I'm sorry, I've been out of car audio for quite a few years so forgive
me if I ask dumb questions :-)
I have it in my head that I want front/rear/subwoofer pre-amp outputs
on my receiver. How useful/important is this? I'm thinking once I get
the levels correct, the balance between front/rear and subwoofer
output, how often will it really need to be adjusted?
More importantly, I want to have a multi-band eq and/or electronic
crossover so should I just run front/rear pre-amps back to that, then
just use the subwoofer pre-amp output that I assume it will have to
adjust the subwoofer level, still giving me the front/rear fading
capability?
Keeping to only two pair pre-amps will give me more choice of head
units as well.
So what I want is head unit -> audio control type device -> 4 channel
amp for front/rear and 2 channel amp to the sub. Simple enough.
Thank you so much for your input. I have all my equipment sitting here,
can't wait to install it :-)
Joel
Vivek - 12 Jul 2006 12:16 GMT
| I have it in my head that I want front/rear/subwoofer pre-amp outputs
| on my receiver. How useful/important is this? I'm thinking once I get
| the levels correct, the balance between front/rear and subwoofer
| output, how often will it really need to be adjusted?
People buy systems with more pre-outs because they tend to adjust the fader
and sub level from the HU frequently. If you intend not to change frequently
then go ahead with 2 pair systems. I am having only 1 pair of pre-outs and
this is fed to a 4 channel amp and the amp is also having pre-out. These go
to the sub amp.
Nowadays sub-amps also come with a remote bass knob which is heavily used by
people at each change in song. Just that umph more
| More importantly, I want to have a multi-band eq and/or electronic
| crossover so should I just run front/rear pre-amps back to that, then
| just use the subwoofer pre-amp output that I assume it will have to
| adjust the subwoofer level, still giving me the front/rear fading
| capability?
I do not have experience with active crossovers. Hope I helped you.
WannaKatana - 12 Jul 2006 17:02 GMT
> I am having only 1 pair of pre-outs and
> this is fed to a 4 channel amp and the amp is also having pre-out. These go
> to the sub amp.
So the voltage (signal?) coming from the amp's sub pre-out is adjusted
by the head unit volume control?
Thanks,
Joel
Vivek - 12 Jul 2006 17:54 GMT
Yes the volume of pre-outs on the amplifier are in sync with the inputs. The
detailed setup is as follows
I pair of RCA pre-outs go to the one set of RCA inputs on the 4 channel amp.
The amp can use the same pair for both the pairs and also outputs the same
signal to outputs for second amp.
I loose the fader control, but I have never felt the need to used the fader
control. On my wife's car the fader control is used extensively.
| > I am having only 1 pair of pre-outs and
| > this is fed to a 4 channel amp and the amp is also having pre-out. These go
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
|
| Joel
MOSFET - 12 Jul 2006 20:14 GMT
> I have it in my head that I want front/rear/subwoofer pre-amp outputs
> on my receiver. How useful/important is this? I'm thinking once I get
> the levels correct, the balance between front/rear and subwoofer
> output, how often will it really need to be adjusted?
Once the level is adjusted between the fronts and rear speakers you will
likely never need to adjust them again. I have three sets of outputs on my
HU, but I never mess with my fader control.
The subwoofer control is an entirely different matter. I am ALWAYS
adjusting the subwoofer outputs level, practically from one song to the next
(even in the middle of songs). I find that bass varies GREATLY from song to
song and older recordings almost always, IMHO, seem to need a little help in
the bass department. Most people I talk to feel the same way. The
subwoofer control tends to be the most used control on any HU. Bass is a
VERY personal thing and what is considered "enough bass" varies widely from
person to person.
Therefore, a HU with two sets of RCA outputs would be the minimum acceptable
to me. That way, I could run one pair into a four channel amp (let's say)
to drive the front and rear speakers. I could use the gains on the amp to
adjust the "fader" settings (level to the fronts and level to the rear
speakers) to my liking and then never touch it again. The other set of RCA
outputs could then be run into my subwoofer amp, this way it would be
adjustable from the HU (you would adjust the fader to increase the sub
level). I had an old system configured this way for years (using an Alpine
7939) and it worked great.
Of course, three sets of outputs makes this whole thing even easier, but
IMHO, not necessary.
MOSFET
anToNIcHeN - 13 Jul 2006 14:33 GMT
OK...I have a question here......
how do you feed one pair of RCA cables to a 4 channel amp?.. you have
one pair (RCA) and 4 inputs on your amp. Or is it that you use a signal
splitter?...
MOSFET I have another question for you!!....
you have biamped your front channel?.. how did you do it?.... can you
explain how you connected everything?... Like for eg... from HU -->
passive cross over --> ... etc...
thanks
Antony.
> Therefore, a HU with two sets of RCA outputs would be the minimum acceptable
> to me. That way, I could run one pair into a four channel amp (let's say)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> MOSFET
MOSFET - 13 Jul 2006 19:31 GMT
> OK...I have a question here......
> how do you feed one pair of RCA cables to a 4 channel amp?.. you have
> one pair (RCA) and 4 inputs on your amp. Or is it that you use a signal
> splitter?...
Almost ALL four channel amps have a switch that allows for either two or
four channel input (and then output for all four channels). This feature is
especially usfull when using a four channel amp to drive subwoofers.
MOSFET
> MOSFET I have another question for you!!....
> you have biamped your front channel?.. how did you do it?.... can you
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>
>> MOSFET
MOSFET - 13 Jul 2006 21:09 GMT
> MOSFET I have another question for you!!....
> you have biamped your front channel?.. how did you do it?.... can you
> explain how you connected everything?... Like for eg... from HU -->
> passive cross over --> ... etc...
OK, first of all my HU has an adjustable high-pass filter so I employ this
for the front channel. I have it set on a high-pass filter at 63 Hz with a
slope of 24 dB per octave (the sharpest slope available on this unit, I can
also choose 18, 12, and 6 dB per octave). My rear speakers are set with a
high-pass filter at 120 Hz at 12 dB per octave. So that takes care of my
high-pass filter for my midbass speakers in front. I do not use any
low-pass filter for my midbass speakers. I just let them roll-off
naturally. My midbass speakers are driven by an old school RF Punch 225.2
(112.5 x 2 RMS at .05% THD).
OK, the tweeters. First, you should know that after my HU, I run the front
signal through a Clarion 750 dash mounted EQ. This splits the signal into
four channels (tweets and mids), this allows me to control the level of the
tweeters and the midbass drivers from the dash. The Clarion has a built in
line-driver that boosts the signal to 7 volts. I DO NOT employ any of the
high/low pass filters available on the EQ. So the midbass signal runs to my
RF amp and my tweeter signal runs to a Coustic XM-3 Electronic X-over. This
is my high-pass filter for my tweeters. It is adjustable up to 8000 Hz with
a 12 dB slope. I have it set to 3000 Hz. From there. the signal goes to my
Jensen (YES, JENSEN!) XP45 amplifier. It has been a really great amp for my
tweets and it is VERY powerful (60 watts X 2 RMS .5 % THD), I do not use any
of the high/low pass filters incorporated into the Jensen amp to preserve
sound quality. By the same token, I do not employ the high/low filters on
the RF amp I use for the midbass drivers. Any time you employ filters you
denigrate the sound so I try to use as few as possible. For that matter, I
do not use ANY passive filters AT ALL in my system (capacitors and inductor
coils). This is just my opinion (don't flame me, anyone), but I think
passive filters tend to degrade the sound. Again, this is only my opinion.
Anyway, that's how it's set up. I will soon be replacing my rear-fill
speakers and front tweeters to an ALL JL set-up (except for the subwoofers,
of course, they will stay MTX). And I may change some of those settings
then if the need arises. Stay tuned. ;)
MOSFET
Brandonb - 12 Jul 2006 22:02 GMT
Something also to keep in mind, is that a lot of EQs/crossovers will
take 1 imput and then give all the outputs itself. The Pioneer DEQ-P8000
I think did this. A case such as that, pretty much just runs from the
front pre-out and doesn't use the rest. So it depends on what equipment
you're planning on using as well. I've got a crossover that will accept
1, 2, or 3 inputs and any of them will do all three outputs. One of my
favorite pieces of equipment, and made by Directed.
Brandonb
> I'm sorry, I've been out of car audio for quite a few years so forgive
> me if I ask dumb questions :-)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Joel
Brian Peixinho - 14 Jul 2006 05:43 GMT
Three pair of pre outs are nice if u have a nice head unit with built in
electronic crossover. It eliminates the need for an external x-over.. But if
u want to have an outboard electronic x-over, go with using the front / rear
pre outs to feed the fr-rr inputs on the xover. You will have total fade
control and also level control and also different x-over points if needed
for front and rear. Say u have big 6.5' seperates up front and wanna go down
to 120hz but your rears are 4' seperates u can set at 200hz.. levels, freq,
and other stuff can be fine tuned with a good x-over. But really, a good
head unit now has all that built it and u don't need another external piece
of hardware.. less rca patch cords and all.. check it out
> I'm sorry, I've been out of car audio for quite a few years so forgive
> me if I ask dumb questions :-)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Joel