Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Some numbers to piss off SADDAM

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fred G. Mackey - 18 Feb 2007 06:05 GMT
I gleaned these figures from the Larimer County, CO website:

http://www.co.larimer.co.us/sheriff/earlyrelease/index.cfm

Since late 2004, they have released 846 inmates early, 335 of them were
DUI offenders - another 195 were DUR (Driving Under Revocation) offenders.

The early release program does not include violent offenders or those on
work release or "weekenders".

Average time served for an early release DUI offender: 69 days
Average sentence for an early release DUI offender: 82.6 days

I'm sure SADDAM wishes these numbers reflected years instead of days,
but the fact is, most of these folks were probably caught up in roadside
checkpoints and didn't pose any more of a risk than lots of other idiots
driving around on our roads.  Given that, 69 days is pretty serious.  I
don't even want to imagine the disruption it would cause in my life to
have to serve 2 days, let alone over 2 months, not to mention having a
record, lawyer fees, court costs, fines, and probation requirements
these folks will surely incur.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS - 18 Feb 2007 06:50 GMT
> I'm sure SADDAM wishes these numbers reflected years instead of days,
> but the fact is, most of these folks were probably caught up in roadside
> checkpoints and didn't pose any more of a risk than lots of other idiots
> driving around on our roads.

If they had been caught with some cocaine on them it would have 69
MONTHS even though they clearly posed no risk to anyone.  That's my
complaint about drug sentencing. Why should mere possession of a drug
in your own house get you a much stiffer sentence than driving a 2 ton
vehicle on public roads while under influence of a drug.??
Fred G. Mackey - 18 Feb 2007 07:42 GMT
>>I'm sure SADDAM wishes these numbers reflected years instead of days,
>>but the fact is, most of these folks were probably caught up in roadside
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If they had been caught with some cocaine on them it would have 69
> MONTHS even though they clearly posed no risk to anyone.

Don't be so sure - there were 40 early releases for "controlled
substance" and the average sentence was 58 days.  The average time
served was 49.6 days.

Marijuana offenses were listed separately, so it looks like your theory
is blown.

>  That's my
> complaint about drug sentencing. Why should mere possession of a drug
> in your own house get you a much stiffer sentence than driving a 2 ton
> vehicle on public roads while under influence of a drug.??

It shouldn't.  Drugs should be legal - and DUI sentences are out of
control and causing serious problems for taxpayers who are expected to
foot the bill for building more prisons.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.