> It's not likely to be low trans fluid. More likely some worn components
> or sticking valves.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> It may be expense, but it also might not be.
>> Bring it to a reputable transmission specialist and if one of the first
>> words out of their mouths is "rebuild" before even doing a teardown go
>> find another that will actually diagnose the problem first.
In my experience "reputable transmission specialist" is an oxymoron of
the first magnitude.
Richard Sexton - 28 Jun 2006 18:14 GMT
>>> Bring it to a reputable transmission specialist and if one of the first
>>> words out of their mouths is "rebuild" before even doing a teardown go
>>> find another that will actually diagnose the problem first.
>
>In my experience "reputable transmission specialist" is an oxymoron of
>the first magnitude.
What he said.

Signature
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
>> It's not likely to be low trans fluid. More likely some worn components
>> or sticking valves.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>come back to life after a top-up (followed by numerous flushes and
>refills)
Thanks. That's good to know, for next time and for me wrt other
makes. They say it's bad and will be 1500 to repair or rebuild. This
would be ok if she hadn't had the thing rebuilt only 2 1/2 years ago
at the same place. They charged 1800 then and say they are charging
less now because it only lasted such a short time.
Apparently she had it repaired or rebuilt on location last time. They
didnt seem to offer her a "factory" rebuilt trans. My impression is
that those are better than shop rebuilt, because they do them over and
over, have more space, and replace more parts, not just the ones that
have failed or are near failure, but everything that ever fails (maybe
other than freak things that have only failed once.)
Do they have "factory" rebuilt transmissions for BMW? I don't mean
the BMW factory but some place that does nothing but rebuilding, no
installation.
She doesn't want to keep towing it all over the place, and I guess she
shopped last time. But it is annoying to pay the same place twice in
3 years.
Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.
Dave Plowman (News) - 29 Jun 2006 23:32 GMT
> Apparently she had it repaired or rebuilt on location last time. They
> didnt seem to offer her a "factory" rebuilt trans. My impression is
> that those are better than shop rebuilt, because they do them over and
> over, have more space, and replace more parts, not just the ones that
> have failed or are near failure, but everything that ever fails (maybe
> other than freak things that have only failed once.)
It's common practice to replace all the wearing parts when overhauling an
auto - and those non wearing parts that have a history of failing. Also
the torque converter if there are any signs of fluid contamination. The
labour cost is so much more than the parts that it doesn't make sense not
to. No specialist worth the name will simply repair a fault if it means
removing the box.

Signature
*If we weren't meant to eat animals, why are they made of meat?
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
mm - 30 Jun 2006 02:06 GMT
>> Apparently she had it repaired or rebuilt on location last time. They
>> didnt seem to offer her a "factory" rebuilt trans. My impression is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to. No specialist worth the name will simply repair a fault if it means
>removing the box.
Well I doubt they will tell her what specific part they found that
didn't work, even though I would love to know.
What's the difference between factory rebuilders and in-shop
rebuilders? And have you all not heard that factory rebuilders do a
better job?
Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.
Dave Plowman (News) - 30 Jun 2006 09:16 GMT
> >It's common practice to replace all the wearing parts when overhauling
> >an auto - and those non wearing parts that have a history of failing.
> >Also the torque converter if there are any signs of fluid
> >contamination. The labour cost is so much more than the parts that it
> >doesn't make sense not to. No specialist worth the name will simply
> >repair a fault if it means removing the box.
> Well I doubt they will tell her what specific part they found that
> didn't work, even though I would love to know.
No reason why they shouldn't? It is possible to diagnose most auto faults
by going through a series of checks even if it doesn't have electronic
diagnostics built in.
> What's the difference between factory rebuilders and in-shop
> rebuilders? And have you all not heard that factory rebuilders do a
> better job?
If it is the factory that made the transmission - ie ZF in this case -
they probably should do a better job since they have access to any
modifications, etc. However, there's no intrinsic reason why a specialist
can't equal their standards.

Signature
*I will always cherish the initial misconceptions I had about you
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
news - 30 Jun 2006 03:24 GMT
how the hell does a rebuild only last a couple of years ?
does she drive between alaska and mexico all the time ?
sounds like a ripoff.
go somewhere else.
> >> It's not likely to be low trans fluid. More likely some worn components
> >> or sticking valves.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
> me know if you have posted also.