Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

P1174?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JC - 02 Feb 2005 12:51 GMT
Just pulled the code on my son's '96 318ti and it comes up P1174, which
is something like  "Fuel Trim Adaptation Malfunction"; whatever that is.

Seems to run fine, although overheating, which it's being shopped for
today.  Anyone have this error and figured out exactly what it means?

JC
Jeff Strickland - 02 Feb 2005 20:59 GMT
Here is a link to the codes, and your code isn't listed. This tells me that
the list isn't complete/acccurate, or you erred in writing the code.
http://www.wattora.com/Mods/OBDII/

Having said that, the code could have been stored some time ago. I would
clear it and then see it it pops up again. If it does come back, then figure
out what it is.

> Just pulled the code on my son's '96 318ti and it comes up P1174, which
> is something like  "Fuel Trim Adaptation Malfunction"; whatever that is.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> JC
Kyle and Lori Greene - 02 Feb 2005 23:37 GMT
> Here is a link to the codes, and your code isn't listed. This tells me
> that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> JC

P1174 is a BMW specific code so it won't show up on a generic OBDII chart.
You are correct on it's meaning.  It's telling you that the ECU is not able
to properly adjust the fuel trim (the increase or decrease of the length of
time the fuel injectors stay open) to maintain the correct air/fuel mix.  If
the O2 sensors are still the original, it is likely that they are no longer
functioning correctly.  You may also want to check around for a vacuum leak.
This would cause a lean condition.  These can sometimes be difficult to find
and range from a cracked or disconnected hose (relatively easy to find) to a
leaking injector o-ring (you need to tear apart a bunch of stuff to get to
it).

Kyle.
JC - 03 Feb 2005 15:45 GMT
>>Here is a link to the codes, and your code isn't listed. This tells me
>>that
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Kyle.

Well, got it back from the shop yesterday afternoon and they said the
engine coolant temperature sensor was bad.  So only $200 later they're
convinced we've got it fixed.

Let you know.

JC
Jeff Strickland - 03 Feb 2005 17:15 GMT
> >>Here is a link to the codes, and your code isn't listed. This tells me
> >>that
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Let you know.

NOT wanting to argue or start a fight, but if the O2 sensor or the Coolant
Temp Sensor were operating out of range, they would both throw a code, I
think.

I would have reset the code you had, P1174, and waited to see if it came
back before I poured $200 into a repair. If the code was a fluke, and many
are, then you will never know that the $200 coolant sensor actually did
anything, because the code that was a fluke would, by definition of flukes,
would not return anyway. That fact that it doesn't return after the new
sensor _might_ mean nothing at all, if it was a fluke it wouldn't return
anyway.

I have an uncomfortable feeling that you spent $200 on the wrong repair.
JC - 03 Feb 2005 20:24 GMT
>>>>Here is a link to the codes, and your code isn't listed. This tells me
>>>>that
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>
> I have an uncomfortable feeling that you spent $200 on the wrong repair.

Actually, I did reset the code.  It's a long(er than I thought the group
would be interested in) story.  But last week it was towed because of
overheating with coolant loss.  The shop AAA towed it to replaced a
broken plastic branch fitting located under the intake manifold and a
new thermostat.  But this week it overheated (without coolant leak).

That was the primary reason for shopping it this time (hopefully covered
by warranty for the $500 of work done last week) again (note my original
post).  I asked them to check for vacuum leaks, thinking they may have
bumped a vacuum hose while replacing coolant hoses.  I posted the
trouble code here expecting there was no relationship to the overheating
issue.

That's when they said the bad sensor was not allowing the fan to run, so
it overheated in slow traffic.  I too have an uncomfortable feeling they
made this sensor issue up to soak me for a little more mooola.

Keep in mind this is my son's car and I got most of the problem
descriptions second hand and I was under a time constraint in getting
the silly thing done asap.  If it were a car here at home, I would have
taken more time to diagnose the problem myself, and likely would have
found that the fan wasn't running.

So instead, I've spent near $1500 on the cooling system alone on this
car since last summer.  Can't wait for the kid to get out of school and
on his own.

Thanks for your thoughts, JC
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.