Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Right turn signal required on green traffic light?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken Jones - 27 Apr 2006 16:31 GMT
Hi,

I just got ticketed for making a right turn on GREEN light without
turning my right-turn-signal light on.

Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
when the traffic light is green on your direction?

Thanks,
Ken
Arif Khokar - 27 Apr 2006 16:43 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
> when the traffic light is green on your direction?

What happened?  Did you forget to change your blinker fluid?
Mike T. - 27 Apr 2006 16:58 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Ken

Turn signals are required for all turns.  It doesn't matter if the turn is
LEGAL or not.  In this case, the turn would have probably been legal, if
you'd bothered to put your signal on.  But as you didn't signal, you got the
ticket you earned.  -Dave
Andrew - 27 Apr 2006 18:23 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> you'd bothered to put your signal on.  But as you didn't signal, you got
> the ticket you earned.  -Dave

Makes me wonder if Ken learned to drive in the South. They tend to not use
their turn signals in the South and the police there ignore it...

Signature

Mr. Transmission Sucks!
http://mrtransmissionsucks.com

John F. Carr - 27 Apr 2006 20:09 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Turn signals are required for all turns.

That is not true in California.  Vehicle Code section 22107
requires use of turn signals only when other vehicles would
be affected by the turn.  The law is the same in Massachusetts
where I live.  Many other states do require unnecessary use
of turn signals.

Signature

   John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)

Brent P - 27 Apr 2006 20:32 GMT
> That is not true in California.  Vehicle Code section 22107
> requires use of turn signals only when other vehicles would
> be affected by the turn.  The law is the same in Massachusetts
> where I live.  Many other states do require unnecessary use
> of turn signals.

Like the cop behind him or any number of other drivers at that
intersection.


Dave - 27 Apr 2006 23:30 GMT
>> That is not true in California.  Vehicle Code section 22107
>> requires use of turn signals only when other vehicles would
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Like the cop behind him or any number of other drivers at that
> intersection.

Don't forget the drivers, pedestrians, motorcyclists, etc., that the driver
HAD NOT SEEN YET.  -Dave
Motorhead Lawyer - 27 Apr 2006 23:01 GMT
> >Turn signals are required for all turns.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> where I live.  Many other states do require unnecessary use
> of turn signals.

So now you're left arguing the meaning of "affected".  If I had to
gamble a couple hundred bucks and some points on my license that I can
convince a judge that anyone seeing my turn signal is "unaffected", I'd
just use the signal.  In fact, I do.

As far as Massachusetts is concerned, common practice throughout New
England not only mandates that one NOT SIGNAL a right turn but that one
NEVER STOP before making one, regardless of the current coloration of
any traffic signals in the vicinity.

Ask the *first* rear bumper of my old Toyota how I know this.
--
C.R. Krieger
(foolish enough to believe that 'right turn on red after stopping'
actually means that)
Ken Jones - 27 Apr 2006 23:30 GMT
It happened at 5:30 am when the streets were practically empty (except
for the cop hiding on one of the side street).

Ken.

> > >Turn signals are required for all turns.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> (foolish enough to believe that 'right turn on red after stopping'
> actually means that)
Dave - 28 Apr 2006 00:11 GMT
> It happened at 5:30 am when the streets were practically empty (except
> for the cop hiding on one of the side street).
>
> Ken.

It doesn't matter what happened.  The fact is, you did not see and COULD not
see all the traffic and potential traffic around you.  That is when it is
most important to use the signal.  That is, ALWAYS, as you can never be 100%
sure that you have seen ALL traffic around you.  -Dave
John F. Carr - 28 Apr 2006 00:18 GMT
>> It happened at 5:30 am when the streets were practically empty (except
>> for the cop hiding on one of the side street).
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>most important to use the signal.  That is, ALWAYS, as you can never be 100%
>sure that you have seen ALL traffic around you.  -Dave

So you think police ticket law-abiding drivers whose legal
driving you happen to disapprove of?  I bet a cop could
find something to throw you in jail for if freed from
the requirement that he only arrest you for illegal acts.

Signature

   John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)

royaldothighness@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2006 02:19 GMT
Remember it's close to the end of the month. Cops need to meet their
quota for the month. They can always find something wrong with every
driver. What can you say? They are crook.

Royal

> >> It happened at 5:30 am when the streets were practically empty (except
> >> for the cop hiding on one of the side street).
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> find something to throw you in jail for if freed from
> the requirement that he only arrest you for illegal acts.
Alex Rodriguez - 28 Apr 2006 22:05 GMT
>> It happened at 5:30 am when the streets were practically empty (except
>> for the cop hiding on one of the side street).
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>most important to use the signal.  That is, ALWAYS, as you can never be 100%
>sure that you have seen ALL traffic around you.  -Dave

Does the cop hiding in the bushes count as traffic?
-----------------
Alex
Tom Royer - 28 Apr 2006 14:37 GMT
>>> Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> where I live.  Many other states do require unnecessary use
> of turn signals.

Why even worry if the signal is necessary or not.  Just signal
for all turns or lane changes; you'll never be wrong -- and you
won't have to think about it.
Scott en Aztlán - 29 Apr 2006 22:41 GMT
>>>> Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
>>>> when the traffic light is green on your direction?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>for all turns or lane changes; you'll never be wrong -- and you
>won't have to think about it.

For some reason, it's "uncool" or "too much work" or something equally
lame for some people to use their turn signals. OTOH, other people
think that by turning on their signal you are REQUIRED to yield the
right-of-way to them, even if it means you have to slam on your
brakes.

One thing you almost never see here in SoCal is the use of a turn
signal when entering or exiting a freeway. I think I may be the only
driver in the entire state who does it. ;)
Signature

What the heck, I'll play too.
- Dave

Pooh Bear - 27 Apr 2006 16:58 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
> when the traffic light is green on your direction?

What puzzles me is why you think it's acceptable *not* to use an
indicator in such a situation.

Graham
Jim Yanik - 27 Apr 2006 17:01 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Ken

DUH,that's what turn signals are FOR,when you -make a turn- !!!

USE THEM.

(suppose a person was going to cross the street,and seeing no turn
signal,thinks you are going straight,and walks out in your path?)

They also let people behind you know what you are doing,why you are
slowing,for instance.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Brent P - 27 Apr 2006 20:31 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
> when the traffic light is green on your direction?

Is this a troll or a window on the 'I used my turn signal so you must
yield to me' mentality?

Signals are to be used when other traffic is present, period. Signaling
is not something you just do to get someone to move out of your way, in
fact your signal creates no such obligation upon others.
Dave - 27 Apr 2006 23:33 GMT
> Signals are to be used when other traffic is present, period.

You're close.  Signals are to be used at all times, because you aren't
always aware of all the "other" traffic around you, no matter how carefully
you try to maintain 360 degree awareness.  If you don't see any traffic
around you, it is even MORE IMPORTANT that you signal, to potentially alert
someone you DO NOT SEE. -Dave
Brent P - 28 Apr 2006 02:34 GMT
>> Signals are to be used when other traffic is present, period.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> around you, it is even MORE IMPORTANT that you signal, to potentially alert
> someone you DO NOT SEE. -Dave

Yep. That's the meaning I was hinting at. There is always other traffic.
John S. - 28 Apr 2006 16:55 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Ken

Since you got a ticket I think the answer is obvious.

Common sense, courtesy, concern about the safety of others and
self-interest would dictate the use of turn signals at all times.  It's
a good habit to get into.
Alex Rodriguez - 28 Apr 2006 22:02 GMT
>Hi,
>I just got ticketed for making a right turn on GREEN light without
>turning my right-turn-signal light on.
>Does anyone know if turning signal is mandatory in California? Even
>when the traffic light is green on your direction?

this question explains a lot of the poor driving I see.
------------
Alex
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.