
Signature
Paul.
Self appointed unofficial overseer
of kooks and trolls in rec.autos.driving
> Still think that what I saw on the gas pump was some kind of dream in a
> Dali-esque sort of way:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I assume that someone somewhere at the station made a mistake, but it was
> thatway on the sign and on the pumps.
Looks like the 2.999 had the first 9 flipped upside-down. Should have
been 2.699
Paul. - 29 Sep 2005 14:08 GMT
On 29 Sep 2005 05:59:43 -0700, Larry Bud <larrybud2002@yahoo.com> said
the following in rec.autos.driving...
> > Still think that what I saw on the gas pump was some kind of dream in a
> > Dali-esque sort of way:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Looks like the 2.999 had the first 9 flipped upside-down. Should have
> been 2.699
That's what I thought when I entered the gas station (the sign by the
street has to be changed by hand and the pumps are digital), but the
pumps also had the same pricing. Needless to say, I bought the Plus
instead of regular today (I didn't feel like going to another station
over this matter)...

Signature
Paul.
Self appointed unofficial overseer
of kooks and trolls in rec.autos.driving
> Still think that what I saw on the gas pump was some kind of dream in a
> Dali-esque sort of way:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I assume that someone somewhere at the station made a mistake, but it was
> thatway on the sign and on the pumps.
Saw something similar several years ago, driving cross-country. I was in
the middle of SD somewhere. Pulled just off I-90 to refuel at one of the
few exits that had gas available (that area is rather low-density, ha ha).
There was no unusual volatility in gas prices at the time. But this station
was selling 91 octane for 10 cents less per gallon than 87 octane, and their
87 octane price was the same as the 87 octane price for other stations in
the area. I even ASKED about it, as the 91 octane was selling cheaper than
the usual price of 87 octane, on both the sign and the pumps. The clerk
behind the counter said there was a local surplus of 91 octane. I didn't
question it. Needless to say, my car got a tankful of 91 octane. :) -Dave
Kevin Rhodes - 29 Sep 2005 16:51 GMT
> Still think that what I saw on the gas pump was some kind of dream in a
>> Dali-esque sort of way:
>>
>> Regular Unleaded: $2.999/gal
>> Plus Unleaded: $2.789/gal
>> Super Unleaded: $2.899/gal
This is common in the Midwest - Plus and Super have 10% ethanol in them,
regular is straight gasoline. Saw it in Des Moines last week. Problem is that
ethanol has rather lower energy content than gasoline, even though it has a
higher octane rating. So gas mileage is inevitably lower.May or may not
balance out in terms of total cost.
Kevin Rhodes
Westbrook, Maine (but travels all over the country for work)
DTJ - 30 Sep 2005 01:14 GMT
>> Still think that what I saw on the gas pump was some kind of dream in a
>>> Dali-esque sort of way:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>This is common in the Midwest - Plus and Super have 10% ethanol in them,
>regular is straight gasoline. Saw it in Des Moines last week. Problem is that
Des Moines is not the entire Midwest. There is no such thing in
Chicago.
>Regular Unleaded: $2.999/gal
>Plus Unleaded: $2.789/gal
>Super Unleaded: $2.899/gal
Milk Lowfat: $2.59/gal

Signature
-john
wide-open at throttle dot info
Roy Shroyer - 30 Sep 2005 13:44 GMT
>>Regular Unleaded: $2.999/gal
>>Plus Unleaded: $2.789/gal
>>Super Unleaded: $2.899/gal
>
> Milk Lowfat: $2.59/gal
That's about the stupidest f.cking comment I've ever seen posted on this
newsgroup in the last 7 years. Given the presence of Judy/LBMHBF or
whatever it is, that's saying something. Congratulations.
Please elaborate on how milk enables us to drive our cars to work. How we
need milk to function for economic activity in this country. Wake the f.ck
up.
Cheers.