 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 20061992 318i, rack&pinion need replacing according to inspection, but...
Hi folks, I'm the proud new owner of a 1992 318i (standard 5speed, 140,000 km) convertible. The inspection went well, and I bought the car. The points: - rack & pinion needs replacing - minor brake fluid leak (I have a bunch of spare fluid in the trunk) - muffler will have a hole in 2 months - timing belt is li I've only done a few drives (<10km), but I'd like to go up to a cottage this weekend (about 3.5hrs). The car drives beautifully, the handbrake doesn't work very well but I'm not sure what that's about. My question is; what are the odds it will fail on this drive? I realize this is a hard question to answer, sight unseen, but any advice would be appreciated. It's going to be a beautiful day and drive, but I'd hate to end up on the side of the road. Thanks, Simon. re: the timing belt (got cut off) - timing belt is due for replacement, but no outward signs of trouble yet > re: the timing belt (got cut off) > - timing belt is due for replacement, but no outward signs of trouble > yet If it has a belt they can fail without warning and effectively wreck the engine. Round about this time BMW changed back to chains. As regards the rack, is it play or leaks? If play it's usually the track rod inner ball joint and that assembly can be replaced without removal of the rack.  Signature*That's it! I‘m calling grandma! Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. > re: the timing belt (got cut off) > > - timing belt is due for replacement, but no outward signs of trouble > yet There never are signs. Until it breaks and you then need a complete head rebuilding (at least) $$$$. If I knew a car was due for a timing belt I would not even start it until that was accomplished. But, more importantly, are you sure that engine has a timing belt? You should have an M42 engine which has a chain, not a belt. Signature-Fred W I'm not certain, http://tinyurl.com/rxloq indicates it has a chain. http://tinyurl.com/pot8c is inconclusive. I'll take a look at the manual tomorrow, perhaps it will say? I should point out that I have the 4 cylinder engine, I know that from memory. Thanks for the help guys. > I'm not certain, http://tinyurl.com/rxloq indicates it has a chain. > http://tinyurl.com/pot8c is inconclusive. I'll take a look at the > manual tomorrow, perhaps it will say? give me the last 7 digits of your VIN number and I can look it up and tell you which engine you have for sure. Signature-Fred W >> I'm not certain, http://tinyurl.com/rxloq indicates it has a chain. >> http://tinyurl.com/pot8c is inconclusive. I'll take a look at the >> manual tomorrow, perhaps it will say? > > give me the last 7 digits of your VIN number and I can look it up and > tell you which engine you have for sure. Better yet... You can look it up yourself here: http://www.realoem.com/bmw/select.do By the way, it appears that all model year 92 318's which were the E36 body style had the M42 engine with chain. The earlier E30 bodied cars had M40 engines with a belt. The link above will show you exactly. Signature-Fred W I'll get the VIN and double-check tonight. I'm almost positive it's an E30 1992 cabrio. The confusion I think comes from the fact that they continued to manufacture E30 cabrio's in 1992-1993, the time frame during which they'd changed to E36 for the hard-tops. I'll find out for sure tonight. Simon. > >> I'm not certain, http://tinyurl.com/rxloq indicates it has a chain. > >> http://tinyurl.com/pot8c is inconclusive. I'll take a look at the [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > body style had the M42 engine with chain. The earlier E30 bodied cars > had M40 engines with a belt. The link above will show you exactly. Aha, even more confusion lol. According to the realoem.com link above, European 1992 318i Cabrios had the M40, and USA 1992 318i Cabrios had the M42. Maybe I'll skip work and go check now :) Ok, just checked, it's an E30 with an M42. Yay! Also checked the manual, the fluid that the previous owner had been topping up all the time was actually Power Steering fluid (with ATF). That's probably related to the rack&pinion problem the inspector found? Simon. Simon, With that being the case, (M42 with no timing belt) and the steering rack leaking I would not be concerned about a 3 to 5 hour trip. These cars run a long time and as long as you have oil you can top up the power steering fluid. Nothing in there should break catastrophically. I have been running on a leaking rack for over a year and while the drips are annoying it will just have to wait until I have time to rebuild it... Cheers, Bob > Ok, just checked, it's an E30 with an M42. Yay! Also checked the > manual, the fluid that the previous owner had been topping up all the > time was actually Power Steering fluid (with ATF). That's probably > related to the rack&pinion problem the inspector found? > > Simon. > Ok, just checked, it's an E30 with an M42. Yay! Also checked the > manual, the fluid that the previous owner had been topping up all the > time was actually Power Steering fluid (with ATF). That's probably > related to the rack&pinion problem the inspector found? > > Simon. OK, that is good news. I did not know they made E30s fitted with M42s. So now you know why the timing belt was not changed. But it makes me a bit skeptical about your mechanic recommending a belt change, eh? Signature-Fred W It wasn't the mechanic, it was my friend heh. The mechanic made the mistake, but he corrected himself halfway through his inspection. Got me a little worried for a few minutes hehe. Going to get the rack fixed on Friday, plus misc stuff (coolant flush, since we don't know whether the coolant head gasket was ever replaced etc). Still a great car to drive, I just can't wait until I have to worry less about it =) > I'll get the VIN and double-check tonight. I'm almost positive it's an > E30 1992 cabrio. The confusion I think comes from the fact that they [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Simon. Ah, yes indeed, you are correct. You did not mention that your car was a cabrio, which means it was an E30 and does have the M40 engine complete with timing belt. So, change it. Soon. Now. Before it breaks... Changing it afterward will not be a happy experience. Signature-Fred W >> re: the timing belt (got cut off) >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > But, more importantly, are you sure that engine has a timing belt? You > should have an M42 engine which has a chain, not a belt. According to the info I have, the 3 series 1.8 up to '93 was fitted with the M40 B18 engine which has a timing belt. Mike. 1992 318i is fortunate enough to not have a timing belt. > re: the timing belt (got cut off) > > - timing belt is due for replacement, but no outward signs of trouble > yet |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.