 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / June 2006Guns don't get racy exciting names. Why do cars?
I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the manufacturer such as winchester model 94 or Smith and Wesson 629 or Remington 700 or Ruger P345. No sense in giving a deadly tool a cute name. But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens > with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive > names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse encourage "murderous driving". > > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse > encourage "murderous driving". If you believe that then you are as ignorant of human nature as you are of everything else. > > > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > > > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > If you believe that then you are as ignorant of human nature as you are > of everything else. Jus because you might go and ram a dozen people at a fruit stand because Ford named a car after an animal doesn't mean the rest of us will. > > > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > > > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > If you believe that then you are as ignorant of human nature as you are > of everything else. So what does naming cars after astronomical entities do (Galaxy, Saturn, Comet, Meteor) or other animals (Impala, Sable, Lynx, Cougar, Viper) or places (Tahoe, Capri, Bel Aire) or groups (Navigator, Aviator, Explorer, Prowler) or other things (Expedition, Corvette, Taurus. Freestyle, Caravan, Frontier). Are numbers and/or letters acceptable (Five Hundred, LS 400, LTD, XL, 2002tii, S600, 240Z)? Are made up names OK (Camry, Corvair, Caprice, Maxima, Elantra)? The idea that the name of a car influences driving styles is a little much. I suppose you might make the case that people who have a predisposition to drive recklessly might be more attracted to cars with racy sounding names, but really, don't you think those people would still prefer fast cars even if they were given dull names? I certainly don't find anything racy in the name Boxster or Carrera - well not until they are on a Porsche (the name of a person). Ed "C. E. White" wrote in a message > So what does naming cars after astronomical entities do (Galaxy, Saturn, > Comet, Meteor) or other animals (Impala, Sable, Lynx, Cougar, Viper) or [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > XL, 2002tii, S600, 240Z)? Are made up names OK (Camry, Corvair, Caprice, > Maxima, Elantra)? > The idea that the name of a car influences driving styles is a little > much. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > of > a person). Well Said Ed. > "C. E. White" wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Well Said Ed. I have always wanted to buy an "asskicker 5000" I am just waiting for someone to make one :P nate  Signaturereplace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel > I have always wanted to buy an "asskicker 5000" I am just waiting for > someone to make one :P Charger or Barracuda or Challenger or Magnum (a gun name I think) all sort of have that asskicker suggestion don't you think? I am not quite sure how to classify Hummer..... Ed > > I have always wanted to buy an "asskicker 5000" I am just waiting for > > someone to make one :P > > Charger or Barracuda or Challenger or Magnum (a gun name I think) all sort > of have that asskicker suggestion don't you think? Sure... personally I like the connotations of Daytona, Bonneville, or Le Mans... (the cars, eh, some of them live up to the promise and some... well...) I traded my Daytona for a Commander; not sure if I want to see if it has any nautical skills however. > I am not quite sure how to classify Hummer..... They're like chinese food, good while it lasts but just leaves you wanting more :) nate >> > > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >> > > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >XL, 2002tii, S600, 240Z)? Are made up names OK (Camry, Corvair, Caprice, >Maxima, Elantra)? The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. You don't see cars named after turtles. THINK "laura bush did me with a strap-on" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. You don't see > cars named after turtles. THINK Boxter is pretty close. But yeah... when I can imagine that the image of a Box would make you think "SPEEDSPEEDSPEEDKILLKILLKILL" ... because, as your posts indicate, you have a penchant for violence and killing people. The sad thing is that you wish everyone else was like you. You don't care if you kill them yourselves or if someone else does the killing... you just enjoy the blood sport. Get help. Around 6/20/2006 7:49 PM, Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote: >> So what does naming cars after astronomical entities do (Galaxy, Saturn, >> Comet, Meteor) or other animals (Impala, Sable, Lynx, Cougar, Viper) or [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. And when all you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. For you, everything on the face of the Earth appears to "obviously imply speed and/or violence" because that's all you seem to think about. Get some professional help, Judy. Signature~/Garth "I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it." - Edith Sitwell (Ventis secundis, tene cursum.) >>>>>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>>>>thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. You don't see > cars named after turtles. THINK So the Beetle is a deadly speed demon? >> >> The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. You don't see >> cars named after turtles. THINK > >So the Beetle is a deadly speed demon? Why do you support cars built by nazis? > Why do you support cars built by nazis? YOU LOSE !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Godwin's Law is invoked !!!!!!!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress. Graham >> Why do you support cars built by nazis? > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Graham You really should read that law and understand it before you refer to it. Your interpretation is incorrect BECAUSE if the SUBJECT matter is "Nazis", then Godwin's law serves to prevent debate. Now granted that the idiot you responded to has the debate skills of an stupid sponge, but nonetheless your invocation is incorrect. Also, there is another phrase in your reference that you need to look at carefully "There is a widely recognized codicil that any such deliberate invocation of Godwin's Law will be unsuccessful." > >> Why do you support cars built by nazis? > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Your interpretation is incorrect BECAUSE if the SUBJECT matter is "Nazis", > then Godwin's law serves to prevent debate. Read Godwin's law " once such a comparison is made * meaning using the term Nazi to refer to something esle. > Now granted that the idiot you responded to has the debate skills of an > stupid sponge, but nonetheless your invocation is incorrect. Sorry. it's quite correct. Godwin's Law would serve no purpose otherwise ! > Also, there is another phrase in your reference that you need to look at > carefully > "There is a widely recognized codicil that any such deliberate > invocation of Godwin's Law will be unsuccessful." Eh ? Oh that ! You're suggesting Loco Laura was bright enough to understand that concept ? Graham >> >> Why do you support cars built by nazis? >> > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > term Nazi > to refer to something esle. Your own references proves you wrong There was NO comparison It was a claim that a SPECIFIC car was built by nazis. That claim is obviously WRONG You don't need to invoke Godwin's law to disprove that UNLESS you're so incapable as a debater that you need to use a sledgehammer instead of a fly-swatter. You yourself are guilty of the VERY THING that Godwin's law is intended to avoid You should have kept on reading the part about "debate and controversy". In particular the last paragraph. It describes what you do very well.. >> Now granted that the idiot you responded to has the debate skills of an >> stupid sponge, but nonetheless your invocation is incorrect. > > Sorry. it's quite correct. Godwin's Law would serve no purpose otherwise ! See above >> Also, there is another phrase in your reference that you need to look at >> carefully [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > understand that > concept ? See above But since you have trouble getting so far Here's the pertinent part. "The practical consequence of invoking or respecting the validity of so-called "Godwin's law" is that no such comparison is ever allowed, no matter how justified it may be. In any honest and open debate, one party may not preëmptorily reject another's argument without regard for its validity. Thus, the correct way to oppose comparisons to Hitler is to show that they are invalid rather than to reject them out of hand. As a historical figure, Hitler is representative of a whole class of authoritarian or totalitarian behavior. He is neither unique nor the first of his kind with respect to them. This suggests that Hitler cannot be automatically rejected for purposes of comparison where valid.? Take it to heart the next time you blindly invoke Godwin to try to close debate, when a far simpler approach is available. > >>>>>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > >>>>>thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > So the Beetle is a deadly speed demon? Anything traveling over 20mph is too fast for Aunt Judy's tiny brain to comprehend. That's one of the reasons, the other being a DUI, that Aunt Judy drives a moped. >>>>>>>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>>>>>>thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > comprehend. That's one of the reasons, the other being a DUI, that Aunt > Judy drives a moped. Not legally. laura bush had a brain fart at a STOP sign wrote: > >> > > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > >> > > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > The animal names obviously imply speed and/or violence. You don't see > cars named after turtles. THINK I think the Jeep Wrangler is aptly named...it invokes the cowboy image of wrestling steers, and off-roading requires wrestling with the steering wheel. >> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >> thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse > encourage "murderous driving". I may be wrong, but didn't the thunderbird swoop down and take small children for meals? >> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >> thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse > encourage "murderous driving". Only someone as stupid and ignorant as you mistakes "Mustang" for the dull label of "Horse." A Mustang is a wild horse. Something decidedly different than the domestically raised horse. And horses, as well, are associated in the public mind with "speed," as in Horse Racing. When you decide to criticize another's choice of words to make a point, you might think about your choice of words chosen to make your point. Actually you'd have done better to pick on "Thunderbird." R R R R R 0:-> Signature"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) > >> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > >> thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Only someone as stupid and ignorant as you mistakes "Mustang" for the > dull label of "Horse." Are you saying a Mustange is NOT a horse? > A Mustang is a wild horse. Something decidedly different than the > domestically raised horse. I never predicated "horse" as wild or domestic. Even a wild horse can run, what, maybe 40 mph? Hardly encouraging "murderous driving". Perhaps you're as weak minded as our resident nutjob. >> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >> thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse > encourage "murderous driving". "It does have a name. I call her 'Vera'" :-) >> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >> thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Only to someone as weak minded as you does naming a car after a horse > encourage "murderous driving". Murderous, no. Vehicular homicide, definitely. Most "accidents" aren't; they're caused by inattention, which includes: - driving too fast for conditions - distractions (e.g., changing a tape caused 4 deaths in a rather celebrated case) - inebriation - not following the law -- in California, one is supposed to stop for pedestrians while said pedestrians are in a marked crosswalk, for example. About the only true accident I can think of would be a hailstone through the windshield or might be a dead tree falling on or in front of one's car while driving, and even in the latter case, one should have about a seconds' warning -- which may barely be enough. I wouldn't call it murderous but it's extremely sloppy to have 40-50,000 people die on roadways per year; presumably many of them are done in by "marauding trees" getting in front of them after having a few too many, or by falling asleep at the wheel. http://www.onlinelawyersource.com/personal_injury/auto/statistics.html is rather sobering, but apparently only 17,400 or so are done in by moving flora, bridge abutments, and such after a night out with a few too many. But it's a bit of a tradeoff: which is more important, 40-50,000 lives or getting from San Francisco to San Jose quickly? Were we willing, we'd all walk, and even then, someone could drop dead of a heart attack, but at least collisions would be far safer at 3 mph with at most 100 kg of flesh padding, hopefully tastefully covered by appropriate clothing ("oops, pardon me ma'am") than at 60 with 2,000 of metal and plastic, hopefully tastefully covered by an appropriate paint job (ugh, get the body bag). [followups to talk.politics.misc, mostly because this is where I'm posting from] Signature#191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless. > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive > names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. Hmmm...mind grabbing stats on this one? The US is a HUGE sanctuary for murderers. > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Hmmm...mind grabbing stats on this one? The US is a HUGE sanctuary for > murderers. The media has brainwashed america into believing killing people is good. The press is always glorifying guns, cars, abortion, and war. Yes - america is a nation of murderers. > > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > good. The press is always glorifying guns, cars, abortion, and war. > Yes - america is a nation of murderers. You forgot one...drugs. > You forgot one...drugs. Most drug use is harmless. When trouble does come it's usually because drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK "I Love Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > Most drug use is harmless. When trouble does come it's usually because > drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK Think. What a concept. You should try it once. Consider this word; "Overdose", and then explain how it is harmless. Feel free to discuss the recent rash of deaths from Heroin. > "I Love Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Consider this word; "Overdose", and then explain how it is harmless. > Feel free to discuss the recent rash of deaths from Heroin. And then there's those Tweakin' meth heads that can be sooooo much fun for friends and family. 0:-> Signature"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) >"I Love Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Consider this word; "Overdose", and then explain how it is harmless. >Feel free to discuss the recent rash of deaths from Heroin. That's suicide you idiot and nobody cares about that. It's homicide that we should be concerned with. Has anyone ever killed anyone with some pot? Perhaps they have, but it's rare. THINK "I have the IQ of an evergreen bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>Consider this word; "Overdose", and then explain how it is harmless. >>Feel free to discuss the recent rash of deaths from Heroin. > That's suicide you idiot and nobody cares about that. It's homicide > that we should be concerned with. Has anyone ever killed anyone with > some pot? Perhaps they have, but it's rare. THINK Every time I think you couldn't possibly get any more retarded, you prove me wrong again. Overdoses can be either accidental or intentional. I can assure you that people who are just looking for a better high that die from an accidental overdose are NOT committing suicide. I am highly unsurprised at your lack of knowledge of the recent rash of accidental deaths related to heroin laced with Fentanyl. I have yet to see you discuss a topic on which you seemed to have even a minor grasp of the most basic facts. ... but don't start now. It would totally ruin your reputation as one of the top 10 morons of TPG. >"I have the IQ of an evergreen bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a >message [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >you that people who are just looking for a better high that die from an >accidental overdose are NOT committing suicide. BS - All ODs are suicides. Now stop shedding tears over these druggies. "Laura Bush knows I'm a moron" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > BS - All ODs are suicides. Now stop shedding tears over these > druggies. See if you can shove your feet a little farther down your throat moron. Your constant desire for people to die goes a long way towards indicating the extent of your mental illness. >>"I Love Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > That's suicide you idiot and nobody cares about that. No, it isn't. Suicide has a willing participant. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 > > You forgot one...drugs. > > Most drug use is harmless. When trouble does come it's usually because > drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK Meth growth, explosions of meth labs...think... > Most drug use is harmless. When trouble does come it's usually because > drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK Aha! I think we've found the cause of the incoherent gibberish you post on these newsgroups. Since you've been especially busy today with such bright ideas as letting slow-moving tractors onto freeways, we can assume that instead of smuggling meth into your group home they smuggled some old-school crack. You do know that in the future when you post your normal rants we will bring up the fact that DUI includes drug usage as much as it includes alcohol usage... >> You forgot one...drugs. > > Most drug use is harmless. **Wrong. Tobacco abuse kills more humans than pretty much any other cause. Unlike, say, heroin, there is no safe level of tobacco use. The drug is legal and very deadly. Users are morons. Alcohol is the second most deadly drug in US society and it causes huge numbers of deaths and the associated misery to those around abusers is incalculable. Alcohol abuse is associated with huge numbers of automobile deaths and violent assaults. By comparison, heroin abuse is an insignificant, statistcal blip. When trouble does come it's usually because > drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK **Indeed. Alcohol and cars (or guns) are a fatal combination. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>You forgot one...drugs. >> >>Most drug use is harmless. > > **Wrong. Tobacco abuse... I know the concept is new to you, but PLEASE try to figure out the difference between use and abuse! Why DO you constantly make a fool of yourself, each and every time you post? SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at it with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to use them for their unintended design purposes. 99% of all parents are not stupid, unless they gave birth to you! >>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I know the concept is new to you, but PLEASE try to figure out the > difference between use and abuse! **ANY use of tobacco is abuse. > Why DO you constantly make a fool of yourself, each and every time you > post? **When will you stop beating your boyfriend? > SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at it > with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. > Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to use > them for their unintended design purposes. **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. > 99% of all parents are not stupid, unless they gave birth to you! **OK then, keep beating your boyfriend. I don't care one way or the other. I don't care that you are a violent paedophile. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>> >>>>Most drug use is harmless. >>> >>> **Wrong. Tobacco abuse... **Oops. Mea culpa. Nicotine (the active, addictive ingredient of tobacco) is an excellent insecticide. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > **Oops. Mea culpa. Nicotine (the active, addictive ingredient of tobacco) is > an excellent insecticide. Aren't you tired of me always proving you wrong? >>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Aren't you tired of me always proving you wrong? **You didn't. _I_ was the one who acknowledged the use of nicotine as an insecticide, not you. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > **You didn't. _I_ was the one who acknowledged the use of nicotine as an > insecticide, not you. After I told you of it and other uses. >>>>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > After I told you of it **Wrong. and other uses. **Tobacco users are morons. Are you a tobacco user? SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>**You didn't. _I_ was the one who acknowledged the use of nicotine as an >>>insecticide, not you. So you admit that THE HUMAN USE OF THE TOBACCO PLANT is not always harmful? I said that all along! >>After I told you of it > > **Wrong. Why are you so afraid to admit that you constantly make MISTAKES? YOU said that "ANYBODY" that uses Tobacco" is a moron. I proved you wrong. You later agreed, with your "insectide" remark, after I pointed it out in another post, that YOU "didn't read." Later, I proved that GOOD, STILL STANDING, MEDICINAL HUMAN uses for the plant are there, and you said: "That's 60 years old, so it doesn't count!" So then, I posted some NEW stuff, and ... now what? They don't count either now, because I proved you wrong again? Just how STUPID are you, Trevy? >>>> **Wrong. Tobacco abuse... > > **Oops. Mea culpa. Nicotine (the active, addictive ingredient of tobacco) > is an excellent insecticide. It is also a medicine. >>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > **ANY use of tobacco is abuse. Sez who, you? There YOU go again, Trevy... attempting to think again! PLEASE stop doing that, as you keep being PROVEN to be constantly wrong! "Medicinally it is used as a sedative, diuretic, expectorant, discutient, and sialagogue, and internally only as an emetic, when all other emetics fail." >>Why DO you constantly make a fool of yourself, each and every time you >>post? > > **When will you stop beating your boyfriend? Why do you believe I am a homosexual, like you? I have no "boy friend", butter cup. I have been happily married to a human female since 1993! >>SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at it >>with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. > > **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. On the contrary. YOU don't know what the f.ck you are attempting to talk about, let alone what newsgroup yer in! Tobacco, sex, drugs... YOUR TURN! >>Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to use >>them for their unintended design purposes. > > **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. And the abuse of them... remember? "**ANY use of tobacco is abuse." --Trevor-- Well, I proved you wrong again! Keep using that term. It's all you have left! >>99% of all parents are not stupid, unless they gave birth to you! > **OK then, keep beating your boyfriend. I don't care one way or the other. I > don't care that you are a violent paedophile. Funny how when you lose an argument, YOU think of plookin' kids! The Asstralian way! >>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Sez who, you? **EVERY SINGLE medical professional who is not employed by the tobacco industry. Go ask. There is no safe level of tobacco ingestion. > There YOU go again, Trevy... attempting to think again! > PLEASE stop doing that, as you keep being PROVEN to be constantly wrong! **Wrong about what? That smoking tobacco products is a proven method to kill humans? That only terminally stupid people smoke? Be precise. Which part am I wrong about? > "Medicinally it is used as a sedative, diuretic, expectorant, discutient, > and sialagogue, and internally only as an emetic, when all other emetics > fail." **LOL! Tell you what: YOu smoke and I won't. We'll see who dies first. >>>Why DO you constantly make a fool of yourself, each and every time you >>>post? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I have no "boy friend", butter cup. > I have been happily married to a human female since 1993! **Sure you have. >>>SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at it >>>with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Well, I proved you wrong again! **Er, no, you did not. > Keep using that term. > It's all you have left! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Funny how when you lose an argument, YOU think of plookin' kids! > The Asstralian way! **I use such arguments, when engaged in discussions with morons, to make a point. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 72 lines] > **I use such arguments, when engaged in discussions with morons, to make a > point. Your entire argument is lazy and stupid. I already posted the PROOF of the many positive uses for tobacco. >>>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > Your entire argument is lazy and stupid. > I already posted the PROOF of the many positive uses for tobacco. **Not quite. You posted a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference. See if you can find anything more up to date. Anything in the last 2 years will be fine. And further: I have never denied that tobacco has positive uses (insecticides, for instance). I have merely stated that tobacco is a dangerous drug and that users are morons. You may continue to mis-read my words, if you wish. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >>> >>>**Sure you have. I can prove it. But I doubt you can handle the truth, as you go ballistic with your gay fantasies, every time you are proven wrong. >>>>>>SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at it >>>>>>with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. >>>>>**Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. Yes, in a POLITICAL GUN NEWSGROUP! I wonder why YOU always turn to drugs? >>>>On the contrary. >>>>YOU don't know what the f.ck you are attempting to talk about, let alone >>>>what newsgroup yer in! >>>> >>>>Tobacco, sex, drugs... YOUR TURN! TALK. POLITICS. GUNS, you cross posting RETARD! Damn! You make Judy look smart! >>>>>>Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to >>>>>>use them for their unintended design purposes. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >>> >>>**Er, no, you did not. You not only lie, but you forgot the entire post I added that DID descibe the many medicinal uses for that plant. You just HATE being proven wrong time and time again... as usual! YOU even forgot your OWN post that acknowledged the great use of tobacco! >>>>>>99% of all parents are not stupid, unless they gave birth to you! >>>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >>>**I use such arguments, when engaged in discussions with morons, to make >>>a point. Stop talking to your parents... if you know who they really are. >>Your entire argument is lazy and stupid. >> I already posted the PROOF of the many positive uses for tobacco. > > **Not quite. You posted a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference. So? Does age make a difference? Are you saying that if something is older than you, it isn't true? What I posted was, and STILL IS accurate to this day, and YOU can't disprove a single damned thing! I PROVED YOU WRONG... AGAIN! > See if you can find > anything more up to date. Why? Why should I spend more of my time to show the entire world what an idiot you are, when it's now a known fact? > Anything in the last 2 years will be fine. And > further: I have never denied that tobacco has positive uses (insecticides, > for instance). "For instance"? Wow! What a disclaimer... and a time limit to boot! http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/t/tobacc21.html http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-208929 You are one easy SOB! Took me ten seconds to find the two above. > I have merely stated that tobacco is a dangerous drug and > that users are morons. Then you just re-admitted that you are wrong...and a liar! You mean "ABUSERS"! Kinda like you and "airplane glue!" > You may continue to mis-read my words, if you wish. Reading your "words" VERY carefully! >> **Not quite. You posted a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference. > > So? > Does age make a difference? **Of course it does, you f.cking idiot! It was not until the 1960s that conclusive proof existed that tobacco use was killing people. > Are you saying that if something is older than you, it isn't true? **Nope. I am saying that the particular SIXTY year old reference is hopelessly out of date with current medical knowledge. Clear? > What I posted was, and STILL IS accurate to this day, and YOU can't > disprove a single damned thing! **I can tell you that tobacco use is stupid and deadly and that tobacco users are morons. > I PROVED YOU WRONG... AGAIN! **Not with a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference, you didn't. >> See if you can find anything more up to date. > > Why? **Er, because medical knowledge has altered somewhat in the last 60 years. Are you unaware of this fact? > Why should I spend more of my time to show the entire world what an > idiot you are, when it's now a known fact? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/t/tobacc21.html **There's that 60 year old reference again. > http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-208929 **What's your point here? Be precise. We all know that tobacco is used in cigarettes and cigars. We also know that nicotine is useful as an insecticide. We also know that tobacco users are morons. Are you, by any chance, a tobacco user? > You are one easy SOB! > Took me ten seconds to find the two above. **Restating what you have stated before is not going to advance your case. >> I have merely stated that tobacco is a dangerous drug and that users are >> morons. > > Then you just re-admitted that you are wrong...and a liar! **Nope. Tobacco users are morons. If you feel that I am wrong, feel free to prove it. > You mean "ABUSERS"! > Kinda like you and "airplane glue!" > >> You may continue to mis-read my words, if you wish. > > Reading your "words" VERY carefully! **Clearly you cannot. Are you a tobacco user? SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>**Not quite. You posted a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > **Of course it does, you f.cking idiot! It was not until the 1960s that > conclusive proof existed that tobacco use was killing people. You mean the ABUSE of the plant! I gave you the BENEFITS and great use of it, that YOU SAID DON'T EXIST! What is rattling around in that empty skull of yours? I am NOT going to prove you wrong again on this subject! >> Are you saying that if something is older than you, it isn't true? > > **Nope. I am saying that the particular SIXTY year old reference is > hopelessly out of date with current medical knowledge. Clear? That IS "current", you tiny teenybop! You are most stupid! You can't prove those things are wrong OR "hopelessly out of date" as you say. You just say sh.t that makes you feel better, with no facts to back your a.s up. >> What I posted was, and STILL IS accurate to this day, and YOU can't >>disprove a single damned thing! > > **I can tell you that tobacco use is stupid and deadly and that tobacco > users are morons. And again, you are wrong. Even you admitted it! >>I PROVED YOU WRONG... AGAIN! > > **Not with a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference, you didn't. Of course I did! And I backed it up with "newer stuff" that you refuse to acknowledge! Yer easy, kid! You say something stupid I prove you wrong You claim: "THAT"S OLD!" or, "You didn't understand what I really meant!" >>>See if you can find anything more up to date. >> >>Why? > > **Er, because medical knowledge has altered somewhat in the last 60 years. > Are you unaware of this fact? You aren't. And YOU know NOTHING about medicine...and you obviuosuly take a LOT of medications! >> Why should I spend more of my time to show the entire world what an >>idiot you are, when it's now a known fact? >>>Anything in the last 2 years will be fine. And further: I have never >>>denied that tobacco has positive uses (insecticides, for instance). [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > **What's your point here? Be precise. Can't read, eh? >>You are one easy SOB! >> Took me ten seconds to find the two above. > > **Restating what you have stated before is not going to advance your case. It did! I PROVED YOU WRONG! >>>I have merely stated that tobacco is a dangerous drug and that users are >>>morons. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > **Nope. Tobacco users are morons. If you feel that I am wrong, feel free to > prove it. AGAIN? (Sigh) >>You mean "ABUSERS"! >> Kinda like you and "airplane glue!" >>>You may continue to mis-read my words, if you wish. >> >>Reading your "words" VERY carefully! > > **Clearly you cannot. I do! I PROVED you wrong...again! > Are you a tobacco user? How often do you snort anal vapors ? >>>>**Not quite. You posted a SIXTY YEAR OLD reference. >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > You mean the ABUSE of the plant! > I gave you the BENEFITS and great use of it, that YOU SAID DON'T EXIST! **Nope. You provided a SIXTY YEAR OLD document. One which was writtne long before the dangers of tobacco use were fully realised. Are you a tobacco user? > What is rattling around in that empty skull of yours? **A complete absence of nicotine. How about yours? Are you a tobacco user? > I am NOT going to prove you wrong again on this subject! **That's only because you cannot. Tobacco users are morons. Are you a tobacco user? >>> Are you saying that if something is older than you, it isn't true? >> >> **Nope. I am saying that the particular SIXTY year old reference is >> hopelessly out of date with current medical knowledge. Clear? > > That IS "current", you tiny teenybop! **Wanna bet? Are you a tobacco user? > You are most stupid! > You can't prove those things are wrong OR "hopelessly out of date" as you > say. **Er, yes, I can. > You just say sh.t that makes you feel better, with no facts to back your > a.s up. **I don't need to. The document was written before the dangers of tobacco use were fully realised. Are you a tobacco user? >>> What I posted was, and STILL IS accurate to this day, and YOU can't >>> disprove a single damned thing! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > And again, you are wrong. **Really? Do you think that using tobacco is smart? How? Are you a tobacco user? > Even you admitted it! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > And I backed it up with "newer stuff" that you refuse to acknowledge! **What "newer stuff"? An ecyclopaedia reference is not "newer stuff". I suggest you read it yourself. > Yer easy, kid! > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > And YOU know NOTHING about medicine...and you obviuosuly take a LOT of > medications! **Are you a tobacco user? >>> Why should I spend more of my time to show the entire world what an >>> idiot you are, when it's now a known fact? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Can't read, eh? **Sure can. Clearly, you cannot. Are you a tobacco user? >>>You are one easy SOB! >>> Took me ten seconds to find the two above. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It did! > I PROVED YOU WRONG! **Only in your own delusional state. Are you a tobacco user? >>>>I have merely stated that tobacco is a dangerous drug and that users are >>>>morons. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > AGAIN? **For the first time would be acceptable. > (Sigh) > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > How often do you snort anal vapors ? **Are you a tobacco user? SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > **ANY use of tobacco is abuse. In *your* opinion. >> Why DO you constantly make a fool of yourself, each and every time >> you post? > > **When will you stop beating your boyfriend? Why? Does it hurt when he bats you around? >> SEX is not bad thing, for instance... unless you attempt to have at >> it with a goat that doesn't belong to you again. > > **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. The discussion was drugs, sex and alcohol. You just came in late. >> Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to >> use them for their unintended design purposes. > > **Non-sequitur. We're discussing drugs. See above. >> 99% of all parents are not stupid, unless they gave birth to you! > > **OK then, keep beating your boyfriend. I don't care one way or the > other. I don't care that you are a violent paedophile. Too bad he hurt you, child. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>>>>You forgot one...drugs. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Too bad he hurt you, child. If it's all about the drugs he's using, then why is he posting his off topic crap? > RD (The Sandman) wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > If it's all about the drugs he's using, then why is he posting his off > topic crap? I assume that in some of the NGs that are crossposted on here, it is not off topic. Like talk.politics.misc SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 > Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to > use them for their unintended design purposes. Are you suggesting that guns aren't intended for shooting ppl ? Graham >> Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to >> use them for their unintended design purposes. > > Are you suggesting that guns aren't intended for shooting ppl ? Sometimes shooting people is a good thing. Such as when they're shooting at you. And I hope you're not trying to say that such as the Hammerli Olympic-grade single shot target pistol was "intended for shooting ppl?" Or the Kolibri 2.6mm? Signaturejimbo@sonic.net "There are only 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don't." "Pooh Bear" wrote in a message >> Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to >> use them for their unintended design purposes. > Are you suggesting that guns aren't intended for shooting ppl ? Some guns are intended for shooting people, primarily military weapons, other guns are not. Hunting guns are intended for hunting. Target weapons are intended for shooting at targets. Flare guns are intended to save lives and aid in rescue efforts. Starting guns are designed to let runners know it's time to haul a.s... >> Guns are not an evil thing, for instance... unless you keep trying to >> use them for their unintended design purposes. > > Are you suggesting that guns aren't intended for shooting ppl ? Which is not always a bad thing. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 >>> You forgot one...drugs. >> Most drug use is harmless. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > **Indeed. Alcohol and cars (or guns) are a fatal combination. That's why there are laws determining that the use of guns and cars is prohibited while intoxicated. In fact in most areas of the US one may not even have gun in one's possession while drinking. Of course we could go to the brilliant logic of the argument you so stupidly make that guns should not be allowed at all unless so tightly regulated they are rendered nearly useless of one of the most important of their obvious uses; self defense. That will go well with cars should not be allowed either for their most obvious and important use; transport. Go back to sleep Trevor. This is all too much for you. 0:-> Signature"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) >>> You forgot one...drugs. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >with huge numbers of automobile deaths and violent assaults. By comparison, >heroin abuse is an insignificant, statistcal blip. Smokers harm essentially just themselves and i don't care about suicides. >> You forgot one...drugs. > > Most drug use is harmless. When trouble does come it's usually because > drugs were combined with guns or cars.THINK None of which have minds of their own or can make decisions. It is all up to the user. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 > Laura Bush murdered her boy friend said in rec.autos.driving: > The media has brainwashed america into believing killing people is > good. The press is always glorifying guns, cars, abortion, and war. Darwin Awards... > Yes - america is a nation of murderers. And proud of it, man!!!! SignatureAunt Judy demonstrates its lack of understanding of the concept of "</killfile>," and "<killfile>," and what a "thread," is: "Now that takes nerve. You claim to killfile me TWICE in the same thread and you expect people to take you seriously???" Ref: http://tinyurl.com/r5qp9 >> Laura Bush murdered her boy friend said in rec.autos.driving: >> The media has brainwashed america into believing killing people is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >And proud of it, man!!!! Sad but true. Americans do indeed think murder is cool. > laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE said in rec.autos.driving: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Sad but true. Americans do indeed think murder is cool. Redrum!! Redrum!!! Redrum!!! Signature"Hell i once painted a whole car with a bunch of spray cans." --Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend, 3/29/06 Ref:http://tinyurl.com/qqaeq Message ID: 1143700563.098595.106970@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > thunderbird or cutlass. Or 350SL, 530i, GS300, NSX, STS, 300Z... all racy car names, eh? Another stupid and completely untrue comment. >"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Another stupid and completely untrue comment. Those are foreign models, you nitwit and even those are rare. Most car makers throughout the world name their cars. THINK > >"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Those are foreign models, you nitwit and even those are rare. Most > car makers throughout the world name their cars. THINK Yeah, really violent names like...... Focus Land Cruiser Omega Prius RAV4 Civic Matiz Landwind Golf LaCrosse ( now that can actually be quite a violent game ! ) Caravan Crown Victoria Yawn Now I would have been embarassed to have owned say a Toyota Starlet or maybe even a Nissan Sunny - but that's another matter. Graham >> >"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >Caravan >Crown Victoria I didn't say all the names are violent. But why use names at all? It makes cars look harmless and friendly. "My brain is mush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > I didn't say all the names are violent. But why use names at all? > It makes cars look harmless and friendly. Cars are not friendly or violent. They are inanimate objects. Your psychotic and irrational fear of cars requires the help of a competent mental health professional. Please get help before you hurt yourself or someone else. >> >"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > maybe > even a Nissan Sunny - but that's another matter. **I rather like that great Japanese car name: The Nissan Cedric. The evocation of power and masculinity is clear and obvious. Then there's the Nissan Princess. That one really evokes feelings of power. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>>> "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> maybe >> even a Nissan Sunny - but that's another matter. Both are reserved for export to the British Commonwealth nations as befitting the customer. > **I rather like that great Japanese car name: The Nissan Cedric. The > evocation of power and masculinity is clear and obvious. Then there's the > Nissan Princess. That one really evokes feelings of power. Got a surprise for you pussy. They are not imported to the US. But YOU get them in AU, don't you, Trevor? R R R R R 0:-> Signature"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) > > "Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Both are reserved for export to the British Commonwealth nations as > befitting the customer. I think their marketing depts lost the plot there in that case ! ;~) Graham >>>>> "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Got a surprise for you pussy. They are not imported to the US. But YOU get > them in AU, don't you, Trevor? **We did. Back in the early 1970s, Nissan decided that English names were too tricky and switched to selling autos with numbers and not names. After the switch, their marketing team worked miracles with the brand in this country. Toyota seemed to enjoy more success (in all the Western nations) by calling their cars by the names attributed to women's headwear. Curious. The Cedric is still sold in Japan. It would seem that the name is appealing to the Japanese. I rode in several Nissan Cedric taxis last time I was there. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > "0:->" <pohaku.kane@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > country. Toyota seemed to enjoy more success (in all the Western nations) by > calling their cars by the names attributed to women's headwear. Curious. Were the early Nissans you got called Datsuns like here by any chance ? The Datsun Cherry - another classic ! > The Cedric is still sold in Japan. It would seem that the name is appealing > to the Japanese. I rode in several Nissan Cedric taxis last time I was > there. That is a *very* strange name to like ! Graham >> "0:->" <pohaku.kane@gmail.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Were the early Nissans you got called Datsuns like here by any chance ? **Yep. > The Datsun Cherry - another classic ! **LOL! Back when I was training, one of my mates arrived with a Datsun Fairlady. After we had a chuckle about the name, he took each of us for a spin. We all went very quiet. The bloody thing could hit 120MPH! It made the then very popular MGB look like a sick joke. Bloody brilliant car. Shame about the name. >> The Cedric is still sold in Japan. It would seem that the name is >> appealing >> to the Japanese. I rode in several Nissan Cedric taxis last time I was >> there. > > That is a *very* strange name to like ! **You need to visit Japan. It is a very odd (for Westerners) place. Many Japanese wear T-shirts with incomprehensible slogans. I asked about them and was told that the words sounded nice to Japanese ears. They didn't actually have to make any sense. I can only imagine that the name Cedric sounds nice to the Japanese. Perhaps it is a reassuringly English name. For a goodly part of last Century, the Japanese admired everything British. After all, the British trained several of their military officers in the early part of the 20th Century. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com y> **LOL! Back when I was training, one of my mates arrived with a Datsun > Fairlady. After we had a chuckle about the name, he took each of us for a > spin. We all went very quiet. The bloody thing could hit 120MPH! It made the > then very popular MGB look like a sick joke. Bloody brilliant car. Shame > about the name. The Datsun Fairlady was a worthy competititor to the MGB, only no one really wanted a Japanese car back then. Another Japanese car that was your basic giant killer was the Isuzu Bellet. For a sedan, it could out corner and out brake virtually anything else in it's engine size class. Signaturejimbo@sonic.net "There are only 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don't." > y> **LOL! Back when I was training, one of my mates arrived with a Datsun >> Fairlady. After we had a chuckle about the name, he took each of us for a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > your basic giant killer was the Isuzu Bellet. For a sedan, it could out > corner and out brake virtually anything else in it's engine size class. **Except, possibly, anything from Italy or Germany. Back in the day, I used to try to keep up with Alfas and Beemers. I had few problems, 'till those damned corners made an appearance. Bloody Euro cars, stuck to the road like sh.t to a blanket. My little Escort (live rear end) could stop OK though. Front disks ensured that I could out-brake my mate's MG Midget (drums on all four corners). SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com "I'm a complete idiot" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>> But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>> thunderbird or cutlass. >>Or 350SL, 530i, GS300, NSX, STS, 300Z... all racy car names, eh? >>Another stupid and completely untrue comment. > Those are foreign models, you nitwit and even those are rare. Most > car makers throughout the world name their cars. THINK Once again, you go to extremes to display how completely moronic and uninformed you are on EVERY topic you attempt to discuss. An STS is not a foreign model. "Most car makers throughout the world..." use alphanumeric designations for their cars. EVERY Mercedes, every BMW... American car companies were always big on names, thus, those companies who sell cars in the US originally mimicked this trend. Why not try posting something on a topic on which you clearly excel? Something like "Clueless morons who bring up stupid points that ignore facts and reality" would suit you well. No one can do that as well as you do. >>"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Those are foreign models, you nitwit and even those are rare. Huh? Most of those he nmed are quite common. THINK SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 > "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Another stupid and completely untrue comment. Accord, Civic, S2000, Element, CRV, Si, Fit ... Yeah, LBMHBF has brought up another cogent thought (chough) ... TL, TSX, RL, RSX, MDX, RDX (All courtesy of Honda/Accord) SignatureKent Finnell From the Music City USA >> "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >another cogent thought (chough) ... TL, TSX, RL, RSX, MDX, RDX (All >courtesy of Honda/Accord) IDIOT. We're talking about american cars not some bangladesh beater. >>> "I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >>another cogent thought (chough) ... TL, TSX, RL, RSX, MDX, RDX (All >>courtesy of Honda/Accord) That should have been Honda/Acura. > IDIOT. We're talking about american cars not some bangladesh beater. Bangladesh beater? Idiot your own stupid self. Honda/Acura makes some of the best, most dependable cars in the world. Many of them are made in the US and Canada ... Ohio, Ontario, Alabama. Toyota makes cars in Kentucky and California; Nissan makes cars and trucks in Smyrna, Tennessee. As a matter of fact, Nissan is moving its US headquarters to Franklin, Tennessee. Then there's Saturn (GM) in Spring Hill, TN with its Ion, Sky, and Vue. Real fearsome names there, silly bitch. Colt was NOT named after a young horse, but after the company's founder, Samuel Colt. Some of its wheelguns (no longer produced IIRC) were named after snakes ... Python, Cobra, Anaconda. Some of Smith and Wessons were named Detective, Chief, Airweight, and even Ladysmith. The Rugers you named were called Blackhawk and Redhawk because of the color of the hawk in the company crest. The really big .50 caliber wheelgun is called the Alaskan. The above is NOT all inclusive, just off the top of my head. I speak from the top of my head, not from the a.s as you do. SignatureThe Second Amendment ... America's Original Homeland Defense Kent Finnell From The Music City USA "laura bush is my goddess" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>Accord, Civic, S2000, Element, CRV, Si, Fit ... Yeah, LBMHBF has brought >>up >>another cogent thought (chough) ... TL, TSX, RL, RSX, MDX, RDX (All >>courtesy of Honda/Accord) > IDIOT. We're talking about american cars not some bangladesh beater. How about STS, CTS, DTS, SLR, SRX, ESV and EXT then? >"laura bush is my goddess" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >How about STS, CTS, DTS, SLR, SRX, ESV and EXT then? Never heard of them. "Laura's Bush smells like me" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>How about STS, CTS, DTS, SLR, SRX, ESV and EXT then? > Never heard of them. Not a lot of newer Cadillacs in your trailer park, eh? Your knowledge of cars post 1976 leaves you ill prepared for the discussion you started here. I'd suggest you quit while you're ahead... but you've never managed to be ahead of anything or anyone. ... perhaps you should just quit - period. >"Laura's Bush smells like me" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Not a lot of newer Cadillacs in your trailer park, eh? As i figured, you're a gas-guzzling cadillac freak. It's because of monsters like you that brave americans are being killed in iraq. Do the world a favor and drive your caddy into a telephone pole. "I'm as smart as an evergreen Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>>>How about STS, CTS, DTS, SLR, SRX, ESV and EXT then? >>> Never heard of them. >>Not a lot of newer Cadillacs in your trailer park, eh? > As i figured, you're a gas-guzzling cadillac freak. It's because of > monsters like you that brave americans are being killed in iraq. Do > the world a favor and drive your caddy into a telephone pole. Wow moron! You make a stupid comment about car names and then suddenly, because I have a clue, you know what I like or drive? How many Mustangs do you own Beavis - since you mentioned them in your original post. Every post brings you one step closer to achieving human black hole status. ... and once again you suggest violence against someone who simply points out what an idiot you are. >"I grew a laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Another stupid and completely untrue comment. Followed up with another juicy morsel of Troll Food. SignatureWhat the heck, I'll play too. - Dave Cars are largely sold as PLANNED-OBSOLESCENCE items - with the manufacturer's survival depending on almost all customers trading in the car long before it wears out. Guns aren't. Guns are sold as UTILARIAN tools - like hammers or screwdrivers, neither of which get sexy brand names to conjure up images either. No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com > Cars are largely sold as PLANNED-OBSOLESCENCE items - with the >manufacturer's survival depending on almost all customers trading in >the car long before it wears out. Guns aren't. Guns are sold as >UTILARIAN tools - like hammers or screwdrivers, neither of which get >sexy brand names to conjure up images either. Oh BS. That's not why cars get racy names, you nitwit. And besides, we need to stop this planned obsolescence sh.t for cars and everything else. > Cars are largely sold as PLANNED-OBSOLESCENCE items - with the > manufacturer's survival depending on almost all customers trading in > the car long before it wears out. Guns aren't. Guns are sold as > UTILARIAN tools - like hammers or screwdrivers, neither of which get > sexy brand names to conjure up images either. Bullshit >I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive >names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. I call my Colt 1911 .45 ACP Kitten. Signature"Science is the record of dead religions." -- Oscar Wilde "There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is impossible." -- Jack Vance "Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant. "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography" -- Ambrose Bierce "Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life. --Will Durant Joseph R. Darancette daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net >>I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >I call my Colt 1911 .45 ACP Kitten. Well - as we all know, you're a psychopath. But the manufacturer engages in no such nonsense. >I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive >names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. This is my next gun. http://www.gunblast.com/SW_500.htm I think I'll call it "Honey Bunny". Signature"Science is the record of dead religions." -- Oscar Wilde "There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is impossible." -- Jack Vance "Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant. "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography" -- Ambrose Bierce "Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life. --Will Durant Joseph R. Darancette daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > But every car gets a name No it doesn't. I drive a Saab 9000 for example. Graham > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Graham HAHAHA. So one car out of a million has a numerical designation and you think that proves something? It proves you can't think. > > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > HAHAHA. So one car out of a million has a numerical designation and > you think that proves something? It proves you can't think. BMW - all models are numbers. Mercedes - all models are a letter followed by numbers Peugeot - all models are numbers Saab - all models are numbers Volvo - al models are numbers Lexus - all models are number and letter combinations Porsche - most models are numbers Citroen - all models are a number/letter combination Alfa Romeo - all models are numbers Mazda - all models are numbers Many other brands use numbers and/or letters for some vehicles Not exactly one in a million is it ? So, as for your post.......... " you think that proves something? It proves you can't think. " Graham >> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >Alfa Romeo - all models are numbers >Mazda - all models are numbers Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. >>> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. Hmmm... Looking at the newsgroups to which this is posted and crossposted I don't see even a single exclusively "American" newsgroup. > Scout said in rec.autos.driving: <ECP removed> > Hmmm... Looking at the newsgroups to which this is posted and crossposted I > don't see even a single exclusively "American" newsgroup. Nor is there a "board," in the newsgroup listings.... >> Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. > >Hmmm... Looking at the newsgroups to which this is posted and crossposted I >don't see even a single exclusively "American" newsgroup. The internet was invented in america, you moron. The eskimos didn't do it. "Help! I'm stupid & I can't get up" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > The internet was invented in america, you moron. The eskimos didn't > do it. He didn't list any Eskimo made vehicles. >>>Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. >> >>Hmmm... Looking at the newsgroups to which this is posted and crossposted I >>don't see even a single exclusively "American" newsgroup. > The internet was invented in america, you moron. The eskimos didn't > do it. What's that got to do with anything, you drunken slut? Car's weren't invented in America. >>> Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The internet was invented in america, you moron. The eskimos didn't > do it. Neither did Al gore. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 > >>> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > >>> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Hmmm... Looking at the newsgroups to which this is posted and crossposted I > don't see even a single exclusively "American" newsgroup. "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" is retarded. I think this is the result of it slurping too much semen when it's hanging out in bath houses drooling over it's homosexual porno mags. >>>>>I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>>>>Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. HEY, you drunken cross posting slut, T.P.G. and all others, are NEWSGROUPS, seen, read, and responded by people from all nations. And YOU can't legally drive a car in the USA on our hiways or streets, or legaly own a firearm in any country, you stump stupid c.nt. YOU can't even vote! > >> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > >> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! Ford F150 truck ? I could go on........ > This is an american board. " you think that proves something? It proves you can't think. " It's neither a board nor is it American. It's *Usenet*. Graham >>> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. **Nope. SignatureTrevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > >BMW - all models are numbers. > >Mercedes - all models are a letter followed by numbers [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. Clearly the USA should buy more foreign cars in that case to avoid tempting ppl to crime. Graham "My Brain committed VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>BMW - all models are numbers. >>Mercedes - all models are a letter followed by numbers [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >>Alfa Romeo - all models are numbers >>Mazda - all models are numbers > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. Hey brainiac - there are a few of those cars sold in the US these days. >>> > > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>> > > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. Hey, Stupid. No, it isn't. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 >Hey stuipid. Those are foreign cars!!! This is an american board. SAAB is owned by GM. Volvo is ownedf by Ford. BMW builds cars in the US ------------ Alex "Laura Bush makes me feel inferior" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >> I drive a Saab 9000 for example. > HAHAHA. So one car out of a million has a numerical designation and > you think that proves something? It proves you can't think. HAHA you idiot. You posted that one car in a million gets a numerical designation AFTER responding to my post in which I pointed out examples of BMW, Mercedes, Lexus & Cadillac using only alphanumeric designations on ALL their cars. On a related note - are you listed in The Guinness Book of World Records for getting your head farther up your a.s than any other living human? I'm sure the lack of oxygen and fecal bacteria play a huge role in the quality of your "thoughts". >I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >Redhawk "Desert Eagle", "Street-sweeper" ... >but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the >manufacturer such as winchester model 94 or Smith and Wesson 629 or >Remington 700 or Ruger P345. No sense in giving a deadly tool a cute >name. I know a guy who named it after his ex-girlfriend - who had a lethal disposition. >But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens >with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive >names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. There's a lot more MONEY in automobiles - so they try to get every advantage they can. A sharp name can mean many, many millions of dollars in the bank while an Edsel is an Edsel .... >>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > many millions of dollars in the bank while an Edsel is an > Edsel .... Now that's a stupid argument. Houses cost more than even cars but they don't get names. THINK "Moronic Poster - Character HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > Now that's a stupid argument. Houses cost more than even cars but > they don't get names. THINK Please... quit insisting on proving to us what a complete idiot you are. Want Lexington homes to build your house? Choose from the Ruby, Onyx, Don Mercado, Excalibur, Largo, Barcelona, Devonshire, Jacqueline, Islander Elite, Royal Oxford, Royal Chelsea, Pinehurst, Captiva or any of their other 19 models that don't have names. How about having Lakewood builders build your house? Choose from the Austin, Bentley, Camden, Drake, Dover, Essex, Exmoor, Graham, Oxford, Hartford, Franklin, Jefferson or any of their other not named models. Leach Homes? The Bentley, Logan, Newport, Bristol, Richmond, Wellington, Yale, Morgan Zee... THINK! And maybe try doing a bit of research before you shove your foot into your mouth AGAIN. That must be quite a sight... you with both feet shoved down your throat while your head is shoved up your a.s. If you keep working at it, I think you will soon become the first human Black Hole! > "Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz>" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a > message [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Leach Homes? The Bentley, Logan, Newport, Bristol, Richmond, Wellington, > Yale, Morgan Zee... Besides model names, don't forget that some individual houses even have proper names - very, very expensive, and/or very, very old houses, for example. Even some not so old or expensive: http://www.keepmedia.com/pubs/USATODAY/2004/01/09/371719 Signature~/Garth |"I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. Almgren | I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. ******* | And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant." (pgp@v6stang.com for secure mail info) --H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) >"Moronic Poster - Character HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a >message [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >while your head is shoved up your a.s. If you keep working at it, I think >you will soon become the first human Black Hole! Yep - "designer name" houses are the big rage nowdays. I guess it's the only way they can get people to mortgage their whole lives away for a pasteboard box. >>>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>>thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Now that's a stupid argument. Houses cost more than even cars but > they don't get names. THINK Sober up, you drunken slut. Many homes are given names. http://www.namenerds.com/irish/house.html Mine's called Dave. "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in > But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or > thunderbird or cutlass. Americans kill more of their fellow citizens > with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive > names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. Let's test your accusation with the top sellers... Toyota names: Corolla, Prius, Avalon, Solara, Matrix, Camry, Yaris 100% wrong there Honda names: Accord, Civil, Insight, Fit, Element 100% wrong there Ford names: Fusion, Focus, Freestyle, Mustang, Victoria, 500, GT 66% wrong there Chevy names: Aveo, Corvette, Impala, Cobalt, HHR, SSR, Monte Carlo, Malibu 75% wrong there Dodge names: Caliber, Stratus, Viper, Charger, Magnum only 40% wrong! hey... you almost got one right It would seem your claim is baseless. >"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >It would seem your claim is baseless. WTF are you trying to say.? >>"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> >>It would seem your claim is baseless. > WTF are you trying to say.? That you are a drunken idiot slut. >>"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > WTF are you trying to say.? That your claim that American cars have "racy" names and guns do not it is incorrect. Are you mentally impaired? >> WTF are you trying to say.? > >That your claim that American cars have "racy" names and guns do not it is >incorrect. I never said it's true in every case. Stop being so literal. "I married Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>That your claim that American cars have "racy" names and guns do not it is >>incorrect. > I never said it's true in every case. Stop being so literal. "But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or thunderbird or cutlass." Minor detail - you *DID* claim it to be true in every case. "every car gets a name..." > "I married Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Minor detail - you *DID* claim it to be true in every case. "every car > gets a name..." actually it claimed that it was "often" true and it's not and EVERY car does not have a name either >I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the >manufacturer I gotta hand it to you, Aunt Judy: you certainly have mastered the art of picking volatile audiences to mix together for your trolling. :) SignatureWhat the heck, I'll play too. - Dave > Scott en Aztlán said in rec.autos.driving: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I gotta hand it to you, Aunt Judy: you certainly have mastered the art > of picking volatile audiences to mix together for your trolling. :) Well, if people would just prune the newsgroups headers..... OF course, I did find some information that might be interesting to the ne.weather crowd... > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive > names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. Cars are given cool names so stupid Americans can "identify" with something and buy it. >> I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >> Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Cars are given cool names so stupid Americans can "identify" with > something and buy it. Good point. >> I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >> Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Cars are given cool names so stupid Americans can "identify" with >something and buy it. And that's sick. People should not identify with a deadly tool like an automobile. laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": > >Cars are given cool names so stupid Americans can "identify" with > >something and buy it. and replied: > And that's sick. People should not identify with a deadly tool like > an automobile. Sorry - he's right. Why the hell else but "image" do you think will get a customer to pay many thousands more for a Cadillac that's basically a Chevy, except for trim and luxury interior and (of course) that Cadillac nameplate and hood ornament? No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com >laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": >> And that's sick. People should not identify with a deadly tool like >> an automobile. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >basically a Chevy, except for trim and luxury interior and (of course) >that Cadillac nameplate and hood ornament? Yes indeed - people are insecure idiots and need their status symbols. Actually they shouldn't buy ANY new car, chevy or caddy. Just buy 10 year old junkers. > >laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Actually they shouldn't buy ANY new car, chevy or caddy. Just buy 10 > year old junkers. And spend double the vehicle's worth on repairs? Make it 2-5 years, and the target may be reasonable. By the way: this may be along your "drivers-are-murderers" LOS: the reason guns don't get the cool names is this: they are totally useless unless loaded, while drivers are dangerous IF loaded. An unloaded gun can only travel as fast as the guy either carrying it or giving it a mighty heave, which is not near as fast as a car. morticide quoted "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE": > > Yes indeed - people are insecure idiots and need their status symbols. > > Actually they shouldn't buy ANY new car, chevy or caddy. Just buy 10 > > year old junkers. and replied: > And spend double the vehicle's worth on repairs? Make it 2-5 years, > and the target may be reasonable. Sorry - he's the one who's right, not you. I can tell you from personal experience that an eight-year-old Toyota Camry, given just scheduled maintenance, runs every bit as good as a new one - and as good as that Toyota Camry ran at any point in its life to that date. No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com >morticide quoted "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE": >> > Yes indeed - people are insecure idiots and need their status symbols. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >scheduled maintenance, runs every bit as good as a new one - and as >good as that Toyota Camry ran at any point in its life to that date. That's my experience too. People who have never owned an old car just assume they tend to fall apart but that has certainly not been the case for me. The auto industry pays people to come on the net and say old cars are unreliable. For decades they've been paying the media to say that too. "I wanna be Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > That's my experience too. People who have never owned an old car just > assume they tend to fall apart but that has certainly not been the > case for me. The auto industry pays people to come on the net and say > old cars are unreliable. For decades they've been paying the media to > say that too. Actually, it's the aliens who make people say that. Your tin foil hat was tilted so you got the message as "people and media". >"I wanna be Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Actually, it's the aliens who make people say that. Your tin foil hat was >tilted so you got the message as "people and media". HAHAHA. Listen to the loony saying there are no conspiracies in america. After 9-11 and the iraq war, everybody knows otherwise, you idiot. > >"I wanna be Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > america. After 9-11 and the iraq war, everybody knows otherwise, you > idiot. As usual, you didn't address the issue. That's ok; it just proves the prior poster was right in that your tin foil hat is slipping. :-) > Sorry - he's the one who's right, not you. I can tell you from >personal experience that an eight-year-old Toyota Camry, given just >scheduled maintenance, runs every bit as good as a new one - and as >good as that Toyota Camry ran at any point in its life to that date. Be aware, though, that the reason the eight-year-old Camry is being sold is the original owner died... of boredom :-) SignatureThere's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can result in a fully-depreciated one. >> >laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >And spend double the vehicle's worth on repairs? Make it 2-5 years, >and the target may be reasonable. I don't believe that. Certainly my junkers have never caused me much trouble. "Laura Bush thinks I'm a worm" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > I don't believe that. Certainly my junkers have never caused me much > trouble. I imagine that would be different if you took them down off the blocks and attempted to drive out of the trailer park. >>>>laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I don't believe that. Certainly my junkers have never caused me much > trouble. That's because it's a flower pot. You aren't allowed to drive it, you drunken slut. "My brain is mush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > Yes indeed - people are insecure idiots and need their status symbols. > Actually they shouldn't buy ANY new car, chevy or caddy. Just buy 10 > year old junkers. That's real good for gas mileage and the environment dumbass. All those 1976 Caddy's you trailer trash are driving around aren't exactly the most fuel efficient cars. >"My brain is mush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Caddy's you trailer trash are driving around aren't exactly the most fuel >efficient cars. They get the job done. "I worship Laura Bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message >>That's real good for gas mileage and the environment dumbass. All those >>1976 >>Caddy's you trailer trash are driving around aren't exactly the most fuel >>efficient cars. > They get the job done. I'll bet. 4 or 5 1976 Caddy's parked strategically around the trailer, and you never have to get out the scissors to mow the lawn. Take off the trunk lid, throw in some potted plants and flowers and you're in business. Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 21 Jun 2006 23:54 GMT On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:57:01 -0500, "John P." <AdmiralPee@neveragainvolunteeryourself.com> was understood to have stated the following: >I'll bet. 4 or 5 1976 Caddy's parked strategically around the trailer, and >you never have to get out the scissors to mow the lawn. Take off the trunk >lid, throw in some potted plants and flowers and you're in business. Eh, that should be "pot plants", not "potted plants." --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. >>laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Actually they shouldn't buy ANY new car, chevy or caddy. Just buy 10 > year old junkers. Why? Most people can afford newer, bigger, more efficient cars, you drunken slut. >>>laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Most people can afford newer, bigger, more efficient cars, you drunken >slut. If you don't pay cash for it, you can't afford it. Around 6/20/2006 7:57 PM, Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote: >> Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > If you don't pay cash for it, you can't afford it. This may come as a shock to you as someone who only dreams of enough cash to buy your next fix, but with proper financial planning, many people that can afford new, bigger, and more efficient cars can also afford to pay cash for said new cars. Signature~/Garth "I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it." - Edith Sitwell (Ventis secundis, tene cursum.) > Around 6/20/2006 7:57 PM, Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) > <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > people that can afford new, bigger, and more efficient cars can also > afford to pay cash for said new cars. I didn't think Aunt Judy's welfare checks were that big. >>>>laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE quoted "Osiris88": >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > If you don't pay cash for it, you can't afford it. That's what I said, you drunken slut. > >> I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > >> Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > And that's sick. People should not identify with a deadly tool like > an automobile. I use my vehicle because I don't have the time or energy to walk across the city every day. It's a tool. >And that's sick. People should not identify with a deadly tool like >an automobile. Any tool can be lethal when yielded by an idiot. The same tool in the hands of an expert can do wornderful things. You don't blame the tool for the damage caused by the idiot using it. As a prime example, when you get behind the wheel of your POS no one around you is safe. The same car driven by anyone else would probably be harmless. -------------- Alex > I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive > names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. Do you really just barf up every dumb thing that pops into your head here? `Cause thats most idiotic thing you've ever posted, which is saying something. Its like I always say, thanks to the internet, I'll never have to wonder what stupid people think about. Mez >> I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >> Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Mez As usual all you have is childish namecalling. Hope you have a better day tmrw. > >> I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger > >> Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > As usual all you have is childish namecalling. Hope you have a better > day tmrw. I actually had a super awesome day. It takes more than someone else's stupidity to bring me down, but kudos on the attempt to take the high road. Maybe now I won't speed past your childrens' grade school if I pass it. Mez [Followup-To: RAD] > I actually had a super awesome day. It takes more than someone else's > stupidity to bring me down, but kudos on the attempt to take the high > road. Maybe now I won't speed past your childrens' grade school if I > pass it. No need, Judy already has that department well covered. He's freely admitted in the past to being ticketed for doing 41 in a 25 MPH school zone. See http://tinyurl.com/5u4wg for more. (FYI, PoA = Judy = lb-VH = so many other aliases) Signature~/Garth |"I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. Almgren | I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. ******* | And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant." (pgp@v6stang.com for secure mail info) --H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 21 Jun 2006 23:52 GMT >I actually had a super awesome day. It takes more than someone else's >stupidity to bring me down, but kudos on the attempt to take the high >road. Maybe now I won't speed past your childrens' grade school if I >pass it. You think someone's actually stupid enough to breed with that retard? Besides a crack whore, anyways? Wouldn't matter if they did; Aunt Judy has eluded to the fact that it's homosexual on numerous occasions. --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. > Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) said in rec.autos.driving: > You think someone's actually stupid enough to breed with that retard? Please! I just ate dinner! :) > Besides a crack whore, anyways? I thought Loco Laura *was* a crack whore... > Wouldn't matter if they did; Aunt Judy > has eluded to the fact that it's homosexual on numerous occasions. See above. SignatureLoco Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend shows us how Loco it really is: "Now that is really stupid. As with all FLs, Laura Bush is the most influential woman in the country." Ref: http://tinyurl.com/zcdkz Message ID: rp8k92dnv98vb2jpsv9ra6uel94s3qovum@4ax.com >I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >with cars than with guns and it's insane to give cars any attractive >names but esp names that enourage murderous driving. 911,928, 924, 944, 99, 900, 96, X1/9, MR2, DB#, e300, e320, e350, S320, S420, s450, s500, s600, s55, E55, C55. That's just a small number of cars without names. As always, your ignorance just makes you look stupid. -------------- Alex >>I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >-------------- >Alex (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >>In article <86md92hov7nmek4jst3maj8kvgb7l15mji@4ax.com>, >>xeton2001@yahoo.com [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are > foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C (195x), 300D (196?), 300E, 300F, 300G, 300H ... time passes ... 300M (cab forward FWD 2000), 300D (2004-2006 RWD V6 and Hemi V8). The years may not be exact, but the model designations are correct. The line was designated 300, IIRC, because the first one was the first American production car with 300 hp. A distant relative (by marriage) was the inventor of the Apperson Jackrabbit around the turn of the last century (1914). Now there's a fearsome, violence provoking name. SignatureKent Finnell From the Music City USA In talk.politics.guns "Kent Finnell" <kentfinn@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>>In article <86md92hov7nmek4jst3maj8kvgb7l15mji@4ax.com>, >>>xeton2001@yahoo.com [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >>>>But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or >>>>thunderbird or cutlass. To continue Kent's excellent rebuttal of Laura's foolishness...... Dodge Diplomat. Honda Civic, Acura Integra, Plymouth Reliant,Reliant Kitten, Chevrolet Luv, Hyundai Sonata, Datsun Bluebird, Honda Prelude, Nissan Silhouette, Pontiac Vibe, Ford Freestyle. Dodge Neon, Toyota Matrix, Buick Regal, Lincoln Continental, Dodge St. Regis, Buick Park Avenue, Pontiac Solstice. Chevrolet Equinox, Dodge Aries, Saturn Sky, Infiniti FX45, Cadillac SRX, Audi S4, Jaguar X-Type No "deadly" names there..... >> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >> >Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C Chrysler is a foreign company. >>>(sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>>foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >> >>Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C > > Chrysler is a foreign company. Now, and THANK GOODNESS! > >> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are > >> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. > >> > >Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C > > Chrysler is a foreign company. uh... not in 1955 it wasn't. nate >> >> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >> >> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >nate We're talking NOW not the stone age, you dimwit. >>>>>(sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>>>>foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > We're talking NOW not the stone age, you dimwit. What kind of VODKA where YOU consuming when you were deprived of the legal ability, fundamental principles, and rights? > Johnny Moore said in rec.autos.driving: > What kind of VODKA where YOU consuming when you were deprived of the > legal ability, fundamental principles, and rights? Skyy. > >> >> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are > >> >> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > We're talking NOW not the stone age, you dimwit. If I'm the dimwit, then why am I making a comment pertinent to the date that the abovementioned cars were produced and you as usual are making non sequiturs? nate Around 6/24/2006 11:56 AM, lAunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea) <http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote: >>>>> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>>>> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > We're talking NOW not the stone age, you dimwit. Nobody is sure of what you're talking about; You're the one who dismissed out-of-hand modern, American-made Cadillacs because they didn't conform to your trite theory. Signature~/Garth "I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it." - Edith Sitwell (Ventis secundis, tene cursum.) >>> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >>> >>Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C > > Chrysler is a foreign company. Not at the time of the original 300 models. The MB-Chrysler merger didn't occur until 1998. Most, if not all, Chrysler products are built in North America. Go pick nits in the proper time frame. SignatureKent Finnell From the Music City USA >>> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >>> >>Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C > >Chrysler is a foreign company. Damn right. They went nazi on us and sold out to Daimler-Benz. Judy - VEHICULAR RACIST wrote: >>>>(sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>>>foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Damn right. They went nazi on us and sold out to Daimler-Benz. What kind of car do YOU claim to own, Judy? DTJ <None@nowhere.com> wrote in news:h6uq92l3l1ueaubhvi67tkkqliqnshpoo6@ 4ax.com: >>> (sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >>> foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. >>> >>Ok then, let's take just one Chrysler line ... the 300, 300A, 300B, 300C > > Chrysler is a foreign company. Not really.....in Europe, the Chrysler is silent. SignatureSleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman "Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag." "We'll fill landfills with tons and tons of garbage, but when our trash is shaped like a human, we [somehow] feel the need to keep it around." John P...2006 >>>I know there are a few exceptions like the Colt Python or Ruger >>>Redhawk but most guns are just given a numerical designation by the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >(sigh) As has been explained a dozen times in this thread, those are >foreign cars and we're talking about american cars. No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some of those cars are made in the USA even though they are a 'foreign' company. Ford owns Jaguar, Aston Martin, Range Rover and Volvo. GM owns Opel and Saab. ----------- Alex >No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some of >those cars are made in the USA even though they are a 'foreign' company. Ford >owns Jaguar, Aston Martin, Range Rover and Volvo. GM owns Opel and Saab. >----------- >Alex Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting names.? > >No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some of > >those cars are made in the USA even though they are a 'foreign' company. Ford [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting > names.? Try this for size.... Cars weigh an average of 500 or so times as much as guns. They can easily go between 55 and 100 mph. Try some research...have a buddy with a radar gun along, take them and a gun to the nearest ditch, and give the gun a heave. The traveling speed of that gun will not be as fast as that of the average car. Bet it's worth trying, even when loaded (you, not the gun). >>No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some of >>those cars are made in the USA even though they are a 'foreign' company. Ford >>owns Jaguar, Aston Martin, Range Rover and Volvo. GM owns Opel and Saab. >>----------- >>Alex > Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting > names.? Many cars do. So do many guns, you drunken slut. It's called MARKETING. "laura bush has more letters in her name than I have brain cells" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting > names.? Damn Judy... this isn't a tough question - it's so that people will by them. Just as Laundry soap get bright, cheerful, colorful names. For the same reason *any* product is given any name, placed in any packaging, advertised as it is. A company making a product like Tide will make several versions of the same box with different color schemes, then have a focus group choose the one that ends up on the shelf. They didn't just pull that orange/red/yellow box out of their a.ses... they did a ton of research to figure out the best way to get people to part with their money. Ford could choose to call a Mustang an A450... but if a focus group indicates that more people will BUY a Mustang than would buy an A450, guess what the name will be. It's not about how people will drive - a person who drives like a moron will do so whether she is in a Mustang, an A450 or a Sweet Innocence. The name is all about separating people from their money - nothing more. You could have made a better case for the manner in which cars are driven in auto industry advertising. THAT sets more of an example of "Hey! Drive our car recklessly!" (always cover their a.ses with "Professional driver on a closed course. Do not attempt!". ... but even then you wouldn't have a case - no on turns into a moron because of a car name or an advertisement. Morons are morons no matter what they are subjected to. I highly doubt you'd accuse car companies of causing moron drivers to drive better because they sold them a Diplomat, would you? >>No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some >>of [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting > names.? You mean like "The Thing"? "Scout" wrote in a message >> Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting >> names.? > You mean like "The Thing"? Duh! No. Judy means cars with EVIL, VIOLENT names like Parisiesanne, Alero, Lumina, Dynasty, Aspire, Focus, Vibe, Freestyle, Neon ... and you know as well as anyone that Chevy stopped production of the Luv pickups because anyone who even looked at that name was driven to a murderous rampage instantly. >>>No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some >>>of [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >You mean like "The Thing"? Yeah - i read about that one the other day when i was researching for this thread. HAHA. There have been some stupid names for cars, such as gremlin. Anyway - i never said ALL cars had violence-inspiring names. "I shave my laura bush" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in a message > Yeah - i read about that one the other day when i was researching for > this thread. HAHA. There have been some stupid names for cars, such > as gremlin. Anyway - i never said ALL cars had violence-inspiring > names. Actually, you said *every* car... "But every car gets a name and often something like mustang or thunderbird or cutlass..." >>>>No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. >>>>Some [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > as gremlin. Anyway - i never said ALL cars had violence-inspiring > names. Heck, you've yet to show ANY you drunken slut. >> Yeah - i read about that one the other day when i was researching for >> this thread. HAHA. There have been some stupid names for cars, such >> as gremlin. Anyway - i never said ALL cars had violence-inspiring >> names. > >Heck, you've yet to show ANY you drunken slut. Oh yes i have. Cars named after speedy animals like mustang and impala are obvious examples. They encourage speed and speeding is a super-violent crime. >Oh yes i have. Cars named after speedy animals like mustang and >impala are obvious examples. They encourage speed and speeding is a >super-violent crime. You must drive a car names 'Stupidity' if you think a car name will influence the way you drive it. Do you think all Spanish people only park their Chevy Nova's? --------------- Alex In talk.politics.guns laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: >Oh yes i have. Cars named after speedy animals like mustang and >impala are obvious examples. They encourage speed and speeding is a >super-violent crime. No they don't. Since these animals spend 90% of their time grazing, they encourage slow, thoughtful driving. Of course, if you want to provide any PROOF of your wild, drug-induced accusations, go right ahead. I predict you won't. >>>>No, you are just ignorant as has been pointed out many times before. Some >>>>of [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > as gremlin. Anyway - i never said ALL cars had violence-inspiring > names. Correct, you said Guns don't, you drunken slut. >Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting >names.? Because it helps to sell cars. Isn't it obvious to you? I guess your stupidity isn't limited just to your driving. ---------------- Alex >>Why don't you address the issue?. Why do cars get racy exciting >>names.? > >Because it helps to sell cars. >---------------- >Alex I know that, you hatefilled maggot. It just shows how stupid the public is that they happily accept names that encourage more killing and maiming on the roads. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.