Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Winter drivinng: FWD and RWD with snow tires vs. AWD with all-season tires - what people who have done the tests say

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
GRL - 12 Feb 2006 12:52 GMT
It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires help,
and the discussion veers to the supposed benefits of AWD vs. 2WD (front or
rear) in such conditions. (Somebody trying to justify their purchase of an
SUV, maybe.)

Anyway, so here comes the March 2006 issue of Road & Track, page 71. R&T has
done testing of summer tire, all-season tire, and snow tire equipped cars in
summer/winter conditions. There opinion is credible. Here is what they say
as part of a comparison test of mid-size all-wheel drive sedans:

"Which is better, one of our AWD competitors on all-season tires, or its
front- or rear-drive counterparts on dedicated summer or winter rubber?
Summer is a close call; but winter isn't. All-wheel drive has its benefits,
but not the 28-30 percent offered by dedicated snow tires. And AWD won't
help at all when it comes to stopping in snow. Of course, the best choice
for winter conditions is all-wheel drive and snow tires."

The 28-30% figure comes from comparison testing of all-season and winter
tires on snow - snows are 28-30% better.

I come away pleased from this as it confirms my experience in driving a 2000
Yukon XL AWD with all-seasons and now a '92 LS400 on winter rubber through
Michigan winters. I felt the LS was doing every bit as well and even thought
it might be doing a wee bit better in all but very deep (say, 10") snow, but
the latter seemed counter-intuitive.

Just wanted to make sure this gets into the Google memory banks in time for
next winter.

- GRL
R. Mark Clayton - 12 Feb 2006 13:37 GMT
> It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
> their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires
> help, and the discussion veers to the supposed benefits of AWD vs. 2WD
> (front or rear) in such conditions. (Somebody trying to justify their
> purchase of an SUV, maybe.)

All things being equal 4WD will be better than FWD will be better than RWD
and snow tyres will do better than regular road tyres.
IMHO essential for any winter driving is ABS, and if you do have a RWD BMW
get one with snow mode on the gearbox.
Mike G - 12 Feb 2006 14:48 GMT
> > It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
> > their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> and snow tyres will do better than regular road tyres.
> IMHO essential for any winter driving is ABS,

IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery conditions.

and if you do have a RWD BMW
> get one with snow mode on the gearbox.

My BMW has a snow setting, but I haven't had a chance to try it out yet, but
theoretically it should be better with it than without.
Mike.
Fred W - 12 Feb 2006 20:39 GMT
> IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery conditions.

My experience is contrary to your.  In emergency stopping situations the
ABS works well in snow or slippery conditions.  It can be disconcerting
until you get used to how it works, but it does allow the maximum
available braking while still maintaining steerage.

> My BMW has a snow setting, but I haven't had a chance to try it out yet, but
> theoretically it should be better with it than without.
> Mike.

Yeah mine does too.  It's called 3rd gear (it's a manual trans)  ;-)

Signature

-Fred W

Mike G - 13 Feb 2006 00:01 GMT
> > IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery conditions.
>
> My experience is contrary to your.  In emergency stopping situations the
> ABS works well in snow or slippery conditions.  It can be disconcerting
> until you get used to how it works, but it does allow the maximum
> available braking while still maintaining steerage.

The problem with ABS in snow or icy conditions, with varying levels of grip,
is that it does not allow different braking techniques to be used in line
with how much grip there is at any particular moment.
At times it may be better to lock the wheels to slow down or stop At other
times, it might be better to cadence brake. Varying the rate to give the
best result.
IMO and experience, basic ABS is not sensitive enough in very slippery
conditions. It doesn't give any feel to the brakes. They're either on or
off, with virtually nothing in between.
I'm not against ABS per se. It's made a good contribution to road safety. I
just wish sometimes that I was able to switch it on and off as required in
the winter months, without pulling the fuse.
Mike.
Fred W - 13 Feb 2006 00:46 GMT
>>>IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> the winter months, without pulling the fuse.
> Mike.

It seems to me, and from my experience, the ABS is actually able to
react to the varying traction conditions much faster under these
conditions than even the most adept human driver.  In dry road
conditions I think that your analysis may be correct...

Signature

-Fred W

Mike G - 13 Feb 2006 10:26 GMT
> >>>IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> conditions than even the most adept human driver.  In dry road
> conditions I think that your analysis may be correct...

My experience tell me the opposite.
If there is any grip, ABS is fine, and does react very quickly.
It doesn't cope very well if grip is very low, or almost non existant.
In such conditions IME, driver controlled braking can be more effective.
Mike.
GLitwinski - 13 Feb 2006 00:58 GMT
http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/driving/articles/43810/article.html

It is never better to lock up your brakes on any surface except, maybe,
loose gravel where a plow effect can come into play. Lock 'em up on any hard
surface and you will increase your braking distance and also loose steering
control. A very good driver on the right surface may be able to beat an ABS
car's stopping distance by constantly holding the tires on the verge of lock
up. But there are few such talented people around.

- grl

>> > IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery
> conditions.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> the winter months, without pulling the fuse.
> Mike.
Mike G - 13 Feb 2006 10:03 GMT
> http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/driving/articles/43810/article.html
>
> It is never better to lock up your brakes on any surface except, maybe,
> loose gravel where a plow effect can come into play.

That also can apply when driving on virgin snow.

Lock 'em up on any hard
> surface and you will increase your braking distance and also loose steering
> control. A very good driver on the right surface may be able to beat an ABS
> car's stopping distance by constantly holding the tires on the verge of lock
> up. But there are few such talented people around.

Agreed.
Mike.
GRL - 24 Feb 2006 02:42 GMT
Possibly, but only in deep snow that you are unlikely to be going at any
speed in anyway and even then I'll bet you are better off with abs .

>> http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/driving/articles/43810/article.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Agreed.
> Mike.
Mike G - 26 Feb 2006 18:27 GMT
> Possibly, but only in deep snow that you are unlikely to be going at any
> speed in anyway and even then I'll bet you are better off with abs .

Nope. With ABS the snowplough effect doesn't happen, because the wheels
never stop turning.
Mike.

> >> http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/driving/articles/43810/article.html
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > Agreed.
> > Mike.
dizzy - 13 Feb 2006 03:44 GMT
>IMO and experience, basic ABS is not sensitive enough in very slippery
>conditions. It doesn't give any feel to the brakes. They're either on or
>off, with virtually nothing in between.

You should try it with good tires sometime.  I used to think ABS was a
joke, until I ditched the all-seasons...
Fred W - 13 Feb 2006 12:40 GMT
>>IMO and experience, basic ABS is not sensitive enough in very slippery
>>conditions. It doesn't give any feel to the brakes. They're either on or
>>off, with virtually nothing in between.
>
> You should try it with good tires sometime.  I used to think ABS was a
> joke, until I ditched the all-seasons...

Exactly.  In that case the ABS was just highlighting the (poor) amount
of traction.

Signature

-Fred W

R. Mark Clayton - 12 Feb 2006 21:45 GMT
"Mike G" <metier@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message news:43ef4ad3$0$9238

>> IMHO essential for any winter driving is ABS,
>
> IME ABS doesn't help when driving on snow or in very slippery conditions.

The only conditions where ABS iis counter-indicative is deep fresh snow
(rare) or pebbles.

> and if you do have a RWD BMW
>> get one with snow mode on the gearbox.
>
> My BMW has a snow setting, but I haven't had a chance to try it out yet,
> but
> theoretically it should be better with it than without.

From first hand practical experience it is, although an experienced driver
with a a manual box wuold do quite well by comparison.  OTOH even a top rank
rally driver would be likely to better anything but a novice with ABS on wet
/ icy roads.

> Mike.
nopcbs - 12 Feb 2006 19:37 GMT
What is "snow mode"? Some kind of automatic tranny thing where the car
starts in 2nd gear?  I just have traction control on our LS400 and
never have any trouble (with snow tires mounted).

I find that the combination of snow tires and traction control on a RWD
car (unless it is ridiculously nose heavy, like say an original
Hemi-Cuda) results in no worries in any amount of snow that your car
can go over and not turn into a plow.

- GRL

> > It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
> > their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> IMHO essential for any winter driving is ABS, and if you do have a RWD BMW
> get one with snow mode on the gearbox.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 12 Feb 2006 20:12 GMT
> What is "snow mode"? Some kind of automatic tranny thing where the car
> starts in 2nd gear?

Yep.

> I find that the combination of snow tires and traction control on a RWD
> car (unless it is ridiculously nose heavy, like say an original
> Hemi-Cuda) results in no worries in any amount of snow that your car
> can go over and not turn into a plow.

Yep.

Use the right tool for the job.
Fred W - 12 Feb 2006 20:44 GMT
> What is "snow mode"? Some kind of automatic tranny thing where the car
> starts in 2nd gear?  

3rd gear actually.

> I just have traction control on our LS400 and
> never have any trouble (with snow tires mounted).
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Hemi-Cuda) results in no worries in any amount of snow that your car
> can go over and not turn into a plow.

I prefer to turn traction control off sometimes and use the gas pedal to
steer the car at times.  Much more fun...

Signature

-Fred W

Fred W - 12 Feb 2006 20:36 GMT
>>It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
>>their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> IMHO essential for any winter driving is ABS, and if you do have a RWD BMW
> get one with snow mode on the gearbox.

Mark, Mark, Mark...  we've been through this before.

All things are *never* equal, and that is the real point here.

For one thing, when was the last time you saw a 4WD or AWD vehicle
equipped with *real* winter tires?  Where I live (Northern New England)
people with 4WD or AWD just fit them with all-season tires year round.
Why?  beats me... but that is exactly what they do.  Maybe they figure
(like you) that because the AWD provides superior acceleration in the
snow they will not need them.  Well, as GRL's evidence supports, they
are just wrong.  Dead wrong.  Stupidly dead wrong.

Case in point:  It happens to be snowing like gangbusters here today.
10"+ of fresh.  The plows (being a Sunday) are not making too much
effort to get things cleared up and not too many people are heading out.
 Probably mostly due to the news reports, stirring up paranoia, etc.
Well I needed to get to the pharmacy, so passing up the AWD SUV (It is
my boat hauling machine) equipped with all-season tires and I jumped
into my E36 325i with the Michelin Arctic Alpins mounted.  Needless to
say it went through the snow with NO problem whatsoever and I got the
required meds.  And yes, I feel much better now ;-)

Of course, on the way I passed some fool in the ditch on the side of the
road being assisted by the local cops and winched out by a tow truck.
Oh yeah... it was one of those cute 4WD mini-SUVs.  Want to guess what
kind of tires it had on it?

So that is the point that GRL is making, and the same one I have made
numerous times before.  A RWD BMW with Snow tires is better than ANY
other vehicle (FWD, AWD, 4WD, or obviously RWD) with "all-season" tires
on it.

Signature

-Fred W

R. Mark Clayton - 12 Feb 2006 21:52 GMT
> Mark, Mark, Mark...  we've been through this before.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> equipped with *real* winter tires?  Where I live (Northern New England)
> people with 4WD or AWD just fit them with all-season tires year round.

I live in England UK, and fortuitously it snows not a lot.

> Case in point:  It happens to be snowing like gangbusters here today. 10"+
> of fresh.

1963 when I lived in Scotland we had maybe -25C & 15cm snow ... worst winter
in my lifetime (in UK), but OTOH no 4WD BMW's then.

Maybe us Brits should duck out of discussions of winter driving in the
colonies...
Fred W - 12 Feb 2006 23:49 GMT
>>Mark, Mark, Mark...  we've been through this before.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Maybe us Brits should duck out of discussions of winter driving in the
> colonies...

perhaps so...  less than 6 inches is a "dusting" by our standards in the
Northeast.  OTOH, it's enough to cripple some of our more southern
cities (where incidentally they do not believe in winter tires)

Signature

-Fred W

E28 Guy© - 14 Feb 2006 16:57 GMT
> Maybe us Brits should duck out of discussions of winter driving in the
> colonies...

After that 'rare' remark about new fresh snow a couple messages back, I
was thinking the same thing.  Glad you caught yourself.  I've been in
that 'rare' stuff more times than I can remember.  And the others are
right.  It's just like gravel.  You'll stop (slightly) shorter when you
can pile up a little wedge of the stuff in front of the wheels.  ABS
just lets you roll on.  As for steering, there's not enough traction to
steer in that stuff anyway.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 13 Feb 2006 01:23 GMT
> A RWD BMW with Snow tires is better than ANY
> other vehicle (FWD, AWD, 4WD, or obviously RWD) with "all-season" tires
> on it.

And a FWD car with snow tires is better than a RWD with snows, and an
AWD or 4wd with snows is better still.
Fred W - 13 Feb 2006 12:35 GMT
>>A RWD BMW with Snow tires is better than ANY
>>other vehicle (FWD, AWD, 4WD, or obviously RWD) with "all-season" tires
>>on it.
>
> And a FWD car with snow tires is better than a RWD with snows, and an
> AWD or 4wd with snows is better still.

I can not agree with your first assertion.  Contrary to popular modern
thought, FWD is not inherently better than RWD in the snow.  It depends
on the individual vehicle to a great extent.  There are advantages and
disadvantages to each configuration in the snow and it generally comes
down to whatever the driver is most comfortable with.  Many less skilled
drivers prefer FWD over RWD because they are uncomfortable when (not if)
the rear end breaks lose in a corner.  But that very capability can be
useful in some situations.

Yes, a 4WD or AWD vehicle *with* winter tires would be the best set-up.

Signature

-Fred W

sunderland - 14 Feb 2006 20:07 GMT
> All things being equal 4WD will be better than FWD will be better than RWD

On acceleration only. For turning and stopping, they are all equal.

4WD does tend to make people overdrive their ability to stop.

> if you do have a RWD BMW get one with snow mode on the gearbox

Mine has "1", "2", "3", "4", and "5". What is this "snow mode" of which
you speak?
Mike G - 16 Feb 2006 10:19 GMT
> > All things being equal 4WD will be better than FWD will be better than RWD
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Mine has "1", "2", "3", "4", and "5". What is this "snow mode" of which
> you speak?

Auto boxes only. Normal is economy, with  snow or sport on a separate
switch.
Mike.
Mark Klebanoff - 12 Feb 2006 22:31 GMT
> It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make
> their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires help,
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> - GRL

Well, in my admittedly limited experience with an '02 manual gearbox
IS300, when they tell you that the standard 17" performance tires
should not be used in virtually any kind of snow at all, you ought to
believe them.  I've gotten that car stuck in 4 inches of snow, with
clear road less than 3 feet away, and I couldn't even get the car to
move 3 feet until I just got out and shoveled the 3 feet of snow.  At
one point I ran 4 dedicated winter tires on it (Blizzak LM22 on 16"
rims), and using the snow settings, turning off traction control, and
working the manual gearbox, I could barely make it through 5 inches of
snow.

I finally gave up, and just kept the performance tires on the IS
year-round.  I bought a used 2-door RAV4 with a manual gearbox and
locking center differential, put 4 big-a.s snow tires on it, and only
drive it in the snow and when I need to haul dirty cargo, and maybe
once a week just to keep a charge on the battery.  I think I put
around 1,000 miles a year on that car, but it's very handy on days
like today.  I can easily bulldoze through plowed-up walls of snow
that are 3 feet high and 6 feet wide.
Pete - 12 Feb 2006 23:36 GMT
> Anyway, so here comes the March 2006 issue of Road & Track, page 71.

Is it the issue that's currently on the stands?  I looked through it but
didn't see it.  Not sure which issue it was, but it said "to be
displayed on the stands until March 21."

Pete
GLitwinski - 13 Feb 2006 01:05 GMT
If you area subscriber, you have it. Don't know if it is on the stands, yet.

>> Anyway, so here comes the March 2006 issue of Road & Track, page 71.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Pete
trwbmw - 13 Feb 2006 02:52 GMT
One thing to add and reinforce.  The driver is the key factor that
makes or brakes that 30% advantage.  Case in point when I was a teenage
need for speed type I had a sweet '82 Trans-Am that I thought snow
tires would help on.  On Super Bowl Sunday 1996 I got it stuck 6 times
the same day!!!   After that I would tell people my Trans-Am would get
stuck on an ice-cube.  Of course years later when I got older I
realized you don't have to slam the gas and redline during every
takeoff in the snow.  So no matter how good you think tires are and you
may think tires are the reason person X with Y tires and X wheel drive
is stuck, their is a very good chance driving skill has a lot to do
with it.  Doh!
Fred W - 13 Feb 2006 12:39 GMT
> One thing to add and reinforce.  The driver is the key factor that
> makes or brakes that 30% advantage.  Case in point when I was a teenage
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> is stuck, their is a very good chance driving skill has a lot to do
> with it.  Doh!

True.  And another point to consider is that modern winter tires are a
completely different animal from the "snow" tires of days gone by (in a
better way).  The rubber compounds have come a long way in recent years
and modern tires utilize advanced siping to gain traction in ice that
were not around back "in the day".

Signature

-Fred W

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.