> Perhaps one, but not both. There's no steadfast rule regarding the rear
> speakers in relation to the fronts.
> > Perhaps one, but not both. There's no steadfast rule regarding the rear
> > speakers in relation to the fronts.
>
> Go try it out !!
Been there, done that. In the car before my last car, I actually went with
phase inversion. In my current car, I didn't. And in some cars, a
difference wasn't readily noticable. As for subs, in my last two cars I've
had the sub inverted in phase (relative to the front speakers). In the car
before that, my head unit had an inversion setting so I adjusted on the fly.
Bottom line is that I've yet to encounter a handy rule of thumb for best
results.
> Now, your claiming REAR phase doesnt need to match front phase...!
>
> Sure, it does!
> Same things that phase changes from R-L happens between F-R...
Then, according to your argument above, you should be suggesting that out of
phase is the better option. Above (snipped for space) you said that when
L-R are out of phase, it tends to be louder when the listener is closer to
the L or to the R. Similarly, the same argument would hold true for F-R.
Since, in many (but not all) cars, the listener is closer to the F than to
the R, then your argument would suggest that they should be out of phase.
However, I don't buy the implications of your argument to begin with. The
reason L or R are louder in the out-of-phase condition is because you're
attenuating the cancellation effects of the other side by NOT being in the
middle. It doesn't have anything to do with the position per se'. The
wavelengths tend to be too long to create a practical series of coherence or
antinodes at different locations aside from the middle.
Anyway, the F and R will interact. It's very difficult to predict how
they're going to interact since it's VERY dependent on the contours of the
vehicle. Hell, as with most audio settings in the car, it may sound better
one way when the windows are down and another way when the windows are up!
It's too random to be able to suggest that in-phase is better than
out-of-phase when it comes to rear speakers or subwoofers relative to the
fronts.
Nousaine - 02 Jun 2004 00:23 GMT
"MZ" zarellam@twcnyremove.rr.comspam
wrote:
>Anyway, the F and R will interact. It's very difficult to predict how
>they're going to interact since it's VERY dependent on the contours of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>out-of-phase when it comes to rear speakers or subwoofers relative to the
>fronts.
A compounding factor with combined bass subwoofers (L+R or LFE) is that the
polarity of a combined signal is not known in advance. That's one reason every
home audio or home theater subwoofer has a phase switch or other compensation
device.
Eddie Runner - 02 Jun 2004 00:33 GMT
> Been there, done that. In the car before my last car, I actually went with
> phase inversion. In my current car, I didn't. And in some cars, a
> difference wasn't readily noticable. As for subs, in my last two cars I've
> had the sub inverted in phase (relative to the front speakers). In the car
> before that, my head unit had an inversion setting so I adjusted on the fly.
Were NOT talking about inverting the phase of the sub... The REASON there
is a sub phase switch is only because the electronic xovers (and passive as
well)
can end up changing the sub phase pretty far out of whack... reversing it
sometimes
really brings it back closer to the normal phase....
> Bottom line is that I've yet to encounter a handy rule of thumb for best
> results.
I have.... DO IT RIGHT...
I would say my 200000plus cars in the last 30 years are a few more
than the TWO you have done
ha ha ha
RULE OF THUMB
WIRE THEM CORRECTLY
OUT OF PHASE IS USUALLY CRAPPY
> Then, according to your argument above, you should be suggesting that out of
> phase is the better option. Above (snipped for space) you said that when
> L-R are out of phase, it tends to be louder when the listener is closer to
> the L or to the R. Similarly, the same argument would hold true for F-R.
> Since, in many (but not all) cars, the listener is closer to the F than to
> the R, then your argument would suggest that they should be out of phase.
thats NOT what I said and if you believe that you are warped...
I said if the L and R are not in phase the system sounds LESS POWERFULL
than if they are wired correctly... Same thing goes for F-R... if the rear
are out of phase the phole system sounds less powerfull...
NOT SOMETHING most folks want.
> However, I don't buy the implications of your argument to begin with. The
> reason L or R are louder in the out-of-phase condition is because you're
> attenuating the cancellation effects of the other side by NOT being in the
> middle.
thats what I said.. so who would want them out of phase??
> It doesn't have anything to do with the position per se'.
??????????????????????
Are you talking to me???
Your quoting my message you must be talking to me....
WHERE DID I SAY POSITION..??
Are you on drugs or is it the wine???
I SAID fade it to the left or right.....
> Anyway, the F and R will interact. It's very difficult to predict how
> they're going to interact since it's VERY dependent on the contours of the
> vehicle.
Bullshit, they interact JUST LIKE THE R AND L DO!!
SAME DAMN THING!!
> Hell, as with most audio settings in the car, it may sound better
> one way when the windows are down and another way when the windows are up!
has nothing to do with this conversation.
> It's too random to be able to suggest that in-phase is better than
> out-of-phase when it comes to rear speakers or subwoofers relative to the
> fronts.
Your wrong....
If your rears are out of phase with your fronts it will cause even the fronts to
appear to have reduced output level... it would be RARE that that would
be a good thing for anyone....
Eddie Runner
R E A D M Y P O S T S M O R E C A R E F U L L Y