Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

8-series

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Griff - 01 Jun 2005 13:45 GMT
Dear all

I've read the various threads about which is the better car [840 vs 850
(ignoring the CSI)] and whilst these are no doubt informative I do
wonder whether they may be a little out-of-date.

So, I ask (previous owners?) that, with the benefit of hindsight, which
really is the car to own!

The points I'm really interested in are as follows:

1 - economy: are they similar or radically different?

2 - robustness: which of the two engines is the more "bullet proof"

3 - total cost of ownership: are parts for one significantly more
expensive than the other?  What annual bill would I be looking at to
cover maintenance?

4 - when buying a car, any particular things to check?

Many thanks in advance

Griff
Malt_Hound - 01 Jun 2005 15:27 GMT
> Dear all
>
> I've read the various threads about which is the better car [840 vs 850
> (ignoring the CSI)] and whilst these are no doubt informative I do
> wonder whether they may be a little out-of-date.

How could the info be out of date?  They have nopt made this model for
over 7 years now.  Most of the information out there is still perfectly
valid.

> So, I ask (previous owners?) that, with the benefit of hindsight, which
> really is the car to own!
>
> The points I'm really interested in are as follows:
>
> 1 - economy: are they similar or radically different?

Let me preface by saying I'm not a previous owner.  But I can still tell
you that they will be different.  8 cylinder is pretty darn economical
considerin the amount of power at your toes.

> 2 - robustness: which of the two engines is the more "bullet proof"

Neither, but the later years 8 cylinder is the most bulletproof.
Earlier 8's suffered from Nikasil problem.  12 cylinders are 12 cylinders.

> 3 - total cost of ownership: are parts for one significantly more
> expensive than the other?  What annual bill would I be looking at to
> cover maintenance?

Yes.  12 cylinders are more expensive and harder to find parts.  The 8
cyl engine was in the 5 and 7 series as well as the 8 series.

If I were looking for one, I'd try to find a later model ('96  - '97) 8
cylinder, after the engine size went from 4.0 to 4.4 liters.  I'd also
want the thing with a manual transmission, but you'll be hard pressed to
find such an animal.  You do occasionally see an odd 850i with a
6-speed, but never the 840i.  Maybe it was not even available that way?
 Too bad, because that's what I would want.

Fred W
Griff - 01 Jun 2005 16:18 GMT
I understand that the CSI is a manual, but the engine has so much
torque that it continually wears out the clutch (at least the friction
disk between the two plates).  I don't know whether the non-CSI manuals
suffer from similar wear.

Was the 12 cylinder engine not used in any other model (750 for
example)?
Somebody - 01 Jun 2005 19:39 GMT
> I understand that the CSI is a manual, but the engine has so much
> torque that it continually wears out the clutch (at least the friction
> disk between the two plates).  I don't know whether the non-CSI manuals
> suffer from similar wear.

If that's true, you can blame the owner for abusing it.  A clutch shouldn't
wear twice as much when the engine has twice as much power -- from rest, the
extra power should be applied after the clutch plates are engaged, not while
they are engaging.  Weight here will be more of a wear factor than engine
power.   At shift time, a properly matched shift does not wear the clutch
plates at all, regardless of how much power is available.

Do a lot of mashed throttle drop clutch takeoffs and the extra power will
indeed wear the clutch harder.  Which is abuse.  As is slipping the clutch
on shifts, where extra power will again cause extra wear.

-Russ.
bfd - 01 Jun 2005 20:19 GMT
I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
Z8:

http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/flywheel/V8/index.htm

As the ad says, this clutch is setup to give "normal" lifespan
comparable to standard BMW models, 50K-80K miles depending on driving
style.  If you're getting less mileage on your clutch than this, its
due to driver abuse.....
Somebody - 01 Jun 2005 23:43 GMT
> I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
> abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> style.  If you're getting less mileage on your clutch than this, its
> due to driver abuse.....

50K to 80k miles?  I just swapped mine out 'cause the throwout bearing
went -- 344,000km, could have put it back in but I had bought a kit anyway.

-Russ.
Jeff Strickland - 02 Jun 2005 00:44 GMT
> > I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
> > abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 50K to 80k miles?  I just swapped mine out 'cause the throwout bearing
> went -- 344,000km, could have put it back in but I had bought a kit anyway.

I second that. I have a '94 325i and I replaced the factory clutch at
210,000 miles, and I did it because I was tired of listening to the
throw-out bearing howl its complaints everytime I depressed the pedal.

I'll accept the idea that the 8 Series and the 3 Series are not even
remotely similar once you get behind the Roundelo on the hood, but I reject
the notion that the standard is 50- to 80-thousand miles on a clutch.
Trey - 02 Jun 2005 06:46 GMT
>> > I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
>> > abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> reject
> the notion that the standard is 50- to 80-thousand miles on a clutch.

What kind of driving do you do? if its day after day of heavy metro traffic,
I can see it wearing out faster than if you commuted though the countryside.
When Im on the interstate on my motorcycle, I can cover over 100 miles
without touching the clutch. Get in the city, and the clutch gets used every
20 feet
Somebody - 02 Jun 2005 12:04 GMT
> >> > I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
> >> > abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> without touching the clutch. Get in the city, and the clutch gets used every
> 20 feet

Well that's fair, heavy stop and go -- if you literally stop -- wears the
clutch no matter how careful you are.

A manual tranmission 850 is hardly a good choice of a daily commuter if your
commute is truly that bad, however.  Seems unlikely that so many of them
live that sort of life that they all have a reputation of tossing clutches
at 80Kmiles.

-Russ.
Trey - 02 Jun 2005 16:24 GMT
>> >> > I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
>> >> > abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> -Russ.

They could be making the clutch pads out of a softer compound to give it
greater grip in a smaller area.. Thats the only thing left I can think of.
Somebody - 03 Jun 2005 11:57 GMT
> >> >> > I agree if the CSL clutch is "wearing out", then its due to driver
> >> >> > abuse. The BMW 850CSL clutch is the "upgrade" for the E39 M5 and E52
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> They could be making the clutch pads out of a softer compound to give it
> greater grip in a smaller area.. Thats the only thing left I can think of.

I guess that's possible.  Perhaps an aftermarket clutch could fix that, but
if they've just made it too small there may not be much that can be done.
Still a gentle foot at first engagement and proper rev matching should
extend clutch life significantly.  You can actually get good fast starts
from a car while barely slipping the clutch at all and stomping the gas
after full engagement when a car has as much torque as that motor does.

-Russ.
Dru Abrams - 11 Jun 2005 22:45 GMT
I've heard my mechanic repeatedly bitc$ and moan about the 850 v12.  
Say's its a piece of garbage.

This is coming from Steve Moran Motors...best dang Beemer shop I've ever
been to.  Its in Berkely, CA.

I was talking to one of the guys when an 850 came in with a blown motor
and out of curiousity asking how they were, and how they held up, and he
just sort of put his head down and said they're terrible.

I've got a six myself and have had my fair share of probs...but it seems
the 850's just weren't designed to last.

My .01
Dru

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
>
>  
Malt_Hound - 01 Jun 2005 20:41 GMT
> I understand that the CSI is a manual, but the engine has so much
> torque that it continually wears out the clutch (at least the friction
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Was the 12 cylinder engine not used in any other model (750 for
> example)?

Yes it was, in much lower production volume.

-Fred W
bfd - 01 Jun 2005 17:49 GMT
Agree, information here on the E31 8 series is some of the best you can
find! For example, do a search for Paul Michael Brown's E31 Buyer's
Guide. Its arguably the best info on 8 Series cars. Here's a link to
part 1:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.autos.bmw/browse_frm/thread/feb8bc8aeebf
2b00/38d688eab7e2c1b3?q=E31+buyer%27s+guide&rnum=2#38d688eab7e2c1b3


Now go do a search for part 2....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.