> I was watching a program about China this afternoon, and I think I know what
> the reason for Chinese Fire Drills are. You know, where the occupants of
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Steve
Regarding the digital clock: I have seen them before, DC IIRC, but it
was for pedestrians. Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
http://www.mylandofmisery.com/roads/mo/mo-devil.htm
You can find a perfect definition of "Speed Limit" there as well.
Brent P - 20 Jan 2007 05:30 GMT
> Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
> definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
Left on red is a standard move of a chicago cop.
MLOM - 20 Jan 2007 15:36 GMT
> > Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
> > definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
>
> Left on red is a standard move of a chicago cop.
Light bar/siren activation optional in that case?
Ashton Crusher - 21 Jan 2007 01:45 GMT
>> > Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
>> > definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
>>
>> Left on red is a standard move of a chicago cop.
>
>Light bar/siren activation optional in that case?
brain optional too.
Steve B - 21 Jan 2007 08:11 GMT
>>> > Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
>>> > definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> brain optional too.
not in the case of homo sapiens.
Brent P - 21 Jan 2007 02:52 GMT
>> > Regarding the left-turn-against-red, that's the
>> > definition of the Kansas City Left per the link.
>>
>> Left on red is a standard move of a chicago cop.
>
> Light bar/siren activation optional in that case?
Suburban cops will almost always activate the lights, chicago cops well
I'll just say I haven't seen one bother.
>I was watching a program about China this afternoon, and I think I know what
>the reason for Chinese Fire Drills are. You know, where the occupants of
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Steve
You're almost as stupid as your buddy gpstroll.
Rhetorical question: if people don't pay heed to the rather simplistic
signal indication system already in place, what makes you think a more
complicated scheme will improve things?

Signature
gpstard (gpsman@driversmail.com) demonstrates his inability to comprehend the
simple differences of the definitions of the monosyllabic words "time" and "chance:"
(Message-ID: <1167151218.287827.24230@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>)
Why don't you argue that the faster one drives the less time spent driving and available to be involved in an accident?
GPSboi demonstrates he doesn't understand the concept of "zero velocity":
: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/4b00dc234d5fd559
Please explain how you concluded a vehicle with a velocity of zero might be -the- contributing factor to a collision due to driver inattentiveness.
"Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend" brags of it's homosexuallity:
the guys at the bath-house stopped laughing at my 3 inch weenie.
: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/168e8e621dd649fb?hl=en
"Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend" brags of it's ability to operate a vehicle:
I must be doing something right to go 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash.
: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/a376114ee8a61824?hl=en
Joshua Calvert <joshua_l_calvert@hotmail.com> demonstrates his lack of understanding of the terms "sarcasm", "irony", and "hypocrisy":
Poor rightard, forced to whine about an 40 year old event.
Message-ID: <Xns970A68202F1C5joshualcalverthotmai@68.6.19.6>