 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / September 2006California bans driving while holding a cell phone - THIS IS BULLSHIT
http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Cell Phone Law Megan Braziel Reporting - Posted: Friday, 15 September 2006 4:05PM KNX 1070 NEWSRADIO OAKLAND, CA (AP) -- Governor Schwarzenegger singed a bill Friday that will make it illegal to hold a cell phone while driving. The new law will require drivers to use headsets or speakers to talk while in the car. Motorists could be fined up to $50 when the new bill will take effect July 1, 2008. (snip) ========================== I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good 1. You can still phone-drive as long as it's on a hands-free phone 2. The penalty is a measly $50 3. The law doesn't take effect for TWO YEARS!!!!!!!! > I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good > > 1. You can still phone-drive as long as it's on a hands-free phone And drivers can still be distracted by passengers too ! Utterly shocking. All passengers should have gags fitted ! This should be compulsory fitment at the factory. Don't even start on the distraction caused by traffic !!!!! > 2. The penalty is a measly $50 I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. Graham >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Don't even start on the distraction caused by traffic !!!!! There HAS been research done on this sort of stuff - and cell phones are apparently MORE distracting than traffic, the oldies station or even screaming kids. Too much of the brain gets drawn into the conversation, drivers are half there, half with the person on the other end of the connection. ALL non-emergency telephone use by drivers should be banned. We could re-fit some of those automatic speed cameras to detect cell-band transmissions and snap a photo. If we can see the driver fooling with a phone - instant ticket. >> 2. The penalty is a measly $50 > >I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. How high ? Make it legal for other drivers to shoot anyone they see gabbing on a phone ? :-) >>I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. > > How high ? Make it legal for other drivers to shoot > anyone they see gabbing on a phone ? :-) I'm all for that! Mandatory gun ownership! YEAH!  SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" > >>I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Bill Funk > replace "g" with "a" there you go...shoot the tires out, then approach the car "Park the damn thing if you want to talk." Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), morticide said in rec.autos.driving: > > >>I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. > > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > there you go...shoot the tires out, then approach the car "Park the > damn thing if you want to talk." Put the gun to the gas tank of cell phone driver's car, "Go ahead, make my day!" SignatureLoco Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend foams like a Bartlo (and spelling or gramatical errors are left as is): "Hey - necromancer is a criminal coddler. BTW the article says 4X and then it says the BAC was .187 which doesn't make much sense. Not that it matters. Drunk drivers who kill should get life wo parole." Ref: http://tinyurl.com/rqvtg Message ID:i2k082lf3gv2p6h1sosge2bqma6uvce2ft@4ax.com >> >>I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. >> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> Bill Funk >> replace "g" with "a" How did Bill go from "making it legal to shoot" to "*mandatory* gun ownership"??? > there you go...shoot the tires out, then approach the car "Park the > damn thing if you want to talk." Problem is;any misses,who knows where the stray bullets end up. People get killed that way,the wrong people. At least if you shoot into the auto body,the bullets have a better chance of stopping instead of exiting. B-) SignatureJim Yanik jyanik at kua.net >>> >>I agree. It probably should be higher to have a true deterent effect. >>> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >How did Bill go from "making it legal to shoot" to "*mandatory* gun >ownership"??? Not only that, but anything with less than 500lbs/ft of energy at 50' means you must stay in the right lane! >> there you go...shoot the tires out, then approach the car "Park the >> damn thing if you want to talk." > >Problem is;any misses,who knows where the stray bullets end up. >People get killed that way,the wrong people. So what? It's the fault of the guy with the cell phone, anyway. >At least if you shoot into the auto body,the bullets have a better chance >of stopping instead of exiting. B-) It would take more than a handgun to go through a steel-bodied car. I guess that means anyone driving a plactic/fiberglass-bodied car should be very careful to not talk on a cellphone while driving, huh? SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" > It would take more than a handgun to go through a steel-bodied car. I take it you've never fired a weapon at a car before. Not only will the average handgun ammo pierce the body of the car, it will go all the way through the car and lodge itself in whatever is behind the car, if it doesn't also go through THAT. > I guess that means anyone driving a plactic/fiberglass-bodied car > should be very careful to not talk on a cellphone while driving, huh? Doesn't matter. Drive a Hummer H3 if you want to, and it won't protect you from handgun ammo. -Dave >> It would take more than a handgun to go through a steel-bodied car. > >I take it you've never fired a weapon at a car before. Not only will the >average handgun ammo pierce the body of the car, it will go all the way >through the car and lodge itself in whatever is behind the car, if it >doesn't also go through THAT. Depends on what you consider to be an average handgun. A .357 Magnum will go through a door, a .38 Special won't, unless you hit a soft spot. Even a .357 won't penetrate the average windshield from over 100'. The .41 Magnum wasd developed specifically because law enforcement needed a harder-hitting round for autos than the .375, but with less kick than the .44 Magnum. >> I guess that means anyone driving a plactic/fiberglass-bodied car >> should be very careful to not talk on a cellphone while driving, huh? > >Doesn't matter. Drive a Hummer H3 if you want to, and it won't protect you >from handgun ammo. -Dave I wouldn't buy an H3 on a bet. A Colorado with a 5 cyl. engine and very expensive sheet metal doesn't do anythkng for me at all. And, BTW, get a sense of humor. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" >> It would take more than a handgun to go through a steel-bodied car. > >I take it you've never fired a weapon at a car before. Not only will the >average handgun ammo pierce the body of the car, it will go all the way >through the car and lodge itself in whatever is behind the car, if it >doesn't also go through THAT. Unless it hits something reasonably solid like the engine block, driveshaft, or driver. SignatureThere's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can result in a fully-depreciated one. > >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good > >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > detect cell-band transmissions and snap a photo. If we can > see the driver fooling with a phone - instant ticket. Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. Signature"You know I have ninety four percent recall of all conversations?" "Ninety four percent?" "I've tested myself.", Philip Seymour Hoffman, 'Capote' >>>> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good >>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> > Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. And read books, apply make-up, shave, etc. All DISTRACTIONS! I would ban them ALL! >> Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. >> >And read books, apply make-up, shave, etc. All DISTRACTIONS! I would ban >them ALL! And we need to take radios and CD players out of cars too. Distracted drivers are MURDERERS. > >> Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. > >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > And we need to take radios and CD players out of cars too. Distracted > drivers are MURDERERS. It's been shown that radios and the like can help keep drivers alert. Cell phones can as well. It depends on the driver and the circumstances. Signature"You know I have ninety four percent recall of all conversations?" "Ninety four percent?" "I've tested myself.", Philip Seymour Hoffman, 'Capote' >> >> Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >It's been shown that radios and the like can help keep drivers alert. >Cell phones can as well. It depends on the driver and the circumstances. Oh shut up you nutball criminal coddler. YOu sound just like the drunk drivers who say they drive better when drunk!!!!!!! > >> >> Bull. People should be free to use mobile phones if they want to. > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Oh shut up you nutball criminal coddler. YOu sound just like the drunk > drivers who say they drive better when drunk!!!!!!! So it's impossible that something could improve someone's driving? It isn't possible that a cup of coffee could improve the driving of a sleepy driver? That's impossible right out of the box? Shouldn't we do studies to see if listening to the radio can help some people drive more safely? Signature"You know I have ninety four percent recall of all conversations?" "Ninety four percent?" "I've tested myself.", Philip Seymour Hoffman, 'Capote' >> Oh shut up you nutball criminal coddler. YOu sound just like the drunk >> drivers who say they drive better when drunk!!!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >studies to see if listening to the radio can help some people drive more >safely? If you're sleepy you shouldn't be driving period. And no - we don't need any studies to know that playing with a radio while driving is unsafe. Why don't you get some common sense? > >> Oh shut up you nutball criminal coddler. YOu sound just like the drunk > >> drivers who say they drive better when drunk!!!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > If you're sleepy you shouldn't be driving period. I was pointing out that something that you do can help you drive better. How about sleeping, getting plenty of rest, before driving? You'd support that as helping people drive, right? So why not listening to the radio? > And no - we don't need any studies to know that playing with a radio > while driving is unsafe. Why don't you get some common sense? You don't play with the radio, you just push a button which you can push without even looking away from the road if you know the car. Signature"You know I have ninety four percent recall of all conversations?" "Ninety four percent?" "I've tested myself.", Philip Seymour Hoffman, 'Capote' >>> Oh shut up you nutball criminal coddler. YOu sound just like the drunk >>> drivers who say they drive better when drunk!!!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >And no - we don't need any studies to know that playing with a radio >while driving is unsafe. Why don't you get some common sense? For most of us on the "outside", facts trump imaginary fantasies. I completely understand your situation, though. For you, it's obvious that reality doesn't intrude into your fantasies very much. I'm sure the costors there are working very hard to fix this, but you could do yourself a real favor and work some on this yourself. It's probably not a good thing for you to resist this as much as you do. No pen pals, either, huh? It's no wonder your girlfriend charges you $3. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" >Distracted drivers are MURDERERS. The biggest distraction when I drive is the speedometer, especially when a cop is around. I say we remove those from our cars. > And we need to take radios and CD players out of cars too. Distracted > drivers are MURDERERS. You think music is a distraction, wait till you have a 2 year old having a hissy fit!! That is a hundred times more dangerous than being the ex boyfriend of Laura Bush with her driving near you!! Children in a car should be banned too!! NO! any passengers should be banned, they talk and distract you more than music >> And we need to take radios and CD players out of cars too. Distracted >> drivers are MURDERERS. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > should be banned too!! NO! any passengers should be banned, they talk > and distract you more than music I thing flashlights in cars should be banned. Oh wait, Judy needs a flashlight in his car to see his instrument panel since he won't replace the fuses/bulbs. >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >passengers should have gags fitted ! This should be compulsory fitment at the >factory. Lots of things are distracting to drivers. Some like using a cell phone or a radio or a CD can be banned. Other activities like talking cannot be banned. Just because we can't stop ALL distracting activities done by drivers doesn't mean we can't stop SOME of them. THINK > >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good > >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > activities done by drivers doesn't mean we can't stop SOME of them. > THINK Cellphones were never a problem when sane people were using them and driving. Apparently now that anyone has a phone, you fascists figure you'll take away rights from the rest of us. Signature"You know I have ninety four percent recall of all conversations?" "Ninety four percent?" "I've tested myself.", Philip Seymour Hoffman, 'Capote' >> >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good >> >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >driving. Apparently now that anyone has a phone, you fascists figure >you'll take away rights from the rest of us. Rights???? HAHAHA. You have a right to drive a 4000 pound car on public highways while playing with a phone???? I suppose you have a right to drive drunk too. URANUTBALL >>> >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good >>> >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >public highways while playing with a phone???? I suppose you have a >right to drive drunk too. URANUTBALL I know this is difficult for you, being as you're obviouisly not able to think clearly (that's why you're where you are, after all), but... Yes, we do have the right to drive while using a cell phone, and no, we don't have the right to drive drunk. Sorry, but reality must intrude at least part of the time. Ask the nice young man in the white jacket to explain this to you, if your doctors haven't already. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" > >> I'm all for cracking down on phone drivers but this won't do any good > >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > activities done by drivers doesn't mean we can't stop SOME of them. > THINK What do you mean, "talking cannot be banned." Of course it can, coddler. Why don't you stop being an apologist for criminals? It's because you're drunk this very minute, that's why. > http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > 3. The law doesn't take effect for TWO YEARS!!!!!!!! No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that causes...especially when they're watching "Team America World Police" and trying to drive at the same time - that's a recipe for disaster for sure. And don't get me started on people who shower while driving... >No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that >causes...especially when they're watching "Team America World Police" >and trying to drive at the same time - that's a recipe for disaster for >sure. And you know this, how? :-) SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" >No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that >causes...especially when they're watching "Team America World Police" >and trying to drive at the same time - that's a recipe for disaster for >sure. You sound like you're joking but DVD players are available in cars and it's insane. >>No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >>driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >You sound like you're joking but DVD players are available in cars and >it's insane. Yeah, it was funny how he juxtaposed a real problem (DVDs) with a fake one (showering). Good technique. The reason that DVD players are allowed is because the culture has gone kid-crazy. Anything that benefits breeding (aka, child rearing) is OK (and cannot be criticized). >>>No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >>>driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >kid-crazy. Anything that benefits breeding (aka, child rearing) is OK >(and cannot be criticized). It's also because Detroit loves car crashes. They make billions of $ every year just replacing the cars totalled on our highways. Same reason they build cars that do 100mph and make commercials that encourage speeding. They don't care how many innocent people they kill as long as they make money off it. >>>>No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >>>>driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >encourage speeding. They don't care how many innocent people they kill >as long as they make money off it. Hmmm... Are you sure your doctors aren't prolonging your treatment? After all, they make a lot of money from this. So does the facility you're in. Or is it a possibility that you are resisting getting better? After all, it's pretty nice there, isn't it? Three meals a day (plus snacks), a nice man in a white jacket who does his best to make things easy for you, and all of your needs taken care of. I'll bet that's it. Is that why you see the same everywhere you look? SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 18 Sep 2006 04:51 GMT Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >>>>No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while >>>>driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >encourage speeding. They don't care how many innocent people they kill >as long as they make money off it. Innocent people aren't involved in automobile accidents; incompetent people are. Look up the definitions of "innocent" and "incompetent" if you haven't torn those pages out of your facilities's dictionary yet. --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:51:14 -0400, "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> wrote: >Innocent people aren't involved in automobile accidents; incompetent >people are. Look up the definitions of "innocent" and "incompetent" if >you haven't torn those pages out of your facilities's dictionary yet. > >--- Actually, innocent peolel are involved in car crashes, unless you consider passengers to be somehow driving. Or even those drivers who are, through no fault of their own, involved by other drivers. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 18 Sep 2006 04:51 GMT Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >You sound like you're joking but DVD players are available in cars and >it's insane. DVD players in cars are GREAT ideas. I mean, how else are you going to pass the time when you're waiting for some retarded LLBer to vacate the lane? I guess there's always solitaire on the laptop, if you don't have a DVD handy. Of course, now that iPod has games available, I could always mess with that. --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Hello Kitty said in rec.autos.driving: > No, the real problem this doesn't address is people watching DVDs while > driving. I mean, you just can't imagine what kind of problems that > causes...especially when they're watching "Team America World Police" > and trying to drive at the same time - that's a recipe for disaster for > sure. I can think of harder things than that that people have been known to watch in their cars. And let's not get started on someone watching "World's Wildest Police Videos," while driving and getting ideas... > And don't get me started on people who shower while driving... Signature"f.cking California!" --Bruce Willis as John McClane in "Die Hard." > http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > OAKLAND, CA (AP) -- Governor Schwarzenegger singed a bill Friday that > will make it illegal to hold a cell phone while driving. Good. a.sholes who do that are a serious hazard to other people. >> http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Good. a.sholes who do that are a serious hazard to other people. That's true but a $50 fine won't stop anybody. >>> http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >That's true but a $50 fine won't stop anybody. That's more than you spent on your car. Of course, now, you don't have any money problems; in the facility, everything you need is provided at no cost to you. Spending OPM is fun, isn't it? SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com> said in rec.autos.driving: >>That's true but a $50 fine won't stop anybody. > >That's more than you spent on your car. Correction: that's more than Judy's car is *worth.* :) SignatureI'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it! Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Scott en Aztlán said in rec.autos.driving: > Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com> said in rec.autos.driving: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Correction: that's more than Judy's car is *worth.* :) Correction: That's $50.00US more than Judy's car is *worth.* ;) Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Scott en Aztlán said in rec.autos.driving: > Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com> said in rec.autos.driving: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Correction: that's more than Judy's car is *worth.* :) Correction: That's $50.00US more than Judy's car is *worth.* ;) Correction: That's $500.00US more than Judy's car is *worth*. That's about how much you'd have to pay somebody to tow it away. :) -Dave Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 18 Sep 2006 04:51 GMT Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver any clue to the following address: Scott en Aztlán <scottenaztlan@yahoo.com> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >Bill Funk <BigBill@there.com> said in rec.autos.driving: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Correction: that's more than Judy's car is *worth.* :) Correction: that's more than Judy is worth. --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. New York and DC Passed this type of law several years ago...problem is as I understand it is that cops won't bother to enforce it, yet. Many other nations have already banned the practice. Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Botswana, Canada, Egypt, Finland, Ireland, Mexico, South Africa Sweden and the United Kingdom 3 other states have pending legslation. The first big study of this was from Carnegie Mellon U in 2001 The Latest is from BYU in June 2006 UILL study in 2004 even indicts hands free as not the solution...your mind is still not on what you are doing. The evidence is mounting http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author:"Strayer"%20intitle:"Cell%20Phone%20I nduced%20Failures%20of%20Visual%20Attention%20During%20..."%20&hl=en&lr=&safe=of f&oi=scholarr I agree the fines are not yet steep enough to detour the behavior...and that behavior the studies show is that talking on a cell phone is proven to impair a person's ability to concentrate as much as being intoxicated...It is true that other things distract too and everything that can be done to limit them should be done until we get the robot cars (but a lot of them are passive like radio, books on tape, where conversation is an active distraction, you're not just listening......then you can yak your face off, because driving several tons of metal at 60mph when your mind is some place else is sheer lunacy....How did people get along without them for 90 years, you just pulled over to make a call, but we've come to expect instant gratification. It will be interesting to see what happens as more states, cities and most importantly Insurance companies get on board. It took twenty years to get seat belts (mainly because of car companies) made mandatory > http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > 3. The law doesn't take effect for TWO YEARS!!!!!!!! >The first big study of this was from Carnegie Mellon U in 2001 >The Latest is from BYU in June 2006 >UILL study in 2004 even indicts hands free as not the solution...your >mind is still not on what you are doing. Oh hell - we don't need studies of this. You might as well say we should legalize shooting people until studies prove bullets are dangerous. >>The first big study of this was from Carnegie Mellon U in 2001 >>The Latest is from BYU in June 2006 [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >should legalize shooting people until studies prove bullets are >dangerous. Hey, that's good. Did your $3 ho girlfriend tell you that? It certainly couldn't have been original with you. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 17 Sep 2006 20:31 GMT Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >OAKLAND, CA (AP) -- Governor Schwarzenegger singed a bill Friday that >will make it illegal to hold a cell phone while driving. When did Arnie start singing legislation? --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. ... >>OAKLAND, CA (AP) -- Governor Schwarzenegger singed a bill Friday that >>will make it illegal to hold a cell phone while driving. > >When did Arnie start singing legislation? Or setting it on fire? On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:31:58 -0400, in misc.transport.road "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> wrote in <pk8rg29vkj5ol92g8426u3m67rk3c2g9od@4ax.com>: >Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able >to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >When did Arnie start singing legislation? I hope he's better than Hastert when he sings. On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:31:58 -0400, "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> wrote: >Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able >to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >When did Arnie start singing legislation? Hey stupid. They misspelled "signed". You are so stupid. HAHAHA >On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:31:58 -0400, "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM >(Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Hey stupid. They misspelled "signed". You are so stupid. HAHAHA And the right word to have used instead of "signed" would have been "singeing". You are so stupid! Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to rub it in. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:31:58 -0400, "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM > (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Hey stupid. They misspelled "signed". You are so stupid. HAHAHA The kind of person who blames the reader for the misspelling misunderstanding is the kind that would blame DEAD VICTIMS for car crashes caused by CRIMINALS! Why don't you stop coddling the GUILTY? Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers) - 20 Sep 2006 03:17 GMT Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver any clue to the following address: "Pete from Boston" <masspete@my-deja.com> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:31:58 -0400, "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM >> (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >misunderstanding is the kind that would blame DEAD VICTIMS for car >crashes caused by CRIMINALS! Why don't you stop coddling the GUILTY? What would you expect of a card-carrying supporter of Tubby Kennedy? --- "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 SignatureEl Pollo Loco (Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend) demonstrates it's complete gullibility, stupidity, and state of delusion when it falls for an April Fool's joke, hook, line, and sinker: > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/008d032d86999983?hl=en& Ragnar wrote: > Gods, you're dumb. Its a rather obvious April Fool's joke. And you're > the Fool. This is no joke. "Ted Kennedy - President of DDDAMM (Drunk Driving Divers Against Mad Mothers)" <stfu@microsoft.com> said in rec.autos.driving: >Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able >to deliver any clue to the following address: Speeders & Drunk Drivers [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >When did Arnie start singing legislation? singe Pronunciation (snj) tr.v. singed, singe·ing, sing·es 1. To burn superficially; scorch. 2. To burn off the feathers or bristles of (a carcass of a bird or animal) by subjecting briefly to flame. See Synonyms at burn1. 3. To burn the ends of (hair, for example). 4. To burn the nap from (cloth) in manufacturing. Aunt Judy is saying that Ah-Nold took a match to the legislation and burned it up like it deserves. SignatureI'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it! GOOD! I hope it hits my state tomorrow - > http://www.knx1070.com/pages/83763.php?contentType=4&contentId=206095 > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > 3. The law doesn't take effect for TWO YEARS!!!!!!!! >GOOD! I hope it hits my state tomorrow - Well - as the article says, it's not hitting CA for two years. Looks like Schwarzenazi was bought off by the cell phone companies. >>GOOD! I hope it hits my state tomorrow - > >Well - as the article says, it's not hitting CA for two years. Looks >like Schwarzenazi was bought off by the cell phone companies. Um, if he'd been bought off, he wouldn't have signed it. Boy, are you stupid! Oh, sorry, one of your doctors called, and said I souldn't say that to you. It seems that's not going to help your recovery. But it's true, nonetheless. SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" >>>GOOD! I hope it hits my state tomorrow - >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Um, if he'd been bought off, he wouldn't have signed it. >Boy, are you stupid! This silly law is just what the cell companies wanted. If shcwarz was honest he'd have refused to sign unless the law was written to take effect next month and mandated $1000 fines. >>>>GOOD! I hope it hits my state tomorrow - >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >honest he'd have refused to sign unless the law was written to take >effect next month and mandated $1000 fines. See what I mean? Even when the illogic of your writings is pointed out to you, you persist in your fantasy. Such a shame. Of course, it's nice and comfy there, isn't it? All your needs taken care of, a nice young man in a white jacket to make sure you don't hurt yourself, no bills to pay, even your TV choices made for you. But I have to wonder; are you really trying to get better? It doesn't seem so. Don't your doctors ever urge you to try to make a littl eprogress towards getting better? Or has it been determined that you will probably stay there forever, a ward of the state? SignatureBill Funk replace "g" with "a" Good thing they didn't pass a law saying one can't drive wile holding a flashlight, huh Judy? >Good thing they didn't pass a law saying one can't drive wile holding a >flashlight, huh Judy? Only an idiot would compare the two. THINK |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.