Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

what tranny and diff fluid should I use in my 330xi?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SharkmanBMW - 08 May 2006 00:30 GMT
I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
want to service these asap.

What fluids are best for this car?
BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?
Floyd Rogers - 08 May 2006 01:28 GMT
>I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
>want to service these asap.
> What fluids are best for this car?

Well, *MY* 330xi has Redline MTL and Redline GL5 in the transmission
and diffs.  If you have an auto tranny, I have no idea what to put in there.

> BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?

Pretty much everyone uses the OEM BMW oil (which is Castrol), or
Mobil-1 (which is about $5 a quart at Costco - you need 8 quarts for
your 330xi.)  And GI-Joe's now carries oil filters for it.

FloydR
DCA - 08 May 2006 03:54 GMT
> I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
> want to service these asap.
>
> What fluids are best for this car?
> BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?

I have been told from an experienced mechanic that to replace the auto
transmission oil before 100K is a total waste of time and money
Fred W - 08 May 2006 13:17 GMT
>> I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime,
>> so I want to service these asap.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I have been told from an experienced mechanic that to replace the auto
> transmission oil before 100K is a total waste of time and money

That's nice.  Will he be paying for your repair bill if it does?

Signature

-Fred W

clifffreeling@yahoo.com - 08 May 2006 18:03 GMT
> >> I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime,
> >> so I want to service these asap.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> That's nice.  Will he be paying for your repair bill if it does?

I see you believe in that mythology.  I have lifetime fluid in my
auto tranny and have no intentions of ever changing it (86k miles
on it now).  I have NEVER changed transmission fluid in any car
I've owned, and I keep cars for WELL over 100k miles.  (Never
once needed a transmission repair either.)

Checking it okay; changing it, no.  Do you also believe cars need
oil changes every 3k miles?
Changing t. fluid often does more harm than good, by well meaning,
but uninformed owners.  Even my owners manual doesn't recommend it.
Manuals like Bentleys will fill paper on how to change it, and that
it needs doing regularly, it's just padding a book the way I see it.

--
Cliff
Fred W - 08 May 2006 20:17 GMT
>>>>I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime,
>>>>so I want to service these asap.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I've owned, and I keep cars for WELL over 100k miles.  (Never
> once needed a transmission repair either.)

Well of course you can drive a car over 100k miles without doing any
maintenance.  That's not the point.  Talk to me after 200k or 300k and
let me know how that lifetime tranny fluid is getting along.  Mythology
my a.s...

> Checking it okay; changing it, no.  Do you also believe cars need
> oil changes every 3k miles?

No.  5k miles is about right (depending on usage) and even longer if
using full synthetics.

> Changing t. fluid often does more harm than good, by well meaning,
> but uninformed owners.  

What you are referring to is when people change it after waiting 100k
miles and have a sudden failure.  It wasn't the fluid change that caused
the problem, it was the prior negligence.  If the fluid was changed
regularly at reasonable intervals, (say every 40-50k miles) there is
never any sudden issues.

> Even my owners manual doesn't recommend it.

Of course it doesn't.  It was written by the same manufacturer that was
trying to convince the original purchaser that their car is so reliable
that it requires hardly any regular maintenance.  Especially the portion
they are committed to pay for in their largest market.

> Manuals like Bentleys will fill paper on how to change it, and that
> it needs doing regularly, it's just padding a book the way I see it.

Ah, I see.  And what exactly are your "expert" qualifications?

But the funny thing is, I don't see anywhere in the Bentley manual that
shows how to change the fluid in a lifetime fill - sealed ZF transmission.

Signature

-Fred W

clifffreeling@yahoo.com - 08 May 2006 20:49 GMT
> Well of course you can drive a car over 100k miles without doing any
> maintenance.  That's not the point.

No it isn't, and I never made such a point.  We are talking about
transmissions
with lifetime fluid.

>Talk to me after 200k or 300k and
> let me know how that lifetime tranny fluid is getting along.

Well, I've yet to hit 200k miles with any car, but one of my
cars is pushing 180k at present.  I have *added* some t.
fluid, but never changed it....still works like a charm.  I've
had other cars in the past till well into the 100s with no
problems whatever.

> No.  5k miles is about right (depending on usage) and even longer if
> using full synthetics.

I change the oil and filter in my other car about every 4k, with LOTS
of city driving and idling, but I doubt it really needs it.  I use
Mobil 1 syn with the BMW and change it about every 8.5k,
which is usually every December, but it's probably overkill.

> What you are referring to is when people change it after waiting 100k
> miles and have a sudden failure.  It wasn't the fluid change that caused
> the problem, it was the prior negligence.  If the fluid was changed
> regularly at reasonable intervals, (say every 40-50k miles) there is
> never any sudden issues.

So you say.

> Of course it doesn't.  It was written by the same manufacturer that was
> trying to convince the original purchaser that their car is so reliable
> that it requires hardly any regular maintenance.  Especially the portion
> they are committed to pay for in their largest market.

I don't buy this, sorry.  Waste your time & money if you like.

> > Manuals like Bentleys will fill paper on how to change it, and that
> > it needs doing regularly, it's just padding a book the way I see it.
>
> Ah, I see.  And what exactly are your "expert" qualifications?

Never claimed to have expert qualifications; just years of
experience owning and maintaining cars.

> But the funny thing is, I don't see anywhere in the Bentley manual that
> shows how to change the fluid in a lifetime fill - sealed ZF transmission.

I don't know anything about it, but if it's factory sealed, even
Bentley,
Haynes or the the others wouldn't have any instructions on changing
fluid in such a tranny, for obvious reasons.

--
Cliff
SharkmanBMW - 08 May 2006 21:21 GMT
you are only supposed to change filter and replace fluid that came out on
older LIFETIME trannys.

It may last, it likely won't.

If you try flushing a lifetime tranny after 120k miles, it will possibly
leak or die from having new fluid cleaning up the gunk.

If you service it every 50k miles, it will never die or leak....

I had a 540 that was neglected, it cost me a rebuild.
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 May 2006 23:44 GMT
> Well of course you can drive a car over 100k miles without doing any
> maintenance.  That's not the point.  Talk to me after 200k or 300k and
> let me know how that lifetime tranny fluid is getting along.

Most autos will fail before that mileage regardless of fluid changes.

Signature

*When companies ship Styrofoam, what do they pack it in? *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

clifffreeling@yahoo.com - 09 May 2006 13:38 GMT
> > Well of course you can drive a car over 100k miles without doing any
> > maintenance.  That's not the point.  Talk to me after 200k or 300k and
> > let me know how that lifetime tranny fluid is getting along.
>
> Most autos will fail before that mileage regardless of fluid changes.

Yep, and lots of times they fail early due to style of driving over
time.  But this is one of those arguments that never really gets
settled.  People have deeply set beliefs about things and
are convinced the other guy is wrong--or won't admit THEY
could be wrong.

----------
"Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We,
the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."

----Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 2001

--
Cliff
Dave Plowman (News) - 09 May 2006 14:44 GMT
> Yep, and lots of times they fail early due to style of driving over
> time.  But this is one of those arguments that never really gets
> settled.  People have deeply set beliefs about things and
> are convinced the other guy is wrong--or won't admit THEY
> could be wrong.

Yes - however you can look at history as regards extending oil change
periods as oils, filtering and engine manufacturing techniques improve.
When I were a *very* young lad, they were every 1000 miles. By the time my
father got his first new car, they were 3000. But he managed to wear out
that engine to the point where it needed a re-bore and crank grind etc
before 40,000 miles - despite regular servicing. By the time I started
driving 5 or 6000 oil changes were the norm - but most cars would wear out
one or more engines in their life. My first almost new car was bought in
the early '80s and was up to 10,000 mile oil changes. Still got it and
it's somewhere around 170,000 miles on the original and still very fit
engine - although not in everyday use. My BMW does somewhat more than that
10,000 before the service indicator announces the need for an oil change.

So my *personal* experience says the makers know exactly what they're
doing with oil and fluid change intervals. More so than anyone on here,
IMHO.

Signature

*The problem with the world is that everyone is a few drinks behind *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

JRE - 10 May 2006 00:43 GMT
<snip>

> So my *personal* experience says the makers know exactly what they're
> doing with oil and fluid change intervals. More so than anyone on here,
> IMHO.

Likewise.  The first car I decided to follow the manufacturer's change
interval for is a 1991 Honda Accord.  180K miles later the engine is
fine after changes with conventional oil every 7500 miles.  Chances are
the engine will outlast the rest of the car, which is getting moderately
rusty...but still, I expect it to hit 250K or more before my son has to
replace it.

JRE
Fred W - 10 May 2006 00:51 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> JRE

Swell.  Enjoy you Honda  (snicker...)

Signature

-Fred W

JRE - 10 May 2006 10:53 GMT
> Swell.  Enjoy you Honda  (snicker...)

It gets my son where he needs to go, as my E46 330i (with PP) gets me
where I need to go.  And I'm following BMW's recommendations for it and
my wife's 325i, too.  I might report on how they're doing in 15 years or
so.  Or not.

Oh, and you left off an "R" in your post.  Here's a few extra in case
you need them, Fred:

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

JRE
clifffreeling@yahoo.com - 10 May 2006 15:30 GMT
> Fred W wrote:>
> >
> > Swell.  Enjoy you Honda  (snicker...)
>
> It gets my son where he needs to go,

Not only that, but you've enjoyed and used a well
engineered automobile for many years, with, I'm
sure, damn few problems, just as I have with my
Japanese car---'90 model, 176k miles with a history
of nothing but regular oil/filter changes, a couple
of timing belt changes (which still looked good after
60k miles on them), brake pads, and the other minor
and usual service.  Nary a real problem and the
sweetie still drives as it did when brand new.  Oh yeah,
I've also put in a couple radiators (cheap).

This is in stark contrast to my Beamer, which has had
a list of ailments half as long as my arm, mostly electrical
problems, but not all.  It still has that shimmy at ~60 mph
that nobody has ever been able to pinpoint as to its cause;
there is also that multi-year minor emissions problem which
keeps tiggering the Check Engine light that they can't find.
My sister had a nice Accord, and it was fun to drive.  She
then decided to trade it for a BMW.  I wanted to ask her
why but never did.

--
Cliff
Fred W - 10 May 2006 19:10 GMT
>> Swell.  Enjoy you Honda  (snicker...)
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> JRE

Thanks.  Being from the Boston area I tend not to use too many of those.
 You know, "I pahk my cah at Havahd Yahd", and all that...  But I'll
hang on to them for the when I need them.

Signature

-Fred W

SharkmanBMW - 10 May 2006 19:26 GMT
great response!
adder1969@yahoo.co.uk - 10 May 2006 13:30 GMT
> Likewise.  The first car I decided to follow the manufacturer's change
> interval for is a 1991 Honda Accord.  180K miles later the engine is
> fine after changes with conventional oil every 7500 miles.  Chances are
> the engine will outlast the rest of the car, which is getting moderately
> rusty...but still, I expect it to hit 250K or more before my son has to
> replace it.

...and if Honda suddenly said increase the service interval to 15,000
miles you'd be ok with that too?
Dave Plowman (News) - 10 May 2006 17:29 GMT
> > Likewise.  The first car I decided to follow the manufacturer's change
> > interval for is a 1991 Honda Accord.  180K miles later the engine is
> > fine after changes with conventional oil every 7500 miles.  Chances
> > are the engine will outlast the rest of the car, which is getting
> > moderately rusty...but still, I expect it to hit 250K or more before
> > my son has to replace it.

> ...and if Honda suddenly said increase the service interval to 15,000
> miles you'd be ok with that too?

BMW did near that - double the change interval. With a higher spec oil.

If you doubt them you can have the oil analysed at the higher interval to
see how it's doing. Everyone I've read of doing this reports it's ok.

Gut feelings have little place in science.

Signature

*To err is human. To forgive is against company policy.  

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

JRE - 10 May 2006 23:42 GMT
> ...and if Honda suddenly said increase the service interval to 15,000
> miles you'd be ok with that too?

If they did that while improving the metallurgy of the engine's
materials and the service classification of the oil (not to mention
switching to synthetic oil), then yes.  I'm OK with it for our bimmers.
 If you choose to buy more oil and filters that's your choice...

JRE
adder1969@yahoo.co.uk - 11 May 2006 13:43 GMT
> > ...and if Honda suddenly said increase the service interval to 15,000
> > miles you'd be ok with that too?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> JRE

On my M3 new oil will last about 7000 miles before I have to start
doing regular top-ups. After an oil change it'll use no oil until the
7000 mile mark again.
Bob Smitter - 11 May 2006 14:01 GMT
> On my M3 new oil will last about 7000 miles before I have to start
> doing regular top-ups. After an oil change it'll use no oil until the
> 7000 mile mark again.

That's a good time to change it on an E46 M3, in my opinion.  I
have a 2002 M3 and had an oil analysis done after 6000 miles on
the oil.  Although still usable, it did show a high level of fuel in the
oil resulting in a viscosity change.  Although Brookstone didn't
specifically recommend changing the oil (maybe because I mentioned
the sample was taken at an oil change), they did say it was a good idea.

This is about what I expected - half the BMW recommended mileage.
My M3 service indicator has routinely got to zero each 12,000 miles.

Bob
Fred W - 11 May 2006 14:24 GMT
>>On my M3 new oil will last about 7000 miles before I have to start
>>doing regular top-ups. After an oil change it'll use no oil until the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Bob

No, no Bob.  The BMW engineers know best.  You should leave that oil in
there until the idiot lights say to change it.  It says so right in the
manual.

In case you can't tell, I'm being facetious...  ;-)

Signature

-Fred W

RT - 12 May 2006 05:17 GMT
>> On my M3 new oil will last about 7000 miles before I have to start
>> doing regular top-ups. After an oil change it'll use no oil until the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the oil.  Although still usable, it did show a high level of fuel in the
>oil resulting in a viscosity change.  Although Brookstone didn't

Do you drive short distances a lot ?

>specifically recommend changing the oil (maybe because I mentioned
>the sample was taken at an oil change), they did say it was a good idea.
>
>This is about what I expected - half the BMW recommended mileage.
>My M3 service indicator has routinely got to zero each 12,000 miles.

I also change my m3's oil  at 7K miles.
Fred W - 11 May 2006 14:19 GMT
>>>...and if Honda suddenly said increase the service interval to 15,000
>>>miles you'd be ok with that too?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> doing regular top-ups. After an oil change it'll use no oil until the
> 7000 mile mark again.

So what is that telling you?

To me it suggests that the viscosity of your oil is changing (for the
worse) at or actually a little before the 7k mile mark.  The small
amount of oil that you are adding is not enough to help the average
viscosity (hey, there's 8 quarts in there...) so you continue to burn
some oil.  Then when you change the oil it is back to the correct
viscosity again.

If that were my car I would be changing the oil at (or actually bit
before) 7k miles.  Yes, it may cost you more than changing the oil per
schedule or the service reminder.  And some will tell you that it makes
no difference.  You have observed evidence to the contrary.

But it's not my car, so you can continue to do whatever you like...

Signature

-Fred W

Fred W - 09 May 2006 14:58 GMT
>>Well of course you can drive a car over 100k miles without doing any
>>maintenance.  That's not the point.  Talk to me after 200k or 300k and
>>let me know how that lifetime tranny fluid is getting along.
>
> Most autos will fail before that mileage regardless of fluid changes.

Most?  I don't think so.  Some, certainly.  A lot depends on how you
drive it.  The rub is, for the vast majority of these so-called
"lifetime fill" transmissions, the original owners believed (or wanted
to believe) the manufacturer and so did not do regular fluid changes, so
we will never collect anything but anecdotal evidence that they can be
made to last longer with proper maintenance.  But assuming that other
brand cars' automatic transmissions are similar, the ones that *do*
advise changing the fluid at regular intervals (40-50k miles) often get
much better longevity than those of the "lifetime" ilk.

Signature

-Fred W

Ted Johnson - 10 May 2006 06:04 GMT
>But the funny thing is, I don't see anywhere in the Bentley manual that
>shows how to change the fluid in a lifetime fill - sealed ZF transmission.

Actually you can try asking the author of the Bentley manual about that.
The Bentley authors seem to answer a surprisingly large number of questions.

You can ask them via:
  http://tech.bentleypublishers.com/category.jspa?categoryName=bmw

Cheers,
-Ted
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 May 2006 19:31 GMT
> > I have been told from an experienced mechanic that to replace the auto
> > transmission oil before 100K is a total waste of time and money

> That's nice.  Will he be paying for your repair bill if it does?

Well, you can't just replace the auto fluid as you can't drain the torque
convertor. It can be flushed but this uses even more of the very expensive
fluid.

Because of the cost, I'd have the fluid analysed to see if it needs
changing.

Signature

*I believe five out of four people have trouble with fractions. *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

SharkmanBMW - 08 May 2006 20:38 GMT
some of you truly are clueless...

Lifetime fluid means 100k, it should be done every 50k miles to keep it
healthy.

I wanted names of fluids more than timeframes...

but after driving an e34 540 for years, I know lifetime fluid is a joke.

Those of you who NEVER do the maintenance are going to have issues after
100k miles, and the car will be dead after 200k.

I may or may noty keep the car after 100k miles, but I would surely feel
better knowing it is at it's best.

If you are clueless or can't afford to do basic, helpful maintenance, you
should have bought a Hyundai.

BMW has new maintenance shcedulesw,,, but only since THEY pay the
maintenance! Before they offerred that, the suggested maintenance timeframes
were MUCH more frequent.

If you believe that the cars just got this extended maintenance shcedule
because they learned how to make things last, you are dreaming.

What fluids do those of you use who are smart enough to change them?
bfd - 08 May 2006 21:33 GMT
For my 1990 BMW E34 535i, 5spd, 106K miles, I change my manual tranny
and differential fluids as suggested by BMW:

*Every 30,000 miles* I use either Redline MTL and my last change was
with Royal Purple. Since my car takes less than 2 qts of fluids, and
its really, really easy to change (basically you jack the car up and
open up the fill plug and drain plug, drain and refill), its like
$12-15 each change.

For MY CAR, with the older maintainence schedule, it also recommends
flushing coolant and brake fluid every 2 years; change brake fluid
every year if track.

Since I still use dino oil, I normally burn a quart every 3000-3500
miles, so I usually change it around that time (and filter, of course).
bfd - 08 May 2006 21:34 GMT
For my 1990 BMW E34 535i, 5spd, 106K miles, I change my manual tranny
and differential fluids as suggested by BMW:

*Every 30,000 miles* I use either Redline MTL and my last change was
with Royal Purple. Since my car takes less than 2 qts of fluids, and
its really, really easy to change (basically you jack the car up and
open up the fill plug and drain plug, drain and refill), its like
$12-15 each change.

For MY CAR, with the older maintainence schedule, it also recommends
flushing coolant and brake fluid every 2 years; change brake fluid
every year if track.

Since I still use dino oil, I normally burn a quart every 3000-3500
miles, so I usually change it around that time (and filter, of course).
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 May 2006 23:46 GMT
> BMW has new maintenance shcedulesw,,, but only since THEY pay the
> maintenance! Before they offerred that, the suggested maintenance
> timeframes were MUCH more frequent.

And all the lubricants have been changed since then. BTW, 'free'
maintenance isn't included in every country BMW sells to. Nor is it free -
it's part of the premium you pay for a BMW over other cars.

Signature

*I wished the buck stopped here, as I could use a few*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

John Carrier - 08 May 2006 21:56 GMT
>I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
>want to service these asap.
>
> What fluids are best for this car?
> BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?

Engine oil.  Any quality synthetic in 5W30.

Trans.  Auto requires a special fluid that is not cheap.  50K would be a
good time if you intend to own the car past 120K (usual BMW auto trans
life).

Trans.  Manual.  Redline MTL or D4 ATF are excellent.  Royal Purple
synchromax also very good.  BMW uses ATF for ease of shifting in the cold.
MTL is the better lubricant, but you need to be deliberate with the gear
shift until the trans warms in cold weather.  Every 30K or insp interval 1 &
2.

Diff.  75W90 Synthetic gear lube (non-limited slip).  Redline or RP are both
excellent.  30K etc.

Don't forget the power steering.  Synthetic D4 ATF.  30K etc.

R / John
bfd - 08 May 2006 22:07 GMT
I agree with almost all of what John recommended. However, for power
steering fluid, best to check your owner's manual or better yet, power
steering reservior cap, as some BMW, especially older ones, do not use
ATF.

Instead, some older BMW, especially those with hydraulic steering, use
Pentosin, which is expensive stuff compared to ATF. You cannot change
or mix and match.

Best to check the power steering reservior cap to see which fluid you
use.
SharkmanBMW - 08 May 2006 23:11 GMT
this is a 2003, but my older 540 takes pentosin, I forget which one, but
there are 2 versions.

what about quantities of fluid? so I know what to buy!?
Dave Plowman (News) - 08 May 2006 23:51 GMT
> Instead, some older BMW, especially those with hydraulic steering, use
> Pentosin, which is expensive stuff compared to ATF. You cannot change
> or mix and match.

The recommended PS fluid for older BMWs is Dexron II

Signature

*Santa's helpers are subordinate clauses*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Fred W - 09 May 2006 15:01 GMT
>>Instead, some older BMW, especially those with hydraulic steering, use
>>Pentosin, which is expensive stuff compared to ATF. You cannot change
>>or mix and match.
>
> The recommended PS fluid for older BMWs is Dexron II

Not all of them.  Many take Pentosin CHF11S (I think that is what it is,
Just off the top of my head)

Signature

-Fred W

Dave Plowman (News) - 09 May 2006 17:57 GMT
> > The recommended PS fluid for older BMWs is Dexron II

> Not all of them.  Many take Pentosin CHF11S (I think that is what it is,
> Just off the top of my head)

Might be difficult in the UK as I've never seen Pentosin of any type on
sale. Unless it has a different brand name here.

Signature

*Born free - taxed to death *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

bfd - 09 May 2006 17:44 GMT
That's true, but since Dexron II ATF is *no longer available* most
people use Dexron III ATF.

On the other hand, some BMW require Pentosin:

Pentosin 11s
http://www.bavauto.com//assets/product_images/hardpart/82111468041.jpg

Pentosin 7.1
http://www.bavauto.com//assets/product_images/hardpart/81229407549.jpg

Again, READ the hydraulic steering reservior cap to make sure you use
the correct one!
Dave Plowman (News) - 09 May 2006 19:17 GMT
> That's true, but since Dexron II ATF is *no longer available* most
> people use Dexron III ATF.

Yes - as far as I know it's suitable as a replacement or even to be mixed
with Dexron II.

Signature

*If a pig loses its voice, is it disgruntled?

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

SharkmanBMW - 08 May 2006 23:10 GMT
excellent info, thanks
Fred W - 09 May 2006 14:51 GMT
> I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
> want to service these asap.
>
> What fluids are best for this car?
> BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?

For engine oil, check out the 5W40 Fully Synthetic Shell Rotella T.  It
is designed for (very) extended use in light diesels, but is also
certified for use in gas engines. Available at WalMarts for pretty cheap
($15 a gallon as I recall) and it's the best thing since sliced bread as
far as I can find.  Better performance than Mobil 1 or Castrol Syntec at
~1/3 less cost.

I'm switching over everything I own to this stuff (motorcycles, cars,
outdoor power equipment) until they catch on and raise the price into
the stratosphere...

Signature

-Fred W

RT - 10 May 2006 02:08 GMT
>> I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
>> want to service these asap.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>outdoor power equipment) until they catch on and raise the price into
>the stratosphere...

I'v ebeen using the rotella T synthetic in my motorcycle for a couple
years now. Excellent stuff and a steal.
SharkmanBMW - 11 May 2006 21:30 GMT
here is my plan... the car has 55k miles and has only followed BMW service
so far. Inspection 2 was done last november.\

engine oil change with Mobil 1 0w-40

diff fluid change with ?? Redline, but what type? or Royal Purple?

Tranny fluid change with BMW synthetic.

Removal of CDV for smoother shifting.

PLEASE comment on the fluid types you like, NOT intervals...
JRE - 13 May 2006 02:49 GMT
<snip>
> PLEASE comment on the fluid types you like, NOT intervals...

I'm kinda partial to Bass Ale and Becks, myself.

JRE
Fred W - 14 May 2006 19:35 GMT
> here is my plan... the car has 55k miles and has only followed BMW service
> so far. Inspection 2 was done last november.\
>
> engine oil change with Mobil 1 0w-40

I have a hard time finding this.  I'd be tempted to go with the Shell
Rotella T 5W40 I mentioned before.

> diff fluid change with ?? Redline, but what type? or Royal Purple?

I like Mobile 1 synthetic gear oil for this.

> Tranny fluid change with BMW synthetic.

Not sure about current models, but the Redline MTL seems to be the fluid
of choice for most of the (older) manual transmissions

> Removal of CDV for smoother shifting.

Not a fluid, but I'd be on that one like stink on feces.  Probably
before it even needed its next oil change.  I hate an artificially
slowed down clutch action.  Oh and while you're at it, if you don't know
the last time it was done, you might think about a brake/clutch fluid
change/bleed.  Any good DOT4  (not 3, definitely not 5)

Signature

-Fred W

RT - 12 May 2006 06:21 GMT
>I have passed the 50k mark... Lifetime fluid is really not lifetime, so I
>want to service these asap.
>
>What fluids are best for this car?
>BTW, what engine oil do you say is best?

This might interest you;
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=16;t=002116
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.