On Feb 26, 7:59 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Maybe he thinks all laws are 'illegal' too ?
>
> Graham
There's a definition problem there...
But the OP might have a point. It isn't too difficult to twist the
legal system, either by OJ or by a government.
Changing the rules by declaring an offense to be "civil" instead of
"criminal" might not be fair.
I remember hearing about drug laws doing this. If they think you are
violating a law, the authorities can seize your property/money, and
you have to sue to get it back and prove your innocence. Anecdotally,
this has include seizure of homes and farms. I can't vouch for the
veracity of what I have heard, but it rings true, and it isn't right.
Still, you shouldn't get involved with drugs, and you shouldn't speed.
Jim Yanik - 27 Feb 2007 15:45 GMT
> On Feb 26, 7:59 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> you have to sue to get it back and prove your innocence. Anecdotally,
> this has include seizure of homes and farms.
Make that AUTOS,homes and farms.
> I can't vouch for the
> veracity of what I have heard, but it rings true, and it isn't right.
>
> Still, you shouldn't get involved with drugs, and you shouldn't speed.
Nonsense,SLs are often set too low(intentionally),and conditions vary.
Open roads,low traffic density;speeds can run higher than at peak traffic
times,SAFELY.
The 55 NMSL was repealed because people voted with their throttle and
ignored the 55 MPH SL.

Signature
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Eeyore - 27 Feb 2007 16:09 GMT
> The 55 NMSL was repealed because people voted with their throttle and
> ignored the 55 MPH SL.
'People Power'. We need more of that !
Damn the politicians. Most of them don't want real democracy at all.
Graham
>> http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/4580963.html
>> Michael Kubosh said Sunday that he will argue the city cannot impose a
>> civil penalty on drivers who run red lights.
>>
>> "The city has gone outside their legislative authority,"
> That should be funny.
>
> Maybe he thinks all laws are 'illegal' too ?
I don't know how it works in the UK, but in the US, local laws do not
take precedence over state law. In Texas, moving violations (such as
speeding and disobeying a traffic control device) are considered
misdemeanors AFAIK. A county or municipality does not have the
authority reclassify a crime as a civil infraction.
Of course I could be wrong, and IANAL.