Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Car Audio / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

why solid wood is not common for car subwoofer box use?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pernilongo - 24 Oct 2007 01:56 GMT
Why do they use MDF instead of real solid wood in small sub boxes

--
pernilong
forjj - 24 Oct 2007 06:24 GMT
Its cheape

--
forj
koma - 24 Oct 2007 10:19 GMT
it's cost alot mor

--
kom
G - 24 Oct 2007 13:39 GMT
>Why do they use MDF instead of real solid wood in small sub boxes?

It has very good audio qualities. You want a quiet cabinet.
They use it on larger cabinets also. Traditional speakers use mostly particle
board. Plywood  and synthetics are good for portable equipment. Particle board
was also very cheap, but when I just looked at it at The Home Depot, it was
not cheap like it used to be. I looked at some MDF and I chose not to carry
that heavy board home. Solid wood is also very pretty and easy to work
with. It tends to be lighter though, and need more bracing
to reduce flex. I had a home cabinet made solid oak. The planks were
cut from raw wood, and cut to demensions for my project, and then put
together. The guy only charged me about $165 for the pair.

greg
Ian F - 24 Oct 2007 16:10 GMT
It's easier to maintain consistent quality in engineered wood than i
solid wood.  This means you either get a better or cheaper box, or both

--
Ian
Mister.Lull - 24 Oct 2007 17:26 GMT
> It's easier to maintain consistent quality in engineered wood than in
> solid wood.  This means you either get a better or cheaper box, or both.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Ian F's Profile:http://www.zerohurtz.com/member.php?userid=380
> View this thread:http://www.zerohurtz.com/showthread.php?t=46943

Price may be a factor for some individuals, but it certainly won't be
a reason for anyone to choose MDF.

Particle board is cheaper, plywood is cheapest, solid wood looks
better/best.  MDF is the correct choice because it's more dense than
either of the other options, and when building a (subwoofer)
enclosure, a dense material is what you want to use.  Using plywood or
particle board will actually provide flex in the building material,
thus decreasing the efficiency of the enclosure.  Solid wood simply
doesn't provide the (interior) sound/vibration deadening required for
a decent box.

~Mister.Lull
lawagoneer - 24 Oct 2007 17:33 GMT
Solid wood resonates and changes shape and resonance frequency wit
humidity and temperature changes. MDF, OSB and high quality plywood ar
used because of their stability with  changes in temperature an
humidity and resistance to resonance

--
lawagonee
chooka - 24 Oct 2007 14:40 GMT
solid wood costs alot more and is much heavier

--
chook
G - 24 Oct 2007 17:44 GMT
>solid wood costs alot more and is much heavier.

Lighter.

The actual weight is going to also vary according to wood type and moisture
content.

greg
alk99 - 24 Oct 2007 18:24 GMT
Although I do agree with some of the previous answers, (except for th
weight idea) MDF is a much denser material and lends well to shapin
using one solid piece, where as wood would have to be jointed and glue
to come up with the same dimensions and that joint would be cause fo
concern over time. MDF being a more dense material has better acousti
qualities and due to being more dense weighs more than the equivalen
size dimensional lumber, and in most cases is cheaper than it
dimensional counterpart

--
alk9
THE_SILENT_LINE - 24 Oct 2007 20:15 GMT
MDF is denser

--
THE_SILENT_LIN
Christopher "Torroid" Ott - 24 Oct 2007 17:31 GMT
MDF is more dense, and reduces resonances better than solid wood.
Acoustically it's consistent throughout, without knots or rot. It doesn't
absorb and hold moisture. It's cheaper to buy and easier to machine in large
volumes.

Chris

> Why do they use MDF instead of real solid wood in small sub boxes?
mfreak - 26 Oct 2007 21:09 GMT
On Oct 24, 11:31 am, "Christopher \"Torroid\" Ott" <spamtrap at
ottelectronics dot com> wrote:
>  It doesn't absorb and hold moisture.

O RLY?? A few months ago I had a 4x8' sheet of MDF in my basement
standing up against a wall, my water softener leaker a 1/4" of water
on the floor near it.  Not only did the MDF soak up water, but it
wicked up the sheet to about a foot off the floor.  The 3/4" mdf
expanded to about 1.25", and when it dried out, it was still that
thick, and it was all warped and totally un-usable.   IME MDF absorbs
and holds water like a friggin sponge!
Christopher "Torroid" Ott - 26 Oct 2007 23:42 GMT
OK, how about it doesn't absorb and hold moisture from humidity.

When I was (much) younger I worked at a Weyerhaeuser plant, and among many
other products we made particle board and MDF. The main difference between
the two is the MDF has more resin, smaller particulate and is made under
higher pressure. The resin also helps prevent some absorption of moisture.
It would not prevent it from being turned into a sponge when soaked in
standing water in your basement though.

> On Oct 24, 11:31 am, "Christopher \"Torroid\" Ott" <spamtrap at
> ottelectronics dot com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thick, and it was all warped and totally un-usable.   IME MDF absorbs
> and holds water like a friggin sponge!
Mariachi - 27 Oct 2007 02:04 GMT
> On Oct 24, 11:31 am, "Christopher \"Torroid\" Ott" <spamtrap at
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> thick, and it was all warped and totally un-usable.   IME MDF absorbs
> and holds water like a friggin sponge!

correct me if I'm wrong... isn't this what a fiberglass coating is for
(or some other coating)?  To protect the MDF wood from moisture?
mfreak - 30 Oct 2007 20:00 GMT
>Christopher Torroid Ott  -  OK, how about it doesn't absorb and hold
>moisture from humidity.

Ok, that's true, wasnt really thinking in that context cuz Im still in
pain from having to buy another new water softener....

> correct me if I'm wrong... isn't this what a fiberglass coating is for
> (or some other coating)?  To protect the MDF wood from moisture?

That'd be a great idea, too bad 99% of all sub boxes are just mdf and
carpet.  I've never had any fiberglass in my trunk, I've never seen
any fiberglass in any of my friend's trunks, and I don't recall ever
seeing any fiberglass coated sub boxes in any store, even install
shops.  Nobody stocks prefab boxes coated in fiberglass.  I think it's
totally custom, not to mention very expensive.
Mook Johnson - 27 Oct 2007 22:14 GMT
> Why do they use MDF instead of real solid wood in small sub boxes?

Actually some of the best sub boxes are made with birch marine plywood.
Very dense, no voids, extremely stiff (most important for subs).  Most sub
box panels don't have resonant fequencies in the sub 100Hz range so low
resonance isn't a prime concern.  What you don't want is for the box walls
to flex due to the force cause by the pressure in the box.  Good quality
plywood is better at this than MDF.

Plywood is more expensive though.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.