>>> Via fark.com
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Over 90% of people using handicap tags I see, I believe must have mental
>handicaps because they show no physical problems.
Well, technically they're "ethical handicaps". I'd call them "moral
handicaps" but with so many people cheating on handicapped tags and so
many damned special pleading spots of various sorts that I'm starting
to wonder if not cheating is simply being a chump.

Signature
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
Brent P - 16 Jan 2007 23:23 GMT
>>> Nasty. I noticed the handicap tag on the rear view mirror, but I don't
>>> think mental counts as a handicap worthy of the tag.
>>Over 90% of people using handicap tags I see, I believe must have mental
>>handicaps because they show no physical problems.
> Well, technically they're "ethical handicaps". I'd call them "moral
> handicaps"
True, I was just giving them the benefit of the doubt as it's impossible
to tell a mental handicap from an ethical one at a distance.
> but with so many people cheating on handicapped tags and so
> many damned special pleading spots of various sorts that I'm starting
> to wonder if not cheating is simply being a chump.
Which is why I find driving to just be a model of the society at large. A
system geared for those who cheat and scam to get ahead. (MFFY and 'just
let them do it')