Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I need a better winter car...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ulf - 01 Mar 2005 17:46 GMT
My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
of minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
windshield. I brake because I can't see anything, and then I'm stuck... :-(

First time, notice how little snow it actually takes:

http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw1.jpg
http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw2.jpg

Second time, this time the car stopped in the next snowdrift:

http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw3.jpg
http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw4.jpg

Notice that both times I'm stuck completely *on* the road.

I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
getting stuck. :-)

Ulf
Troika - 01 Mar 2005 10:48 GMT
Well there are a number of seniors here .1# you must always adjust your
driving to the conditions of the road always always.2#  You must have 4 snow
tires on you vehicle  some drivers can do with 2 but
I say 4.you do not have the same rear-end as the newer 3-series so having
said that.I want to say I live in a part of the world call  Canada yes and
where I live we get lots of snow I mean lots so if you have experience and
most of all drive to the conditions of the roads you will be fine.
I often see lots of Japanese 4BY4's and others in the ditch its how you
drive I have all ways
driven BMW from the 3s to x5 and I feel so good in the x5 but if I chose to
drive foolish I know I will wind up in the ditch too.
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ulf
The Malt Hound - 01 Mar 2005 17:52 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles
> great, but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
> getting stuck. :-)

This is a joke right?

You don't look like your "on the road" to me.  Looks like you drove
into the snowbank.

Also, do you have snow tires on the thing (can't tell)

-Fred W
Ulf - 02 Mar 2005 01:31 GMT
>>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles
>>great, but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> You don't look like your "on the road" to me.  Looks like you drove
> into the snowbank.

Well, the "snowbank" was *on* the road. :-)

Here are two more pictures. In the first I'm parked *off* the road while
taking the picture. This is also before I got stuck as you can see by
the front only being covered by road grime and not snow.

In the second picture, compare how much of the amber sticks, marking the
edges of the road, is viable on the right vs. the left side of the road.
I'd estimate that it's between two and three feet of snow *on* the road
on the right side. I'm standing pretty much in the middle of the road in
this picture too.

http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw5.jpg (original size)
http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw6.JPG

> Also, do you have snow tires on the thing (can't tell)

Yup, studded snow tires.

> -Fred W

Ulf
spare-me-spam - 02 Mar 2005 13:39 GMT
| >>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles
| >>great, but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
| >
| Ulf

Look, if that snowbank WAS on the road, timing, not sedan version, is
your problem.

If you NEED to drive when the snow on the road is higher than your
bumper, how much imagination does it take to realize that it's ground
clearance you need, and not the inch or so difference between e30, e34,
or ix variants.

Once you manage to use the snow as a ramp, and take the weight off the
wheels, it wont much matter how many of them are spinning, or if it has
tires or paddlewheels on it.

There is a reason that plows are pushed by the type of machinery that
pushes them. The common denominator is ground clearance.

BMW's are lousy submarines, too. Let me save you the trouble of test
diving various models.

--
tech27 - 01 Mar 2005 17:57 GMT
I picked up a 2001 740i as a winter car. It already had a set of
Hakkap.......something Swedish snow tires on it. I find the weight of the
vehicle and the tires is more than enough to get me through the snow.

> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great, but
> I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ulf
Alex Rodriguez - 01 Mar 2005 22:37 GMT
>I picked up a 2001 740i as a winter car. It already had a set of
>Hakkap.......something Swedish snow tires on it. I find the weight of the
>vehicle and the tires is more than enough to get me through the snow.

The Hakapelittas (sp?) make a huge difference.  The extra weight of a heavier
car does not help.  
-------------
Alex
Max - 02 Mar 2005 01:36 GMT
>>I picked up a 2001 740i as a winter car. It already had a set of
>>Hakkap.......something Swedish snow tires on it. I find the weight of the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> -------------
> Alex

Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow. Not even studded. They were
awesome traction.

Signature

----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 15:47 GMT
> I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
> nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow.

Of course that is bullshit.....heh
Big Bill - 02 Mar 2005 21:03 GMT
>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
>nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow. Not even studded. They were
>awesome traction.

Obviously, you've only driven in light snow.
Be reasonable. When the snow is over your bumper, tires are not the
answer. You need more clearance.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Max - 02 Mar 2005 23:48 GMT
>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
>>nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow. Not even studded. They were
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Be reasonable. When the snow is over your bumper, tires are not the
> answer. You need more clearance.

Never had Hakkapelitas eh?

Signature

----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Big Bill - 03 Mar 2005 10:49 GMT
>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
>>>nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow. Not even studded. They were
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Never had Hakkapelitas eh?

What good do they do when the snow lifts those wonder tires enough to
lose traction?
When the snow is high enough to lift the vehicle high enough that the
tires don't any longer have enough weight on them to gain traction,
better tires are *NOT* the answer.

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

The Malt Hound - 03 Mar 2005 13:31 GMT
>>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab
>>>>900 and
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> tires don't any longer have enough weight on them to gain traction,
> better tires are *NOT* the answer.

Snow will not magically elevate your car.  The stuff is generally
pretty light, especially if light and drifted, and can be pushed aside
as the car plows through it if you have the traction to do so.

Sorry, but you are wrong.  Good traction *is* the answer.

-Fred W
fbloogyudsr - 03 Mar 2005 15:03 GMT
"The Malt Hound" <Malt_Hound@*no spam please*yahoo.com> wrote
> "Big Bill" <bill@pipping.com> wrote
>> What good do they do when the snow lifts those wonder tires enough
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Sorry, but you are wrong.  Good traction *is* the answer.

Sorry, Fred, but *YOU* are wrong.  I've been high-centered enough
to know this.  And my Pilot Alpines won't save me.

However, the usual method is that the surface that the tires are
packing in the snow - higher than the road surface - gives way
leaving you high and spinning.

Floyd
Big Bill - 03 Mar 2005 15:56 GMT
>>>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab
>>>>>900 and
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>pretty light, especially if light and drifted, and can be pushed aside
>as the car plows through it if you have the traction to do so.

Did you see the OP's photos? If not, I sugest you do so. Then you will
see what I mean.

>Sorry, but you are wrong.  Good traction *is* the answer.

Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets packed
under the car, it lifts you up, and the tires lose traction.
I haven't noticed any changes in show that would have changed this,
and, seeing the OP's pics, I am confident in saying that.
I wonder where you drive that this is not so.

>-Fred W

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

The Malt Hound - 03 Mar 2005 16:41 GMT
> Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
> I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and, seeing the OP's pics, I am confident in saying that.
> I wonder where you drive that this is not so.

I learned to (and currently) drive in the snow in northern New
England.  What you say is definitely true should you drive into a bank
or pileup created by a snowplow.  But if it is just unpacked deep
snow, you can definitely go through snow as high or higher than the
bumper.

YM(and snow)MV,
-Fred W
Michael Low - 03 Mar 2005 17:11 GMT
> > Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
> > I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> YM(and snow)MV,
> -Fred W

Fred, you are a knowledgeable guy but you are wrong on this one.

You are guaranteed to get stuck if you insist on plowing through snow
that does not clear the underside of your car.  It's one thing to go
over a short bump on the road but you cannot plow through a distance on
this stuff, regardless of what kind of wheels you are driving.  Wheels
have to touch "ground" with sufficient weight to provide traction.

The reason is simple - if the underside of your car touches the snow,
your car will become a very inefficient snowplow and the snow will
bunch up against the underbody of your car and pack itself.  The
momentum of your car will eventually leave your wheels "hanging" from
the "ground".  As the weight of the car diminish from the packed snow,
the amount of traction you get from whatevr tire or drivetrain will
vanish.

You will get stuck as you try to move through this kind of condition.
Clearance is the issue if your tires can provide traction on the
surface.  Snow must not touch the underside of your car.  Of course, if
your tires are wrong then clearance doesn't matter.  You're not even
moving.
Somebody - 03 Mar 2005 19:39 GMT
> > > Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
> > > I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> this stuff, regardless of what kind of wheels you are driving.  Wheels
> have to touch "ground" with sufficient weight to provide traction.

Sorry, I've done this for hundreds of meters at a stretch in snow up to the
bumper in my iX -- ie if you stop and open your doors you are pushing snow
out of the way.  It packs into the brake ducts and covers the fog lights and
the openings to the oil cooler, and leaves a neat trail behind me, but it
doesn't stop me.  Guaranteed or not, I've done it.

> The reason is simple - if the underside of your car touches the snow,
> your car will become a very inefficient snowplow and the snow will
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the amount of traction you get from whatevr tire or drivetrain will
> vanish.

Ever looked under an E30?  It's flat from the front crossmember back with
only a couple of very minor protrusions.  The only way what you say would be
true is if the front was higher than the back so that snow was wedging the
car upwards.

> You will get stuck as you try to move through this kind of condition.
> Clearance is the issue if your tires can provide traction on the
> surface.  Snow must not touch the underside of your car.  Of course, if
> your tires are wrong then clearance doesn't matter.  You're not even
> moving.

Again, if your air dam is plowing it, snow doesn't touch the underside of
your car because it's flat.

-Russ.
fbloogyudsr - 03 Mar 2005 19:51 GMT
"Somebody" <somebody@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote
> Again, if your air dam is plowing it, snow doesn't touch the underside of
> your car because it's flat.

Two things you have neglected in your discussion.
1)  If you try to go through a drift, the front wheels are likely to plane
up on the more densely packed snow, then drop down the other side,
which puts the car into a teeter-totter on the drift.
2)  A car is often higher in the front, either due to weight/loading,
or by weight shift (granted, small if you're a smart winter driver), or
by the action of the air dam deflecting snow downward.

FloydR
Somebody - 03 Mar 2005 21:28 GMT
> > Again, if your air dam is plowing it, snow doesn't touch the underside of
> > your car because it's flat.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or by weight shift (granted, small if you're a smart winter driver), or
> by the action of the air dam deflecting snow downward.

1) I mentioned in my previous post
2) short of a huge weight in the back most cars aren't lower in the back.
Some air dams form a wedge to push it downwards, (most bimmers) have a wedge
to push snow upwards.

-Russ.
fbloogyudsr - 03 Mar 2005 22:11 GMT
> "fbloogyudsr" <fbloogyudsr@nwlink.com> wrote
>> > Again, if your air dam is plowing it, snow doesn't touch the underside
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 1) I mentioned in my previous post
> 2) short of a huge weight in the back most cars aren't lower in the back.

Wrong.  Most BMW's have pretty even weight distribution - figured with
driver only.  Add more passengers and the car is rear-heavy.  Unless the
car (7-series, wagons) has self-levelling suspension, it's down at the back.

> Some air dams form a wedge to push it downwards, (most bimmers) have a
> wedge
> to push snow upwards.

Wrong.  My 330xi will push it down.  My '91 525i will push it down.
A modern 5-series has a very rounded front-end when viewed from
the side.  Even if the lower edge is quite sharp (possibly M3/M5)
with no fence (and they all have a flexible fence due to curb rash
possibilities), physics tells us that the act of splitting the flow
(of the snow over the edge) will result in upwards force on the dam.
The *only* exception to this would be a perfect snowplow resting
on the perfect plowed surface with no snow between the blade
and surface.  Never happen.

Floyd
Somebody - 03 Mar 2005 23:23 GMT
> > "fbloogyudsr" <fbloogyudsr@nwlink.com> wrote
> >> > Again, if your air dam is plowing it, snow doesn't touch the underside
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> on the perfect plowed surface with no snow between the blade
> and surface.  Never happen.

Well I guess my car is the bumblebee then, because I have no trouble plowing
snow.

-Russ.
The Malt Hound - 03 Mar 2005 21:42 GMT
>> > > Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
>> > > I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> -Russ.

There's no use arguing the point Russ.

You know, it's really not that big of a thing guys...  it just depends
on how light and fluffy, or wet and compact the snow is.

Yes, you can high center a car on snow that's been compacted.  But you
can also blast through it if it has not been compacted.  Now... can we
move on or what?

-Fred W
Bradburn Fentress - 04 Mar 2005 00:34 GMT
>  Now... can we  move on or what?

Don't be a dick, Fred. If you want to move on, then do so. This isn't a
circle jerk.

People can have conversations without your input or approval.
The Malt Hound - 04 Mar 2005 13:30 GMT
>>  Now... can we  move on or what?
>
> Don't be a dick, Fred. If you want to move on, then do so. This
> isn't a circle jerk.
>
> People can have conversations without your input or approval.

I can't remember you ever contributing anything worthwhile and you
continue to be prick.

I'm done with you.

<plonk>
Fentress Bradburn - 04 Mar 2005 16:25 GMT
>> People can have conversations without your input or approval.
>
> I can't remember you ever contributing anything worthwhile

I can't remember caring much what you remember.

> and you continue to be prick.

Only to you, the self-anointed infallible god-send on this ng.

> I'm done with you.

It would be better if you were done with  believing yourself infallible, but
hey...I'll take what I can get from a blind-minded egotist.
Harri Holopainen - 04 Mar 2005 08:42 GMT
..
>You are guaranteed to get stuck if you insist on plowing through snow
>that does not clear the underside of your car.  It's one thing to go

...that piles up on the underside of the car.

>over a short bump on the road but you cannot plow through a distance on
>this stuff, regardless of what kind of wheels you are driving.  Wheels
>have to touch "ground" with sufficient weight to provide traction.

it depends on the quality and structure of the snow. if there is
light, fresh snow at -10C it will generally not pack under the car. if
there's a hard, packed bank of snow blown by the wind or a plough at
0C, there's a fair chance of getting into problems. we've got snow
from Nov to April, and winter tyres are mandatory. during my 15 years
of winter driving with RWD cars I've gotten stuck on the road
(showelwork and/or pushing required) twice: once by losing traction on
an hill, and once by parking on a spot where there was packed snow
which collapsed under the wheels (but not under the car).

>The reason is simple - if the underside of your car touches the snow,
>your car will become a very inefficient snowplow and the snow will
>bunch up against the underbody of your car and pack itself.  The

my current AWD 525ix is quite a good snowplow actually, drove it on a
frozen lake once and couldn't really see because of all the snow
flying on the windshield...

in practice, with summer tires you will lose traction before the
packing happens, unless you're driving 50mph+, in which case one is a
complete idiot IMO :)

>momentum of your car will eventually leave your wheels "hanging" from
>the "ground".  As the weight of the car diminish from the packed snow,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>your tires are wrong then clearance doesn't matter.  You're not even
>moving.

the difference between winter and summer tyres on ice can be
visualized by thinking about running on an iceskating rink with a)
ballroom dancing shoes and b) heavy studded army boots.
Bradburn Fentress - 03 Mar 2005 17:47 GMT
>> Well, I learned how to drive in the snow in Pa.
>> I learned that when you simply plow into the snow, and it gets packed
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> created by a snowplow.  But if it is just unpacked deep snow, you can
> definitely go through snow as high or higher than the bumper.

Interesting. I live above Vail Colorado. We see a lot of snow. We've been
seeing a lot of snow all our lives. We are somewhat used to a lot of snow.
Yet no one around here is able to plow down the road in their 3,500 lb car
in over the bumper snow with the ease you suggest New Englanders enjoy.

I don't buy it. In snow as deep as being spoken about here, cars tend to
ride up and lose all or some of the contact patch. It's just the way it
works when a car has limited clearance in deep snow.

Plus, I don't think Hakka's are the best snow tires for where I live anyway
(to keep context correct, the tires I have owned were the Hakkapelita Q).
They are pretty effective in fresh snow (braking, acceleration), crappy in
slush or heavily wetted snow and lateral traction in any snow is about as
bad as I have ever experienced which cause them to not track well. Superb
ice tire though. I got the sense the tire is designed for conditions where
the temps are uncommonly low all the time and every snow fall eventually
becomes hardpack and then ice. I can imagine these tires are spectacular in
that kind of condition.

For my money, for the area where I live, the Blizzak MZ-02 seems to suit the
conditions best. But only when the car in question can maintain the contact
patch.
Badger - 03 Mar 2005 21:07 GMT
> Interesting. I live above Vail Colorado. We see a lot of snow. We've been
> seeing a lot of snow all our lives. We are somewhat used to a lot of snow.
> Yet no one around here is able to plow down the road in their 3,500 lb car
> in over the bumper snow with the ease you suggest New Englanders enjoy.

Same in Northern Scotland.

> I don't buy it. In snow as deep as being spoken about here, cars tend to
> ride up and lose all or some of the contact patch. It's just the way it
> works when a car has limited clearance in deep snow.

I agree, and I've driven in snow deep enough to get my 2500kg landrover
4.0V8 beached out and going nowhere!

> Plus, I don't think Hakka's are the best snow tires for where I live
> anyway
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> contact
> patch.

When it snows heavy here, the best tyres for my landrover are......  Leave
it at hom and take the Landy to work! ;-)
Badger.
Somebody - 03 Mar 2005 19:32 GMT
> >>>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab
> >>>>>900 and
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> and, seeing the OP's pics, I am confident in saying that.
> I wonder where you drive that this is not so.

I think that comes down to the airdam.  If you airdam is low enough, snow
will either get plowed or pile up in front of the car.  If it is higher than
the undercarriage, snow will build up under the car, starting with the
lowest points of the undercarriage and proceeding to all sections that occur
lower than the airdam's lower lip.

On the E30 if you have an iS lip, it's low enough.  An i lip will still not
allow any significant buildup under the car.  With no lip, you will get
buildup in front of the steering gear and the front crossmember, which will
get into the belts eventually.  Nothing behind the front crossmember is any
lower than that so it won't build up back there.  Regardless, snow in that
seciton is not likely to lift the front up, and if it did, the drive wheels
are still in traction.  It would be very difficult to build up enough snow
to lift the rears.

Now, breeching a drift is another story... you can blast the front wheels up
and over it, and then settle the car down on the crest of the drift and high
center it just as the rears begin to get lifted up.  Hit it hard enough and
momentum will carry you through regardless  Go slowly enough and you will
tend to plow it out of the way and not allow anything under the car, but
might get stuck when the rears get into the middle of it if you have bad
tires -- with good ones, the rears will still bite and you'll continue on.

-Russ.

-Russ.
Todd Zuercher - 04 Mar 2005 00:15 GMT
>>>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab
>>>>>900 and
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -Fred W

It is possible to drive through very very deep snow with the right
vehicle.  I've driven through snow that was 6ft. deep with my old Chevy
S-10 4wd.  Traction how ever wasn't my main problem engine power to
maintain forward movement was.  The only time I got stuck was when I
chose to high of a gear going over a 6 ft drift.  The engine bogged down
and when I tried to downshift all forward motion stopped and it sank.
This little truck only weighed 3000 lbs and the bottem of it was shapped
like a sled.  It had enough downward suspention travel to dangle the
front tires more than 16 inches below the lowest point of the chassy and
the rears would go even lower.  It also had about 11 inches of ground
clearence on dry ground.  Tires were pretty ordinary all-terrain truck
tires.  Oh, and to the Jeep touting dude, that worthless little S-10
would (and did) run circles around my Jeep CJ7 in the snow. Serious off
roading, mud, rocks, ect the jeep was far superior.
Max - 04 Mar 2005 17:52 GMT
>>>>Hakkapelittas are nuts. I had a set (Hakka 10's) once on a Saab 900 and
>>>>nothing, nothing could stop me in the snow. Not even studded. They were
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> tires don't any longer have enough weight on them to gain traction,
> better tires are *NOT* the answer.

Coupled with a vehicle that has a smooth underbody that doesn't catch
the snow underneath...

Signature

----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Snow - 01 Mar 2005 18:30 GMT
That's because you drive a shitty European piece of sh.t...

Snow ..."your suvee is NOT a JeeP and my JeeP is NOT a suvee"

> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great, but
> I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ulf
Corey Shuman - 01 Mar 2005 19:01 GMT
Ah.. I love Jeep mentality "a shitty peice of sh.t" nice!!!... Thats
why Rovers are always pulling them out....Your JeeP is not the best
offroader out there so how about you sit back and have a nice cup of
"shut the f@$k up".

Sorry bout that ....First off the snow looks a little deep, I would
expect to get stuck in that. Only thing I would recommend is 300lbs of
salt in the trunk, you can also use it to melt your way out but it does
help traction. Other than that, momentum and chains. My personal
opinion is that the bimmers are kind of "sleds" in the snow. But they
are great for wet or dry roads... its just the damn snow that impedes
them... My M3 hasnt left the garage in snow since I slid into a curb
and had to replace the front bumper.
Good luck!!
Snow - 01 Mar 2005 23:23 GMT
"> Ah.. I love Jeep mentality "a shitty peice of sh.t" nice!!!... Thats
> why Rovers are always pulling them out....Your JeeP is not the best
> offroader out there so how about you sit back and have a nice cup of
> "shut the f@$k up".

Never seen any Land Rovers around here.  But I have pulled many of European
crap out of ditches, pulled even more Asian riced crap out.  Advantages of
driving for a towing service :P...   oh and yes pulled a few JeePs out too.

Snow......"your suvee is NOT a JeeP and my JeeP is NOT a suvee"
Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 00:39 GMT
> "> Ah.. I love Jeep mentality "a shitty peice of sh.t" nice!!!... Thats
>> why Rovers are always pulling them out....Your JeeP is not the best
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Advantages of driving for a towing service :P...   oh and yes pulled a few
> JeePs out too.

Like almost anything to do with stuck cars, it generally has little
importance what they are driving.....bad drivers can get stuck in almost any
car they drive, and good drivers can manage to move safely no matter how
difficult the vehicle they seem to be piloting.

And while I myself really love Jeeps and own two, neither Jeep nor Land
Rover make the best full line 4x4/off-road vehicles...that honor goes to
Land Cruiser. We, and Europe, just don't get some of their best units. In
SOuth Amercia you can find LC's that are superb. Built like monster and
perform with ease and capability. I am even of an opinion that Jeep and LR
don't match up against some of Mistu's 4x4's, but then Mitus doesn't have a
full line of off-roaders.

By the way JeFf Strickland (I remember you from the r.a.m.j.w) have you seen
the LC FJ40 coming to the states in a couple years. Beautiful little retro
4x4 with starting price around 23, 000 (according to AutoWeek). Jeeps in for
a fight when Toyota lands that little bugger on our shores. The kids are
gonna love it.
Somebody - 02 Mar 2005 02:59 GMT
> > "> Ah.. I love Jeep mentality "a shitty peice of sh.t" nice!!!... Thats
> >> why Rovers are always pulling them out....Your JeeP is not the best
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> car they drive, and good drivers can manage to move safely no matter how
> difficult the vehicle they seem to be piloting.

Evidenced by me today passing everyone in the ditch in my rental -- worst
peice of crap I ever drove in the winter.  It's a Sebring with worn all
seasons, no ABS, no traction control, no balance, no visibility, fogging
windows, no feedback, sheesh.  I could barely navigate the dang thing around
town much less on snow-covered highways.  But somehow I stayed between the
lines.

On days like those, I've kept count of what types of cars are populating the
ditches, and given up.  Everything from rice rockets to Euro sedans to SUVs
to pickup trucks.  No patterns have been observable from my seat.

-Russ.
Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 16:01 GMT
>> Like almost anything to do with stuck cars, it generally has little
>> importance what they are driving.....bad drivers can get stuck in almost
> any
>> car they drive, and good drivers can manage to move safely no matter how
>> difficult the vehicle they seem to be piloting.

> On days like those, I've kept count of what types of cars are populating
> the
> ditches, and given up.  Everything from rice rockets to Euro sedans to
> SUVs
> to pickup trucks.  No patterns have been observable from my seat.

That is 100% correct. When the vehicle ends up in a ditch, and hasn't been
forced their by another car, it is almost always the drivers fault. In most
cases they drove in a manner unfit for the conditions. And despite the
electronic wizardry of the day, and the wonderful tire choices we get, it
hardly matters much if you don't or can't drive "down" to the ambient
conditions.

My BMW's have always been quite good in the snow if driven properly. They
don't match my Jeeps or my pickup, but they do quite well if I drive as good
as the car is for the conditions I am driving in. As has been mentioned here
before, with most cars clearance is the great equalizer even if you have 4
or AWD and the best snows money can buy.

The guy here who talks about driving his Saab thru snowbanks taller than the
car.........well, my bet is that he's seen a few ditches in his time :^)
Corey Shuman - 02 Mar 2005 19:44 GMT
Cruisers, seriously... well, at the risk of trolling I would venture
that a stock Rangie would eat a stock Cruiser for breakfast. and if you
are going out of country, look to the Australian Rovers.
I will digress with this though, vehicle capability is limited by the
driver, a good driver in a bad 4x will go farther that a bad driver in
a good 4x.
Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 22:14 GMT
> Cruisers, seriously... well, at the risk of trolling I would venture
> that a stock Rangie would eat a stock Cruiser for breakfast.

You'd be venturing off course. Be careful of the hype....."Bigger
Nuts"...."Best4x4xFar"....and all that jivin' cosmic debris.

Land Cruiser is  the preeminent full lineup of 4x4s in the world. I suspect
you simply don't have any perspective for what types of vehicles they
distribute throughout the world. Don't get hung up on the soccer-mom-mobiles
you see here. The US, and in fact most Western countries, only get the
pretty ones. I don't know anybody with any experience who would choose a LR
over a LC, if capability and strength were the only issue. Unfortunately
things like service and parts come into play and post-british colonial
countries tend to be supplied for LR's in greater amount than they are LCs
because of those relationships.

If you hit the Middle East, which in my view is about as difficult as
overall conditions get, you won't see many LR's. It is almost all Japanese
from Pajeros, to Patrols, to LC's. Neither the Jeep nor the LR's measure up
to those vehicles. And who knows precisely what the new Defender will bring
to the table. I think it gets shown at Geneva in the next couple days, with
a release later this year.

Really, anyone who claims differently simply doesn't have the experience to
know any better. Sorry.

And just for purpose of being factual: The Defenders sold in Australia are
actually South African models. The only model specific to Australia (I
think) was the Defender fitted with BMW's 2.8 petrol engine...some years
ago. The SA models will likely remain as the "Classic" and only sold in
countries where they still will meet emission, safety and other vehicle
legislation.

Our British friends on this ng could correct me if I am wrong about models
and release dates.
Mr Fix It - 01 Mar 2005 19:02 GMT
What you need to do (so you get to upset some 4x4 drivers) is to let
the rear tyres down to 10psi, and fit narrow front tyres.
And don't ... repeat ... DON'T work the throttle/clutch like a track
driver!!

I did this in a citroen axgt (small french front wheel drive car) although
my
driven tyres were at 10psi and the rears were at normal pressure.

Quite funny when you get to drive around three people pushing an estate car
which got stuck in the snow ... onto
the grass, then back onto the road.
Makes 'em stand around scratching heads!!!

Signature

Regards....
Steve

> That's because you drive a shitty European piece of sh.t...
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >
> > Ulf
Bradburn Fentress - 01 Mar 2005 20:04 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great, but
> I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple of
> minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
> windshield. I brake because I can't see anything, and then I'm stuck...
> :-(

Hey, Safari Beige...my first Bimmer, an E21, was Safari Beige. I wish I
would have kept that car. Your photos remind me of that.
John Burns - 01 Mar 2005 20:52 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
> of minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
> windshield. I brake because I can't see anything, and then I'm stuck... :-(

Wow! And I thought my E30 saw serious snow in the winter! I'm assuming
your on snow tyres. Time for a 325iX I think ;-)

> I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
> getting stuck. :-)

My techie runs a '93 525iX touring with snow tyres, little stops it :-)

Signature

Who needs a life when you've got Unix? :-)  
Email: john@unixnerd.demon.co.uk, John G.Burns B.Eng, Bonny Scotland
Web  : http://www.unixnerd.demon.co.uk - The Ultimate BMW Homepage!
Need Sun or HP Unix kit? http://www.unixnerd.demon.co.uk/unix.html

The Malt Hound - 01 Mar 2005 23:19 GMT
>> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles
>> great,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> assuming
> your on snow tyres. Time for a 325iX I think ;-)

psha!!  That snow's not all that deep.  He just ran the car into the
snow bank and didn't have good winter tires...

-Fred W
Ulf - 02 Mar 2005 01:50 GMT
>>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Wow! And I thought my E30 saw serious snow in the winter! I'm assuming
> your on snow tyres. Time for a 325iX I think ;-)

Yeah, but I'm looking to upgrade to an E34. I like the styling better,
plus, it's a bigger car. Of course, the downside is that it's probably
not as fun to drive as an E30.

>>I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
>>getting stuck. :-)
>
> My techie runs a '93 525iX touring with snow tyres, little stops it :-)

I'm sure there must be something. :-)

Ulf
Harri Holopainen - 01 Mar 2005 21:32 GMT
how about getting a decent set of winter tyres first. crap tyres + AWD
will only get you into more trouble...

to.e-mail.see@homepage wrote:
>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Ulf
Henrik Ohm Eriksen - 01 Mar 2005 21:45 GMT
An x5 seems right in case you really like to drive in the snow ;-)

And its a nice car too - I dont have any problems in the snow we get here in
denmark..

/Henrik

> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great, but
> I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ulf
Cartlon Shew - 01 Mar 2005 22:50 GMT
>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw1.jpg
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw2.jpg

You look like your on the shoulder in those

>Second time, this time the car stopped in the next snowdrift:
>
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw3.jpg
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw4.jpg
>
>Notice that both times I'm stuck completely *on* the road.

No, this time you're definitely *OFF* the road.

>I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
>getting stuck. :-)

Why not move where it doesn't f.cking snow so bloody much?

>Ulf
The Malt Hound - 01 Mar 2005 23:21 GMT
> Why not move where it doesn't f.cking snow so bloody much?

I'm not the OP, but I know the answer to that one"

'cause that's where all the other people live...

There is a lot of value in being away from the rest of humanity.

-Fred W
Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 00:40 GMT
> There is a lot of value in being away from the rest of humanity.

Are you implying that where Ulf lives, humanity doesn't exist :^)
Ulf - 02 Mar 2005 01:47 GMT
>>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> You look like your on the shoulder in those

Nope.

>>Second time, this time the car stopped in the next snowdrift:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> No, this time you're definitely *OFF* the road.

Again, no. All four wheels were on the (icy) asphalt. I know, I was there.

>>I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
>>getting stuck. :-)
>
> Why not move where it doesn't f.cking snow so bloody much?

I actually doesn't snow that much here, but when it rains, it pours...

>>Ulf

Ulf
Cartlon Shew - 02 Mar 2005 16:51 GMT
>> Why not move where it doesn't f.cking snow so bloody much?
>
>I actually doesn't snow that much here, but when it rains, it pours...

Yeah, right - then why are you considering getting a different car?
Dave C. - 02 Mar 2005 00:52 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
> of minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
> windshield. I brake because I can't see anything, and then I'm stuck...
:-(

In snow, momentum is your friend.  You don't need a better car.  Just turn
the wipers on high before you hit a drift, pay attention to the road beyond
the drift and keep moving.  -Dave
Ulf - 02 Mar 2005 01:42 GMT
>>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the wipers on high before you hit a drift, pay attention to the road beyond
> the drift and keep moving.  -Dave

Yeah, but it takes several seconds before the vipers get enough snow off
the windshield so that I can see. Just look at the third and fourth
picture. Another problem is that the car pulls in the direction the snow
is deepest. I both these cases that was to the right, as you can see on
the pictures. So if I were to keep going I might actually end up in the
ditch, and I'd rather get stuck on the road than off the road...

Ulf
Snow - 02 Mar 2005 14:05 GMT
Then clean your windows of BEFORE you venture out and use the wiper delay to
keep it clear..  oh and also clean of your head and tail lights too..

Snow...
Max - 02 Mar 2005 01:35 GMT
Heh... My Saab, I can drive through snowbanks taller than the car and
have no problem on bald summer performance tires... you know before
Bombardier and the Ski-Doo, people drove Saab 93's instead...

> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Ulf

Signature

----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Bradburn Fentress - 02 Mar 2005 15:45 GMT
> Heh... My Saab, I can drive through snowbanks taller than the car

No you can't........heh
Big Bill - 02 Mar 2005 21:09 GMT
>Heh... My Saab, I can drive through snowbanks taller than the car and
>have no problem on bald summer performance tires... you know before
>Bombardier and the Ski-Doo, people drove Saab 93's instead...

I usd to have a Yugo; in a really bad snowstorm, the Wyoming roads
department called me to come up there and clear the roads so their
plows could get through.
Honest!

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Somebody - 02 Mar 2005 02:55 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
> getting stuck. :-)

Once I was a passenger in the iX that I eventually bought, and the test
driver put it backwards into a ditch.  It was very wide, about 3 feet deep,
but completely covered with snow.  We were in at an angle, one front was
sort of near the road surface, the back was deep in the drift.  The car was
tilted at a crazy angle.  She was freaking out.  "put it in gear and drive
it out" I said.  "No way" she said.

She did it.  Sure enough, the thing drove right out.  Left a giant hole in
the bank that was visible for weeks.

After owning it for 4 years, I've never met anything my iX couldn't handle.
As long as you don't hang the undercarriage up on something so bad that the
wheels are off the ground, it's so surefooted it's spooky.  I use proper
snow tires of course.  The main problem I have is snow packig into the brake
ducts and knocking them loose.

http://www.russdoucet.com/bimmertech/ix-winter/iX(006).jpg

I don't have any action shots, if I get a chance I'll take some next big
snowstorm.  :-)

-Russ.
Scott en Aztl?n - 02 Mar 2005 04:20 GMT
>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>but I get stuck everywhere!

Next time, try the bus.

>Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
>of minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw3.jpg
>http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw4.jpg

What, did that snowdrift jump out in front of you?

You DROVE IT INTO that snowdrift. And WTF are you doing driving around
on unplowed country roads? Just so you could take these silly
pictures, I'll wager... ;)

Signature

Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/

Somebody - 02 Mar 2005 04:26 GMT
> >My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> >but I get stuck everywhere!
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> on unplowed country roads? Just so you could take these silly
> pictures, I'll wager... ;)

Why not? I do it all the time.  Not for pictures though, just for kicks.

-Russ.
1988 iX
BBO - 02 Mar 2005 06:23 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw1.jpg
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw2.jpg

Why didn't you steer to the left of that bank in the first place? Did
you meet an oncoming car? If you did you could have slowed down and
let it pass, then drive past the snowbank on the left side. At least it
looks like it from the pictures.

> Second time, this time the car stopped in the next snowdrift:
>
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw3.jpg
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw4.jpg

Now, that is just plain silly. You hit that snowdrift hoping to float
over it - the result is obvious. We used to amuse ourself with that kind
of driving conditions where I grew up. We always kept a showel in the
back though - and a few friends in the car to push us out.

> Notice that both times I'm stuck completely *on* the road.
>
> I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
> getting stuck. :-)

Oh, you'll get stuck alright. Just farther into the snowdrift and in
need of a tractor to pull you out. Either that or wait for spring...

It's fun to drive around in snowy conditions, but before you do I'll
second the opinion of many here: Get a pair of decent snowtires, and
skills to go with it.

I'm curious - where have you got that kind of snow conditions? We barely
have any snow here nowaways. Here being Norway. :-/

Signature

azoth@dod.no
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wenn im Zweifel, Volleistung!                                 DoD#2101
 azoth@dod.no, '90 BMW 318i                   When in doubt - floor it!

richard - 02 Mar 2005 12:44 GMT
Yea, How cool is that, never seen that white stuff myself....and you guys
get to test your 4WD's in it :-)
Currently 35C here today...a bad winter goes to around 5C (and we call that
"freezing" :-) )

If we had snow like that I'd find a) a good woman, b) pron c) a book & sit
by a fire & drink rum.
OH&S must have rules about people getting to work in that stuff?

Cool pics anyhow.

> I'm curious - where have you got that kind of snow conditions? We barely
> have any snow here nowaways. Here being Norway. :-/
Big Bill - 02 Mar 2005 21:13 GMT
>If we had snow like that I'd find a) a good woman, b) pron c) a book & sit
>by a fire & drink rum.

I understand a) and c), but what does a pronoun do for you??
If that's supposed to be "porn", I think you need to concentrate on
actually getting a). It makes porn redundant. :-)

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Larry Bud - 02 Mar 2005 20:28 GMT
> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,

> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
> of minutes. Same scenario, hit a snowdrift and snow goes flying onto the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw3.jpg
> http://members.roadfly.org/ulf/bmw4.jpg

"Little" snow?  Any standard sedan is going to get stuck when the
freakin' snow level comes up to the headlights.
Alex Rodriguez - 03 Mar 2005 20:31 GMT
>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>I'm leaning more and more towards a 525xi, nothing like AWD to avoid
>getting stuck. :-)

Looks like you need more practice driving in the snow.  The center of the
road looks fine.  Keep it down the middle and you should be fine.  You should
also get 4 snow tires to help you keep it down the middle.
------------
Alex
Ulf - 06 Mar 2005 17:42 GMT
>>My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
>>but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> road looks fine.  Keep it down the middle and you should be fine.  You should
> also get 4 snow tires to help you keep it down the middle.

Contrary to popular opinion I do actually know how to drive in the snow.
I'm also unhappy to report that the car did not survive the snow as good
as I thought. It appears I have a oil leak somewhere, because there's a
big puddle of oil under the car and despite adding two liters of oil
it's still below the "min" mark on the dipstick... :-( This means I'll
have to start parking on the street to avoid further complaints as well
as checking the oil level daily. *aghh* Can't wait for spring!

> ------------
> Alex

Ulf
Russ Maki - 07 Mar 2005 15:23 GMT
> I'm also unhappy to report that the car did not survive the snow as good
> as I thought. It appears I have a oil leak somewhere, because there's a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> as checking the oil level daily. *aghh* Can't wait for spring!
> Ulf

I wonder if the leak might be coming from a bad oil pressure sender. It's
the cylindrical object near the crank pulley on the passenger (US/Canada)
side of the block. That's a common leak point on M20 engines and a 15-minute
repair. It would take quite awhile for it to lose three liters of oil,
though. Leaking oil cooler/line, maybe? I'm not sure if the 323 *has* an oil
cooler, but they can be vulnerable to damage. (As an '87 325i owner, I have
firsthand experience.)

Russ
Ulf - 07 Mar 2005 22:37 GMT
>>I'm also unhappy to report that the car did not survive the snow as good
>>as I thought. It appears I have a oil leak somewhere, because there's a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> cooler, but they can be vulnerable to damage. (As an '87 325i owner, I have
> firsthand experience.)

Nope, I don't have an oil cooler. Thanks for the oil pressure suggestion
though, I was thinking a leaking oil pan myself. The damn thing seems to
smack the ground every other time I drive over a speed hump...

> Russ

Ulf
Pat - 03 Mar 2005 22:47 GMT
I have 95 318is...always winter driven with 4 snows in very heavy snow
(Quebec City). Manual trans (big help) & when necessary  extra weight in
trunk over axle (e.g...couple bags of sand). Never had problem ...knock on
wood.

padraig

> My '86 BMW 323 is really a crappy winter car. Sure, it handles great,
> but I get stuck everywhere! Today, I got stuck *twice* within a couple
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Ulf
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.