> I have some ideas for speaker cabinet designs and I'd like your input. I'm
> not sure if any of you have seen sound dampening "studio foam". It's
> basically a square pad with pyramids on it that dampen sound waves, for
> reducing sound reflection and standing waves. Would it be a good idea to
> texture the inside of the cabinet like this?

Signature
Cyrus
*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*
>> I have some ideas for speaker cabinet designs and I'd like your input. I'm
>> not sure if any of you have seen sound dampening "studio foam". It's
>> basically a square pad with pyramids on it that dampen sound waves, for
>> reducing sound reflection and standing waves. Would it be a good idea to
>> texture the inside of the cabinet like this?
Solid foam is best. The pyrimids only affect extremely high freqs/
The foam helps dampen walls and interior reflections.
>Depends on the type of enclosure. Different frequencies have different
>wavelengths, those enclosures dealing with shorter wavelengths/higher
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Correct room treatment goes far beyond foam.
>http://ethanwiner.com/acoustics.html <<< very informative.
Incedently, foam is the best absorber compared to fiberglass or anything
else.
http://www.pitt.edu/~szekeres/atten.txt
greg
>> I was also curious to the affect of multi-ply cabinet walls with soft
>> material inbetween each ply to provide insulation. My idea is to take
>> several thin sheets of wood, apply fiberglass resin to the outside to add
>> some rigidity, and use these as the plys. Then put insulation foam or
>> something similar inbetween each ply. Build up several plys and then
>> connect them all into one unit with several tight bolts.
I have seen plywood like, plexiglass, aluminum, plexiglass. etc.
>Any type of construction that adds mass and/or provides an airlock will
>be beneficial. Recording studios are somewhat built in this fashion, a
>room built within a room.
Austin Becker - 20 Feb 2006 17:35 GMT
just be sure to compensate for the amount of airspace occupied by the foam.
If the recommended sealed enclosure for your sub is 1.25 cubes, make sure if
your sub occupies .11 you make it 1.36 cubes, and if your foam occupies .5
cubes you make it 1.86 cubes... or somewhere in between. Probably could
divide the space that the foam occupies by two or so because of the fact
that it is not a solid, so maybe something like 1.61 cubes. I've seen this
done, and it does seem to keep the box from resonating at any frequencies
and helps the speaker to do all of the moving.

Signature
- AUSTIN BECKER
> >
> >> I have some ideas for speaker cabinet designs and I'd like your input. I'm
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >be beneficial. Recording studios are somewhat built in this fashion, a
> >room built within a room.
GregS - 20 Feb 2006 17:43 GMT
>just be sure to compensate for the amount of airspace occupied by the foam.
>If the recommended sealed enclosure for your sub is 1.25 cubes, make sure if
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>done, and it does seem to keep the box from resonating at any frequencies
>and helps the speaker to do all of the moving.
Adding foam to a closed box lowers resonance, like making the box bigger.
Polyfill is usually used here to fully stuff the box. Where did you come up with this
stuff?
greg
GregS - 20 Feb 2006 17:46 GMT
>>just be sure to compensate for the amount of airspace occupied by the foam.
>>If the recommended sealed enclosure for your sub is 1.25 cubes, make sure if
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>greg
http://www.pitt.edu/~szekeres/resonant.txt
Austin Becker - 20 Feb 2006 21:35 GMT
Just depends on the density of what you are using. If you are using
something like fiberglass matting which is already in strands, it will have
a different effect than a solid piece of foam like the space pillows.

Signature
- AUSTIN BECKER
> >>just be sure to compensate for the amount of airspace occupied by the foam.
> >>If the recommended sealed enclosure for your sub is 1.25 cubes, make sure if
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> http://www.pitt.edu/~szekeres/resonant.txt
Cyrus - 20 Feb 2006 21:55 GMT
> >> I have some ideas for speaker cabinet designs and I'd like your input. I'm
> >> not sure if any of you have seen sound dampening "studio foam". It's
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> greg
My comment was more pointed at studio construction than to boxed subs.
Personal tastes dictate that no attenuation or excitation of any
frequencies are needed within an enclosure, drivers do enough of that
already. YMMV.
> >> I was also curious to the affect of multi-ply cabinet walls with soft
> >> material inbetween each ply to provide insulation. My idea is to take
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >be beneficial. Recording studios are somewhat built in this fashion, a
> >room built within a room.

Signature
Cyrus
*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*