So there's this road near where I live with ALL the major businesses on it.
You know, the wally world supercenter, the mall, the major supermarkets, the
home improvement warehouses, strip malls, etc. This road gets backed up for
miles, usually. Every day. The backup is usually long enough to stretch
through several traffic lights. That is, you are waiting at light 5 (then
4, then 3, then 2) to go through light 1. It's not unusual to have traffic
blocking intersections so that nobody can enter the main road from side
roads or major driveways.
This past saturday, the mall, home improvement stores, supermarkets, etc,
were all packed as usual. Probably due to an earlier power outage, all the
traffic lights were flashing. On the main road, the lights were flashing
yellow. On the side roads and major driveways, the lights were flashing
red. Traffic was moving very smoothly, with NO BACKUPs at all. Go figure.
As a taxpayer, why am I paying to install all these traffic lights that are
not needed? As a taxpayer, why am I paying for the electricity to run all
these traffic lights that are not needed? Couldn't all these traffic
signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs to control access to the
main roads? -Dave
gpsman - 05 Mar 2007 15:30 GMT
On Mar 5, 9:59 am, "Mike T." <n...@nohow.not> wrote: <brevity snip>
> This past saturday, the mall, home improvement stores, supermarkets, etc,
> were all packed as usual. Probably due to an earlier power outage, all the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> not needed? As a taxpayer, why am I paying for the electricity to run all
> these traffic lights that are not needed?
Because it's usually not Saturday...? One anecdotal weekend example
does not make for a situational rule that might be an improvement, and
from which one might draw the conclusion that that situation might be
best 24/7/365.
After all, you only observed the situation for a minute or two at
most.
-----
- gpsman
Harry K - 05 Mar 2007 15:51 GMT
> So there's this road near where I live with ALL the major businesses on it.
> You know, the wally world supercenter, the mall, the major supermarkets, the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs to control access to the
> main roads? -Dave
So you are advocating replacing all lights with 4-way stops? That
would slow traffic to a crawl as every car in both directions would
have to stop at every intersection and play 'after you".
Or is it Yellow in main route, Red on intersecting? Won't work if
traffic is anywhere near what you say as the side streets would never
get a chance to enter.
I suspect your powers of observation for that situation was seriously
lacking.
Harry K
Mike T. - 05 Mar 2007 16:58 GMT
> So you are advocating replacing all lights with 4-way stops?
No, I'm saying main road should have NOTHING, and side roads/driveways
should have STOP signs or even yield signs.
> Or is it Yellow in main route, Red on intersecting? Won't work if
> traffic is anywhere near what you say as the side streets would never
> get a chance to enter.
Obviously it does work. I had to go to one of the home improvement
warehouses. I was counting on 20 minutes to get there and 20 minutes to get
back. The whole trip took 20 minutes, including the ~10 minutes I was in
the store. Traffic was heavy (extremely) but moving near the speed limit.
People from the side roads/major driveways were not waiting long (at
flashing red), even if they were turning left.
> I suspect your powers of observation for that situation was seriously
> lacking.
Well normally the road is a real cluster-f.ck, but with the side roads
controlled by a virtual stop sign (flashing red), traffic was actually
MOVING. And no, that doesn't mean that traffic was backing up on the side
roads, either.
What usually happens (when the lights are cycling red, green, yellow...) is
that the main road gets backed up so far that the side roads get backed up,
also. With the lights flashing, the main road traffic wasn't backed up, so
the side roads weren't backed up, either. -Dave
Scott en Aztlán - 05 Mar 2007 21:32 GMT
"Mike T." <noway@nohow.not> said in rec.autos.driving:
>Well normally the road is a real cluster-f.ck, but with the side roads
>controlled by a virtual stop sign (flashing red), traffic was actually
>MOVING. And no, that doesn't mean that traffic was backing up on the side
>roads, either.
Your observation is only meaningful if there were equal numbers of
cars in both scenarios. For all you know, the power outage could have
kept many people from going out shopping, leaving traffic on
Clusterfuck Drive much lighter (and thus less backed up) than normal.

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!
Steve B - 05 Mar 2007 16:37 GMT
> So there's this road near where I live with ALL the major businesses on
> it. You know, the wally world supercenter, the mall, the major
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs to control access to the
> main roads? -Dave
People don't pay attention to stop lights, what makes you think they will
obey stop signs?
It's a societal thing. Too many people thinking that they have a right to
drive, and that includes anything they can do while driving. Like putting
on makeup, talking on a cell phone, using a PDA, or viewing a laptop. Add
about a hundred things to that list.
People are just in a hurry. They're overworked. They're frazzled. They
just don't give a sh.t about anyone besides themselves and getting to that
soccer practice on time, picking up some Maxi-Tampons, or getting a burger.
Politeness and order are almost dead in our society, and there's not enough
practitioners left to make it anything but the seething pushing shoving rude
mess that it is.
Steve
Mike T. - 05 Mar 2007 16:59 GMT
> People don't pay attention to stop lights, what makes you think they will
> obey stop signs?
That's beside the point. If people are running red lights and traffic is
CONSTANTLY GRIDLOCKED, how is that better than people are running stop signs
but traffic is moving? -Dave
Steve B - 05 Mar 2007 18:10 GMT
>> People don't pay attention to stop lights, what makes you think they will
>> obey stop signs?
>
> That's beside the point. If people are running red lights and traffic is
> CONSTANTLY GRIDLOCKED, how is that better than people are running stop
> signs but traffic is moving? -Dave
Well, then, according to your Pollyannish logic, maybe we should just chuck
ALL traffic control devices?
Steve
Brent P - 05 Mar 2007 16:47 GMT
> So there's this road near where I live with ALL the major businesses on it.
> You know, the wally world supercenter, the mall, the major supermarkets, the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs to control access to the
> main roads? -Dave
Must be some seriously bad light timing. Everytime a traffic light in my
area goes out and defaults to a stop, it's a clusterf**k. People who
think that a dark traffic signal means GO and don't stop. People who are
totally clueless... leads to huge backups and danger.
If you have a majority of drivers with a clue, many areas can be
improved with stop signs. The problem is that after several stupid people
cause spectatcular collisions the lights go in and are set up
incompetently or purposely to clog traffic.
The area you describe would work very well and better than stop signs
could ever hope to if all the traffic signals were appropiately timed
together.
Arif Khokar - 05 Mar 2007 17:43 GMT
> As a taxpayer, why am I paying to install all these traffic lights that are
> not needed? As a taxpayer, why am I paying for the electricity to run all
> these traffic lights that are not needed? Couldn't all these traffic
> signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs to control access to the
> main roads?
Better to replace them with roundabouts. And if a college town full of
18 to 20 year old inexperienced drivers can handle a roundabout, then
traffic in your area can as well.
Eeyore - 05 Mar 2007 22:21 GMT
> Couldn't all these traffic signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs
> to control access to the main roads?
You need roundabouts.
Graham
Scott en Aztlán - 06 Mar 2007 02:47 GMT
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> said in
rec.autos.driving:
>> Couldn't all these traffic signals be torn down and replaced with STOP signs
>> to control access to the main roads?
>
>You need roundabouts.
We need competent drivers.

Signature
I'm a wreckless driver and damn proud of it!