Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Car Audio / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Fixed" 8 volt output o-loads eq

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Hoff - 18 Feb 2004 11:27 GMT
My deck  (Eclipse 8053) has biamp outputs - provided the "rear" channels are
switched to become "mid" and the front channels become the "high" outputs.

So, in biamp mode I have no rear channels---but the deck also has a "Fixed
Out" that runs at full volume only.

I ran this fixed out to an old alpine 10-band that I am using to control the
rear speakers.  Fuzztone.  On the EQ, there is an led array that shows total
overload unless I lower all the bands to minus 12  db (or -15 db, maybe--I
forget) and it's still slightly distorted at those settings.

My plan is to try  a 10k resistor (guessing on the value here) inline with
the tip of the interconnect rca before the EQ.

Is this plan valid???

Another idea, better, would be to able to sum the mids & highs for the back
speakers *without having them be summed to the front speakers.  That way,
fronts and rear would be controlled by the head unit's volume control.  I
don't know how to build this circuit, other than buying a little mixer.
MZ - 18 Feb 2004 13:11 GMT
> My plan is to try  a 10k resistor (guessing on the value here) inline with
> the tip of the interconnect rca before the EQ.

Check your amp's manual.  A lot of times there's a value for input
impedance.  It's generally in the 10-30k range.  Then just treat it as a
voltage divider.

PS Are you saying that this output isn't controlled by the volume knob?

> Is this plan valid???
>
> Another idea, better, would be to able to sum the mids & highs for the back
> speakers *without having them be summed to the front speakers.  That way,
> fronts and rear would be controlled by the head unit's volume control.  I
> don't know how to build this circuit, other than buying a little mixer.

It's a pain.  Leave it alone.

Why not run just the low output to the rears?  Where's the cutoff?
Jim Hoff - 19 Feb 2004 04:10 GMT
Yes the "fixed" output I am trying to tone down is not controlled by
any voulme control  on the head unit, other than the mute control.

I need a full range signal and not just mid-bass at the request of my
daughter passengers in the back.  The xover is set for 1.6k hz, nice
and low :)

The spec in the manual says 55 ohm output impedance.  (not 55k)

So does that mean if I build an interconnect with a 55 ohm resistor in
the tip, the signal will be reduced 3 db??

>> My plan is to try  a 10k resistor (guessing on the value here) inline with
>> the tip of the interconnect rca before the EQ.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Why not run just the low output to the rears?  Where's the cutoff?
MZ - 19 Feb 2004 04:14 GMT
> The spec in the manual says 55 ohm output impedance.  (not 55k)
>
> So does that mean if I build an interconnect with a 55 ohm resistor in
> the tip, the signal will be reduced 3 db??

No, that's the output impedance of the head unit.  What you need is the
input impedance of the amplifier.  Oh yeah, and you may want to reduce by
more than 3dB.
MZ - 19 Feb 2004 04:17 GMT
> > The spec in the manual says 55 ohm output impedance.  (not 55k)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> input impedance of the amplifier.  Oh yeah, and you may want to reduce by
> more than 3dB.

Oh yeah, the other way to do it is to use 2 resistors and create a voltage
divider.

Really, you don't need to know the input impedance.  All it does for you is
give you a good starting point.  If you can't find it out, just assume 20k
ohms.
MZ - 19 Feb 2004 04:24 GMT
PS-

If you use a potentiometer (say, 200k ohms or more range), you can dial in
the ideal value of resistance, then use a resistor of that value as the
permanent solution.

Signature

Mark
remove "remove" and "spam" to reply

> > > The spec in the manual says 55 ohm output impedance.  (not 55k)
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> give you a good starting point.  If you can't find it out, just assume 20k
> ohms.
Kevin McMurtrie - 19 Feb 2004 06:04 GMT
200K is way too high.  The impedance will be too high to overcome cable
capacitance and electric noise.  1K would be more like it.

> PS-
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > give you a good starting point.  If you can't find it out, just assume 20k
> > ohms.
MZ - 19 Feb 2004 19:18 GMT
> 200K is way too high.  The impedance will be too high to overcome cable
> capacitance and electric noise.  1K would be more like it.

No, 1kohm would be worthless.  It would provide somewhere on the order of
0.2dB attenuation, which would be inaudible.

I suggested 200k ohm as a POT value, so that he has sufficient range to make
the determination.  I suspect the resistance value that will provide the
results he's after won't exceed ~50kohm.
Jim Hoff - 19 Feb 2004 21:24 GMT
I'll try the pot.   :)

How do I wire it?  Like this:

            _____~~~~~~~~_
to head __            ^          
                |            |________________
                |_______________________to eq

Or do I want the wiper to sweep to ground?

>> 200K is way too high.  The impedance will be too high to overcome cable
>> capacitance and electric noise.  1K would be more like it.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>the determination.  I suspect the resistance value that will provide the
>results he's after won't exceed ~50kohm.
MZ - 19 Feb 2004 21:27 GMT
No, don't run it to ground.  You don't want to short things.  Just run the
wiper out so that it forms a series circuit with the amplifier input.
Essentially, you're just treating it as a variable series resistor.

Signature

Mark
remove "remove" and "spam" to reply

>
> I'll try the pot.   :)
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >the determination.  I suspect the resistance value that will provide the
> >results he's after won't exceed ~50kohm.
Jim Hoff - 20 Feb 2004 03:11 GMT
Ok I'll try it like my diagram above and post if it works.

The only stereo potentiometer in town (Juneau, AK) was a 100k ohm.   Thanks.

> No, don't run it to ground.  You don't want to short things.  Just run the
> wiper out so that it forms a series circuit with the amplifier input.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > >the determination.  I suspect the resistance value that will provide the
> > >results he's after won't exceed ~50kohm.
Kevin McMurtrie - 20 Feb 2004 05:32 GMT
One side to the 8V audio output, one side to the signal ground, and the
wiper to the low voltage amp input.  Use a pot in the area of 1K to 4K.

The 200K series-only pot idea doesn't work because the impedance will
become too high.  The impedance to the amp should be no higher than a
few K Ohms to avoid loss of trebble, electrical noise pickup, and
distortion due to non-linearities of the amp input's impedance.

> I'll try the pot.   :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >the determination.  I suspect the resistance value that will provide the
> >results he's after won't exceed ~50kohm.
MZ - 20 Feb 2004 05:41 GMT
> One side to the 8V audio output, one side to the signal ground, and the
> wiper to the low voltage amp input.  Use a pot in the area of 1K to 4K.

dB = 10ln(A/B) = 10ln(20/21) = -0.4dB

Sorry.  Won't be effective.

> The 200K series-only pot idea doesn't work because the impedance will
> become too high.  The impedance to the amp should be no higher than a
> few K Ohms to avoid loss of trebble, electrical noise pickup, and
> distortion due to non-linearities of the amp input's impedance.

What nonlinearities?

Um...and he can't set the amp's input impedance.  It's predetermined by the
10kohm or greater resistor inside the chassis.  He'll modify the input
impedance some by providing a series resistance, but it still shouldn't be
too high unless he has to introduce some major attenuation.
Kevin McMurtrie - 20 Feb 2004 08:21 GMT
> > One side to the 8V audio output, one side to the signal ground, and the
> > wiper to the low voltage amp input.  Use a pot in the area of 1K to 4K.
>
> dB = 10ln(A/B) = 10ln(20/21) = -0.4dB
>
> Sorry.  Won't be effective.

It will be perfectly effective when wired correctly.  This isn't a
series resistor.  It's a voltage divider where the wiper varies between
the signal and the signal's ground.

> > The 200K series-only pot idea doesn't work because the impedance will
> > become too high.  The impedance to the amp should be no higher than a
> > few K Ohms to avoid loss of trebble, electrical noise pickup, and
> > distortion due to non-linearities of the amp input's impedance.
>
> What nonlinearities?

Amplifiers with the classic differential bipolar transistor inputs can
present a varying impedance if the circuit is not designed well.  Since
car amps are often cheaply designed and a low impedance input is
expected, there could be significant distortion if a high value series
resistor is used.

> Um...and he can't set the amp's input impedance.  It's predetermined by the
> 10kohm or greater resistor inside the chassis.  He'll modify the input
> impedance some by providing a series resistance, but it still shouldn't be
> too high unless he has to introduce some major attenuation.
MZ - 20 Feb 2004 14:20 GMT
> > > One side to the 8V audio output, one side to the signal ground, and the
> > > wiper to the low voltage amp input.  Use a pot in the area of 1K to 4K.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> series resistor.  It's a voltage divider where the wiper varies between
> the signal and the signal's ground.

He'd be better off using a resistor for the final solution rather than a
pot, considering his application.  Again, I only recommended the pot so that
he could pinpoint the correct resistance value.  As I mentioned in a
previous post, a v divider would work fine.  But it's not necessary.

> > > The 200K series-only pot idea doesn't work because the impedance will
> > > become too high.  The impedance to the amp should be no higher than a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> expected, there could be significant distortion if a high value series
> resistor is used.

Low impedance input isn't expected.  The vast majority of amplifiers have
input impedances greater than 10kohms.  Most of the time, the inputs look
like a load resistor and an op amp.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.