Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

E39 540 Sport

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Aspinall - 17 Jun 2005 10:54 GMT
Hi
I am looking for a nice E39 540 Sport, preferably in Silver (in the UK).

I would like the car to be fully loaded if possible, with widescreen sat nav
etc.

Does anyone know anywhere where this car may be available??
I can find 528, 530 and even 535, but not 540.

Cheers

Paul
Jeff Strickland - 17 Jun 2005 20:41 GMT
I am not sure, but I think the popular wisdom around here is that the 530 is
the better choice over the 540.

> Hi
> I am looking for a nice E39 540 Sport, preferably in Silver (in the UK).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Paul
Paul Aspinall - 17 Jun 2005 21:15 GMT
OK - Thanks for the advice.

From what I can see the 540 is much faster, and economy is not that much
different.

Can someone correct me on this?

Thanks

>I am not sure, but I think the popular wisdom around here is that the 530
>is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Paul
Jeff Strickland - 17 Jun 2005 21:33 GMT
I'm certain that somebody will correct one of us.

Maybe the issue was that the cost of the 540 when new wasn't a very good
deal because the preformance gains of the larger engine just weren't there.
I don't know. I just remember something that the 530 was a better choice,
all things considered. Perhaps since you are buying used, then maybe the
swing will go the other way. Stay tuned ...

> OK - Thanks for the advice.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >>
> >> Paul
Ross Garrett - 17 Jun 2005 22:49 GMT
> I'm certain that somebody will correct one of us.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> all things considered. Perhaps since you are buying used, then maybe the
> swing will go the other way. Stay tuned ...

I don't think any correction is necessary. In US mags tests indicate the 530
was slower in a straight line than the 540, but faster in almost any
*driving* test (slalom, figure 8, etc). Pretty much came down to what many
people like about the 530 to begin with...rack & pinion steering, and almost
all aluminum front suspension (the 540 has the steel front end of the 7
series), and additional lighter front end because of the engine weight.

Bottom line, I think, is that for a 4 passenger luxury cruiser the 540 makes
better sense, but for a car that one will try to enjoy by tossing around a
bit, the 530 seems to be the better choice.

I owned both, having *moved up* to a 540 from a 530, and had I had the
advantage of experience I would have stuck with the 530. The steering in the
540 just undercut much of what one looks for in a BMW...particularly in
comparison to it's I6 brethren.

Great cars both. If you like drag racing and big engine cruising the 540 is
the choice. If you enjoy twisties and switchbacks the 530 is definitively
superior.
R. Mark Clayton - 17 Jun 2005 21:53 GMT
> OK - Thanks for the advice.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks

In the 7 series the 728 / 730 (even the V8) were a bit underpowered for the
size of the car, where as the 735 (V8) and 740 were as some other
manufacturers put "adequate".

In the 5 series even the 528 was respectable and the 530 (V8 variants) were
very tasty.  The 540 by comparison did not add a lot to the package, but was
rather thirsty.

The M5 (probably the best / fastest 4 door saloon ever built until the A8)
was the exception that proved the rule, but for ordinary 5 series punters
the price was out of reach.
Paul Aspinall - 17 Jun 2005 22:31 GMT
Thanks for your input.

The figures I have:
for the 540, are 0-60 in 6.0, and 23mpg
for the 530, are 0-60 in 6.9, and 29mpg

I can see the figures are contentious, but I'd go for the 540.

Does anyone have opinions?

>> OK - Thanks for the advice.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> was the exception that proved the rule, but for ordinary 5 series punters
> the price was out of reach.
Sharkmanbmw - 17 Jun 2005 22:55 GMT
I have a 540i and love the speed, the torque... but it guzzles, if you are
afraid of the gas pump, stay away from any V8!
I am sure the 540 will blow the doors off a 530 past 60, 100 and keep
pulling away fast!
> Thanks for your input.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> A8) was the exception that proved the rule, but for ordinary 5 series
>> punters the price was out of reach.
Malt_Hound - 20 Jun 2005 14:42 GMT
> I have a 540i and love the speed, the torque... but it guzzles, if you are
> afraid of the gas pump, stay away from any V8!
> I am sure the 540 will blow the doors off a 530 past 60, 100 and keep
> pulling away fast!

What do you get for mixed mileage?  I get around 24mpg on my '94 540iA.
 That's pretty darn good in my books, certainly not what I'd call
guzzling...

-Fred W
Ross Garrett - 20 Jun 2005 17:39 GMT
> What do you get for mixed mileage?  I get around 24mpg on my '94 540iA.

The differences between your E34 and the E39 is probably found in the
displacement disparity between the M60 and M62, about half-a-liter I think,
along with the higher weight of the E39.
Dave Plowman (News) - 20 Jun 2005 18:53 GMT
> > What do you get for mixed mileage?  I get around 24mpg on my '94 540iA.

> The differences between your E34 and the E39 is probably found in the
> displacement disparity between the M60 and M62, about half-a-liter I
> think, along with the higher weight of the E39.

And if it follows the smaller models, is higher geared too.

Signature

*A person who smiles in the face of adversity probably has a scapegoat *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Steve Garey - 17 Jun 2005 22:56 GMT
I think in the UK you will have more problems trying to trade in a 540
against a 530 when you decide to sell.

Also, popular wisdom in BMW dealer circles is that the 6 cylinder engines
are smoother than the V8s, and likely to be cheaper to maintain.

Cheers

Steve
> Thanks for your input.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> > was the exception that proved the rule, but for ordinary 5 series punters
> > the price was out of reach.
Malt_Hound - 20 Jun 2005 14:41 GMT
> I think in the UK you will have more problems trying to trade in a 540
> against a 530 when you decide to sell.

Possibly.  OTOH, in the US you'll have an easier time reselling the V8.

> Also, popular wisdom in BMW dealer circles is that the 6 cylinder engines
> are smoother than the V8s,

Disagree, somewhat.  The V8 has a small lope at idle (as all V8s do) but
they are equally as smooth underway.

and likely to be cheaper to maintain.

possibly, but not necesarrily.  Everything besides the engines and
steering boxes is the same.  Unless you had to do major engine repairs,
which is pretty unlikely, they will cost pretty much the same to maintain.

> Cheers
>
> Steve

My take would be, if you intend on getting a manual transmission, go
with the 530 for the rack and pinion steering.  If you intend to buy one
with an automatic, get the V8 for the superior horsepower.

-Fred W
Grant - 18 Jun 2005 09:18 GMT
> The figures I have:
> for the 540, are 0-60 in 6.0, and 23mpg
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Does anyone have opinions?

Personally, I want to try one of each first rather than choose one solely
from the numbers. YMMV.
Malt_Hound - 20 Jun 2005 14:33 GMT
>>OK - Thanks for the advice.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> very tasty.  The 540 by comparison did not add a lot to the package, but was
> rather thirsty.

The 540 is *not* thirsty.  It gets amazingly good gas mileage even when
coupled to an automatic, especially considering its respectable increase
in horsepower.

-Fred W
Ross Garrett - 20 Jun 2005 17:24 GMT
> The 540 is *not* thirsty.

Not quite accurate in my experience. The V8 seems to get quite thristy when
you beat it, whereas the I6 maintains good efficiency under the same
conditions. I used to get about 21 mpg in my 540 during a week of mundane
driving, but the minute I started to play it dropped down to 15-16 quite
quickly. The I6 didn't suffer that same disparity.
dizzy - 21 Jun 2005 03:35 GMT
>In the 5 series even the 528 was respectable and the 530 (V8 variants) were
>very tasty.  The 540 by comparison did not add a lot to the package, but was
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>was the exception that proved the rule, but for ordinary 5 series punters
>the price was out of reach.

Seeming to make the 540 a nice compromise.
Dean Dark - 21 Jun 2005 03:55 GMT
>>In the 5 series even the 528 was respectable and the 530 (V8 variants) were
>>very tasty.  The 540 by comparison did not add a lot to the package, but was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Seeming to make the 540 a nice compromise.

But M5 prices are dropping like rocks, in the YooEss at least.  $35K
or so will now get you an '00 or '01 with 60K or 70K miles on it.  It
can only get better.
Signature

Dan.

Ross Garrett - 21 Jun 2005 16:00 GMT
> But M5 prices are dropping like rocks, in the YooEss at least.  $35K
> or so will now get you an '00 or '01 with 60K or 70K miles on it.  It
> can only get better.

Probably depends where you are at. Here in Denver that's about what you
would get for a trade-in value at a dealer. But you will pay between 42 to
45 grand for an 01 with 60,000 on it (private party). I imagine the dealers
are hitting that another 3 to 4 grand if you buy from their lot. That's
still a pretty good drop in a car that wasn't sold in huge numbers and so
retains some measure of exclusivity, but around here we aren't seeing prices
drop like rocks.....yet :^)

It's rather strange though given the beating BMW has taken with the new
design of the E60 that the supposedly preferred design, the E39, isn't
holding value as traditionally as BMW always has. I think there is a vocal
minority whom we hear from on a regular basis and a quiet majority who have
taken the new car to records sales levels. It is going to be interesting to
see how the new designs hold value. Obviously the more they sell the harder
it will become to hold value. We may be seeing the end of days when BMW can
be counted on to retain 65-70% of their value after 3 years.
Dave Plowman (News) - 21 Jun 2005 17:30 GMT
> We may be seeing the end of days when BMW can
> be counted on to retain 65-70% of their value after 3 years.

In the UK, the larger ones never have - apart from the early days of the
E39 where they were in short supply.

Signature

*Nostalgia isn't what is used to be.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) - 18 Jun 2005 10:27 GMT
> From what I can see the 540 is much faster, and economy is not that much
> different.

> Can someone correct me on this?

Are you talking auto or manual? You'll be hard pushed to find a 540 manual.

The major failing with the V-8s is the steering and overall balance.
They use old fashioned recirculating ball steering rather than the rack
and pinion of the sixes. And the weight distribution isn't as good.

Reliability tends to be worse as well. Not with major components, though.

Signature

*I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.