 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / September 2007Texas Woman Kills Toddler While Splashing Kids With Car
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290484,00.html Texas Woman Kills Toddler While Splashing Kids With Car Tuesday, July 24, 2007 DENISON, Texas — Denison police have arrested a driver who tried to splash some neighborhood children with her car, but killed a toddler when the vehicle hydroplaned. Terri Elaine Perdew, 47, lost control of her car as she attempted to splash a group of children playing in some water near an intersection. The victim, 14-month-old Zachary Duncan, was sitting on a curb with his mother. The boy died after the accident. His mother was treated for minor injuries. Denison police charged Perdew with manslaughter. Lieutenant Mike Eppler said Perdew told police she had splashed the children the first time she drove by, and was trying to do it a second time upon returning. Eppler said either Perdew thought splashing the children was funny or they had asked her to do it. ------------------- I predict all charges will be dropped. After all, this is Texas where laura bush got away with running a stop sign and crashing into and killing her boy friend!!! > laura bush got away with running a stop sign and crashing into and > killing her boy friend!!! Don't you ever get tired of playing that same old song? Just how many f.cking times are you going to repeat yourself? >> laura bush got away with running a stop sign and crashing into and >> killing her boy friend!!! > > Don't you ever get tired of playing that same old song? Just how many > f.cking times are you going to repeat yourself? As often as i want. I'm no coddler. On Jul 24, 1:54 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290484,00.html > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > laura bush got away with running a stop sign and crashing into and > killing her boy friend!!! There's a big difference: Laura was a wet-behind-the-ears teenager in her alleged incident. The killer splasher was 47 and should have known better than to pull such a juvenile stunt. Hand it to Texas: if the manslaughter charge sticks (I do realize that "if" is a huge word), execution may be an option, and should be since the victim was under 2. No evidence of alcohol in this incident, but that kind of stupidity does not require alcohol. "Anything said while drunk has been thought out beforehand." - a Murphy's Law corollary MLOM: << reply limited to r.a.d >> > On Jul 24, 1:54 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS > <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290484,00.html <<sneck article and S&DDAM's crap >> > There's a big difference: Laura was a wet-behind-the-ears teenager in > her alleged incident. The killer splasher was 47 and should have [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "Anything said while drunk has been thought out beforehand." - a > Murphy's Law corollary I have to rule this a good kill for Darwin. No 2YO should be allowed to be playing anywhere near a road or where any type of machinery can be used to create a "splash," such as this. Since this kid was too young to know better, the kid's parents should have and we can only assume that this particular stupid gene resided in the kid also. Now, all Darwin has to do is get the kid's siblings (if applicable) and the parents and the gene pool will be much better off. Score one for Charles.  Signature"Look down on me, you will see a fool. Look up at me, you will see your lord. Look straight at me, you will see yourself." - Charles Manson > There's a big difference: Laura was a wet-behind-the-ears teenager in > her alleged incident. The killer splasher was 47 and should have > known better than to pull such a juvenile stunt. No, I don't think that's a *big* difference. You're supposed to have a certain level of adult responsibility when it comes to driving a car. The defense "But I'm a wet-behind-the-ears teenager your honor" just doesn't cut it. That's the equivalent of "I didn't get good intelligence" with her dipshit husband. J SignatureVon Herzen, moge es wieder zu Herzen gehen. --Beethoven On Jul 24, 8:47 pm, The Man Behind The Curtain <no...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > There's a big difference: Laura was a wet-behind-the-ears teenager in > > her alleged incident. The killer splasher was 47 and should have [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Von Herzen, moge es wieder zu Herzen gehen. --Beethoven Tell that to the Texas LEO, if any of them from the time are still around. > On Jul 24, 1:54 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > the victim was under 2. No evidence of alcohol in this incident, but > that kind of stupidity does not require alcohol. No, it won't be a capital case. Manslaughter is not a capital charge anywhere in the U.S. She'd have to be committing another underlying felony, or it would have to be a premeditated killing *and* meet a special circumstance clause (lying in wait, multiple victims, murder for hire, those are the principal ones, IIRC killing a LEO is another one in Texas). Funny thing, if she'd killed her own kid, she probably wouldn't even be charged; the collective whine would be that "she'd suffered enough". But kill someone else's kid and you're toast. Must have been just horrible beyond belief for the mother, to sit there, see the car coming, not have time to do anything and see her toddler get killed. The guilt, wondering if she could have done anything, having it happen right in front of her. Unimaginable. > "Anything said while drunk has been thought out beforehand." - a > Murphy's Law corollary Good quote. I'd call that the Mel Gibson rule. But you realize it has *nothing* to do with this case. The moron just thought 3,000 pounds of steel on a residential street made a nice play toy. She'll get a sentence of less than ten years on an involuntary manslaughter charge. I doubt the d.a. will let her plea bargain, since it's an easy conviction. Bo Raxo > On Jul 24, 1:54 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS > <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > her alleged incident. The killer splasher was 47 and should have > known better than to pull such a juvenile stunt. HAHAHA. And WTF does laura's age have to do with it, you criminal coddler??. Next you'll be saying people with red hair should be allowed to commit manslaughter. You are an idiot. Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS: > HAHAHA. And WTF does laura's age have to do with it, you criminal > coddler??. Next you'll be saying people with red hair should be allowed > to commit manslaughter. You seem to have no problem with flamming idiots like yourself being allowed to commit manslaughter or worse. > I am an idiot. Corrected that line for you. Signature"Oh yeah. Well i've gone 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash so i must be doing something right." --Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend/laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE/ Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are Murderers (SADDAM), 9/24/2006 Ref: http://tinyurl.com/qdotr Msg ID: ivadh2t9kd05ilrgdercft8iuvcls6r5op@4ax.com On Jul 25, 1:11 am, necromancer > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > allowed to commit manslaughter or worse. > you are all idiots and i hope you go to hell for passign judgement on an accidnt.... what if she kneew th elittle boy? what f she has to live with it? what if she was just having fun and things took a bad turn?? what if??? you dont know sh.t so go pass judgement... but kiss your kifds every night cause you never know > > I am an idiot. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Ref:http://tinyurl.com/qdotr > Msg ID: ivadh2t9kd05ilrgdercft8iuvcls6r...@4ax.com On Sep 12, 11:33 pm, pupluv7...@gmail.com wrote: > > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > - Show quoted text - |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.