I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
drive car sits on the back giving it ALOT more grip and now my buddy keeps
telling me im crazy and that its harder to burnout in front wheel dive cars..
im like if thats the case then why isnt all of the high performance cars ive
seen front wheel!?!?!? I think hes out of his mind but i figured this would
be a good discusion
Scott en Aztlán - 01 Mar 2007 06:40 GMT
"snowolf9637" <u32139@uwe> said in rec.autos.driving:
>I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
>because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
>drive car sits on the back giving it ALOT more grip and now my buddy keeps
>telling me im crazy and that its harder to burnout in front wheel dive cars..
You're both right.
Yes, there is a weight shift toward the rear when a car begins to move
forward, which gives a RWD car more traction and makes wheelspin less
likely. The reason most FWD cars don't burn rubber very easuly is
because FWD cars tend to be wimpy little econoboxes with wimpy little
engines that can barely make the wheels turn, much less break the
tires loose. :)

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
snowolf9637 - 01 Mar 2007 09:41 GMT
yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
like everyday to get perfect launces from it without burning out because i
liked to drag race with it but it was a front wheel drive and it took alot of
skill to get that thing to not burnout when I launched it. 3.8L supercharged
ive never lost a race by the way :D im VERY proud of that fact lol
>"snowolf9637" <u32139@uwe> said in rec.autos.driving:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>engines that can barely make the wheels turn, much less break the
>tires loose. :)
Scott en Aztlán - 01 Mar 2007 14:34 GMT
"snowolf9637" <u32139@uwe> said in rec.autos.driving:
>yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
>grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
>like everyday to get perfect launces from it without burning out because i
>liked to drag race with it but it was a front wheel drive and it took alot of
>skill to get that thing to not burnout when I launched it. 3.8L supercharged
>ive never lost a race by the way :D im VERY proud of that fact lol
Try racing something besides a riced-up Civic sometime.

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
snowolf9637 - 02 Mar 2007 22:30 GMT
but i live in kansas ricers and crapy cameros are all we ever get to race!!!
>"snowolf9637" <u32139@uwe> said in rec.autos.driving:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Try racing something besides a riced-up Civic sometime.
Arif Khokar - 01 Mar 2007 19:26 GMT
> yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
> grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
> like everyday to get perfect launces from it without burning out because i
> liked to drag race with it but it was a front wheel drive and it took alot of
> skill to get that thing to not burnout when I launched it. 3.8L supercharged
> ive never lost a race by the way :D im VERY proud of that fact lol
Why is it that teens are unable or not willing to write in proper
English? I know there are exceptions (like Cory Dunkle), but still.
Ed Pirrero - 01 Mar 2007 21:28 GMT
> > yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
> > grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Why is it that teens are unable or not willing to write in proper
> English? I know there are exceptions (like Cory Dunkle), but still.
They have not yet learned that you write to your audience. Txt-msg-
speak is fine for your pals, so it's fine for everyone, right?
The way a person communicates displays their respect for their
audience. As it has ever been, most teens don't have much respect for
anyone except certain peers.
E.P.
Scott en Aztlán - 02 Mar 2007 03:11 GMT
Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.edu> said in rec.autos.driving:
>Why is it that teens are unable or not willing to write in proper
>English? I know there are exceptions (like Cory Dunkle), but still.
Part of it is the kewl lingo of the cellular text message. And part of
it is a widespread culture among teenagers that makes anyone who
appears to be smart or interested in learning the subject of ridicule.
There is INTENSE peer pressure from all the stupid loser kids to make
everyone else as stupid and as useless as they are. Teenagers, of
course, are amazingly susceptible to this peer pressure, which is why
so many reasonably smart teenagers walk around with baggy pants, boxer
shorts exposed for the world to see, aspiring to behave like worthless
thugs.
It will be several more years before these teens realize that they
have shortchanged their own futures simply to seem cool and fit in.

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
necromancer - 02 Mar 2007 13:56 GMT
Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), Scott en Aztlán
said in rec.autos.driving:
> Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.edu> said in rec.autos.driving:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it is a widespread culture among teenagers that makes anyone who
> appears to be smart or interested in learning the subject of ridicule.
Maybe I'm seeing things, but if he is using this text messaging lingo to
make his posts shorter, then why are his posts showing up as being 1100
to 1900 lines in length while the rest of us are in the 10 to 50 line
range...

Signature
Aunt Judy demonstrates its lack of understanding
of the concept of "</killfile>," and "<killfile>,"
and what a "thread," is:
"Now that takes nerve. You claim to killfile
me TWICE in the same thread and you expect
people to take you seriously???"
Ref: http://tinyurl.com/r5qp9
Scott en Aztlán - 02 Mar 2007 15:47 GMT
necromancer <55_sux@worldofnecromancer_nospam_noway.org> said in
rec.autos.driving:
>Maybe I'm seeing things, but if he is using this text messaging lingo to
>make his posts shorter, then why are his posts showing up as being 1100
>to 1900 lines in length while the rest of us are in the 10 to 50 line
>range...
You (or your newsreader) are seeing things. Mine shows line counts of
8 and 24 for his posts to that thread.

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
Arif Khokar - 03 Mar 2007 00:52 GMT
> necromancer <55_sux@worldofnecromancer_nospam_noway.org> said in
> rec.autos.driving:
>> Maybe I'm seeing things, but if he is using this text messaging lingo to
>> make his posts shorter, then why are his posts showing up as being 1100
>> to 1900 lines in length while the rest of us are in the 10 to 50 line
>> range...
> You (or your newsreader) are seeing things. Mine shows line counts of
> 8 and 24 for his posts to that thread.
His original post has a "lines" field in the header. His subsequent
posts do not, which explains the line count discrepancy. In my
newsreader, the line count field indicates 0 lines.
Motorhead Lawyer - 06 Mar 2007 20:48 GMT
> yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
> grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
> like everyday to get perfect launces from it without burning out because i
> liked to drag race with it but it was a front wheel drive and it took alot of
> skill to get that thing to not burnout when I launched it. 3.8L supercharged
> ive never lost a race by the way :D im VERY proud of that fact lol
Ever been in a legally sanctioned one? One where the other driver
actually intended to race?
--
C.R. Krieger
snowolf9637 - 07 Mar 2007 03:32 GMT
yea their is a race track in the city west of mine and i go over their
seldomly and they have races that you can race any car you want. Its a ligit
race track and they have national events their every so often.
>> yea I agree that most front wheel drives lack the power but I own a pontiac
>> grand prix and that engine has soo much low end power that i had to practice
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>--
>C.R. Krieger
Larry Bud - 01 Mar 2007 12:57 GMT
> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> seen front wheel!?!?!? I think hes out of his mind but i figured this would
> be a good discusion
I don't think you can make a general statement either way. It all
depends on the power to the wheels, the weight of the car, the weight
RATIO front to back (FWD has the advantage of an engine in the front),
etc.
Harry K - 01 Mar 2007 15:52 GMT
> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> seen front wheel!?!?!? I think hes out of his mind but i figured this would
> be a good discusion
The weight transfer thing (given approx equal car sizes) doesn't
overcome the initial advantage the FWD one has. Equals it out some,
but doesn't overcome it.
Harry K
Harry K - 01 Mar 2007 15:54 GMT
> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> seen front wheel!?!?!? I think hes out of his mind but i figured this would
> be a good discusion
Ooops, until, that is, you get into the real dragsters where the front
wheels are mostly just along for the ride.
Harry K
Old Wolf - 06 Mar 2007 22:17 GMT
> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
> drive car sits on the back giving it ALOT more grip and now my buddy keeps
> telling me im crazy and that its harder to burnout in front wheel dive cars..
> im like if thats the case then why isnt all of the high performance cars ive
> seen front wheel!?!?!?
LOL you think they take into consideration how good a burnout
the car will do , when they are designing it?
snowolf9637 - 07 Mar 2007 04:00 GMT
no they do the exact opposite!!! But I think they should!!!!! lmao
>> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
>> because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas your rear wheel
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>LOL you think they take into consideration how good a burnout
>the car will do , when they are designing it?
Jim Yanik - 07 Mar 2007 04:14 GMT
>> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn
>> out because they get better traction. I mean when you hit the gas
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> LOL you think they take into consideration how good a burnout
> the car will do , when they are designing it?
It's called "weight transfer";the sprung body weight shifts rearward under
accelleration,due to inertia. RWD cars are harder to "burnout" because of
that transfer.
Most FWD cars are hard to "burn out" because they have low power,low torque
motors.Few have limited slip differentials,too.So the right wheel
slips,while the left front wheel does nothing.
regardless,"burnouts" mean the power is wasted in wheelspin instead of
moving the vehicle.

Signature
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Eeyore - 07 Mar 2007 03:58 GMT
> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> because they get better traction.
You mean make smoke from your tyres ?
Why would any rational person want to do that ?
Graham
snowolf9637 - 07 Mar 2007 04:10 GMT
.... to warm them up for races..... and ITS FUN!!!!
>> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
>> because they get better traction.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Graham
Eeyore - 07 Mar 2007 07:12 GMT
> >> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> >> because they get better traction.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ... to warm them up for races..... and ITS FUN!!!!
Sounds bloody silly to me.
It's illegal to race on public roads btw.
Graham
snowolf9637 - 07 Mar 2007 07:37 GMT
lets put it this way around here NOBODY CARES!!! where I live the cops will
race with you. we will all go out to the airport strip and race. and the cops
wil either race with us or watch us. yea its illegal but nobody cares enough
to stop us.
>> >> I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
>> >> because they get better traction.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Graham
Seven - 07 Mar 2007 15:11 GMT
> lets put it this way around here NOBODY CARES!!! where I live the cops will
> race with you. we will all go out to the airport strip and race. and the cops
> wil either race with us or watch us. yea its illegal but nobody cares enough
> to stop us.
Ah, to be fifteen again, when responsible behavior and understanding
of driving physics took second place to making sure your contrived
tales of roadway supremacy sounded good.
-Steven
Scott en Aztlán - 07 Mar 2007 15:31 GMT
"snowolf9637 via CarKB.com" <u32139@uwe> said in rec.autos.driving:
>lets put it this way around here NOBODY CARES!!! where I live the cops will
>race with you. we will all go out to the airport strip and race. and the cops
>wil either race with us or watch us.
I'd love to see a video of THAT!

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
Old Wolf - 07 Mar 2007 22:23 GMT
On Mar 7, 4:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > I was always taught that rear wheel drive cars where harder to burn out
> > because they get better traction.
>
> You mean make smoke from your tyres ?
> Why would any rational person want to do that ?
1. You like to make smoke
2. You like the smell of burning rubber
3. It makes you the centre of attention
Similar to why people let off fireworks
Ed Pirrero - 07 Mar 2007 22:26 GMT
> On Mar 7, 4:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Similar to why people let off fireworks
4. It costs money.
5. Authority figures don't like it.
E.P.
Jim Yanik - 08 Mar 2007 01:54 GMT
>> On Mar 7, 4:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> 4. It costs money.
correction;it WASTES money.
> 5. Authority figures don't like it.
>
> E.P.

Signature
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Harry K - 08 Mar 2007 03:32 GMT
> > On Mar 7, 4:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> E.P.
6. They haven't grown up yet.
Harry K
Jim Yanik - 08 Mar 2007 01:53 GMT
> On Mar 7, 4:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Similar to why people let off fireworks
And he likes to pay for new tires and balancing after he prematurely wears
the tread off the current ones.
"drifters" must be ADORED by the tire makers.

Signature
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Arif Khokar - 09 Mar 2007 01:04 GMT
> And he likes to pay for new tires and balancing after he prematurely wears
> the tread off the current ones.
What makes you think that *he* pays for them? Most likely he passes off
the costs of his antics to his parents.