
Signature
Mark
remove "remove" and "spam" to reply
Yep, and it seems like AudioControl is only one small step away from
being able to do this if they wish. Since their RTA can "grade" a
response curve compared to the IASCA rules, it must have some kind of
curve-fitting comparison routine built into it already, and their new
digital equalizers already have a flashable EEPROM to store different
EQ curves, so all that's left to add to the equalizer is a way to
change the flash settings via an external connection from the RTA
instead of just manual operator entries. They'd have to program the
RTA with a routine to progressively change the EQ settings until the
proper curve is found, but that's relatively minor.
As to using a PC to do all this, I've written curve-fitting programs
in the past, and the coding wouldn't be that hard. Adding an I/O box
to "press" the buttons on the EQ would be tedious, but not difficult.
The hardest part would be getting the RTA to output its data to the
parallel port constantly, not just when you press the "print" button.
The PC could handle all of the curve-fitting routines and calculate
the necessary adjustments, so you wouldn't have to reprogram the RTA
software except for the constant parallel port output feature.
I imagine there wouldn't be a large end-user market for the RTA, but
AudioControl could market it to shop owners - "Hey, you need an RTA
for your shop anyway, why not buy ours that automatically adjusts our
EQs?" Once the shop has the RTA, it would become very attractive for
them to recommend the compatible equalizers when building a system for
a customer.
Scott Gardner
>Yeah, that would provide a real nice starting point, and wouldn't be
>terribly difficult to implement. (not to mention that the manufacturer
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>> Scott Gardner
MZ - 30 Mar 2004 14:42 GMT
> As to using a PC to do all this, I've written curve-fitting programs
> in the past, and the coding wouldn't be that hard. Adding an I/O box
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the necessary adjustments, so you wouldn't have to reprogram the RTA
> software except for the constant parallel port output feature.
I was thinking more along the lines of a winamp plugin. The RTA interfaace
wouldn't need to be parallel port either, and it wouldn't need to be
continuously upgraded either. Just when the "test"/"adjust" phase was
needed.