Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

You first signal, then brake, right?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
223rem - 26 Sep 2006 02:32 GMT
I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
only
signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
Arif Khokar - 26 Sep 2006 03:24 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only
> signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

Agreed.  If I happen to be behind one of these stupid drivers while
riding I'll shout "MOVE," or "USE YOUR DAMN TURN SIGNAL."  While
driving, I have to resort to the, less interesting, use of my horn.
Brent P - 26 Sep 2006 03:40 GMT
>> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
>> only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

> Agreed.  If I happen to be behind one of these stupid drivers while
> riding I'll shout "MOVE," or "USE YOUR DAMN TURN SIGNAL."  

Guess I'm not the only one who gives such rolling commentary :)

Tends to piss people off being called out on their piss poor driving though.
dr.benway@ziplip.com - 27 Sep 2006 17:32 GMT
Sometimes digital technology must be engaged!
> > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> > only
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> riding I'll shout "MOVE," or "USE YOUR DAMN TURN SIGNAL."  While
> driving, I have to resort to the, less interesting, use of my horn.
gpsman - 26 Sep 2006 03:25 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only
> signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

Signaling before braking for a turn is not required by law but any
self-respecting person who knows how to drive ensures they practice it
and teach it to their children by example long before they're old
enough to be licensed.

"Proper" signal usage is a warning: I'm going to be braking.  A late
signal is an explanation: I braked because I'm going to turn.  Yeah,
thanks Einstein.
-----

- gpsman
Tom Royer - 26 Sep 2006 14:18 GMT
>> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
>> only
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> signal is an explanation: I braked because I'm going to turn.  Yeah,
> thanks Einstein.

Actually, a lot don't bother to signal until they start their turn.
So, to them, the signal means "I am turning (or braking)."

I think some of this results from the way they're taught:
"If you're turning left, push down (just the way the steering
wheel moves by the lever); if you're turning right, push up
(just the way the wheel moves by the lever)."  People then
get in the habit of not hitting the turn signal lever until they
actually start moving the steering wheel.  And driving
instructors don't routinely correct this tendency.

> -----
>
> - gpsman
Old Wolf - 27 Sep 2006 02:23 GMT
> Signaling before braking for a turn is not required by law but any
> self-respecting person who knows how to drive ensures they practice it
> and teach it to their children by example long before they're old
> enough to be licensed.

What happened to your System? People who brake before
signalling are obeying the law and are therefore following the
System, so they are making an effort to contribute to the
Proper Flow of Traffic. That was your line of reasoning when
you were defending LLBs.

Or does the System only apply to laws that you feel like
applying it to?
Brent P - 26 Sep 2006 03:39 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

Yep. Very annoying very damaging to good traffic flow.
Sharon - 26 Sep 2006 15:45 GMT
>> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
>> only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
>
> Yep. Very annoying very damaging to good traffic flow.

    One of my pet peeves:  add this behavior to people who feel the need to
slow nearly to a stop *before* moving into a turn lane.

- Sharon
"Gravity...  is a harsh mistress!"
Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 03:58 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

I was taught.

Mirror
Signal
Brake
Manoeuver

Graham
! - 26 Sep 2006 05:41 GMT
> > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> > only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Graham

Unfortunately, it seems like people around these parts use that to
change lanes. They look in the mirror and see an empty spot in another
lane a ways back, so they put on their blinker and brake until that
empty spot gets there, then get in that spot. Of course, a normal
action of seeing someone ahead of you brake inexplicably is to get into
the other lane and go around, so often that empty spot they saw way
back gets filled, causing them to slow down even more to wait on
another one. Of course, when they finally do get that spot, they are
moving so slowly that oncoming traffic in that lane tries to change
lanes to get around, so some will slow down and break, waiting for
empty spots, and so on...

I've actually seen people come to dead stops to change lanes.
Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 12:53 GMT
> > > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> > > only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I've actually seen people come to dead stops to change lanes.

My reference to the Brake part was in respect of exiting a main road to a side
road.

Thre is *no* reason to brake when lane changing on a multi-lane highway per se.
In fact it's a sign of a bad choice of timing.

Graham
Scott en Aztlán - 26 Sep 2006 15:28 GMT
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
rec.autos.driving:

>> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
>> only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Brake
>Manoeuver

Your teacher was a nincompoop.

Let's suppose you're in the right lane going 30 MPH and you want to
merge left to make a left turn at the next intersection. Let's further
suppose that all the vehicles around you are also going 30 MPH, and
that the left lane is clear ahead of you except for one car whose
front bumper is even with your front door. Let's examine what happens
when you a) Mirror, Signal, Brake, and Maneuver and b) Mirror, Signal,
Speed Up, and Maneuver.

In scenario a, your braking causes you to slow to 25 MPH. The car that
was next to you continues at 30 MPH, and passes you. The car behind
him, also moving at 30 MPH, also passes you. This continues until
either a JLEDI comes along or you get so close to your turn that you
are afraid you'll miss it, so you brake again and slow down even more,
causing the other cars to pass you even faster. Eventually you come to
a complete stop, and sit there waiting pathetically for someone to let
you in. Meanwhile, during all of this, the cars in the right lane
behind you are either stuck behind your stupid Sloth a.s, or are
getting fed up with your lack of driving skill and whipping out into
the left lane to pass you. This only increases your delay, and the
people who you so inconsiderately delayed now become one of the conga
line of vehicles that are delaying YOU. It becomes a vicious circle,
feeding upon itself and creating many vehicle-minutes of needless
delay.

In scenario b, you blip the throttle, clear the car next to you, make
your lane change, and NOBODY IS DELAYED.

Only an idiot thinks scenario a is better.
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 16:11 GMT
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
> rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Your teacher was a nincompoop.

This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.

Graham
gpsman - 26 Sep 2006 17:36 GMT
> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
> > rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.

But you miss the point.  The idea is to apply your criteria to an
unrelated scenerio and then feel intellectually superior.  It works for
a lot of idiots here.
-----

- gpsman
Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 18:43 GMT
> > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
> > > rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> unrelated scenerio and then feel intellectually superior.  It works for
> a lot of idiots here.

The scenario wasn't actually stated in the original post. If it had been, my
response would have been Mirror Signal Manouvre.

Graham
Scott en Aztlán - 27 Sep 2006 02:40 GMT
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
rec.autos.driving:

>This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.

Sadly, far too many people do.
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

Eeyore - 27 Sep 2006 05:06 GMT
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
> rec.autos.driving:
>
> >This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.
>
> Sadly, far too many people do.

The answer is to teach proper vehicle control. I can't say how you
tackle the 'common sense' aspect of it.

Graham
Scott en Aztlán - 27 Sep 2006 15:06 GMT
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
rec.autos.driving:

>The answer is to teach proper vehicle control.

Some people simply cannot be taught.

>I can't say how you tackle the 'common sense' aspect of it.

I would love to say "let them take the tube" like they do in London,
but our public transit system in America is just not up to the task.
Which is, of course, why so many incompetent f.cks have driver's
licenses; if we didn't let them drive, our economy would suffer.
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

morticide - 27 Sep 2006 15:29 GMT
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
> rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> --
> I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

Factor in the fact that most drivers display their best driving skills
during the initial road test at about age 16...then experience kicks in
with the obtained bad habits...ouch.
Arif Khokar - 27 Sep 2006 17:30 GMT
> Factor in the fact that most drivers display their best driving skills
> during the initial road test at about age 16...then experience kicks in
> with the obtained bad habits...ouch.

I'm a much better driver now as compared to when I was 16.  Back when I
first started driving, I didn't know how to set my mirrors correctly, I
couldn't consistently parallel park, I didn't merge at speed, and
definitely had little experience with skid recovery.  I also did most of
my highway driving holding the steering wheel with one hand at the 7
o'clock position instead of two hands at the 9 and 3 positions.
morticide - 27 Sep 2006 17:44 GMT
> > Factor in the fact that most drivers display their best driving skills
> > during the initial road test at about age 16...then experience kicks in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> my highway driving holding the steering wheel with one hand at the 7
> o'clock position instead of two hands at the 9 and 3 positions.

I have also improved significantly since 16.  We did have driver's ed
back then, and we spent half the instruction period practicing parallel
parking because it was automatic failure at the local testing facility.
It was my first experience on the highway (I had driven *illegally*
starting at age 12 on the farm, on gravel).  However, I grew up in a
town that did not have traffic lights or freeways, so my first
experience with a traffic light was at 17 and with freeways at 20.
Skid recovery was natural given the gravel road time.  The instructed
practice was hands at 10 and 2 instead of 9 and 3.  I also was licensed
during Federal 55, so I was 24 before the first SL increase kicked in.
Old Wolf - 27 Sep 2006 23:59 GMT
> >This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.
>
> Sadly, far too many people do.

I had to today. I was in the lane next to the exit lane. There
was a car immediately in front of me, and in the exit lane
was a duckling to the car in front of me, and another two
cars tailgating the duckling. I waited around in case one of
them sped up, but they didn't, so I had no option but to slow
down to wait for the convoy to pass. (Naturally I didn't try the
reak manoeuvre).

NB. To be pedantic, I didn't actually brake, I laid off the gas
and engine braking slowed me down.
Eeyore - 28 Sep 2006 05:35 GMT
> > >This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> down to wait for the convoy to pass. (Naturally I didn't try the
> reak manoeuvre).

How soon before the junction did you try to begin your lane change ?

> NB. To be pedantic, I didn't actually brake, I laid off the gas
> and engine braking slowed me down.

That's not really an issue.

Graham
Old Wolf - 29 Sep 2006 01:55 GMT
> > > >This wasn't in respect of lane changing. You don't brake for that.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> How soon before the junction did you try to begin your lane change ?

As soon as I passed the previous exit -- about 500m. The mother
duck and duckling stayed in formation the whole way.
Scott en Aztlán - 28 Sep 2006 14:43 GMT
"Old Wolf" <oldwolf@inspire.net.nz> said in rec.autos.driving:

>I was in the lane next to the exit lane. There
>was a car immediately in front of me, and in the exit lane
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>down to wait for the convoy to pass. (Naturally I didn't try the
>reak manoeuvre).

What?!?!?! You mean you didn't force your way into the lane, and then
punish those lawbreaking tailgaters by driving S-L-O-W-L-Y in front of
them?
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

Eeyore - 28 Sep 2006 17:25 GMT
> What?!?!?! You mean you didn't force your way into the lane, and then
> punish those lawbreaking tailgaters by driving S-L-O-W-L-Y in front of
> them?

The best way to deal with tailgaters is to allow them to get real close
and then just gently touch the brake pedal so it doesn't actually do much.
They don't know that of course !

The results can be quite hilarious.

Graham
necromancer - 26 Sep 2006 12:34 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), 223rem said in
rec.autos.driving:
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake
> to a crawl and only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

Consider yourself fortunate. Atleast they signal.

Signature

"The world's gone crazy... You know how I know the
world's gone crazy? 'Cause I'm more scared of white
kids than black kids!"
                            --Chris Rock

Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 12:54 GMT
> Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), 223rem said in
> rec.autos.driving:
> > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake
> > to a crawl and only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
>
> Consider yourself fortunate. Atleast they signal.

Lane discipline seems to be especially bad in the USA.

Graham
necromancer - 27 Sep 2006 23:08 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Eeyore said in
rec.autos.driving:

> > Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), 223rem said in
> > rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Lane discipline seems to be especially bad in the USA.

You could say that. Unfortnately, the puclic transit in this nation is
not that good, otherwise we could just say "let them take the tube," as
Scott was saying in another thread.

I am just thankful that undertaking is legal (or atleast unenforced) and
that the cops haven't been around when I have had to pull some stunts to
pass the clueless...

Signature

C an't
I nterpret
A nything

Eeyore - 28 Sep 2006 05:33 GMT
> Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Eeyore said in
> rec.autos.driving:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> that the cops haven't been around when I have had to pull some stunts to
> pass the clueless...

It's very unfortunate that you have to resort to such ploys IMHO.

Graham
necromancer - 28 Sep 2006 12:57 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Eeyore said in
rec.autos.driving:
> It's very unfortunate that you have to resort to such ploys IMHO.

Sad, but unfortunately, if you want to get anywhere sometimes, you have
to do such things....

OF course, if people like the one referenced below weren't allowed to
have licenses or walk among the normal people...

Signature

"There's not a shred of evidence that the jerries murdered anything
close to 7 million jooz.  Another monstrous lie just like the 9-11
official story. "

-- Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend, 12/01/2004
Ref: http://tinyurl.com/9oog5
Message-ID: <780ea958.0411302101.5ef25456@posting.google.com>

223rem - 26 Sep 2006 13:50 GMT
> Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), 223rem said in
> rec.autos.driving:
> > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake
> > to a crawl and only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
>
> Consider yourself fortunate. Atleast they signal.

I guess...

Cant they imagine the danger they create by slowing down without
signaling? I could be tempted to start to pass them while they're
starting
to  turn left.

I've also been behind people who brake and then accelerate again. And
keep doing that for no reason. Usually these are old drivers.
necromancer - 27 Sep 2006 23:13 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), 223rem said in
rec.autos.driving:

> Cant they imagine the danger they create by slowing down without
> signaling? I could be tempted to start to pass them while they're
> starting to  turn left.

Probably not. Maybe the reason they don't signal is that they are so
clueless that they don't know where they want to go nor how to get
there?

> I've also been behind people who brake and then accelerate again. And
> keep doing that for no reason. Usually these are old drivers.

Sounds like they learned at the SADDAM School of Driving Non Etiquette?

Signature

Loco laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE (a.k.a. SADDAM) shows us all - yet
again - what an idiot it really is:

"Radios shouldn't be in cars either. Only an idiot would argue that."
          --laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE (a.k.a. SADDAM), 8/5/06
Ref:http://tinyurl.com/hwevv
Message ID: fp68d21f99pa2bnn471lsss02nq0pkfa7j@4ax.com

Tom Royer - 26 Sep 2006 14:13 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only
> signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

Absolutely my biggest driving peeve.  It seems to be
endemic to Massachusetts that when exiting a controlled
access highway, they (1) slow down, (2)  move right,
(3) signal; exactly the reverse of the way they should do it.
Scott en Aztlán - 26 Sep 2006 15:13 GMT
"223rem" <223remi@gmail.com> said in rec.autos.driving:

>I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
>only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.

They are waiting for someone to let them in. Of course, nobody wants
someone going slowly to be in front of them, so the people in the
target lane speed up to prevent the Sloth from merging in front of
them. The Sloth dumbass ends up waiting until finally a JLEDI comes
along and slows down for them. In the meantime, everyone in the lane
behind this incompetent f.ck is stuck.

If these jackasses would only SPEED UP and FIND A GAP instead of
slowing down and waiting for someone to create one, we'd all be a lot
better off.
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

223rem - 26 Sep 2006 18:18 GMT
> "223rem" <223remi@gmail.com> said in rec.autos.driving:
>
> >I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> >only signal. Inconsiderate a.sholes.
>
> They are waiting for someone to let them in.

I was referring to people turning right or left into a side street.
Eeyore - 26 Sep 2006 23:50 GMT
> > "223rem" <223remi@gmail.com> said in rec.autos.driving:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I was referring to people turning right or left into a side street.

So I guessed right in the first place !

LOL.

Graham
brink - 27 Sep 2006 07:28 GMT
> I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> only
> signal. Inconsiderate

There is wisdom in this post.

I think a sign of a good driver is when they're "smooth."  They drive
smoothly--changing lanes smoothly, accellerating/slowing smoothly, finding
their "driving space" smoothly, etc.

"Smooth" meaning predictable, logical, legal, and considerate.  Note: this
doesn't necessarily mean slow.  It means the driver avoids unpredictable
moves; inexplicable sudden stops; illegal moves and unsignalled turns;
unsafe operation; basically the kind of driving that causes a danger and
nuisance to everyone on the road.

brink
Eeyore - 28 Sep 2006 05:39 GMT
> > I'm sick of the people who without apparent reason brake to a crawl and
> > only signal. Inconsiderate
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> unsafe operation; basically the kind of driving that causes a danger and
> nuisance to everyone on the road.

You would seem to have summarised my own driving there neatly. Most certainly
not slow at times. There's no point however trying to be pushy when there's
'no way through'.

When the road's really busy I often retreat to our left lane ( your right )
and plod along with the trucks who at least keep going at a solid pace without
stupid ripple braking and usually get there just as fast ( if not quicker ! )

Graham
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.