I am currently debating between two MP3 CD receivers: The Pioneer
DEH-P4600MP and the Sony CDX-F5500. I can get either for about the
same price and both seem to have more or less the same features (I
don't need WMA playback capabilities).
I have been able to reduce the differences to the following important
ones (for me):
Sony CDX-F5500 Pioneer DEH-P4600MP
-------------- -------------------
FM Sensitivity: 9dBf 8dBf
CD Signal-to-Noise: 120dB 94dB
According to this, the Pioneer has clearly superior tuner. On the
other hand, the Sony has much better CD playback SNR
(signal-to-noise-ratio) - 26dB more, to be exact.
It seems to me though that 94dB is more than enough (especially with
ambient road noise - even when all windows are closed) and that 120dB
is simply an overkill.
So, I am currently leaning towards purchasing the Pioneer.
What do you think? Am I fundamentally wrong here?
Thanks,
Sam
DJ TecThreat - 08 Jul 2004 06:18 GMT
> I am currently debating between two MP3 CD receivers: The Pioneer
> DEH-P4600MP and the Sony CDX-F5500. I can get either for about the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> What do you think? Am I fundamentally wrong here?
What does this have to do with road noise??
I'd get the Pioneer. Sony fell off the wagon years ago.
DJ TecThreat
The Real Threat
Silence Seeker - 08 Jul 2004 13:43 GMT
> What does this have to do with road noise??
>
> I'd get the Pioneer. Sony fell off the wagon years ago.
DJ, thanks for your recommendation. I think I will indeed go with the
Pioneer.
As for your question, I am sure everybody here will agree that the
Signal-to-Noise ratio of a cassette tape player is much worse than this
of a CD. Yet, while I couldn't stand listening to a cassette tape in my
living room, it didn't bother me that much when I listened to it in the
car. The ambient road/car noise made the tape hiss noise "negligible"...
Did I explain myself better this time?
BTW, what do you mean by "Sony fell off the wagon years ago"? Was there
a specific incident that change the landscape of entertainment
electronics and made Sony not a quality manufacturer anymore? Can you
point me to some links (URLs) for further reading on the subject?
Thanks,
Sam
DJ TecThreat - 08 Jul 2004 14:21 GMT
> BTW, what do you mean by "Sony fell off the wagon years ago"? Was there
> a specific incident that change the landscape of entertainment
> electronics and made Sony not a quality manufacturer anymore? Can you
> point me to some links (URLs) for further reading on the subject?
I just think the products they produce arent what they used to be and lack
the quality for the price they're asking. The stuff they made 10+ years ago
was much better (for that day and age) now its just junk.
DJ TecThreat
The Real Threat
Quigmeister Quigolator Quiganology - 08 Jul 2004 19:47 GMT
Sony has long been known as the brand salesmen are most likely to convert their
customers FROM.
In other words, the brand is on consumers lips, but doesn't go out in their
hands.
.
www.MAINSTREET-AUDIO.com
~ ~ ~ Where SERVICE never goes out of style ~ ~ ~
V I S I T O U R F O R U M
http://63.74.14.174/forum/phpBB2/index.php
FHLH002 - 08 Jul 2004 21:37 GMT
it's a salesmen's job to sell.... be it sony or pioneer....
If I had a salesmen convince someone to buy a pioneer over a sony and it
cost me money (cause the pioneer was cheaper or something like that) ... his
a.s would be looking for a new job.
FHLH....... opinions are like a.sholes.... every salesmans got one, but
should keep it to themselves... :)
> Sony has long been known as the brand salesmen are most likely to convert their
> customers FROM.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> V I S I T O U R F O R U M
> http://63.74.14.174/forum/phpBB2/index.php
jw - 09 Jul 2004 17:25 GMT
Why do you have pioneer premier cheaper than the "standard" line?
> Sony has long been known as the brand salesmen are most likely to convert their
> customers FROM.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> V I S I T O U R F O R U M
> http://63.74.14.174/forum/phpBB2/index.php
Quigmeister Quigolator Quiganology - 09 Jul 2004 19:21 GMT
>Why do you have pioneer premier cheaper than the "standard" line?
cause we're really nice guys.
Mister_B - 10 Jul 2004 05:10 GMT
because premier warranties arent valid unless installed by an authorize
dealer / shop .
--
Mister_
Les - 10 Jul 2004 06:04 GMT
> because premier warranties arent valid unless installed by an authorized
> dealer / shop ..
> --
> Mister_B
What and who are you replying too? You don't quote so anyone accessing the
group via a newsserver (as Usenet is designed to be accessed) cannot tell.
The warranties on Pioneer products are valid if it is purchased from an
authorized dealer/retailer. It does NOT have to be installed by them.
Les
FHLH002 - 08 Jul 2004 21:34 GMT
while driving?.... prolly not.
FHLH....
> I am currently debating between two MP3 CD receivers: The Pioneer
> DEH-P4600MP and the Sony CDX-F5500.
Scott Gardner - 10 Jul 2004 06:22 GMT
> It seems to me though that 94dB is more than enough (especially with
> ambient road noise - even when all windows are closed) and that 120dB
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Sam
Nope, you've pretty much nailed it. Let's look at what those two
signal-to-noise ratios actually mean:
94 dB S/N: The signal is about 2.5 billion times stronger than the noise.
120 dB S/N: The signal is about one trillion times stronger than the noise.
In either case, the noise is well below the level of audibility, whether
you're listening in a car or in a studio. Stereo manufacturers should
probably just quit listing S/N ratio on their spec sheets - it's been a
non-issue for quite some time now.
Scott Gardner
John Durbin - 10 Jul 2004 18:15 GMT
I haven't seen the whole thread, but if nobody's mentioned it, you
should make sure that S/N is being measured the same way. As an example,
under CEA-2006 amplifier S/N is being measured at 1 watt, which is
reasonably close to worst-case as opposed to measuring it at full output
which is usually best case. That can give you more than 20dB swing, but
the device is no noisier either way. Head unit measurements are probably
not as skewable that way, but my point is know what you're comparing and
how it was measured.
JD
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>Scott Gardner
>