Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / April 2005
Dumb c.nt Gets Creamed While Yacking on her Cell Phone
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Scott en Aztl?n - 14 Apr 2005 03:12 GMT As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight:
A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the path of an oncoming Metra train. She was dragged two blocks and died.
Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in Chicago very soon.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Skip Elliott Bowman - 14 Apr 2005 04:17 GMT > As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: > > A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the > time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the > path of an oncoming Metra train. She was dragged two blocks and died.
> Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in > Chicago very soon. How many people die each year trying to run train crossings? This was a problem long before cell phones.
They'll need a lot more than this to pass a ban.
Brent P - 14 Apr 2005 06:13 GMT > "Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message >> A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the >> time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the >> path of an oncoming Metra train. She was dragged two blocks and died.
> How many people die each year trying to run train crossings? This was a > problem long before cell phones. But how many drove *through* the arm?
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:06 GMT >They'll need a lot more than this to pass a ban. You have never been to Chicago, obviously.
Years ago Chicago banned having more than 2 pets because an old lady died and her 30 or so cats were left to starve. So now fish tanks are illegal in Chicago.
Michele Goudie - 14 Apr 2005 05:33 GMT > Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in > Chicago very soon. You must not read the Trib much.
That was tried last week and postponed. One Alderman was concerned that the cops would pick off drivers coming back from the adjacent suburb on errands.
Michele
Scott en Aztl?n - 14 Apr 2005 14:48 GMT >> Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in >> Chicago very soon. > >You must not read the Trib much. You're right - it's not easy to find a copy here in SoCal.
>That was tried last week and postponed. Last week was before this accident.
>One Alderman was concerned that the >cops would pick off drivers coming back from the adjacent suburb on errands. Tell me, will CPD give a parking ticket (or a Denver Boot) to a suburban car that's just in town for an errand? Will they write a speeding ticket for a suburban driver?
That Alderman might have won the battle, but he's going to lose the war.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Michele Goudie - 14 Apr 2005 15:54 GMT >>> Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in >>> Chicago very soon. >> >>You must not read the Trib much. > > You're right - it's not easy to find a copy here in SoCal. Duuurrrrrh.
http://www.chicagotribune.com
> Tell me, will CPD give a parking ticket (or a Denver Boot) to a > suburban car that's just in town for an errand? Will they write a > speeding ticket for a suburban driver? Booting isn't done by the CPD. It's done by the Dept. of Rev who has specially equipped vans to find cars.
And speeding tickets are only regularly tracked on certain streets and LSD.
Michele
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 16:07 GMT Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
>>One Alderman was concerned that the >>cops would pick off drivers coming back from the adjacent suburb on errands. > > Tell me, will CPD give a parking ticket (or a Denver Boot) to a > suburban car that's just in town for an errand? Will they write a > speeding ticket for a suburban driver? I think he was more concerned with people getting caught "crossing the border" then making sure the law only targets suburbanites.
> That Alderman might have won the battle, but he's going to lose the > war. Not for a while at least.
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend - 14 Apr 2005 06:12 GMT Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in > Chicago very soon. The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all because people drive carelessly.
Magnulus - 14 Apr 2005 06:50 GMT > The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out >of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all >because people drive carelessly. Are you serious? Do you have any studies to back up the idea that radios cause traffic accidents- actually listening to the radio? There are some studies that show that fiddling with stereo controls contributes to accidents (especially if the person takes their eyes off the road), and that loud stereos might contribute as well, but actually listening to the radio causing an accident? I'm very sceptical.
Also, a frequent bit of advice is to turn on the stereo on very long drives if the driver becomes bored or fatigued.
Dave Head - 14 Apr 2005 13:24 GMT >> The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out >>of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all >>because people drive carelessly. > > Are you serious? Do you have any studies to back up the idea that radios >cause traffic accidents- actually listening to the radio? Are you serious? One of the overwhelming causes of accidents you read about in the paper is from some moron tuning the radio and not paying attention to what the hell they are doing. My good friend was hit and seriously injured from one of these tuners who ran a red light and T-boned my friend's truck. I can't imagine anyone disputing that the radio is a dangerous distraction.
That said... we can't go about, banning everything that is a distraction unless we want to make driving an incrediblely unpleasant experience. I think its one of those kinds of risks we just have to put up with if we want a decent quality of life. Just be more careful, don't give the other guy the opportunity to involve you in his accident.
And, before banning anything, the unintended consequences should be studied to find out what negative outcomes would occur from the ban. Cars with no radios cannot know, for example, that they are running straight toward a tornado, a fact that I learned from the radio a few years ago, nor can they know where all the backups on the freeway are locally. The boredom from having no entertainment in the car _might_ cause people to daydream and maybe go to sleep at the wheel, esp. late at night. There's too much rushing to ban things without considering the side effects of it - ban cell phones in cars, lotsa people (esp. me) would no longer have any use for the thing. (Don't need it at home, it doesn't work _inside_ the mall, can't use it in the theater where I spend a lot of the time that I am not at home, don't use it on the floor of the gym I belong to - I can't think of anywhere I'd make much use of it other than in the car. Things are so far apart here that _most_ of the time I spend away from the house is either at work, or driving, and I have a phone at work.) With _less_ cell phones in society, the reporting of accidents and criminal activity might suffer, causing more harm than good overall.
Study the consequences before banning things, that's all.
Dave Head
Nexus7 - 14 Apr 2005 15:32 GMT > Are you serious? One of the overwhelming causes of accidents > the paper is from some moron tuning the radio and not paying atten > My good friend was hit and seriously injured from one > of these tuners who ran a red light and T-boned my friend's truck. > imagine anyone disputing that the radio is a dangerous distraction. Operating and listening to the radio is not the same as using a cell phone. It is a habit or procedure that has been well established over decades and it is only whack jobs such as you who would make an absurd statement that it is "one of the overwhelming causes of accidents." You're one unlucky friend does not a statistic make.
> in the car. Things are so far apart here that _most_ of the time I > from the house is either at work, or driving, and I have a phone at > With _less_ cell phones in society, the reporting of accidents and > activity might suffer, causing more harm than good overall. > Study the consequences before banning things, that's all. You might be late to the party but the consequences have been studied. The people pulling the most bone-headed moves on the road are those on their hand-held cell phones. The proposed Chicago ban is not for hand-free phones, and you would know this if you had been listening to the radio instead of pissing off everybody else on the road with you poor driving while on the phone.
You also made the wingie mistake of taking what the OP said and exaggerating it into a blanket ban on cell phone usage. When somebody says "ban cell phones while driving" it is accepted that usage such as pulling over and reporting crimes, or handsfree usage, is still OK. The issue has been debated for a long enough time there is a common understanding about what the phrase means, and the proposed rule is clear on that. And how do you get your Limba if you're always on the phone and not listening to the radio you pseudo-wacko-lib?
Magnulus - 14 Apr 2005 17:54 GMT > Operating and listening to the radio is not the same as using a cell > phone. It is a habit or procedure that has been well established over > decades You should have a radio you can work without taking your eyes off the road (which is another reason I think navigational computers in cars are decidedly a double-edged sword). Also, not excessively fooling with the radio is good advice. I was riding around with a certain aquaintance who changed the radio station constantly and fooled around with it. Finally I told him "make up your mind or turn it off".
Here in Florida fooling around with the AC is pretty much a requirement- unless you have a fancy computer controlled A/C system, you'll need alot more AC in the summer when you start the car than when it finally cools off and starts turning into an icebox.
Skip Elliott Bowman - 14 Apr 2005 18:01 GMT >> Operating and listening to the radio is not the same as using a cell >> phone. It is a habit or procedure that has been well established over [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > off > and starts turning into an icebox. This is an intelligent observation--why isn't it obvious to designers? Car reviewers take ease of sightless use into account when writing their reports, so it's not like vehicle dashboard designers aren't hip to the notion. We shouldn't have to divert all our attention to working the radio/AC while driving.
John Harlow - 14 Apr 2005 18:24 GMT >> Here in Florida fooling around with the AC is pretty much a >> requirement- unless you have a fancy computer controlled A/C system, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > designers aren't hip to the notion. We shouldn't have to divert all > our attention to working the radio/AC while driving. It was addressed long ago; many car models have had steering wheel radio controls and automatic climate control for several years now.
Old Wolf - 14 Apr 2005 23:54 GMT > > This is an intelligent observation--why isn't it obvious to > > designers? Car reviewers take ease of sightless use into account [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > wheel radio controls and automatic climate control for several > years now. The problem for me is that the factory steering wheels are always heavy clunky things. My Momo wheel is well under half the weight of the factory Nissan one, and it's far easier to grip and turn.
I'd rather have the extra distraction (which I can control, of course) of operating dashboard controls, and have the light steering wheel.
Dave Head - 15 Apr 2005 00:03 GMT >> Are you serious? One of the overwhelming causes of accidents >> the paper is from some moron tuning the radio and not paying atten [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >statement that it is "one of the overwhelming causes of accidents." >You're one unlucky friend does not a statistic make. Reading it again, that statement didn't say what I meant... I guess I got a little carried away. However, I'd say fiddling with the radio is a "significant" factor in auto accident occurrence.
>> in the car. Things are so far apart here that _most_ of the time I >> from the house is either at work, or driving, and I have a phone at [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >The people pulling the most bone-headed moves on the road are those on >their hand-held cell phones. Studies I've heard reported on the radio and TV all come to the conclusion that cell phone use is _waaaay_ down for most other forms of distraction causing accidents.
>The proposed Chicago ban is not for >hand-free phones, and you would know this if you had been listening to >the radio instead of pissing off everybody else on the road with you >poor driving while on the phone. Hands-free is something else that needs studied. Some automatically think that it is safer, but studies I've heard of say that there's no difference - its the concentration that is the factor that detracts from driving, and the concentration needed to talk hands free is the same as the concentration needed to talk while holding the phone. I wouldn't mind seeing more studies, tho.
>You also made the wingie mistake of taking what the OP said and >exaggerating it into a blanket ban on cell phone usage. Because I don't believe anything is gained by inserting the requirement for hands free operation. I believe we should either go with the premise that its distracting and we're going to 1) educate people to do these two things at once more safely or 2) ban 'em althogether.
>When somebody >says "ban cell phones while driving" it is accepted that usage such as [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >clear on that. And how do you get your Limba if you're always on the >phone and not listening to the radio you pseudo-wacko-lib? Not sure what "limba" is - thought you meant Rush Limbaugh, until you say you think I'm a liberal. I'm the opposite of both liberal and conservative - I'm a libertarian - that feels he has to vote republican because its the best chance of not winding up with more useless/stupid gun control laws. a pet issue with me.
Dave Head
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:08 GMT >>> The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out >>>of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >of these tuners who ran a red light and T-boned my friend's truck. I can't >imagine anyone disputing that the radio is a dangerous distraction. Very simple, davey, the radio did not cause your friends accident, the moron who had no concept about how to pay attention to the task at hand did.
Larry Bud - 14 Apr 2005 13:31 GMT > > The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out > >of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all > >because people drive carelessly. > > Are you serious? Of course she's serious, she's a loon.
> Do you have any studies to back up the idea that radios > cause traffic accidents- actually listening to the radio? Who the hell needs studies when you're a whack job? (not YOU, mind you).
trent - 14 Apr 2005 13:46 GMT > > The cell phone ban is long overdue. Radios should also be taken out > >of cars. 110 americans killed and thousands injured EVERY DAY and all [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Also, a frequent bit of advice is to turn on the stereo on very long > drives if the driver becomes bored or fatigued. B-
trent
 Signature "This user has a pattern of behaviour in the usenet group chi.forsale that borders on abusive."
223rem - 14 Apr 2005 19:40 GMT > Also, a frequent bit of advice is to turn on the stereo on very long > drives if the driver becomes bored or fatigued. Really? Very interesting! Any references?
Dan J.S. - 14 Apr 2005 14:29 GMT > As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Look for a ban on the use of cell phones while driving to be passed in > Chicago very soon. This was someone's wife, mother and daughter. Your link says sloth kills, but reality of the problem is that apathy kills. Have some respect.
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 16:08 GMT >> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > This was someone's wife, mother and daughter. Your link says sloth kills, > but reality of the problem is that apathy kills. Have some respect. Why? She killed herself with her own idiocy. Darwin strikes again!
Dan J.S. - 14 Apr 2005 17:13 GMT >>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Why? She killed herself with her own idiocy. Darwin strikes again! She did, agreed. But let's not judge by the last action that got her killed. Apparently she was a great teacher too!
223rem - 14 Apr 2005 19:36 GMT > She did, agreed. But let's not judge by the last action that got her killed. > Apparently she was a great teacher too! Yes, she was a great teacher. She gave her life to demonstrate the perils of cell phone use at railway crossing. Now that's dedication to teaching.
Scott en Aztl?n - 14 Apr 2005 20:43 GMT >> She did, agreed. But let's not judge by the last action that got her killed. >> Apparently she was a great teacher too! > >Yes, she was a great teacher. She gave her life to demonstrate >the perils of cell phone use at railway crossing. Now that's >dedication to teaching. OF COURSE we should judge her by the last action that got her killed. If it works for the hero who throws himself on a live grenade to save his fellow soldiers, it works for the dumb c.nt who offs herself by being stupid.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:04 GMT >>>> A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the >>>> time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >She did, agreed. But let's not judge by the last action that got her killed. >Apparently she was a great teacher too! Not! A great teacher does not drive around railroad crossing gates. Remember, what she does during her free time is pretty much what she does in front of the children she teaches, and her obvious irresponsibility in this situation pretty much proves she is just as irresponsible in the classroom.
jamie - 15 Apr 2005 04:34 GMT >>>>> A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the >>>>> time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >irresponsibility in this situation pretty much proves she is just as >irresponsible in the classroom. I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but she didn't go around them, she plowed right through them. :-/
Jamie
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:46 GMT >>>>>> A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the >>>>>> time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but she didn't go around them, > she plowed right through them. :-/ If she goes around, she's consciously trying to get on the tracks when a train is coming, that's pretty stupid. If she drives through, she's not trying, she's just ignorant. Dumb vs. Ignorant. Malice vs. Negligence. Which is worse? I'll leave that to the philosophers.
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 05:56 GMT > Which is worse? I'll leave that to the philosophers. Here's one way of looking at it.
Ignorant: "People die everyday. But I won't."
Dumb: "People die everyday. But I won't, because they are DUMB and I am SMART."
It is easy to see that 99% of the Darwin Award committee falls in the latter category (but we knew it anyway, since they elected Scupid as their current spokesman).
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 07:19 GMT >> Which is worse? I'll leave that to the philosophers. > > Here's one way of looking at it. I said philosophers, not dumbosophers.
> It is easy to see that 99% of the Darwin Award committee > falls in the latter category (but we knew it anyway, since > they elected Scupid as their current spokesman). heh
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 07:44 GMT > I said philosophers, not dumbosophers. They are just nymshifts, aren't they?
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 15:19 GMT >> I said philosophers, not dumbosophers. > >They are just nymshifts, aren't they? *PLINK!*
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 16:50 GMT >> I said philosophers, not dumbosophers. > > They are just nymshifts, aren't they? true, true
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 15:20 GMT >>> Which is worse? I'll leave that to the philosophers. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >heh *PLINK!*
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 22:38 GMT >>Not! A great teacher does not drive around railroad crossing gates. >>Remember, what she does during her free time is pretty much what she [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but she didn't go around them, >she plowed right through them. :-/ Depends on the news source.
Scott en Aztl?n - 16 Apr 2005 03:12 GMT >>I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but she didn't go around them, >>she plowed right through them. :-/ > >Depends on the news source. What's odd is that WGN *is* the Chicago Tribune(*). How the hell did they end up reporting two entirely different things?
(*) "WGN" stands for "World's Greatest Newspaper."
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
jamie - 14 Apr 2005 17:39 GMT >>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Why? She killed herself with her own idiocy. Darwin strikes again! Too late! She'd already reproduced.
Jamie
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 19:13 GMT >>>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Too late! She'd already reproduced. you're right.
hopefully the kids will learn
Tushar Samant - 14 Apr 2005 19:43 GMT >>>>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > hopefully the kids will learn Learning is antithetical to "Darwinism" (a super-hilarious concept which elucidates how people are STUPID).
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 21:23 GMT >>>>>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Learning is antithetical to "Darwinism" (a super-hilarious concept > which elucidates how people are STUPID). *sigh*
Your pattern of abuse shall stand no longer.
bye-bye;
Scott en Aztl?n - 14 Apr 2005 20:43 GMT >>> This was someone's wife, mother and daughter. Your link says sloth kills, >>> but reality of the problem is that apathy kills. Have some respect. >> >>Why? She killed herself with her own idiocy. Darwin strikes again! > >Too late! She'd already reproduced. Hopefully she bought the kids cell phones before she died...
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Scott en Aztl?n - 14 Apr 2005 20:38 GMT >>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Why? She killed herself with her own idiocy. Darwin strikes again! All right, who's the politically correct pussy who replaced the word "c.nt" in the subject line with asterisks?
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 21:24 GMT Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
>>>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > All right, who's the politically correct pussy who replaced the word > "c.nt" in the subject line with asterisks? Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread?
It was Smeghead
Brent P - 14 Apr 2005 21:33 GMT > Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? > > It was Smeghead Worlds are colliding!
Geoff Gass - 14 Apr 2005 23:32 GMT >> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >> >> It was Smeghead > > Worlds are colliding! Blennie's brain a-splode!
Brent P - 15 Apr 2005 16:58 GMT >>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Blennie's brain a-splode! Who's Blennie?
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 17:15 GMT >>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Who's Blennie? Who cares. Is your brain OK?
Gregory Morrow - 15 Apr 2005 17:45 GMT > >>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? > >>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Who cares. Is your brain OK? = ^,,^=
 Signature Best Greg
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 18:37 GMT >> >>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >= ^,,^= No? OK. What is it on?
Scott en Aztl?n - 16 Apr 2005 03:04 GMT >>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Who's Blennie? I thought *you* were?
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Brent P - 16 Apr 2005 19:32 GMT >>>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I thought *you* were? I've never used such a name.
Geoff Gass - 17 Apr 2005 05:18 GMT >>>>> Worlds are colliding! >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I've never used such a name. Still funny! Blennie slays!
Scott en Aztl?n - 17 Apr 2005 07:28 GMT >>>>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >I've never used such a name. Maybe not, but it sure seems to be Tushar's pet name for you...
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Geoff Gass - 16 Apr 2005 15:34 GMT >>>> Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Who's Blennie? that one never gets old
Tushar Samant - 14 Apr 2005 21:41 GMT > Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >><glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > It was Smeghead Scupid doesn't really want to know. He's is on a roll man... Probably been a while since he got to call someone else dumb. I'll bet he can't do those petty displays of power at work anymore. It's highly intelligent (by Dumbaztlan standards) to have figured out an opposition-free way to call someone DUMB! Congratulations to Scupid!
sticks - 15 Apr 2005 01:46 GMT >>Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > to have figured out an opposition-free way to call someone > DUMB! Congratulations to Scupid! Smeski was right in the first place. You have to remember that this is the dumb f.ck out in lala land who thinks it is his right to see every last bit of personal suffering people experience so long as it happens out in public, if you do recall. He's a simple minded coward by all appearances.
He posts in chi.gen in the middle of winter about the climate here like a teenager picking on his little pricked friends, oblivious to the fact that we like it here. He goes on crossposting binges, even though he knows Geoff will freak and most thinking people don't like the confusion they cause. It's like talking even when mom tells him to shut up. He uses this tragedy to call a woman a "c.nt" and then bitches when someone removes the term. Think he uses the word around his mommy?
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 02:58 GMT >Smeski was right in the first place. You have to remember that this is >the dumb f.ck out in lala land who thinks it is his right to see every >last bit of personal suffering people experience so long as it happens >out in public, if you do recall. Shelle? Why the nymshift??
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 05:28 GMT Scupid en Dumbaztlán wrote:
>>Smeski was right in the first place. You have to remember that this is >>the dumb f.ck out in lala land who thinks it is his right to see every >>last bit of personal suffering people experience so long as it happens >>out in public, if you do recall. > > Shelle? Why the nymshift?? What a clever word, "nymshift". You finally cleared the Darwin line with that one, Scupid. With an IQ like that, if you die from a disastrous accident you will clearly remember not to be in public.
One less death for your "Darwin Award" committee buddies to go into screaming fits of terror over ...
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 15:16 GMT >> Shelle? Why the nymshift?? > >What a clever word, "nymshift". You finally cleared the Darwin >line with that one, Scupid. With an IQ like that, if you die >from a disastrous accident you will clearly remember not to >be in public. What's with all the hostility, Tushie?
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:43 GMT > He posts in chi.gen in the middle of winter about the climate here like > a teenager picking on his little pricked friends, oblivious to the fact [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > He uses this tragedy to call a woman a "c.nt" and then bitches when > someone removes the term. Think he uses the word around his mommy? hey tush, you should keep an eye on sticks
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 05:48 GMT >> He posts in chi.gen in the middle of winter about the climate here like >> a teenager picking on his little pricked friends, oblivious to the fact [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > hey tush, you should keep an eye on sticks I need to make sure he's not a nymshift.
whatever in the f.ck that means
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:52 GMT >>> He posts in chi.gen in the middle of winter about the climate here like >>> a teenager picking on his little pricked friends, oblivious to the fact [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > whatever in the f.ck that means It's almost as clever as sneck, but Scup is no Qermone
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:11 GMT another moron troll pussy bites the dust.
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 05:31 GMT > another moron troll pussy bites the dust. You figured out the "delete" function in your editor? I am slain! You are clearly many 100ths of a point smarter than you look.
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:42 GMT >> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. > > You figured out the "delete" function in your editor? > I am slain! You are clearly many 100ths of a point > smarter than you look. *plonk*
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 05:45 GMT >>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > *plonk* How did I know you would take the low road again? Sigh;; bye\bye
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:51 GMT >>>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > How did I know you would take the low road again? > Sigh;; bye\bye That's IT. You've crossed the line this time. Your mockery will stop. I am reporting you to the LORD AND MASTER OF USENET
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 15:17 GMT >>>>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >That's IT. You've crossed the line this time. Your mockery will stop. I >am reporting you to the LORD AND MASTER OF USENET No need - I already know about him.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 16:12 GMT Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
><glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>>>><scribble@pobox.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > No need - I already know about him. Gotta give it to Scupe ... it is always interesting to watch him cope.
Scott en Aztl?n - 16 Apr 2005 03:08 GMT >Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >><glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >Gotta give it to Scupe ... it is always interesting to >watch him cope. I learned it all from Tushar Samant, Master Debater.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Tushar Samant - 16 Apr 2005 08:04 GMT Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
><scribble@pobox.com> wrote: >>Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > I learned it all from Tushar Samant, Master Debater. You are its homonymshift.
Geoff Gass - 16 Apr 2005 15:36 GMT > Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >><scribble@pobox.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > You are its homonymshift. heh x 1
Tushar Samant - 16 Apr 2005 15:43 GMT >> Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >>><scribble@pobox.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > heh x 1 Look it up in the dictionary. It will come to you.
I bet DTJ got it ... fuckin DTJ ... I am gonna keep my eye on him
Bernard farquart - 15 Apr 2005 07:32 GMT >> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. > > You figured out the "delete" function in your editor? > I am slain! You are clearly many 100ths of a point > smarter than you look. You can *see* him? wow that must be some bitchin' newsreader ya got there.
Bernard
Tushar Samant - 15 Apr 2005 07:43 GMT >>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You can *see* him? wow that must be some bitchin' > newsreader ya got there. You are smarter than DTJ.
Bernard farquart - 16 Apr 2005 04:41 GMT >>>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > You are smarter than DTJ. That may or may not be true, but even I can not see the people on the NG. You must be the master of the internet we have heard so much about.
Bernard
Geoff Gass - 16 Apr 2005 15:35 GMT >>>>> another moron troll pussy bites the dust. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > see the people on the NG. You must be the master of > the internet we have heard so much about. Nono. Tushar can only dream of being:
ADAM H. KERMAN, LORD AND MASTER OF USENET
but it's a good dream, so he can keep it.
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 02:55 GMT >> Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >>><glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >Scupid doesn't really want to know. He's is on a roll man... >Probably been a while since he got to call someone else dumb. I had plenty of opportunities, but you're just too easy a target. ;)
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 02:54 GMT On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Dumass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote:
>Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >>>>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Your newsreader broken? Can't back up the thread? It was my killfile in action.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
Geoff Gass - 15 Apr 2005 05:50 GMT Scott en Dumztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Dumass How incredibly clever!
><glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>Scott en Dumbztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > It was my killfile in action. killfiles are for c.nts.
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 15:17 GMT >Scott en Dumztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Dumass [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > >killfiles are for c.nts. Yep - and mine is bulging with them.
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 22:55 GMT On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:17:42 -0700, Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:50:30 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Gass >>killfiles are for c.nts. > >Yep - and mine is bulging with them. Exceptional comeback Scott, but I fear little jeffy won't get it.
Tushar Samant - 16 Apr 2005 00:35 GMT ><slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: >>On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:50:30 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Gass [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Exceptional comeback Scott, but I fear little jeffy won't get it. Well, now we know who "gets" Scupie's "exceptional comebacks".
Keep The Wix Alive
Geoff Gass - 16 Apr 2005 15:34 GMT > On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:17:42 -0700, Scott en Aztlán ><slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Exceptional comeback Scott, but I fear little jeffy won't get it. yeah, that was a pretty complex joke. i'll go ask tushar to explain it to me
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:02 GMT >> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >This was someone's wife, mother and daughter. Your link says sloth kills, >but reality of the problem is that apathy kills. Have some respect. Hey fucktard, how did Scott's apathy cause the c.nt to kill herself?
Dan J.S. - 15 Apr 2005 14:44 GMT >>> As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Hey fucktard, how did Scott's apathy cause the c.nt to kill herself? You would not understand it. Just go back to getting that milk for your momma.
DTJ - 15 Apr 2005 02:05 GMT On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:12:41 -0700, Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
>As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: > >A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the >time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the >path of an oncoming Metra train. She was dragged two blocks and died. The news this morning said she drove "around" the gates, not through them. In either case, you are 100% correct on her being a stupid c.nt.
Scott en Aztl?n - 15 Apr 2005 03:00 GMT >>As reported by the WGN News at Nine tonight: >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >The news this morning said she drove "around" the gates, not through >them. Alison Payne and Steve Sanders said she crashed THROUGH them. I'm merely reporting what I was told.
>In either case, you are 100% correct on her being a stupid c.nt.
:)
 Signature Sloth Kills! http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
John David Galt - 29 Apr 2005 07:58 GMT Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the > time, crashed through a downed crossing arm and ran directly into the > path of an oncoming Metra train. She was dragged two blocks and died. I feel sorry... for all the innocent people who were delayed as a result of this moron offing herself by stupidity. And I hope she managed to do it before she had any kids.
Jean Smith - 29 Apr 2005 08:43 GMT > Scott en Aztlán wrote: > > A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > of this moron offing herself by stupidity. And I hope she managed to do > it before she had any kids. <URL:http://www.nbc5.com/news/4374998/detail.html?z=dp&dpswid=2265 994&dppid=65194>
 Signature http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200504/s1351244.htm http:// www.jerseygop.com/RepublicanBabes38.html http://tinyurl.com/cf2u5 http://webcast.ucsd.edu:8080/ramgen/UCSD_TV/9278.rm | Societies Disasterous Decisions http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/diamond03/diamond_index.html
Scott en Aztlán - 29 Apr 2005 15:36 GMT >> Scott en Aztlán wrote: >> > A stupid c.nt, who was talking to her husband on her cell phone at the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> of this moron offing herself by stupidity. And I hope she managed to do >> it before she had any kids. Too late for that, unfortunately. One wonders what sorts of things someone who would drive around lowered crossing gates has been teaching the children in her class, not to mention her own children. It seems pretty certain that good judgement couldn't have been one of them...
><URL:http://www.nbc5.com/news/4374998/detail.html?z=dp&dpswid=2265994&dppid=65194> The woman had been talking to her husband on a cellular phone at the time, Dennis said. She drove around lowered gates at the railroad crossing and her SUV was hit and dragged for two blocks, he said.
Described as hardworking and dedicated to her pupils, school Principal Donald Butler said Quintero was always friendly and outgoing.
"She was always talking," Butler said.
 Signature Life is short - drive fast! http://www.geocities.com/scottenaztlan/
|
|
|