 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / February 2007Should driving penalties be higher if kids in the car?
Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled if there's a passenger under 16 inside. > Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. > Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled if > there's a passenger under 16 inside. Why is speeding worse with someone 15 years and 11 months old in the car as compared to with someone 16 years and 2 months old? >> Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. >> Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled >> if there's a passenger under 16 inside. > > Why is speeding worse with someone 15 years and 11 months old in the > car as compared to with someone 16 years and 2 months old? This is a joke right?. No one is that stupid. This is as easy as clubbing baby seals. Whenever I see ""Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:", I just fast forward knowing I won't miss anything relevant. You can't even hit POST REPLY and have all of the cross posting headers work properly. So much for credibility. Steve > Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. > Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled if > there's a passenger under 16 inside. And what if someone is caught "speeding" while doing 65 and the next day the speed is changed to 75? *PLONK*!! > And what if someone is caught "speeding" while doing 65 and the next > day the speed is changed to 75? What difference does that make? Laws get changed all the time. >> And what if someone is caught "speeding" while doing 65 and the next >> day the speed is changed to 75? > > What difference does that make? Laws get changed all the time. No sh.t. Next we go after anyone with more than two under-10 kids in the car, then smokers, cell phone users, anyone with a sinus condition that might require blowing their nose, fast-food dispensers, car radio/cd/satellite manufacturers and all road-visible advertising and scenic viewing. You might even have a case that GPS is distracting. You're a f.cking genius. Jim > Next we go after anyone with more than two under-10 kids in the car, > then smokers, cell phone users, anyone with a sinus condition that > might require blowing their nose, fast-food dispensers, car > radio/cd/satellite manufacturers and all road-visible advertising and > scenic viewing. You might even have a case that GPS is distracting. There you go again. Taking one idea and taking it to the extreme and claiming it's the same as the original idea. Can you think at all.? >> Next we go after anyone with more than two under-10 kids in the car, >> then smokers, cell phone users, anyone with a sinus condition that [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > There you go again. Taking one idea and taking it to the extreme and > claiming it's the same as the original idea. Seemed the most direct way of pointing out how silly you're being. Jim Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS, a connoisseur of goat fluids, spewed this crap in rec.autos.driving and across unrelated newsgroups: > Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids Why would that be? So you can molest them? > not coddling criminals. You *are* a criminal. 'Nuff said. > Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled if > there's a passenger under 16 inside. Jus curious, did you have a kid in the car when you did this:  Signature-- Loco Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend admits to being a deadly speeder: "There's a 55mph freeway near where i live and if i do 50, everybody passes me. But if i do 60 very few do." --Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend/laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE/ Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are Murderers (SADDAM) 12/17/2004 ref: http://tinyurl.com/np3y6 Message ID: <1103257015.147448.55640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> > Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. > Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled if > there's a passenger under 16 inside. Hey, let's make driving penalties higher if there are kids in any cars anywhere within the vicinity - hell, forget them being in a car, you could run into a house or a school. Just make them higher in any case. Let's start with putting you in prison for driving without a brain. >> Hell yes, but then i care about saving kids not coddling criminals. >> Speeding, DUI, Red light running, Whatever. Penalty should be tripled [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > could run into a house or a school. Just make them higher in any > case. So someone offers and idea to save the lives of kids and you ridicule the idea. Are all your friends an NAMBLA like that?. Get help please. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.