OK, been reading all the threads I can on this subject. Can someone
tell me for sure that I got this right so I can go buy the darned
things? ;p
RF P5002 puts out:
250w x 2 RMS @ 2 ohm
500w x 1 RMS @ 4 ohm
If I wire two dual 4-ohm DVC subs in series/parallel this results in a
4 ohm load. I then bridge the 2 channel amp down to mono and connect
the 2 subs. The amp sees a 4 ohm mono load so each speaker will be
getting 250w RMS??? Whew...
Thanks again!
Daniel
Dan , you ought to look and see if you can find a 1 ohm Class D mono am
. It will be more efficient for bass and use less power .
--
Mister_
Yep, you've got it. You can either make each sub into a 2-ohm load
and leave the amp in stereo mode, and each sub will get 250 Watts.
Or, you can series/parallel the subs together to make a single 4-ohm
load, and bridge the amp to a single 500W channel. This would give
each sub 250W as well.
It's six of one or a half-dozen of the other, but I'd bridge the amp
to mono and wire the subs as a single 4-ohm load if it were my system.
Scott Gardner
>OK, been reading all the threads I can on this subject. Can someone
>tell me for sure that I got this right so I can go buy the darned
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Thanks again!
>Daniel
Dan Erick - 27 May 2004 23:33 GMT
> Yep, you've got it. You can either make each sub into a 2-ohm load
> and leave the amp in stereo mode, and each sub will get 250 Watts.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Scott Gardner
Now why do you say that Scott? I read (and I think it was one of your
posts) that bridging the amp causes it to work harder and run hotter.
I'm confused as to why you wouldn't go with the stero configuration.
WOW I can't believe I understand this stuff after looking at it all
day. You guys rock. Thanks
Scott Gardner - 28 May 2004 00:03 GMT
>> Yep, you've got it. You can either make each sub into a 2-ohm load
>> and leave the amp in stereo mode, and each sub will get 250 Watts.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>WOW I can't believe I understand this stuff after looking at it all
>day. You guys rock. Thanks
How "hard" the amp works is a function of the power delivered by the
amp. If you get 500W from bridging it to a single 4-ohm load, or you
get 250W each from two 2-ohm loads, the strain on the amp is the same.
The reason is that if you leave it in stereo mode, you're giving each
channel of the amp a 2-ohm load. When you bridge it to mono, you're
giving the single channel a 4-ohm load. The higher voltage when you
bridge the amp is offset by the fact that a 4-ohm load is less
strenuous for the amp than a 2-ohm load. The increase in voltage is
offset by the decrease in current, so the net power (and strain on the
amp) is the same.
When I said that bridging puts stress on an amp, I was comparing
stereo mode using two 4-ohm loads to a mono bridge using a single
4-ohm load. Since you're talking about two 2-ohm load versus a single
4-ohm load, the overall stress on the amp (and power produced by the
amp) will be the same either way.
Scott Gardner