Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CBS' Misfeasances and 'Contrived Reality'

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LeMod Pol - 14 May 2005 18:45 GMT
The CBS "Cold Case" Files
By Sherrie Gossett  |  May 13, 2005
In June 1988, Laurence Tisch, then-president of CBS,
Inc, even spoke in support of Accuracy in Media's
resolution presented at the CBS annual meeting, for CBS
to hire an ombudsman or "viewers' advocate" because of
so many flawed stories at the network.  

With Nightline possibly being replaced by a
nightclub-themed "News Cabaret" show, Dan Rather in
pseudo-retirement following 'Memogate', and broadcast
news in general castigated in the new book Bad News,
60-Minutes founder Don Hewitt thinks he has the answer.

In an April 20 interview with The New York Observer's
Joe Hagan, Hewitt pitched the idea of a new PBS show,
which sounds an awful lot like a revamped 60 Minutes:
"With general reality being shoved aside by NBC, ABC
and CBS for contrived reality TV, public television is
in a position to bring back CBS-style news," Hewitt
said. "In that regard, I think an hour of television a
week, devoted to two, three or four well-crafted,
judiciously edited documentaries on a variety of
subjects would be a winner."

"I want to do it 60 Minutes-style," said Hewitt.

Hewitt strikes a tone of idealism with his call for
"reality" in TV news, as opposed to "contrived
reality." However, his broadcast hasn't always meshed
very well with the concept of reality or news. Indeed,
CBS' 60 Minutes has had its share of forays into
"contrived reality" and in so doing has contributed to
a manipulative news culture where material presented to
viewers need not correspond to reality.

Consider 1992, when NBC hit its "electronic Titanic"
over a rigged piece on GM vehicles that seemed to
suggest they caught fire easily. Concealed from viewers
was the fact that incendiary devices had been placed
underneath the vehicles, causing them to burst into
flame. CBS was quick to tell the L.A. Times that "[CBS]
standards forbid the sort of staging that got NBC into
trouble." Hewitt himself told media back then "If that
had happened at '60 Minutes' I'd be looking for a job
tomorrow." He added, "For the life of me, I can't
figure out why anybody would do that. It's not
something anybody at 60 Minutes would do."

Walter Olson, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute,
was quick to expose CBS's hypocrisy, in a devastating
article titled "It Didn't Start With Dateline NBC,"
published in National Review on June 21, 1993. Call it
the CBS "Cold Case" files: incidents of journalistic
malfeasance that have yet to be fully prosecuted.

Olson cited the following incidents:

*   

December 1980: "60 Minutes" reported that the "CJ" Jeep
was dangerously stable, and tipped over easily. Olson
discovered testers had put the Jeeps through 435 runs
to get 8 rollovers. A single Jeep was used 201 times to
get 4 rollovers, suggesting degraded tire tread and
other key safety margins were contributing but
unacknowledged factors. Robot drivers twisted the
steering wheel at rates almost doubling that used in
emergency driving, while gunning the accelerator.
*   

March 1981: An Emmy-winning "60 Minutes" segment showed
scary scenarios of tire rims on heavy trucks flying
off, shredding dummies nearby. Withheld from viewers
was the fact the metal rims had been "modified" to get
them to unravel. Olson discovered ultimately 70% of the
rims had to be been shaved down to get the desired
effect. "Should 60 Minutes have to give back its Emmy?"
asked Olson. "Nah. Maybe they can just take the
statuette to a machine shop and have 70% of it filed off."
*   

In 1986 "60 Minutes" turned its attack journalism on
the Audi 5000, despite the fact Audi had one of the
best safety records on the road. "Sudden acceleration"
was the hobgoblin now, and Olson quipped that the
segment presented Audis as though they had been
possessed: backing into garages, darting into swimming
pools, plowing into bank teller lines, doing everything
but flying on a broomstick - even as drivers were
standing on the brake. Audi lawyers claimed that the
"expert" in the segment, William Rosenbluth, had
drilled a hole in the car's transmission, and attached
a hose leading to tank of compressed air or fluid. Even
though the tank and attached hose were sitting on the
front passenger seat of the Audi, those intrepid
investigative reporters at 60 Minutes managed to keep
any view of the tank off camera and out of the
awareness of viewers.

There are some common threads between these examples of
60 Minutes faux-news. William Rosenbluth, the "expert"
who reportedly modified the Audi, was actually an
expert witness testifying against the carmaker. And the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), whose
dramatic footage "60 Minutes" liked to use, was
actually a group founded by and made up of trial
attorneys. Olson reported that an internal memo from
the IIHS proposed arranging variables in the Jeep
segment "to ensure rollover." Olson also discovered Ben
Kelley's name popped often in the stories. Kelley was
working at the Insurance Institute and later left as a
full-time hired plaintiff's expert and network source.
He also turned up in the Dateline affair.

Is this the sort of "reality based news" the U.S.
taxpayer needs to fund now? We wonder how automobile
manufacturers would feel having to contribute part of
their paycheck for the production of such garbage.

The above-mentioned examples are just the tip of the
CBS iceberg. AIM has been monitoring and reporting on
CBS gaffes longer than any other organization. AIM
staff members have been interviewed by numerous TV news
programs and newspapers about their CBS analyses. In
June 1988, Laurence Tisch, then-president of CBS, Inc,
even spoke in support of Accuracy in Media's resolution
presented at the CBS annual meeting, for CBS to hire an
ombudsman or "viewers' advocate" because of so many
flawed stories at the network.

Even so, CBS went on to defend their questionable
segments. On Larry King's CNN show in 1993, Ed Bradley
defended the Audi and infamous Alar apple scare
stories: "First of all, they're not mistaken. Secondly,
they are true." On the Audi matter he added, "It's not
a figment of our imagination. It actually happened,
whether you believe it or not."

Back to Don Hewitt. Did he ever apologize? On Crossfire
that same year, Hewitt defended the Audi show as well
by asking why had Audi recalled the vehicles after the
60 Minutes episode. Actually, it was to add an
"idiot-proof" device to prevent people from shifting
into gear unless their foot was on the brake.

In addition to contributing a significant library of
"contrived reality" to news history, 60 Minutes and Don
Hewitt have also contributed to the pattern of denial
of wrongdoing by elites at the top of news
organizations, a pattern Dan Rather automatically
adhered to when he uttered false statements on the air
in defense of the "Memogate" segment. Some humility,
apologies and the return of that Emmy might be a good
place to start.  Is Hewitt listening?

--
LP

"A little sunlight is the best disinfectant," Supreme
Court Justice Louis Brandeis commented. "Never
more so than when it exposes towering hypocrisy."
Daniel J. Stern - 15 May 2005 00:18 GMT
Heavens to McGillicuddy.

Y'mean they tell lies on TV, now, too?

Wow. Makes me (even) glad(der) I don't watch the fool thing.

DS
LeMod Pol - 16 May 2005 23:06 GMT
The Guardian reports today a public embarrassment for
Reuters - 'a senior editor's memo that outlined the
media and information company's "terrible quality problems"':

In a memo that has led to comparisons with former
jeweler Gerald Ratner - who famously described his own
company's product as 'crap' - Reuters' global managing
editor David Schlesinger wrote: 'Our news is perceived
as not having enough insight. Our data is perceived as
having terrible quality problems'... The note [was]
intended to be sent to 10 senior managers but [was]
actually distributed to thousands of Reuters staff.

HR subscribers will remember Schlesinger for another
other candid admission - that Reuters appeases Mideast
terrorists through the news outlet's choice of
language. Reuters, long criticized by HonestReporting
for imbalanced coverage of the Mideast conflict, was
the ignominious winner of the 2003 Dishonest Reporting
'Award'.
~~     ~~^~~     ~~
Reuters red-faced over memo mistake
Jane Martinson - Tuesday April 12, 2005
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1457471,00.html
Union officials at Reuters have called a meeting for
today that will discuss a senior editor's memo that
outlined the media and information company's "terrible
quality problems".

In a memo that has led to comparisons with former
jeweller Gerald Ratner - who famously described his own
company's product as "crap" - Reuters' global managing
editor David Schlesinger wrote: "Our news is perceived
as not having enough insight. Our data is perceived as
having terrible quality problems."

Ratners went into rapid decline after his comment and
eventually Mr Ratner was forced out of the company by
angry shareholders.

The note, intended to be sent to 10 senior managers but
actually distributed to thousands of Reuters staff,
went on to say that the group had a "web of inefficient
and duplicative technology".

Union officials made their protests about the memo
known directly to Mr Schlesinger. "It's not an ideal
time to make a comment like that," said one.

Mr Schlesinger told the Guardian that "quite a bit" of
the reaction he had received to the note had been
"supportive".

"They saw it for what it was, an attempt to provoke a
small group of people... into thinking about how we
should improve for the future."

The comments, in a note headed, "the burning platform
in content", were meant to be discussed at a working
group convened by the editor-in-chief, Geert Linnebank,
but were mistakenly distributed more widely.

Mr Schlesinger denied that his comments denigrated
Reuters, which is involved in a battle for market share
against Bloomberg. "We are very, very good in a number
of the things we do... but we are certainly not
perfect," he said.

[About 6 years ago Reuters was caught stealing data
from Bloonberg -- their new Tech mgr (hired from
Citibank) took the fall - LP]
 
Arif Khokar - 17 May 2005 00:42 GMT
> Reuters, long criticized by HonestReporting
> for imbalanced coverage of the Mideast conflict

So, are journalists supposed to report that the one country in the
middle east with the most advanced offensive and defensive capabilities
is the victim of circumstance?

They either should annex the territories and grant full rights and
freedoms to the inhabitants, or they should get the hell out.
James C. Reeves - 16 May 2005 23:44 GMT
This is all old news that everybody already knows.  What's the point?!
Jim Yanik - 17 May 2005 03:37 GMT
"James C. Reeves" <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote in news:Gcydnb5shuHdvxTfRVn-
gw@comcast.com:

> This is all old news that everybody already knows.  What's the point?!

Seems you can add Newsweek to that category;(no credibility)

(Koran-toilet issue)

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

TwitteringOne - 17 May 2005 20:29 GMT
I did not know ~ !
LeMod Pol - 17 May 2005 11:28 GMT
Original newsgroups restored

Jim Yanik wrote:
> "James C. Reeves" <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote in news:Gcydnb5shuHdvxTfRVn-
> gw@comcast.com:
> > This is all old news that everybody already knows.  What's the point?!
> Seems you can add Newsweek to that category;(no credibility)

Also its parent - DC Post, and sister - Slate

--
LP

The libs keep on  broadcasting the faeces of the male
bovine animal, and pray that the excrement never hits
the portable cooling device
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.