Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NEW Brake Rotors on BMW...ALWAYS???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kevin.lavery - 28 Apr 2006 08:20 GMT
I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that i
have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.  Basically, I'm
told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace the rotors.  What's
so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a disc brake is a disc
brake.  Other cars don't have this requirement.....
Dave Plowman (News) - 28 Apr 2006 15:23 GMT
> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i
> that i have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.
> Basically, I'm told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace
> the rotors.  What's so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a
> disc brake is a disc brake.  Other cars don't have this
> requirement.....

They generally last for *two* sets of pads. But the minimum thickness is
stamped on the hub. Measure with a micrometer to see how much left.

Find a new mechanic who doesn't just waste your money.

Signature

*If you don't pay your exorcist you get repossessed.*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Franz Fripplfrappl - 28 Apr 2006 15:49 GMT
> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that i
> have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.  Basically, I'm
> told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace the rotors.  What's
> so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a disc brake is a disc
> brake.  Other cars don't have this requirement.....

With the sage advice of posters to this newsgroup, I recently replaced the
pads and rotors on a friend's '98 E328i sedan with 90,000 miles.  From her
records, it appears this was the second set of pads.  Rotors were grooved
and brakes were becoming noisy.  Rotors and pads are now new and braking
is quiet.  Soon the pads will have seated themselves and all will be like
normal.

If a part is worn or acting up, replace it.  Our cost for doing all 4 sets
of pads/rotors was 20% less than what the mechanic was going to charge to
do only the front ones.

The job is simple enough just about anyone can do it.  Find some sunshine
and give yourself a few hours and it's done.

Nothing like a car that works well.
Jack - 28 Apr 2006 16:19 GMT
I call this the "Bill Gates Syndrome".  Your mechanics don't see any reason
why they shouldn't be rich too and you have been selected to help them in
their endevor.

> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that
> i have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.  Basically,
> I'm told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace the rotors.
> What's so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a disc brake is a
> disc brake.  Other cars don't have this requirement.....
Doug Vetter - 29 Apr 2006 14:42 GMT
> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that i
> have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.  Basically, I'm
> told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace the rotors.  What's
> so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a disc brake is a disc
> brake.  Other cars don't have this requirement.....

Kevin,

I've gone through several sets of brakes with my 328.  Generally what
happens is the pads wear down to nothing and the rotors are at or near
minimum thickness at that point.  If the rotors are above the minimum
specs you CAN replace the pads only but it's a fool's errand to do so,
because the rotors will be below minimum thickness for a majority of the
lifespan of the new pads.

While you're certainly entitiled to operate the brakes in that way,
don't be surprised when they warp.  And then don't be surprised when all
that shimmying in the front end causes damage to the seals in your
steering rack and you have to replace that for nearly $1000US.  (Same
warning goes for tires -- if your front-end is shimmying fix it
immediately!)

BMW pads and rotors are designed (properly, I might add) to wear roughly
equally, so that the proper way to do brakes is to replace both
components at the same time.  And contrary to the advice given elsewhere
in this thread, the way to make your mechanic rich is to be a cheapskate
and only do the pads....because the car will be back on the lift in
10-15K miles to fix the rotors and you'll pay twice for the labor to
disassemble the brakes.

See the BMW section on my site for more.

-Doug

--------------------
Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI
dwvcfii@yahoo.com
http://www.dvatp.com
--------------------
Dave Plowman (News) - 29 Apr 2006 15:11 GMT
> BMW pads and rotors are designed (properly, I might add) to wear roughly
> equally, so that the proper way to do brakes is to replace both
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 10-15K miles to fix the rotors and you'll pay twice for the labor to
> disassemble the brakes.

That may be your experience - it's not mine. With normal use two sets of
pads before discs need replacement. If you're wearing them out equally,
perhaps you need to modify your road driving.

Signature

*Some days you're the dog, some days the hydrant.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Doug Vetter - 30 Apr 2006 13:21 GMT
> That may be your experience - it's not mine. With normal use two sets of
> pads before discs need replacement.

Two sets of pads on the same rotor?  Are we talking about OEM parts
here?  Have you bothered to use a tool to measure the rotors or do you
just say "they look good enough"?  My rotors have been within 10% of
limits each time.  In fact, the last time I did the fronts the rotors
were below spec.

> If you're wearing them out equally, perhaps you need to modify your
> road driving.

The physical characteristics of the parts and the rate at which the
materials wear in relation to each other is a matter of composition,
which is set during manufacturing.  Short of subjecting pads and rotors
designed for street operation to track conditions, there is no driving
techique that will change that relationship.

For what it's worth, it takes about 5-6 sets of pads to wear down the
rotors on my airplane to minimum specs, so I don't replace rotors on it
or my cars as a reflex.  The rotors get replaced when they go below
specs -- simple as that.  And while it's certainly possible to run
rotors below specs, it's not wise.

-Doug

--------------------
Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI
dwvcfii@yahoo.com
http://www.dvatp.com
--------------------
Dave Plowman (News) - 30 Apr 2006 13:59 GMT
> > That may be your experience - it's not mine. With normal use two sets
> > of pads before discs need replacement.

> Two sets of pads on the same rotor?

To the same disc, yes.

> Are we talking about OEM parts here?

Usually, since I never buy cars new. And certainly don't pay main dealer
prices for things like pads and discs. But do buy OEM.

> Have you bothered to use a tool to measure the rotors or do you
> just say "they look good enough"?

If you read my previous posts in this thread there'd be no need to ask
such a stupid question.

>  My rotors have been within 10% of limits each time.  In fact, the last
> time I did the fronts the rotors were below spec.

Then I'd suggest you are not a normal driver. And find it strange that BMW
make a car whose brakes become unsafe before any warning is given. I'd
suggest you take it up with them.

Signature

*I have my own little world - but it's OK...they know me here*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Doug Vetter - 01 May 2006 13:23 GMT
> If you read my previous posts in this thread there'd be no need to ask
> such a stupid question.

You're right -- I apologize.  However, you needn't be nasty -- I was
merely asking a question to help clarify your statements.

> Then I'd suggest you are not a normal driver. And find it strange that BMW
> make a car whose brakes become unsafe before any warning is given. I'd
> suggest you take it up with them.

Unless I learned nothing in physics class, nothing I do as a driver has
anything to do with how much the rotor wears in relation to the pads.
For that reason, I can't see why you and I would have such different
wear rates -- which explains why I responded to you in the first place.
 But just to frame my response I'll say that I am no Andretti -- I
drive "spirited" at times, but never abuse my brakes.  In fact, I drive
a lot of highway miles so I get 30K out of my front brakes and around
60K out of the rear set.  From what I've heard, this is quite typical.

As for the warning, I never said that the brake wear indicator had
tripped, and even if it did, it would only warn if the pads were worn to
minimum limits -- not the rotor.  That said, my rotors have been within
10% of minimum specs even when the pads have been above minimum specs.
This would indicate my rotors wear at nearly the same rate (possibly
faster) as the pads.  I'm not stating anything other than my observation.

And as for your comment in your other message regarding the fact that I
have most of my work (including brakes) done by others, I don't see how
that has anything to do with the price of tea in China.  When I was
young and had more time than money, I did all my own work.  Now that my
time is limited, it pays for me to pay others to do my work.  And
speaking of my mechanic, he's worked on BMWs for 30 years and has more
knowledge, training, and experence than 99% of the people in this group
I'm sure.  Needless to say, he knows how to use a micrometer.

-Doug

--------------------
Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI
dwvcfii@yahoo.com
http://www.dvatp.com
--------------------
Dave Plowman (News) - 01 May 2006 13:56 GMT
> > If you read my previous posts in this thread there'd be no need to ask
> > such a stupid question.

> You're right -- I apologize.  However, you needn't be nasty -- I was
> merely asking a question to help clarify your statements.

Think your comment about me not knowing how to measure a disc was equally
as rude. So I tend to respond like for like.

> > Then I'd suggest you are not a normal driver. And find it strange that
> > BMW make a car whose brakes become unsafe before any warning is given.
> > I'd suggest you take it up with them.

> Unless I learned nothing in physics class, nothing I do as a driver has
> anything to do with how much the rotor wears in relation to the pads.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> a lot of highway miles so I get 30K out of my front brakes and around
> 60K out of the rear set.  From what I've heard, this is quite typical.

It is fairly typical. As is discs lasting for two sets of pads. ;-)

> As for the warning, I never said that the brake wear indicator had
> tripped, and even if it did, it would only warn if the pads were worn to
> minimum limits -- not the rotor.  That said, my rotors have been within
> 10% of minimum specs even when the pads have been above minimum specs.
> This would indicate my rotors wear at nearly the same rate (possibly
> faster) as the pads.  I'm not stating anything other than my observation.

> And as for your comment in your other message regarding the fact that I
> have most of my work (including brakes) done by others, I don't see how
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> knowledge, training, and experence than 99% of the people in this group
> I'm sure.  Needless to say, he knows how to use a micrometer.

Unless you do the measurements yourself and know how to use that data,
you're relying on a third party who may well have a vested interest to
replace things. As happens at most dealers.

> -Doug

Signature

*A nest isn't empty until all their stuff is out of the attic

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Psycho - 01 May 2006 23:01 GMT
 I love watching a good pissing match...

>> > If you read my previous posts in this thread there'd be no need to ask
>> > such a stupid question.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Think your comment about me not knowing how to measure a disc was equally
>as rude. So I tend to respond like for like.

 He didn't ask if you knew how, he asked if you actually did it. I
know plenty of people that look at a rotor to decide whether or not to
replace it.

>> > Then I'd suggest you are not a normal driver. And find it strange that
>> > BMW make a car whose brakes become unsafe before any warning is given.
>> > I'd suggest you take it up with them.

 Not sure what car you think has a light to say !!! Your rotors are
too thin !!! but I've never seen it. You do get a warning, the light
comes on to tell you the pads are worn out. That's all the warning you
should need. I hear cars go by all the time where the squealers are
making all kind of racket and they're still just driving down the
road. I've actually heard people walk into a tire/brake place and say
that their brakes are making a grinding noise and they're not sure if
it's normal. The best one I've ever seen was on a corvette, the
caliper piston was actually partially ground away from contact with
the rotor. You just can't fix stupid....

>> Unless I learned nothing in physics class, nothing I do as a driver has
>> anything to do with how much the rotor wears in relation to the pads.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>It is fairly typical. As is discs lasting for two sets of pads. ;-)

 Hard braking will affect pad life and rotor life pretty much in an
even relationship.

>> As for the warning, I never said that the brake wear indicator had
>> tripped, and even if it did, it would only warn if the pads were worn to
>> minimum limits -- not the rotor.  That said, my rotors have been within
>> 10% of minimum specs even when the pads have been above minimum specs.
>> This would indicate my rotors wear at nearly the same rate (possibly
>> faster) as the pads.  I'm not stating anything other than my observation.

 A rotor that is close to the minimum spec is also a warning that
things may not be well for long. For the price of rotors, why risk it?
I realize that most BMWs seem to get 2 sets of pads to a rotor but
I'll bet the rotor is well under the minimum thickness by the end of
the second set.

>> And as for your comment in your other message regarding the fact that I
>> have most of my work (including brakes) done by others, I don't see how
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>> -Doug

 
Doug Vetter - 02 May 2006 01:51 GMT
> Unless you do the measurements yourself and know how to use that data,
> you're relying on a third party who may well have a vested interest to
> replace things. As happens at most dealers.

While I agree in principle (most dealers are thieves), my technician has
proven to be the most open and honest guy in the business.  He's saved
me thousands of dollars in repairs, and I'm not the only one who's
noticed.  Just had lunch this weekend with a fellow BMW enthusiast and
he volunteered the same observation.  In his case, the technician
informed him he had a bad MAF sensor.  Instead of charging labor for
installation he showed him how to do it himself and told him what part
to order at the parts desk.  Even reminded him about the 20% CCA parts
discount.  Doesn't get more honest than that.  And that's why I keep
going back to him.

As for the rotor specs, my technician did give me the raw data on the
discs for the first couple of brake jobs but I don't recall the numbers.
 I remember thinking that was kind of neat, since no one (dealer or
indy) ever did that for me on any of my other cars.  And then I realized
it was just his personal operating procedure when he would give me
printouts from the BMW diagnostic computer when I had various faults and
the alignment and roadforce balancing specs when I had new tires
installed.  You can see some of this data on my website.

If there's any downside to my dealer right now it's that the family that
owned it has decided to sell the franchise because BMW corporate told
them they had to build a $12M building and go "high volume".  And this
only after BMW agreed to leave them alone if they did the $3M renovation
 they did four years ago.  The family unceremoniously told BMW to go
"F" themselves.  A local dealership conglomerate has purchased the
franchise (pending the closing of course) and I'm afraid things are
about to change for the worse.  Sad to say, but the plague affecting
BMW's recent designs has reached the very top of the organization and
its business practices.  Guess my next car will be a Porsche.

-Doug

--------------------
Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI
dwvcfii@yahoo.com
http://www.dvatp.com
--------------------
Dave Plowman (News) - 02 May 2006 09:59 GMT
> > Unless you do the measurements yourself and know how to use that data,
> > you're relying on a third party who may well have a vested interest to
> > replace things. As happens at most dealers.

> While I agree in principle (most dealers are thieves), my technician has
> proven to be the most open and honest guy in the business.

[snip]

My comment wasn't meant to refer to your guy but was general. Sorry to
imply it did.

Signature

*If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) - 30 Apr 2006 14:07 GMT
>  My rotors have been within 10% of limits each time.  In fact, the last
> time I did the fronts the rotors were below spec.

A quick glance at your website shows you appear to get everything done to
your cars by your 'mechanic'.

I DIY things like brakes.

Signature

*Whatever kind of look you were going for, you missed.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Jack - 01 May 2006 02:36 GMT
Nice website Doug.

>> That may be your experience - it's not mine. With normal use two sets of
>> pads before discs need replacement.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> http://www.dvatp.com
> --------------------
Jack - 30 Apr 2006 02:26 GMT
PoppyCock!!

>> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that
>> i have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> http://www.dvatp.com
> --------------------
Jeff Strickland - 29 Apr 2006 20:50 GMT
No, not always, but usually. It is not uncommon to need rotors with every
brake change for spirited drivers, but the more sedate among us can get the
rotors to last through 2 sets of pads.

> I've had two mechanics tell me that when i do a brake job on my 530i that
> i have to replace my rotors......whether they are worn or not.  Basically,
> I'm told that if you replace the pads, you have to replace the rotors.
> What's so special about BMW brakes?  A car is a car and a disc brake is a
> disc brake.  Other cars don't have this requirement.....
floresrikitic@hotmail.com - 01 May 2006 20:37 GMT
> No, not always, but usually. It is not uncommon to need rotors with every
> brake change for spirited drivers, but the more sedate among us can get the
> rotors to last through 2 sets of pads.

Mine "lasted" through two sets of pads, but were pretty warped near the
end.  I'll never own another beamer, but since I keep cars for eons,
I'll prob. be driving this one for years to come.  However, I'm getting
to know it (and how to repair it) pretty well.

--
F
Jeff Strickland - 03 May 2006 01:16 GMT
>> No, not always, but usually. It is not uncommon to need rotors with every
>> brake change for spirited drivers, but the more sedate among us can get
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'll prob. be driving this one for years to come.  However, I'm getting
> to know it (and how to repair it) pretty well.

My BMW experience(s) has(have) been the best automotive purchase(s) I've
ever made. I'm thrilled with the service requirements, and the relative ease
of services that I can do at home. I'm not able to adjust valve lash or
rebuild heads, that sort of thing, but the brakes are by far the easiest
brakes to service of any automobile I've owned. They come apart easily and
go back together again. The parking brake is the only weak link, and its
adjustment procedure is my only gripe -- they could have made the mechanism
differently and the adjustment would be much easier as a result. Oil changes
and tune ups are a breeze. The coolant system is a bit tight, but otherwise
well designed and easy to service.

Yep, I could sell BMWs -- I like them so much.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.