>> Only one special situation -- extremely heavy bass,
>> severely clipped -- can damage speakers by "underpowering" (actually by
>> making DC flow through them). That's a situation you can easily avoid
>
> Clipping, even when severe, will never cause DC to flow.
Only momentarily. The top of a clipped wave is (temporary) DC.
Les - 01 Sep 2004 04:49 GMT
> >> Only one special situation -- extremely heavy bass,
> >> severely clipped -- can damage speakers by "underpowering" (actually by
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Only momentarily. The top of a clipped wave is (temporary) DC.
Nope. It may resemble a square wave to an extent, but alternating DC just
does not make sense.
Les
Mark Zarella - 01 Sep 2004 05:10 GMT
> > Clipping, even when severe, will never cause DC to flow.
>
> Only momentarily. The top of a clipped wave is (temporary) DC.
There's no such thing. You can't have a direct current that's
alternating. That, by definition, is an alternating current.
What you're describing is essentially a square wave. A square wave,
when described by simple Fourier analysis, does not contain a DC
component.
I understand that the point you're trying to make is that the flatness of
the peaks acts in a similar manner to that of DC applied to the speaker.
But this isn't true either...
Les - 01 Sep 2004 06:27 GMT
> > > Clipping, even when severe, will never cause DC to flow.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the peaks acts in a similar manner to that of DC applied to the speaker.
> But this isn't true either...
Awww Mark, you're no fun.
Can't we just defy science just this one time? I mean, it won't hurt
anything and most people won't even know that were doing it!
Les