Last evening, I watched local channel 13 news at 11 PM, here in Las Vegas.
A story came on that said 206 motorists were ticketed for not yielding to j
walkers.  They said that they used an undercover police officer, and then
stopped vehicles that didn't yield.

Film snippets shown during monologue.

On to next story.

Today, in the local paper, they, (AS gpsman SO ANALLY POINTED OUT), they
posted the facts thusly:

"They wrote 116 tickets for that violation[jaywalking], 36 for
driver's license violations, 20 for failure to carry proof of
insurance, 21 for violations of seat-belt and child-restraint laws, 11
for license plate or registration violations, and two others for
miscellaneous offenses."
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Jan-29-Mon-2007/news/
12256723.html

In the newspaper's story, they also said they targeted a posted crosswalk
that was involved in a high profile accident recently.  This was not
mentioned in the TV piece.

I am a reasonable man.  I would have concluded from the TV snip that 206
tickets were given to motorists for not yielding to pedestrians, otherwise,
why show the footage of the UC  j walking, then the motor cop racing after
the car.

The TV snip showed j walking pedestrians, some with babes in arms.  No
footage was shown of any j walkers being ticketed.

Now I'm really confused.

I don't know if all the tickets went to the motorists, as the TV snip said,
or some and some, or just what.

I'm becoming an unreasonable man.  Particularly when the facts, which speak
for themselves are portrayed in two absolutely different versions.

Ya gotta love today's "news" people.

Steve