> Well this is rec.audio.car. (so it is safe to asume)
>
> the "absolutely,for certain most definetely" was just a play on what the
> OP said: "does anyone have a FIRM knowledge...."
>
> i know there isnt a be all end all answer.
If you knew that then why did you give an end all be all answer?
> but most optical digital devices ARE compatible with eachother. i
> answered his question, that is all i think he wanted from anyone. dont
> make this into a "thing" like everyone else does on r.a.c.
It is a "thing". If you would have said that most optical digital devices
are compatible then it would be fine, but you gave a this is the only way
and the only thing it is used for answer which was wrong. You gave the OP
only half correct information, which could be just as bad as outright wrong.
So, yes, most optical digital devices are compatible with each other. But
before laying down money on something double check, there are a few
companies that will use the same cable and jacks but encode it differently.
It is easier for a manufacture to use a cable system that already exists and
rewrite software rather than reinventing the wheel everytime.
> PS: relax.
PS: I am relaxed. You gave a wrong answer and it was pointed out. Just be
wary of end all be all statements.
Les
EFFENDI - 17 Mar 2004 10:58 GMT
>>Well this is rec.audio.car. (so it is safe to asume)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Les
understood