Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Car Audio / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Older Alpine Vs. Newer Alpine HU's

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sonoman - 24 Mar 2004 05:36 GMT
Hi all:
I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a
Toyota 4runner. Both have Boston Pros for the front, and cheap Bostons for
rear fill. Each has a Boston Pro 12" sub in a sealed enclosure and both are
driven by an Xtant 603X each. There are two main differences between the
systems. One has an older Alpine 7840 (Integra) HU and the other has a newer
Alpine 9815 (4runner) HU. Taking into consideration the size difference
between the cars it seems that the older Alpine performs a lot better than
the newer one quality wise. The highs are crisper and the bass has more
definition. The 9815 sounds a bit dull. I have even tried to change the
settings with that file you configure and download from the Alpine site. Has
anyone experienced this? Why could be the reason for the difference?

I am asking this because I am getting ready to buy a new car and I am really
in love with the 7998. But I rather have good sound quality instead of good
looks. I am going to keep everything from my old system except for the HU,
which I was thinking to exchange the 7840 for the newer 7998. The car that I
am selling is the Acura and I am going to put the system on a G35. I wanted
to get some thoughts from people that have experience with older and newer
Apine units. Please advise.
Tony Hwang - 24 Mar 2004 06:22 GMT
> Hi all:
> I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.627 / Virus Database: 402 - Release Date: 3/16/2004

Hi,
If I were you, I'd switch the head units and compare just to be sure.
Tony
MZ - 24 Mar 2004 06:38 GMT
> Hi all:
> I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> settings with that file you configure and download from the Alpine site. Has
> anyone experienced this? Why could be the reason for the difference?

You can't cross-compare between cars.  There is no difference in sound
between the two units.
Sonoman - 24 Mar 2004 08:19 GMT
I am pretty sure there is a significant difference in favor of the older
unit.

> > Hi all:
> > I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> You can't cross-compare between cars.  There is no difference in sound
> between the two units.
MZ - 24 Mar 2004 14:16 GMT
> I am pretty sure there is a significant difference in favor of the older
> unit.

How can you tell?  As I said, it's literally impossible to make meaningful
comparisons of ANYTHING between cars, unless they're identical cars and
identical installations.

For example, different speakers in the same car will usually sound more
alike than the same speakers in different cars.
Sonoman - 04 Apr 2004 08:00 GMT
I have now tested both units in the same car, just swapped them. Same
everything else. How do you know it is not true? I notice the difference, my
be the newer one in not performing 100%

> > I am pretty sure there is a significant difference in favor of the older
> > unit.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> For example, different speakers in the same car will usually sound more
> alike than the same speakers in different cars.
MZ - 04 Apr 2004 16:02 GMT
> I have now tested both units in the same car, just swapped them. Same
> everything else. How do you know it is not true? I notice the difference, my
> be the newer one in not performing 100%

I know it is not true between working units because there is no difference
in their electrical signals.  This can easily be tested with distortion
analyzers and spectrum analyzers.

So if there's no difference in electrical signal, where would you suspect
the difference comes from?
Rilian - 24 Mar 2004 14:32 GMT
"Sonoman" <nospam@microsoft.com> wrote in news:Nb88c.2175$gZ3.992
@bignews3.bellsouth.net:

> Hi all:
> I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> people that have experience with older and newer Apine units. Please
> advise.

All I can offer is that I've been running a 7998 for about 9 months and
the SQ is excellent.  But it's the first Alpine HU I've owned so no
comparison from me.  I was initially hesitant about the Fantom Face
mechanism eventually wearing out, but so far so good.  
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.