Calling Dave Head!

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

mike3 - 14 Jan 2007 21:34 GMT

Dave,

The debate's over. The $500 trill would best be spent on trying to get
down our CO2 releases to prevent the scientifically-proven
anthropogenic global warming (but you won't believe it since you said
you'll never change, even though you claim you listen to science!).

Goodbye.

Reply to this Message

Matthew T. Russotto - 14 Jan 2007 23:14 GMT

>Dave,
>
>The debate's over. The $500 trill would best be spent on trying to get
>down our CO2 releases to prevent the scientifically-proven
>anthropogenic global warming

The debate's over. The $500 would be best spent on figuring out ways
to contain the scientifically-proven phlogisten, and on blocking the
N-rays.

Signature

There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.

Reply to this Message

Dave Head - 15 Jan 2007 00:39 GMT

>Dave,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Goodbye.

Why spend 500 trillion dollars to save 9 trillion dollars worth of damage
(higher sea levels, lost land area thru sea encroachment and desertification,
etc.) Sounds penny-wise and pound-foolish to me.

Dave Head

Reply to this Message