Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Car Audio / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

how long can a RCA be?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pil - 27 Jun 2004 16:01 GMT
I know this is not the appropriate newsgroup to ask this. The principle will
be the same in audio and video.

How long can I make my RCA from my sattelite receiver to my PC? I want to
run the RCA from the sattelite into my video in of my video card to record
TV programs on the PC.

The cable will have to be longer than 30M for me to accomplish this
Les - 26 Jun 2004 20:43 GMT
> I know this is not the appropriate newsgroup to ask this. The principle will
> be the same in audio and video.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The cable will have to be longer than 30M for me to accomplish this

There is no exact length for composite video, so it would likely work at the
distance you are looking at. But you are already starting with an inferior
signal then running it a long way, which there will be some loss, so the end
result may or may not be acceptable depending on what quality you are
looking for. I would suggest you use the S-video output if it is available.
I have run 100+ feet of S-video with no appreciable signal loss. You may
also research some of the wireless options that are available.

Les
Roxtar - 28 Jun 2004 13:05 GMT
> I know this is not the appropriate newsgroup to ask this. The principle will
> be the same in audio and video.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The cable will have to be longer than 30M for me to accomplish this

I'm running about 20-25 feet of RCA for video, and never noticed any
quality degradation.
Les - 27 Jun 2004 19:34 GMT
> > I know this is not the appropriate newsgroup to ask this. The principle will
> > be the same in audio and video.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I'm running about 20-25 feet of RCA for video, and never noticed any
> quality degradation.

But he is talking running over 4 times as long as you are running. Running
RCA composite video that long will have some signal degradation.

Les
Scott Johnson - 28 Jun 2004 22:36 GMT
best thing to do is just try it and see.

> > "pil" <pil@webmail.co.za> wrote in message
> news:<1_2dnaAgXYDYfEPdRVn-tw@is.co.za>...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Les
Bruce Chang - 29 Jun 2004 06:16 GMT
> > "pil" <pil@webmail.co.za> wrote in message
> news:<1_2dnaAgXYDYfEPdRVn-tw@is.co.za>...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Les

We had the bulb in our projector at church die and had to use a projector on
stage instead.  From the sound room we ran a 100ft RCA to the stage and I
couldn't see any appreciable difference in the projection other than it
being somewhat dimmer (most likely caused by the lower quality
projector/bulb).  I don't see why it'd be any different in your case.

-Bruce
Les - 28 Jun 2004 06:45 GMT
"Bruce Chang" <bechang@swspambegonebell.com> wrote in >

We had the bulb in our projector at church die and had to use a projector on
> stage instead.  From the sound room we ran a 100ft RCA to the stage and I
> couldn't see any appreciable difference in the projection other than it
> being somewhat dimmer (most likely caused by the lower quality
> projector/bulb).  I don't see why it'd be any different in your case.
>
> -Bruce

Bruce,
You are comparing apples to oranges here. Two different projectors on 2
different Sundays. Our memory is actually bad when it comes to recalling
things like video/audio quality.
Likely the OP wouldn't know that he was missing any signal degradation
without a relatively direct comparison. I still think the way to go would be
to use S-video if available. You already start out with an better format.

Les
MZ - 29 Jun 2004 16:10 GMT
With a run that long, noise could be a bigger issue than signal loss anyway.

Signature

Mark
remove "remove" and "spam" to reply

> "Bruce Chang" <bechang@swspambegonebell.com> wrote in >
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Les
Les - 28 Jun 2004 19:33 GMT
> With a run that long, noise could be a bigger issue than signal loss anyway.

Very true. I started discussing that very thing last night with another tech
friend of mine. Relating the video noise at a recent show he did running
about 75feet. Then again, we've done the same thing before with the same
cable with no problems. Mah, whatcha gonna do?

Les

> > "Bruce Chang" <bechang@swspambegonebell.com> wrote in >
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Les
Bruce Chang - 29 Jun 2004 22:59 GMT
> "Bruce Chang" <bechang@swspambegonebell.com> wrote in >
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Les

Agreed, eye-witness testimony is not very reliable.  I would also suggest he
go with S-video but the OP didn't ask for a different alternative, he asked
if it could be done.  It can be done and has been done.  This isn't like USB
where it dies at 10m and needs a repeater to go longer distances.  Not at
these lengths at least.

-Bruce
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.