MLOM:
> You aren't agreeing with Aunt Judy, are you? ;) Don't worry, I
> caught Scott in the same trend yesterday.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> generated."
> -- Devil's Missouri Road Dictionary athttp://www.mylandofmisery.com/roads/mo/mo-devil.htm
I don't have a problem with speed limits in concept, its the
application of speed limits that I disagree with - particularly how
they are set and the way that some juristictions use them for revenue
as opposed to safety. That last one is why I sound a little like AJ
when I say put speeders in jail instead of using fines that give
juristictions an incentive to set speed limits improperly and enforce
them like a rabid dog.
--
C an't
I nterpret
A nything
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 30 Oct 2007 03:40 GMT
>MLOM:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>juristictions an incentive to set speed limits improperly and enforce
>them like a rabid dog.
That makes sense. If it's an infraction that's considered serious,
let's incarcerate people. Make the gubment actually have to *work* for
their money, and most likely they'll get engineers involve who will do
things properly.

Signature
"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's homosexuallity:
the guys at the bath-house stopped laughing at my 3 inch weenie.
: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/168e8e621dd649fb?hl=en
"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's ability to operate a vehicle:
I must be doing something right to go 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash.
: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/a376114ee8a61824?hl=en
Scott in SoCal - 30 Oct 2007 04:24 GMT
>I don't have a problem with speed limits in concept, its the
>application of speed limits that I disagree with - particularly how
>they are set and the way that some juristictions use them for revenue
>as opposed to safety.
Well said.