Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fuel gauge not working

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James F. Puliafico - 19 Jul 2004 03:49 GMT
Hi All,
 After starting my '96 328i after filling up today my fuel gauge didn't
move and in fact read empty.  The on board computer also indicated that I
only had 58 miles worth of gas in the tank.  Any ideas on where to start the
diagnosis would be greatly appreciated.  TIA!

Jim
adder - 19 Jul 2004 09:30 GMT
> Hi All,
>   After starting my '96 328i after filling up today my fuel gauge didn't
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jim

Google groups search.  On mine it was a wire in the sender that had come away.
Jeff Strickland - 19 Jul 2004 18:38 GMT
There are two fuel level sending units, one on the driver's side and anothe
ron the passenger's side. The passenger side level detector is part of the
fuel pump.

My car recently had this same problem. I pulled the driver side fuel level
sending unit and cleaned the contacts inside of it with a business card and
contact cleaner. What apparently happens to these level sensors is that the
gasoline eventually coats the contacts and raises the resistance very high,
and this causes the fuel guage to read E. The proper fuel level may return
at some poinnt during the tank of fuel, or it might return with the next
fill up. Since I cleaned my level sensor, my guage has read properly, before
I cleaned it I had no idea if it would read properly or not.

You can replace the level sensor if you want, but it costs about $100.00
(USD), and if the one on the passenger side needs to be replaced, it costs
about $150 because it includes the fuel pump. For the cost of replacing the
parts, I elected to try cleaning them, and my trouble was solved.

The guy at the Parts Counter said that California gas harms the sending unit
some how, and the new units are much more reliable. I am not sure that I buy
that story, but what do I know?

> Hi All,
>   After starting my '96 328i after filling up today my fuel gauge didn't
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jim
DUINK - 20 Jul 2004 01:36 GMT
I had the same problem on my '98 after letting the gas get so low that the
warning light was on.  Except after filling, the computer showed a full tank.
After about 100 mi of driving, my guage was still downscale so I tapped the
sending unit behind the passenger seat with a rubber mallet on a broomstick.
The guage came back to normal.  A few months later it occurred again after
letting the tank get very low and I restored it the same way.  Since then I
fill up with >50 miles left and the problem has not recurred.
Neoisthe1 - 20 Jul 2004 02:50 GMT
>There are two fuel level sending units, one on the driver's side and anothe
>ron the passenger's side. The passenger side level detector is part of the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>some how, and the new units are much more reliable. I am not sure that I buy
>that story, but what do I know?

I know for a fact it is true in Florida and Georgia.  Shell had a bad batch of
gas about two months ago that was ruining fuel gauges.  Very high sulfur
content that corroded the silver plated contacts causing the gauges to read
high or to fail.   They ended up paying for a number of fuel gauge
replacements.
Jim P. - 20 Jul 2004 07:21 GMT
Thanks for the post Jeff.  Are you referring to the contacts inside the
lobes of the tank, or those the wires connect to the sending units?  I
pulled the wires from the sending units and checked the resistence of the
sending units.  They were different indicating a problem, but I didn't pull
them from the tank.
BTW I think it was a Shell station (in NJ).

> There are two fuel level sending units, one on the driver's side and anothe
> ron the passenger's side. The passenger side level detector is part of the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> contact cleaner. What apparently happens to these level sensors is that the
> gasoline eventually coats the contacts and raises the resistance very
high,Than
> and this causes the fuel guage to read E. The proper fuel level may return
> at some poinnt during the tank of fuel, or it might return with the next
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Jim
Jeff Strickland - 20 Jul 2004 22:12 GMT
There was a recent problem at some southeastern refineries that caused
excessive sulfur in the gas, this caused problems with some fuel level
sensors. I am not aware of the gasoline distribution along the eastern
seaboard, but I wonder if some of the affected gas made its way into your
tank.

That said, I don't get any southeast gas in CA, and my sending units gave me
fits for many months before I finally pulled them out and cleaned them up.
Since doing that, I have had no further problems with the fuel level. It's
been about 4 or 5 months since I serviced my fuel level sensors.

Remove the back seat bottom, and pull back the tar-paper sheet that is on
the floor under the seat. Remove 4 screws from a round plate, then remove
the ring that secures the fuel level sensor. (As I said earlier, the left
side is a simple sensor, the right side also houses the fuel pump.)

With the fuel level sensor out, you can see the variable resistor that
determines how much gas to display. There are two sides to the contact, one
side that is a bunch of little hash-mark like lines arranged in a curve, and
the other side that is attached to the float lever. I used some spray-type
contact cleaner and a rough business card to clean both contacts. Gently
insert the card between the contact strip and the contact on the float
lever, and use it to polish the contacts, particularly the contact on the
float arm. You may like to use a type-writer eraser, one of those old
pencil-style erasers with very course rubber and a brush on the opposite
end, to clean the contact strip. Be careful on the contact attached to the
float lever so that you do not deform it and destroy the sending unit.

You will notice the card gets a black streak when you clean the contacts,
use different portions of the card until you do not get the streaks anymore.

> Thanks for the post Jeff.  Are you referring to the contacts inside the
> lobes of the tank, or those the wires connect to the sending units?  I
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> > >
> > > Jim
Jack \(Sarasota\) - 21 Jul 2004 03:27 GMT
Thanks for the Info Jeff.  I have the same problem ('94 E36 Convertible) and
had planned to investigate the sending units.  Your description will speed
the progress.

Jack (Sarasota)

> There was a recent problem at some southeastern refineries that caused
> excessive sulfur in the gas, this caused problems with some fuel level
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Jim
Jeff Strickland - 21 Jul 2004 20:43 GMT
Good luck. I actually had to do mine twice because I neglected to clean the
contact attached to the float arm on the first go around - DOH!.

Once I actually took the time to clean both sides of the contact, the
problem went away.

> Thanks for the Info Jeff.  I have the same problem ('94 E36 Convertible) and
> had planned to investigate the sending units.  Your description will speed
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > Jim
Jim P. - 24 Jul 2004 21:29 GMT
Thanks again Jeff.  One last question...Did you replace the seals and
O-rings when you removed the sending units?

Jim P.

> Good luck. I actually had to do mine twice because I neglected to clean the
> contact attached to the float arm on the first go around - DOH!.
[quoted text clipped - 122 lines]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jim
Jack \(Sarasota\) - 26 Jul 2004 03:24 GMT
And did you you the "special tool" to loosen the locking ring and drain the
tank like my manual says?   Draining the tanks seem kind of extreme.

Jack

> Thanks again Jeff.  One last question...Did you replace the seals and
> O-rings when you removed the sending units?
[quoted text clipped - 145 lines]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jim
adder - 26 Jul 2004 11:08 GMT
> And did you you the "special tool" to loosen the locking ring and drain the
> tank like my manual says?   Draining the tanks seem kind of extreme.

My special tools were a hammer & a big screwdriver, & my enormous hulk
like strength :-)   ..on mine though it was a wire that had come loose
so I soldered it back on.   I didn't drain the tank.
session - 13 May 2006 19:15 GMT
exactly how did u take off the Rings and remove the sensor? im having
trouble with this step... please help..thanks..peri
Jeff Strickland - 13 May 2006 19:23 GMT
I used a screwdriver and a hammer to GENTLY tap the ring in the direction to
loosen it. The ring is threaded, like a bolt. You simply unscrew it. You
have to be careful to avoid breaking the ring, else it must be replaced.

There is a gasket (Duh!, you asked about the rings.) that has to be placed
properly, or gas fumes will fill the car when the tank is full.

> exactly how did u take off the Rings and remove the sensor? im having
> trouble with this step... please help..thanks..peri
Jeff Strickland - 26 Jul 2004 21:16 GMT
Well, I drove the car until I had synchronized the need for more fuel with a
weekend stay in the garage. I have figured out that I can go a max of about
400 miles on a tank of gas, so when I pulled into the garage with 376 on the
odometer, I figured I had about 1 gallon of gas in the tank. I decided that
this would be empty enough for my purposes.

No, I did not use the special tool. Except where the special tool makes an
impossible job possible, I have generally found them to be more problem than
they are worth.

> And did you you the "special tool" to loosen the locking ring and drain the
> tank like my manual says?   Draining the tanks seem kind of extreme.
[quoted text clipped - 174 lines]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jim
Jack \(Sarasota\) - 26 Jul 2004 23:44 GMT
Thanks Jeff and Adder,

That is pretty much my plan.  Hopefully I will have an easy fix too.

Jack (Sarasota)

> Well, I drove the car until I had synchronized the need for more fuel with a
> weekend stay in the garage. I have figured out that I can go a max of about
[quoted text clipped - 202 lines]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jim
Jeff Strickland - 26 Jul 2004 21:12 GMT
No, I used the original parts over again.

> Thanks again Jeff.  One last question...Did you replace the seals and
> O-rings when you removed the sending units?
[quoted text clipped - 145 lines]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jim
Jim P. - 27 Jul 2004 00:05 GMT
Thanks again! Now I won't worry about gas eventually sloshing around in my
back seat!

> No, I used the original parts over again.
>
[quoted text clipped - 171 lines]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jim
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.