Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Carl Rogers said
in rec.autos.driving:
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The video begins in Bedford, PA, USA, some hundred feet north of the onramp
> from US Federal Business Route 220.
Schuster's Folly! Thanks for the ride. I had wondered what that road
looked like (dunno when I'll get that way to see it myself...)

Signature
"My tars have been bald for two years.
Every month i glue some sandpaper to them and
everythings cool."
--Laura Buch murdered her boyfriend
/ laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE 10/25/05
Message ID: s2ttl1tgnpq5pr6p48lr111p3lnvr4blch@4ax.com
http://tinyurl.com/7p7xq
> The video begins in Bedford, PA, USA, some hundred feet north of the
> onramp from US Federal Business Route 220.
I wonder if you said that to a local. That woulda been a hoot. I lived in
the area for a bit-I know those folks. Bet you cut a fine figure in
Bedford, PA, USA. I thank you for yr service, because any o' the local
citizenry who encountered yr goofy arse *had* to feel better about
themselves after. Those ppl need whatever laughs they can get.
Actually, wouldn't that be "Business US Federal Route 220"? That is if there
were such a thing as "federal" routes. Which there aren't. Still, no matter
how much you insist that there are. It's not the American Association of
*Federal* Highway and Transportation officials that sets the numbers, its
the American Association of *State* Highway and Transportation Officials.
They're state highways. In the case of the Shysterway, it's not even that.
It's a number legislated by a pig who fed long and hard at the public
trough.

Signature
The Rt. Hon Herr Doktor Mister Comrade Ottorino Yamamoto,
RSP, SALF, BFMAP, FSB
perpetrator of:
http://mryamamoto.50megs.com
and now: http://abahc.com/fearandloathing.php
It may be PHP, but it's not bland.
Jeff Kitsko - 08 Nov 2006 13:00 GMT
> > The video begins in Bedford, PA, USA, some hundred feet north of the
> > onramp from US Federal Business Route 220.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Actually, wouldn't that be "Business US Federal Route 220"?
It would since US 220 continues past Exit 1 as it had for years prior to the
infamous 99 shields appearance.
> That is if there
> were such a thing as "federal" routes. Which there aren't. Still, no matter
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It's a number legislated by a pig who fed long and hard at the public
> trough.
Not to mention named not one, but two expressways after himself.

Signature
Jeff Kitsko
Pennsylvania Highways: http://www.pahighways.com/
MLOM - 08 Nov 2006 14:10 GMT
> > > The video begins in Bedford, PA, USA, some hundred feet north of the
> > > onramp from US Federal Business Route 220.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Jeff Kitsko
> Pennsylvania Highways: http://www.pahighways.com/
And now has NY in on that trap!
Chris Bessert - 11 Nov 2006 15:50 GMT
> Actually, wouldn't that be "Business US Federal Route 220"? That is if there
> were such a thing as "federal" routes. Which there aren't. Still, no matter
> how much you insist that there are. It's not the American Association of
> *Federal* Highway and Transportation officials that sets the numbers, its
> the American Association of *State* Highway and Transportation Officials.
> They're state highways.
I think we've already gone over this with Carl in the past and it's
clear, to me at least, that he really doesn't care. Both about accuracy
or about preventing confusion. NO ONE calls it "US Federal Business
Route 220" -- not the locals, not PennDOT, not us m.t.r'ers, not any-
one -- but Carl likes to be "different", even if it causes confusion
or frustration...
Anway, if *I* were Carl, I would call it "The United States of America
Federal Government Business Highway Route Two-Hundred Twenty", as "U.S."
is an abbreviation that may cause confusion and if we're spelling every-
thing else out, for consistency and accuracy, we really *should* also
spell out the numbers as well. It only makes sense!
Later,
Chris

Signature
Chris Bessert
Bessert1@aol.com
http://www.michiganhighways.org
http://www.wisconsinhighways.org
http://www.ontariohighways.org
Chris Bessert - 11 Nov 2006 15:52 GMT
> Actually, wouldn't that be "Business US Federal Route 220"? That is if there
> were such a thing as "federal" routes. Which there aren't. Still, no matter
> how much you insist that there are. It's not the American Association of
> *Federal* Highway and Transportation officials that sets the numbers, its
> the American Association of *State* Highway and Transportation Officials.
> They're state highways.
I think we've already gone over this with Carl in the past and it's
clear, to me at least, that he really doesn't care. Both about accuracy
or about preventing confusion. NO ONE calls it "US Federal Business
Route 220" -- not the locals, not PennDOT, not us m.t.r'ers, not any-
one -- but Carl likes to be "different", even if it causes confusion
or frustration...
Anway, if *I* were Carl, I would call it "The United States of America
Federal Government Business Highway Route Two-Hundred Twenty", as "U.S."
is an abbreviation that may cause confusion and if we're spelling every-
thing else out, for consistency and accuracy, we really *should* also
spell out the numbers as well. It only makes sense!
Later,
Chris

Signature
Chris Bessert
Bessert1@aol.com
http://www.michiganhighways.org
http://www.wisconsinhighways.org
http://www.ontariohighways.org