Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Car Audio / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

short antennas

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Richard Catrambone - 15 Sep 2006 04:29 GMT
This is my first time reading and posting to this group; if I'm raising
an old issue, I apologize and would be grateful if would aim me towards
an appropriate FAQ.

I would like to replace the broken antenna on my 1987 Toyota Celica with
a short antenna.  I've seen them on various web sites but I'm wondering
whether shorter antennas (I'm thinking in the 12" to 15" range) pick up
signals significantly less well than "regular" sized antennas.  If the
technology is such that short antennas work about as well as regular
ones, then my next question is what is a reasonable brand?

Thanks.

Richard
MOSFET - 15 Sep 2006 04:53 GMT
You know, it's not the size of your antenna that matters.  It's what you do
with it.

MOSFET

(sorry guys, I just COULD NOT resist)

> This is my first time reading and posting to this group; if I'm raising
> an old issue, I apologize and would be grateful if would aim me towards
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Richard
Richard Catrambone - 15 Sep 2006 19:49 GMT
I kind of figured I was opening myself up to that comment when I wrote
my post.  However, I'd heard of the legendary maturity of this group, so
I was not worried. :)  I'm not opposed to a serious answer though...

> You know, it's not the size of your antenna that matters.  It's what you do
> with it.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>>Richard
MOSFET - 16 Sep 2006 02:22 GMT
OK, since I was the one with the smart-a.s answer, let me give this a
shot....

First of all, this group DOES have a VERY extensive FAQ that can be found
at:

http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq/

But I took a quick look through the FAQ and did not see any specific
reference to antennas.

But I did find this:

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/radio11.htm

An explanation of antenna priciples that may be useful in your search.  As
we all know, technology has enabled cetain types of antennas to become
shorter (due to coiling and other technologies).  However, height (the
higher the better) will always be a factor with some type of radio bands.  I
am frankly not an expert on this subject and perhaps someone like Matt or an
EE can chime on on this.  But I would try perusing through that second link
I gave as it contains some antenna basics that may be of use to you.

I hope this helps,

MOSFET

> I kind of figured I was opening myself up to that comment when I wrote
> my post.  However, I'd heard of the legendary maturity of this group, so
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >>
> >>Richard
JimJ[VT] - 16 Sep 2006 02:59 GMT
> An explanation of antenna priciples that may be useful in your search
> A
> we all know, technology has enabled cetain types of antennas to becom
> shorter (due to coiling and other technologies)

With the exception of fractal antennas, the fundamentals that gover
antennas haven't changed significantly since the '20's :

Anytime you decrease the physical size of the antenna from
quarter-wave by coil loading (a 1/4-wave at 100MHz is around 2 1/3ft
234/freq. in MHz), you decrease the bandwidth. Just a fact of life. Yo
may notice this on the FM band with a helically wound vertical, or yo
may not, it depends. But 20MHz is a pretty wide bandwidth and th
performance of the stubby vertical is likely to drop off sharply on th
band edges

> or a
> EE can chime on on this

Does a wannabe-EE count? :

--
JimJ[VT]
Richard Catrambone - 21 Sep 2006 04:23 GMT
Thanks very much for the help!

MOSFET wrote:
> OK, since I was the one with the smart-a.s answer, let me give this a
> shot....
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> An explanation of antenna priciples that may be useful in your search....

> With the exception of fractal antennas, the fundamentals that govern
> antennas haven't changed significantly since the '20's :)...
Richard Catrambone - 27 Oct 2006 02:50 GMT
Well, I got the shorty antenna (its about 14") and I can say that so far
the FM reception (in the Atlanta area) seems about the same as with my
prior "regular" antenna; however, AM reception is horrible.  Of the 4 AM
stations I occasionally listened to, all of which came in at least
decently with the old antenna, only 1 comes in now and even that one is
not great.  I have not been out of the Atlanta metro area since I
installed the antenna, so I don't know how the reception of Atlanta FM
stations will work when I wander a bit from town.

I guess my experience is more or less consistent with what MOSFET and
JimJ(VT) said which is that a shorter antenna is going to lose something.

Richard

> Thanks very much for the help!
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>  > With the exception of fractal antennas, the fundamentals that govern
>  > antennas haven't changed significantly since the '20's :)...
Troy T. - 27 Oct 2006 05:44 GMT
I was looking at the same type thing to replace mine and i kept seeing
film antennas. Would they be bad to since they are even smaller.

TroyT.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.