1994 520i SE Touring repair/mainenance manual

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

abc - 19 Apr 2005 10:15 GMT

been and gone and got it - love it so far but want to lavish a bit of
TLC on a rather under loved car. First search for a maintenance/repair
manual (Haynes) has been unsuccessful - is there another model / version
I can use or an alternative source?

your help appreciated as always!

alex

Reply to this Message

abc - 19 Apr 2005 10:38 GMT

Found the Bentley - 1989 - 1995 BMW 5-Series (E34) 525i, 530i, 535i,
540i, including Touring Official Factory Service Manual

but as you can see it does not list the 520 as one of the models covered!

any ideas or will this do ($70!!!!)

> been and gone and got it - love it so far but want to lavish a bit of
> TLC on a rather under loved car. First search for a maintenance/repair
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> alex

Reply to this Message

JB - 19 Apr 2005 10:39 GMT

> been and gone and got it - love it so far but want to lavish a bit of
> TLC on a rather under loved car. First search for a maintenance/repair
> manual (Haynes) has been unsuccessful - is there another model / version
> I can use or an alternative source?
>
> your help appreciated as always!

A Bentley manual (ebay) or for the basics, just look at www.bmwe34.com or
get onto the Roadfly forums.

JB

Reply to this Message

abc - 21 Apr 2005 15:41 GMT

thanks JB

there is a bentley for the 525/530/540 but no 520 - had a look in
handbook and 525 and 520 engines seem to be same configuration - so will
this do?

cheers

alex

>>been and gone and got it - love it so far but want to lavish a bit of
>>TLC on a rather under loved car. First search for a maintenance/repair
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> JB

Reply to this Message

abc - 21 Apr 2005 15:46 GMT

seems that www.bmwe34.com is no more!

>>been and gone and got it - love it so far but want to lavish a bit of
>>TLC on a rather under loved car. First search for a maintenance/repair
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> JB

Reply to this Message