Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

6 hours on I-95 Last Weekend

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
C. E. White - 26 Feb 2007 14:39 GMT
I spent around 6 hours on I-95 last weekend in North and South
Carolina and had only one really bad experience. Some idiot in a
Toyota pick-up felt the need to ride closely behind me for an hour
with his high beams on (this was during the day). He was duckling of
sorts. He latched onto me in South Carolina and clung to me like a
lost kitten till I finally managed to loose him in NC. What made him
particularly irritating was his insistence on running his high beam
lights. They were perfectly targeted to my rear view mirrors. It was
like having two spot lights aimed at you from the rear. Early on, I
tried to loose him, once by speeding up and once my slowing down (but
only slightly). Both times he matched my speed. He was a classic LLB,
so I got some relief after passing cars when I moved back to the right
lane. Still his high beams were an irritant in my rear view mirror.
When we would reach a line of slower moving vehicles, he would close
up on me to keep cars from moving into the space between us while we
were passing the slower moving vehicles. After each pass, I'd move
back to the right, but he would just hang in the left lane, pacing me,
usually dropping back slightly. He never tried to prevent me from
moving back to the left when we would reach the next group of slower
moving vehicles, but he would neither pass me or move to the right
either. We were going fast enough, that only a few cars were trapped
behind them. Occasionally one would go around him on the right, and
then move past me on the left.. Finally when we were passing a longer
line of cars, I sped up enough to temporarily open a significant gap,
and a slower moving vehicle jumped in between us. This allowed me to
escape from the ducking without driving excessively fast. When last
seen, he was tailgating the Explorer that separated us. I almost feel
sorry for the Explorer driver. Otherwise, I-95 was an easy drive this
past weekend, at least in NC and SC.

Ed
Brent P - 26 Feb 2007 14:46 GMT
> I spent around 6 hours on I-95 last weekend in North and South
> Carolina and had only one really bad experience. Some idiot in a
> Toyota pick-up felt the need to ride closely behind me for an hour
> with his high beams on
<...>
> and a slower moving vehicle jumped in between us. This allowed me to
> escape from the ducking without driving excessively fast. When last
> seen, he was tailgating the Explorer that separated us. I almost feel
> sorry for the Explorer driver. Otherwise, I-95 was an easy drive this
> past weekend, at least in NC and SC.

If I am concerned about speed taxation and have a duckling latched on to
me in a neighboring lane, I wait until I have a nice clear patch of road
behind me... I slow up a bit and cause the duckling to close his gap if
required and then hit the brakes hard. This causes the duckling to go in
front of me and find someone else to latch on to. The behavior also
appears irrational to the duckling making him less likely to latch on to
me again should I pass him in the future.
necromancer - 26 Feb 2007 18:47 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Brent P said in
rec.autos.driving:
> > I spent around 6 hours on I-95 last weekend in North and South
> > Carolina and had only one really bad experience. Some idiot in a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> appears irrational to the duckling making him less likely to latch on to
> me again should I pass him in the future.

That's one of my favorite tactics for dislodging a duckling; providing
that traffic is clear behind me. The other tactic I use is to make a
"last minute," course change; either a unplanned turn at the next
intersection if on a surface street or to duck (no pun intended) into
the next rest area/exit if on an interstate.

Signature

necromancer

Deadly Psychopath. And Proud of it, Man!!

C. E. White - 27 Feb 2007 03:26 GMT
> That's one of my favorite tactics for dislodging a duckling; providing
> that traffic is clear behind me. The other tactic I use is to make a
> "last minute," course change; either a unplanned turn at the next
> intersection if on a surface street or to duck (no pun intended) into
> the next rest area/exit if on an interstate.

But that inconveniences me. Why should I have to take an exit I don't need
to take just to loose an irritating duckling?  Slowing down only works part
of the time. Many times when I try this tactic, I end up repassing the
duckling a few miles down the road. In my case, this past weekend, I was
already pushing the upper limit of my speed comfort zone, so I wasn't
willing to try and out run the ducking (and I don't think that would have
worked on this one). I got lucky that I was able to get a slower vehicle in
between us so I could escape. And honestly, if it had not been for the
duckling's use of the high beam headlights, I probably would have ignored
him/her.

Ed
Motorhead Lawyer - 27 Feb 2007 18:09 GMT
On Feb 26, 8:39 am, "C. E. White" <cewhi...@removemindspring.com>
wrote:
> I spent around 6 hours on I-95 last weekend in North and South
> Carolina and had only one really bad experience. Some idiot in a
> Toyota pick-up felt the need to ride closely behind me for an hour
> with his high beams on (this was during the day).

For AN HOUR?  Ed, you are a much more patient man than I.  I would
have done something rather more extreme to lose that loser within 15
minutes.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
MLOM - 27 Feb 2007 19:02 GMT
> On Feb 26, 8:39 am, "C. E. White" <cewhi...@removemindspring.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> C.R. Krieger
> (Been there; done that)

Had it not been an Interstate, I'd guess that executing a U-turn and
returning the high-beam user's "favor" might be effective.
Scott en Aztlán - 28 Feb 2007 05:40 GMT
"Motorhead Lawyer" <88.535is@gmail.com> said in rec.autos.driving:

>On Feb 26, 8:39 am, "C. E. White" <cewhi...@removemindspring.com>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>For AN HOUR?  Ed, you are a much more patient man than I.

"Patient" is not the word I would use.

Ed is the kind of guy who thinks the entire world should change to
accommodate his choices. If he feels like making a pass, he'll do it -
at HIS pace, and anyone stuck behind him be damned. Similarly, he'll
drive along with some idiot duckling keeping station of his rear
bumper because ED shouldn't have to change HIS speed if he doesn't
WANT to.

I'm amazed he has survived as long as he has...
Signature

I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.