Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

STATES UNITE TO PROMOTE SUV SAFETY WITH $27 MILLION PUBLIC EDUCATION CAMPAIGN

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MidnightDad - 29 Mar 2005 18:55 GMT
http://www.esuvee.com/news/press_release.php?id=147

What's next?  $100 million to tell people not to put plastic bags over their
heads or stick knives in their eyes?
N8N - 29 Mar 2005 19:03 GMT
> http://www.esuvee.com/news/press_release.php?id=147
>
> What's next?  $100 million to tell people not to put plastic bags over their
> heads or stick knives in their eyes?

Well, when a large subset of the population apparently believes that
the automotive equivalent of running with scissors ought to be
perfectly safe, sometimes you need to have PSAs that make thinking
people scratch their heads in bewilderment.

nate
C. E. White - 29 Mar 2005 19:22 GMT
> > http://www.esuvee.com/news/press_release.php?id=147
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> perfectly safe, sometimes you need to have PSAs that make thinking
> people scratch their heads in bewilderment.

Maybe, but I don't like the idea of tax dollars being forked
over to a PR firm to create a web site that is unlikely to
be viewed by the target audience and is almost content free.
Why not traditional broadcast PSAs. I've saw the ads for
esuvee.com on TV and didn't even realize what they were for.
Instead of referring people to a web site, why not just
repeapt the main points made by the web site - there are
only three 1) drive at a reasonable speed; 2) properly
inflate your tires; 3) properly load your vehicle. All this
is covered in the owners guide.

This web site smacks of a tax paper funded scam.

Ed
MidnightDad - 29 Mar 2005 19:36 GMT
>> > http://www.esuvee.com/news/press_release.php?id=147
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Ed

You're exactly correct.  Shouldn't all drivers observe the three points?
Why are SUV's singled out?  Although the stated purpose of this campaign is
to promote SUV safety, its true motive is to further demonize SUV's and
their drivers.  Long after the safety messages are forgotten, people will
connect the mascot (a snarling, hulking behemoth) with SUV's.
Brent P - 29 Mar 2005 20:09 GMT
> You're exactly correct.  Shouldn't all drivers observe the three points?
> Why are SUV's singled out?  Although the stated purpose of this campaign is
> to promote SUV safety, its true motive is to further demonize SUV's and
> their drivers.  Long after the safety messages are forgotten, people will
> connect the mascot (a snarling, hulking behemoth) with SUV's.

If a porsche 911 is a few feet off my rear bumper, it's not so bad. When
a ford expedition is, I become very concerned. The former can stop faster
than my car, the later can't. The former vehicle has better ability to
avoid a collision by changing course than the later. That's not even
considering the impact outcome because of the mass difference.

The problem is the low performing vehicles being mated with low
performing drivers. When idiots all bought BMWs,Vettes,Porsches and the
like to show off, at least they moved into a vehicle that could actually
make up for some of their driving definencies. SUVs amplify them.
Magnulus - 29 Mar 2005 21:44 GMT
> If a porsche 911 is a few feet off my rear bumper, it's not so bad. When
> a ford expedition is, I become very concerned. The former can stop faster
> than my car, the later can't. The former vehicle has better ability to
> avoid a collision by changing course than the later. That's not even
> considering the impact outcome because of the mass difference.

  Exactly- the consequences of lack of maintanence or attention for an SUV
is more dire than with a car.  SUV's are not cars and do not handle like
cars, that needs to be hammered home.
John Harlow - 29 Mar 2005 19:42 GMT
> Why not traditional broadcast PSAs.

Probably because the SUV advertisers wouldn't like it ;)
Paul - 29 Mar 2005 22:41 GMT
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:22:06 -0500, C. E. White , one of an infinite
number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters said the following
in rec.autos.driving...

> Maybe, but I don't like the idea of tax dollars being forked
> over to a PR firm to create a web site that is unlikely to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> inflate your tires; 3) properly load your vehicle. All this
> is covered in the owners guide.

Point 1, IMO, would be better made to say that an SUV is a truck and not
a car and as such will not handle like a car (particularly WRT stopping
distance and cornering) and should be driven accordingly. All to often, I
see SUV drivers driving like they think they are Jeff Gordon or Dale
Earnhardt Jr., putting everyone else at risk (including responsible SUV
drivers and yes, I see a few) with their foolish behavior.

Points 2 and 3 are also very valid points, and they should apply to all
vehicles, not just SUVs.

John Harlow - 30 Mar 2005 05:03 GMT
> Point 1, IMO, would be better made to say that an SUV is a truck and
> not a car and as such will not handle like a car

It already says this on the back of SUV sun visors.  If they don't
understand it from there, I doubt a TV ad will make much difference.  I
imagine most SUV types have Replay or Tivo now anyway and would just zip
past the ad.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.