>
> Ya right...
>
> Deep

Run what you brung.  I'm willing to give it a shot against my old, tired
American heap of bolts.   And I LOVED my Porsches......   I just don't love
having people laugh at other people's choice of rides.  The Z06 is about the
most bang for the buck anyone can buy these days.  And my kit car will hold
its own against some of Germany's finest, as well.

Don't get me wrong.  I dearly love the Porsche 911, and particularly the
993.   But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much
anything.
Devils944S2 - 05 Jul 2004 08:48 GMT
Viper-

   I don't believe he was laughing at the Corvette per se...he was laughing
at the writers "equals any german in quality" statement. Yes the Corvette is
a nice little ride and like a Mustang Cobra, can go real fast, but,
quality-wise and driver/synergy-wise it is still years behind. Mis-matched
panels, dodgy interior materials and resale value about as good as grandma's
Impala make it a great car in the short term, but if the money is available,
why not upgrade?
   Hell, I think the new Z-06 has an identity crisis...Looks like they
broke into Dodge and stole the Viper front end!
   I am sure you could smoke a 1955 550 Spyder also, but, sometimes top end
is only a small factor in owning a great car.

> > Cough cough... I'm sorry - I was chocking back the laughter...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> 993.   But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much
> anything.
Viper - 05 Jul 2004 19:56 GMT
> Viper-
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>     I am sure you could smoke a 1955 550 Spyder also, but, sometimes top end
> is only a small factor in owning a great car.

On this we can agree.  Probably why someday I will own a Ferrari,  even
though I completely understand them to be money pits.
And no, I don't think you can give away $22,000 in price, and put the same
quality into build on a Vette as the 911.

On the other hand, if ever I buy another Porsche it will be a 993.   I'm not
impressed that by saving 2/3rds the build time on the 996 by cutting down on
hand fitting, that Porsche has taken a step in the right direction, either.

I have a 99 S420 Mercedes.  I'd like to get a newer one than my car which
was designed in 1991 (I have the last production year, 99), but I won't
because of declining build quality.    Mercedes was once thought of as the
"bank vault" built car of the world.   In recent years, that build quality
has suffered.

I think Porsche is going down the same path as Mercedes.  Cost cutting has
become more important than build quality.  Not as bad at Porsche as
Mercedes, but still a disturbing trend.

Still better than Corvette, but the trade off  is "bang for the buck".   My
99 C5 Corvette was built better than my current 1996 Dodge Viper  (not hard
to do- the Viper is a great engine that someone attached seats to), but not
up to Porsche build standards.    I don't think they can get there without
increasing the price above the market.   Still, the C5 was an amazing
technological move forward for Corvette.    I don't know how good the C6 is
going to be, but if it is a step up from the C5, it will be a very good car.
400 hp   400 ft. lbs of torque, stock, in a hydroformed frame chassis.
Some work on interior appointments.  Could be pretty nice.

And yes, they did steal the Viper front lights.  But then the 2003-2004
Viper stole the Ferrari Maranello look.    One of the things I like about my
96 Viper in Black with Silver Stripes is the outrageous appearance.
Nothing else is as notable on the road, short of a Ferrari Testarossa.   Of
course, anyone who is "into" build quality, can forget the Viper.  My
interior is plastic, modified by leather, no windows, and a leave it at home
top.  No legends of build quality are going to grow surrounding Vipers.

On the other hand, when I took the Viper race class at Laguna Seca (Skip
Barber) I was ASTOUNDED at what these cars can do when unleashed.  Mine, in
current trim puts out around 440 hp, and about 490 ft lbs of torque.  If you
don't mind a little bit of wheel spin, and sudden transitions from
understeer to oversteer, the Vipers are amazing toys.
Deep - 05 Jul 2004 23:43 GMT
Thanks - precisely what I meant...

Deep

> Viper-
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > 993.   But short of a Turbo, I think I can hold my own against pretty much
> > anything.
Gabri - 05 Jul 2004 15:30 GMT
>are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son.  more power,
>more performance, less money.  you must be a young gun, learn from the
>experienced....chevrolet corvette, a good decision.  if not a z06, the c6
>equals any german in quality and performance, might just be a little better
>too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket.  go drive one, you'll love
>it, buy american,

The regular 911 beats the Corvette even if she has (or so they say)
more power. in any case I challenge any corvette against my 911 TT any
day. Corvette owners are so intimidated by the sight of a TT that I
never found one testing their car against mine, they just give the
way. The corvette is a lot of value for the car but she look like a
pimp-mobile, in any case you are right, Porsche, Ferrari etc are not
for everybody if the only thing you can buy is a Corvette, that could
be a good choice.
Viper - 05 Jul 2004 19:59 GMT
> >are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son.  more power,
> >more performance, less money.  you must be a young gun, learn from the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> for everybody if the only thing you can buy is a Corvette, that could
> be a good choice.

My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California,  and
would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put
my 96 Viper up against your Porsche on either Laguna Seca or Infineon
raceway.  Interested?   It would be fun.   Of course I bought mine used for
less than 1/2 the price of your car.....  so if I lose, I'll just use that
as an excuse.

But I suspect I might not lose.   Just a suspicion.

: - )
Gabri - 06 Jul 2004 06:29 GMT
>My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California,  and
>would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>But I suspect I might not lose.   Just a suspicion.

I wouldn't drive 500 miles for that and in any case at 46 I'm not into
the duel business, particularly when I've invested almost 150K in my
hardware.
I've a lot of respect for the Viper, it uses a truck engine but it is
faster than normally aspirated Porsche 911 in the le-mans category.
Don't put it against a TT though, the 911 tt is another animal and
many tt out there are a way more powerful than what a viper engine can
generate. A standard 911tt does 0-60 in 3.9s and has a maximum speed
of 305 Km/h. A standard 911 tt kick your viper butt, it is mathematics
not sci-fi. Of a modified tt you can see only the exhaust pipes when
the 600hp kick in.
btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy?
fbloogyudsr - 06 Jul 2004 06:39 GMT
"Gabri" <nomail@nomail.com> wrote

> I've a lot of respect for the Viper, it uses a truck engine but it is
> faster than normally aspirated Porsche 911 in the le-mans category.

You're showing your ignorance.  Other than both being V10's and
having the same cylinder spacing, the Magnum truck engine and
Viper's V10 have less in common than, say, the engines in the
Boxster and 911.

> btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy?

Look at the headers - he's actually posting from the BMW group.

Floyd
Viper - 06 Jul 2004 07:54 GMT
> > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:59:58 GMT, "Viper" <Viper@nospam.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Viper's V10 have less in common than, say, the engines in the
> Boxster and 911.

It was a slam.  I doubt someone sophisticated enough to put $150,000 into a
Porsche 911 tt didn't know better.   Who cares?   Great cars all the way
around.  We're lucky to have them.   I keep my Porsche hat and buttons.
Never know when I'll want my 4th 911.  : - )

> > btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy?
>
> Look at the headers - he's actually posting from the BMW group.

But I do subscribe to the Porsche newsgroup as well, and quite a few others
as well.   I absolutely love cars, and in over 30 years of car ownership
have been blessed to own quite a number of them.  Porsches, BMWs, Corvettes,
Vipers, etc. included.    Gives me a fair amount of comparison background.

> Floyd
Viper - 06 Jul 2004 07:49 GMT
> >My car isn't quite as nice as a Corvette, but if you're in California,  and
> >would like to attend a Green Day, or other race day, I'd be willing to put
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> the 600hp kick in.
> btw what are you doing in this newsgroup? Porsche envy?

General car enthusiast.  I've owned 3 Porsche 911s, and have driver's seat
time in both the Turbo and the Boxster S.

I've owned most marques over the years in cars and motorcycles, and tend to
follow newsgroups across a number of both.

Nothing I've been near is faster than my prior Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3  ( 0 - 60
in 2.8 seconds) but I find that track expertise has more to do with the
pilot than the machinery.

If you're not racing, why exactly did you put $150,000 into a car bred for
racing?   What can you possibly do on the streets that a Subaru WRX Sti
can't do just as well?

And don't forget that the "truck engine" was engineered by a true Italian
race engine developer, and has a fair amount of additional power
capabilities.

Enjoy your Porsche.   Wonderful marque.
Gabri - 10 Jul 2004 16:55 GMT
>If you're not racing, why exactly did you put $150,000 into a car bred for
>racing?   What can you possibly do on the streets that a Subaru WRX Sti
>can't do just as well?

Toys? Passion? Aren't these motivations strong enough if you can
afford? I owned many Porsche, I had Ferraris and I was close to buy a
Viper if it wasn't for the incredible attituted of the salesmen.
Unfortunately (I'm sure there are exception) buying a VIper is like
buying a Chevy with a sleazy salesman all over you telling lies as
fast as his mouth can open.
BTW, I found an Italian article that I've on PDF and I could email to
you where it shows the TT clearly winning over the RT10. THey were
cars w/o modifications.

G.
Jess Englewood - 05 Jul 2004 18:29 GMT
> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> > a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> are you mad? a chevy corvette z06 is the only way to go son.  more power,
> more performance, less money.

Yes, but the gold chain cost is prohibitive.
Adam Schwartz - 06 Jul 2004 03:32 GMT
> > After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> > a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> too while you can put a few bucks in your pocket.  go drive one, you'll love
> it, buy american, happy july 4th son.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA......
Rob Munach - 05 Jul 2004 12:30 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler
If it took you a decade to come up with $50k, why blow it ALL on a
sports car? For $15k you can buy a nice used E30, M3 - (the "real" M3)
and keep the rest for later. It sounds like that is more in your
*affordable* price range, anyhow. FWIW, my buddy just bought a 996. He
spent 10 times more for it than I spent on my E30 325is. While it was a
nice car,  I can have just as much fun in my E30 for 1/10th the price.

-Rob
T - 16 Sep 2004 17:35 GMT
>>While it was a nice car,  I can have just as much fun in my E30 for
>>1/10th the price.

I always crack up when I hear this argument. I hope this justification
makes you feel better.  ...snicker... And the E30 "real M3?" Let it go
already. Fun? Sure it was. If you really value old technology, go buy a
horse.

Sorry to chime in late but I have been trying to decide the exact same
question as you for the past couple of months. I always take a long,
well-researched approach to a new car purchase. I have narrowed my
choices down to either a 2005 or 2006 Porsche 911 Carerra S (the 997) or
an E46 M3 Coupe. I also considered a new BMW 6-series or the new Mercedes
AMG roadster. A Corvette is just, uh, not on my radar. Did someone
someone actually say this was a good "bang for the buck?" Sheesh.

I have always owned (daily drivers and racing) BMWs (with the exception
of those few "first" cars which were hand-me-downs or other freebies)
since I was ever able to buy for myself. I have had two E30s, an M6, an M
Coupe (by far, *THE* most fun car I have ever had - I still regret giving
this up!) and currently an E36 M3 convertible. Through family and
friends, I have been involved first-hand with about 10-12 others. There
were no complaints from any of them. The first two E30s I owned were
traded in at 365,000 and 264,000 miles respectively. Maintenance and
reliability for BMW is not an issue for me.

With all of that said, I am leaning toward the 997 for a few reasons. 1)
I like toys and technology and the new 911 is full of them. 2) I now know
the difference between a true sports-car (the M Coupe) and a sport-sedan
(the M3). While both are tremendous fun, the M Coupe had the performance
characteristics I crave. 3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is
a true sports car. 4) The 911 seems like a step up from BMW in
engineering, features, options and performance (and price!!) 5) The
Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds better than the
SMG-II in the M3. Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she
does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San
Francisco terrain can be frustrating with a manual transmission. 6) The
911 is at the start of the new model release cycle and BMW M3 is at the
end. This will keep my "new model lust" to a minimum.

Tyler, have you made any decision yet? If you haven't, I will just echo
what several others have said - test drive them both and your preference
(needs for room, fit and finish, performance, personality) will be
instantly clear.

I hope this helps and good luck with your search!

>> Tyler
> If it took you a decade to come up with $50k, why blow it ALL on a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -Rob
Fred W. - 16 Sep 2004 19:11 GMT
> Sorry to chime in late but I have been trying to decide the exact same
> question as you for the past couple of months.

<<snipped a bunch of stuff>>

> With all of that said, I am leaning toward the 997 for a few reasons. 1)
> I like toys and technology and the new 911 is full of them. 2) I now know
> the difference between a true sports-car (the M Coupe) and a sport-sedan
> (the M3). While both are tremendous fun, the M Coupe had the performance
> characteristics I crave. 3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is
> a true sports car.

What is the Z4 then?  Certainly it does not have as much power as your old
M-coupe but it is most certainly a true sports car.  In fact "True Sports
Cars" came with small 4 cylinder engines and drove like a go kart.

> 4) The 911 seems like a step up from BMW in
> engineering, features, options and performance (and price!!) 5) The
> Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds better than the
> SMG-II in the M3.

You are comparing apples to oranges.  Tiptronic is a manually operated
automatic (complete with torque convertor) and the SMG is an automatically
operated manual transmission (complete with a clutch but no pedal).  The
tiptronic is most similar to steptronic in a BMW.

> Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she
> does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San
> Francisco terrain can be frustrating with a manual transmission.

So let's get this straight...  you are dissing the BMW offerings because
they don't make a "true sports car" (in your opinion) but you intend to
order said "sports car" with an automatic so your SO can drive it
comfortably around in the city?  Man...  get your priorities straight.  Get
the pork-chop or the M car (or whatever "true sports car" you decide on) but
by all means get it with a real (read manual) transmission and then go get
the girl-toy an automatic VW bug or something disposable that she can drive
around in the city.  Just reducing the wear and tear on your "true sports
car" will probably make having the second car almost a financial wash.

"True sports cars" have clutches.    ;-)

-Fred W
T - 17 Sep 2004 18:44 GMT
>...3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is a true sports car.
>
> What is the Z4 then?  Certainly it does not have as much power as your
> old M-coupe but it is most certainly a true sports car.  In fact "True
> Sports Cars" came with small 4 cylinder engines and drove like a go
> kart.

*I* would certainly not characterize a Z4 as a true sports car. While I
think it is a very capable car, loads of fun to drive and "sporty," it
most certainly isn't in the league (or purpose) of what *I* consider to
be a sports car. (some examples being the 911, M Coupe, Lotus Elise,
etc.) The M3, which I love, is also not the same as it is a sports sedan.
So, for you, if a true sports car must have a small 4-cyl engine then I
guess you agree since the Z4 is only offered with a 6. We have different
definitions of what a sports car consists of but it's clear that a Z4
doesn't fit either of them. :)

Maybe I will restate my point in another way, which will be less
susceptible to a literal interpretation. BMW's current lineup doesn't
offer anything that excites me performance-wise. Although I have been a
loyal BMW owner for many years, I think I was spoiled by the M Coupe. As
a friend of mine said when I got the coupe, "You're screwed. Where do you
go from here?" He was right, at least with BMW.

>...5) The Tiptronic transmission offered in the 911 is IMHO worlds
> better than
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> automatically operated manual transmission (complete with a clutch but
> no pedal).  The tiptronic is most similar to steptronic in a BMW.

Thanks for the clarification. I am not familiar enough with the
technology and was just comparing the respective alternatives to manual
transmissions. My observation was based on how each of these felt when I
test-drove them. Also not knowing the particulars, I wonder if DSG will
be a better alternative? I have heard it's pretty snazzy.

>> Unfortunately I have to accomodate a co-pilot and she
>> does not embrace manual transmissions, besides the fact that San
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> "True sports cars" have clutches.    ;-)

Agreed. The *plan* is to find a way for me to be happy with a car and to
accommodate her driving preference. The "girl-toy" (whatever that means)
can drive a manual quite well and has proven herself on the track. The
auto option was a preference since, as I already said, it would be more
convenient in the city. I think she is coming around though. :)

I completely agree that my plan is flawed. I've been wrestling with this
and I'm now convinced that the sacrifice is just not worth it. It makes
much better sense to get the manual thant I want, in the car that I want
and to get her a more convenient, comfortable girly ride...maybe a Z4. ;)
Fred W. - 17 Sep 2004 21:51 GMT
> >...3) BMW doesn't offer anything currently that is a true sports car.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> definitions of what a sports car consists of but it's clear that a Z4
> doesn't fit either of them. :)

No you missed my point.  The earliest true sports cars, like MGBs, Triumphs,
Austin Healeys etc. all had small engines and tremendous (for their day)
handling.  This is what a sports car is all about.  Tooling down the back
roads and "feeling" you are going fast even if you really aren't breaking
the speed of sound.

So considering that I would say the definition of a sports car is: "A 2 seat
roaster or coupe (preferably with minimal frills) that handles like it's on
rails.  Said sports car should have a manual transmission because the only
real purpose for a sports car is the total engagement and enjoyment of the
total driving experience FOR THE DRIVER!!"  I don't thing either SMG or
Steptronic or full automatic allow the total engagement of the driver.  Or
to put it another way, my left foot has to be part of the deal...

8<                      8<                         8<
8<

> Agreed. The *plan* is to find a way for me to be happy with a car and to
> accommodate her driving preference. The "girl-toy" (whatever that means)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> much better sense to get the manual thant I want, in the car that I want
> and to get her a more convenient, comfortable girly ride...maybe a Z4. ;)

That's all good.  Two (good) cars are always better than one.  And one good
one and a not so good one is still better.

I just hate to see Z4's (or any decent perfomance cars for that matter) with
automagic transmissions.  It really does contort what is the closest thing
(IMO) to a BMW sports car into, as you say, "a girly ride".  Have you driven
a Z4 3.0 with a stick?  I can't imagine it would come up too short of your
old M-coupe, though I'll admit I've never driven the coupe.

-Fred W
T - 20 Sep 2004 23:00 GMT
> No you missed my point.  The earliest true sports cars, like MGBs,
> Triumphs, Austin Healeys etc. all had small engines and tremendous
> (for their day) handling.  This is what a sports car is all about.
> Tooling down the back roads and "feeling" you are going fast even if
> you really aren't breaking the speed of sound.

Ok, I see where you are coming from. Tossable, fun cars. I wish there were
more of them now. Maybe our disconnect was a (I'm guessing here)
generational thing. I certainly know much less about MGBs, Triumphs, Austin
Healeys etc. than about E30 M3s.

> So considering that I would say the definition of a sports car is: "A
> 2 seat roaster or coupe (preferably with minimal frills) that handles
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> engagement of the driver.  Or to put it another way, my left foot has
> to be part of the deal...

Agreed.

> I just hate to see Z4's (or any decent perfomance cars for that
> matter) with automagic transmissions.  It really does contort what is
> the closest thing (IMO) to a BMW sports car into, as you say, "a girly
> ride".  

And we agree on this too. I knew the idea of Step/Tiptronic was a major
sacrifice. I'm happy to say that it's one I'm not prepared to make.

> Have you driven a Z4 3.0 with a stick?  I can't imagine it
> would come up too short of your old M-coupe, though I'll admit I've
> never driven the coupe.

I have driven a manual 3.0 Z4. It is very fun, quick and does meet your
criteria. My "girly-ride" comment was tongue-in-cheek. It just did not
provide the fun factor of the coupe. Maybe it was power, structural
rigidity or suspension but it just wasn't the same. The coupe really had
that go-kart feel. I know that power can be addictive and sometimes
anything slower than the fastest you've experienced is "slow." I was ruined
for many years after a particulary spirited 993TT ride.

Thanks for your very constructive and critical input. I'll be sure to keep
your email address handy so I can solicit future advice on car purchases.
:)
Fred W. - 21 Sep 2004 17:41 GMT
> Thanks for your very constructive and critical input. I'll be sure to keep
> your email address handy so I can solicit future advice on car purchases.
> :)

No problem.  The next best thing to contemplating spending my own money is
contemplating spending someone elses...

Happy shopping,
-Fred W
TonyK - 05 Jul 2004 12:55 GMT
> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler

If I didn't have a wife & 2 kids I'd go for a 911.

Tony (M3 Conv. being delivered on Friday this week).
Wingman - 05 Jul 2004 18:00 GMT
tuber1487@hotmail.com (Tyler) wrote in news:5e584fa7.0407021151.3b08eef1
@posting.google.com:

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> know both are great cars, I just want to be sure to make the most of
> something I have worked so hard for.  Thanks for your assistance.

Oh to have the dilemma! Your two choices makes it somewhat difficult to
compare since it is an apples to oranges comparo. Two seats or four?
Stealth or head-turning attention?

I'm somewhat in your same category. For the two seat coupe, I would say
it's difficult to beat the price/performance ratio of a Corvette Z06. If
you'd like to carry four of your friends, a Lancer Evo, Subaru STi, or
the M3 or S4 would be a good choice. Either way, the cost of living with
the two German cars would be slightly higher since it's difficult to do
your own maintenance.

FYI, I'm going to buy an M3 here and when I get back home to the States,
get an Evo. I can have my fun car and then my going to the opera car too!
:)
dizzy - 05 Jul 2004 18:27 GMT
>I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or
>Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe.

The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it
will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911.
Adam Schwartz - 06 Jul 2004 03:29 GMT
> >I have it narrowed down to either a BMW M3 or
> >Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe.
>
> The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it
> will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911.

The 911 996 is NOT that much more own... Oil changes are maybe a little
more expensive, but the reliablity of a Porsche is realllllly good...

Also I was very surprised at the cost of insurance on the 996. It isnt
all that much more expensive than a 'normal' car... Say my Audi... And
M3's insurance is very high, at least in my area. I guess based on
statistics M3 drivers are worse.. or maybe they get stolen more.

Maybe its worth checking if you are looking at both cars, but I am
pretty sure the 996 will cost less to insure than an M3. I live in MA,
USA.

Also, I must say - I have had my 996 for about 8 to 10 weeks. I love
this car. Its by far the absolute best car I have ever had... Sure, I
cant haul home sheet rock - but just for driving.. I love it.

Cheers,

Adam
dizzy - 07 Jul 2004 02:29 GMT
>> The M3 is a great car, but, if I could afford it without hardship (it
>> will cost you a LOT more to own), I'd go for the 911.
>
> The 911 996 is NOT that much more own... Oil changes are maybe a little
> more expensive, but the reliablity of a Porsche is realllllly good...

Depreciation costs, however...  And I gotta believe maintenance (beyond
oil changes) is significantly more.

> Also I was very surprised at the cost of insurance on the 996. It isnt
> all that much more expensive than a 'normal' car... Say my Audi... And
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> this car. Its by far the absolute best car I have ever had... Sure, I
> cant haul home sheet rock - but just for driving.. I love it.

Cool.
Sam Wang - 06 Jul 2004 02:58 GMT
Tyler,
If you had to invest for a decade to afford one of these two great cars,
you have to work even harder to keep your dream car running. You may
want to check with you local tax department if you need to pay 5 percent
property tax every year on the car. It's not so much that you can afford to
buy it, it's more that you can afford to keep it.

For the performance, go to buy a WRX. Good luck.

> After about a decade of investing, I finally have enough money to buy
> a sports car.  You can't even imagine how much I have anticipated the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Tyler