Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

03 530i opinions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kmy@hiwaay.net - 07 Mar 2006 20:07 GMT
Any thoughts on a 2003 530i, 93k miles for 19k. It has a good service
history all at a dealer. Are there any hidden/upcoming things to worry
about?
bfd - 07 Mar 2006 20:49 GMT
93K miles is alot of miles. You should review the service history. For
example, when were the fluids changed, i.e., transmission/differential,
brake and coolant? Where these done on a regular basis? Further, BMW
uses plastic in its cooling system. Look to see if the plastic parts
like radiator, coolant reservoir, and maybe thermostat housing were
replaced?

The key with any used car is how close to knew does it look and whether
its service properly. If the "service history" is complete, and more
importantly, has been well-maintained, you should have a nice car.
John Carrier - 08 Mar 2006 19:59 GMT
Good post.

Sweet car, but at a maximum of 3 1/2 years old, thems serious miles.

Auto trans?  If it hasn't been serviced its likely to give trouble in the
120-150K range.  BMW says 100K.  Should be at least every 50K.

Fluids.  Brakes and cooling every two years.  Diff, P/S, and Man trans every
30K or service interval.  Oil at least twice as often as oil service
interval (if you plan to keep it for another 100K).

Double vanos can develop problems with seals over time.  Is the cold idle
smooth?

Insure coils have been replaced IAW BMW service bulletin.

Non-reliability issues.

Pixels in OBC display on inst cluster OK?

Leather holding up well?

O2 sensors and plugs will require replacement at 100K (if not already done)
... sensors are expensive.

Tire wear.  Rears have some negative camber and a little increased inside
wear is acceptable.  Fronts should be even.  Strange tire wear indicates
alignment issues.

Brakes.  Highly dependent on driving style of previous owner, but the parts
alone will run about $600 for rotors and pads + labor.

I personally think the E39 six is the definitive BMW.  Adequate power,
excellent handling and superb balance.  AAANNNDDD, its not Banglicized.

R / John

> 93K miles is alot of miles. You should review the service history. For
> example, when were the fluids changed, i.e., transmission/differential,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> its service properly. If the "service history" is complete, and more
> importantly, has been well-maintained, you should have a nice car.
Fred W - 09 Mar 2006 13:40 GMT
> Good post.
>
> Sweet car, but at a maximum of 3 1/2 years old, thems serious miles.
>
> Auto trans?  If it hasn't been serviced its likely to give trouble in the
> 120-150K range.  BMW says 100K.  Should be at least every 50K.

I'd agree except that highway miles tend not to bother an automatic
transmission nearly as much as stop-and-go miles for obvious reasons.
Not sure about the service interval on an '03 transmission, but 100k
sounds about right considering the prior use.

Signature

-Fred W

John Carrier - 09 Mar 2006 15:48 GMT
>> Good post.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> sure about the service interval on an '03 transmission, but 100k sounds
> about right considering the prior use.

Sometime in 2002 BMW decided "lifetime fill" wouldn't work and went with the
100K service.  I still think 30-50K is more reasonable, but the OEM fluid IS
expensive.

R / John
Fred W - 08 Mar 2006 13:05 GMT
> Any thoughts on a 2003 530i, 93k miles for 19k. It has a good service
> history all at a dealer. Are there any hidden/upcoming things to worry
> about?

The car has had a lot of miles put on in 3 years which most likely means
all highway.  Those are the good kind of miles.  If you have a full
service history you can see that everything has been done per
requirements.  There will be nothing unusual required other than the
normal wear and tear items, which should be minimal considering the type
of mileage it has had.

That price is a steal.  Snap it up.
Signature

-Fred W

mdd - 10 Mar 2006 07:02 GMT
I just completed a 2 month search for a 2003 530i.  A few thoughts for you.
1.  The price is VERY good .... BUT
2.  My previous car, a 540i, 1997, was totalled.  I bought it in 2000 with
96k miles on it.  Totalled with 165k miles on it 5 years later.  During that
5 years, i put in 2 radiators, a water pump, various bearings and seals, etc
etc. Probably a dozen major ($300-1000) parts.   frankly, I would NEVER buy
a BMW with that high mileage. Been there, hated that.
3.  I wound up buying a 2003 530i with 28k miles.  And over 3 years/and 70k
left on the warranty.  But it cost me $30k and I thought I got a good price.
4.  BMWs are fun to drive...feel good cars.  This is my third and I love
them.  But I am not convinced they are built that well or that BMW has put
sufficient thought into parts that last....c'mon, plastic flanges on the
Radiator???  So get one with a warranty and some peace of mind.
5.  The cupholders suck. Had to say that as I face that issue every day. Why
hasnt someone thought of replacing the SAME cupholders with ones made of
metal that don't crack at the drop of a hat.  Put $210 worth of cupholders
in my 540i.
6.  So, you will be paying $11k less than I did for 65k more miles (average
yearly driving is supposed to be 15k miles, so you are getting 4.33 years
more wear on your car.  And that is the point...my 540 with 96k miles had
lots of signs of wear on the interior, exterior and engine...you can't drive
an extra 65,000 miles without lots of things happening...spills, sharp
objects, road chips, etc etc.  $19k is a great price, but is it worth it?
How many days/weeks will the car be in the shop because it started with 93k
miles?  And the 3-4 times you break down with a broken radiator or water
pump or seal or ? over the next few years and are stranded or towed, ...what
is the cost of that?
7.  Finally, I did learn that it becomes VERY hard to sell a car with high
mileage.  As I watched cars go for sale online and at a few dealerships, the
old ones didnt move...partially because there were plenty of 530i's to go
around.  People didnt need to buy ones with damage or high mileage as they
could find them with 35 or 40k miles on them.  Or, as I did (twice shy),
Certified Pre-Owned...have put 2k miles on the new one...love it.  feels
like a brand new car.

Good luck and best wishes,  m.
> Any thoughts on a 2003 530i, 93k miles for 19k. It has a good service
> history all at a dealer. Are there any hidden/upcoming things to worry
> about?
bfd - 10 Mar 2006 15:38 GMT
> I just completed a 2 month search for a 2003 530i.  A few thoughts for you.
> 1.  The price is VERY good .... BUT
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Certified Pre-Owned...have put 2k miles on the new one...love it.  feels
> like a brand new car.

The 2001-03 E39 530i, especially with 5 speed manual and sport suspension is
a very desirable car. I agree that one BIG problem is BMW cooling system,
due mainly to the use of plastic parts. If you have one of these cars, its
best to do a cooling overhaul every 60,000-80,000 miles by changing out the
water pump (get one with metal propeller), radiator (if you willing to spend
the $$$, I believe there are aluminum rad available for that car), coolant
reservoir (more plastic) and thermostat. Also, don't forget to use BMW
coolant (or a cheaper alternative is Saab - both use Valvoline Zerex G-48 in
the US). Good Luck!
Dave Plowman (News) - 10 Mar 2006 17:16 GMT
> The 2001-03 E39 530i, especially with 5 speed manual and sport
> suspension is a very desirable car. I agree that one BIG problem is BMW
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> alternative is Saab - both use Valvoline Zerex G-48 in the US). Good
> Luck!

Don't think radiator problems are so common with six cylinder E39s as with
V-8s. Think the water pump on these doesn't have a plastic impeller.

Signature

*If you remember the '60s, you weren't really there

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

bfd - 10 Mar 2006 17:38 GMT
> > The 2001-03 E39 530i, especially with 5 speed manual and sport
> > suspension is a very desirable car. I agree that one BIG problem is BMW
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Don't think radiator problems are so common with six cylinder E39s as with
> V-8s. Think the water pump on these doesn't have a plastic impeller.

I disagree, ALL BMWs from 1990 or maybe even earlier, have plastic
radiators. IF the OP has experience with plastic necks breaking, its highly
recommended that it should be replaced every 60,000-80,000 miles.

As for the water pump, you may be right. Still, its always good to make sure
that any replacement has a metal impeller.
John Carrier - 10 Mar 2006 19:04 GMT
>> > The 2001-03 E39 530i, especially with 5 speed manual and sport
>> > suspension is a very desirable car. I agree that one BIG problem is BMW
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> sure
> that any replacement has a metal impeller.

Evidently, the M54 engine uses a pump with a metal impeller.  Just transfers
the problems to other issues IMO.  Theres a high capacity pump being
marketed for E46 with the M54 but for some reason, the 530i isn't listed as
being one of the cars it will fit (?!?).

The six puts notably less stress on the cooling system than the V-8 and is
less likely to experience early radiator demise.  But "less likely" is not
absolute.  Good PM would indicate Thermostat (damn plastic housing), Water
Pump and Radiator be replaced in the 60-80K range as stated.  Not too
expensive, but something you wouldn't even think about with an Accord  or
Camry.  An all-aluminm radio is available from Zion Autosport for about 3
x's the OEM plastic not-so-fantastic.  If you intend to own the vehicle for
a very long time, it might make a worthwhile investment.

Cupholders, limited interior storage space, smallish trunk and a rather
tight back seat are all things you learn to live with while enjoying the
E39's many sterling qualities.

The 2001-03 530i 5-speed SP is real treasure.  Only wish it had the 6sp
overdrive trans and a slightly shorter rear end to improve performance
slightly and cut high speed cruising revs.

R / John
bfd - 13 Mar 2006 19:21 GMT
<Evidently, the M54 engine uses a pump with a metal impeller.>

That's good to know!

<Theres a high capacity pump being marketed for E46 with the M54 but
for some reason, the 530i isn't listed as being one of the cars it will
fit (?!?). >

Are you talking about the Stewart water pumps? If so, it appears to
only be available for the m50/s50 engines:

http://www.stewartcomponents.net/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category_Cod
e=BMWHPWP


<The six puts notably less stress on the cooling system than the V-8
and is
less likely to experience early radiator demise.  But "less likely" is
not
absolute.  Good PM would indicate Thermostat (damn plastic housing),
Water
Pump and Radiator be replaced in the 60-80K range as stated.>

Yes, forgot about the "plastic themostat housing," get one of the metal
replacements!

<An all-aluminm radio is available from Zion Autosport for about 3
x's the OEM plastic not-so-fantastic.  If you intend to own the vehicle
for
a very long time, it might make a worthwhile investment. >

Agree, too bad the all-aluminum radiator is so expensive! If you're
like me and keep cars forever (I've owned my 16 year old 90 E34 535i, 5
speed, 105K miles for almost 11 years!), it might be a consideration.
Too bad, one isn't available for my car.

<The 2001-03 530i 5-speed SP is real treasure.  Only wish it had the
6sp
overdrive trans and a slightly shorter rear end to improve performance
slightly and cut high speed cruising revs.>

Agree, with its rack & pinion steering, not available on the E39 540i
V8, its definitely the one to get!
John Carrier - 14 Mar 2006 13:57 GMT
> <Evidently, the M54 engine uses a pump with a metal impeller.>
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Are you talking about the Stewart water pumps? If so, it appears to
> only be available for the m50/s50 engines:

Don't know who makes it, but its listed as compatible with all 330i M54
engines.  With detail differences, that's the same motor.

R / John
bfd - 14 Mar 2006 20:38 GMT
According to the Stewart's website, the E46 1999-2005 330i is included
as one of the cars its "high performance" waterpump will fit into:

"E46 chassis 1999-2005 320,323,325,328 &330 - [3 series] "
kmy@hiwaay.net - 13 Mar 2006 20:34 GMT
Thanks to everyone that replied, the wife didn't like the high miles so we
ended up with an 03 525 with 61k miles for 22,500. The 530 was definately
more fun and cheaper, but this being her car she had the final say so.
Fred W - 14 Mar 2006 03:04 GMT
> Thanks to everyone that replied, the wife didn't like the high miles so we
> ended up with an 03 525 with 61k miles for 22,500. The 530 was definately
> more fun and cheaper, but this being her car she had the final say so.

wimp.  ;-0

Signature

-Fred W

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.