Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Driving / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tonight's r.a.d Top Ten list™

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MLOM - 30 Oct 2007 04:24 GMT
Just for grins...top ten indicators you are a veteran of r.a.d:

10) You are familiar with the acronyms MFFY, LLB and JLEDI.

9) You look for, or submit, information on highway Darwin™ contenders.

8) You have offered to bet a beer with Hector.

7) You await a fresh acronym fo necromancer's .sig.

6) You conclude that it's less dangerous to shoot a video while
driving than to view one.

5) You determine that the worst hazards on the road are drivers and
cops.

4) In discussions about driver distractions, you include the
speedometer.

3) You have ever picked on Scott over his Banana™ colored Corvette.

2) You see a truck accident and immediately consider nominating the
driver for a GPSTroll Award™.

1) You are part of the investigative team on the inquiry into S&DDAM's
speeding habits and issue evasions.

"You can't be serious!"  -- John McEnroe
necromancer - 30 Oct 2007 06:43 GMT
MLOM:
> Just for grins...top ten indicators you are a veteran of r.a.d:

Many grins received. Thanx for the laff.....

> 10) You are familiar with the acronyms MFFY, LLB and JLEDI.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> 7) You await a fresh acronym fo necromancer's .sig.

ROTFLMAO!!!  ;)  
(see below, BTW)  ;-P

> 6) You conclude that it's less dangerous to shoot a video while
> driving than to view one.

Well, mount the camera somehow and don't mess with it while driving and
it is less dangerous.

> 5) You determine that the worst hazards on the road are drivers and
> cops.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> 3) You have ever picked on Scott over his Bananaâ=3F¢ colored Corvette.

I don't think I've done that. Yet....

> 2) You see a truck accident and immediately consider nominating the
> driver for a GPSTroll Awardâ=3F¢.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> "You can't be serious!"  -- John McEnroe

BTW, what's up with the subject line? Usenet having a fit or an
allergic reaction to GPStroll's spit takes? I had to clean it up before
I could post the reply (this is what came through on my end:
=?utf-8?q?Tonight's_r=2Ea=2Ed_Top_Ten_list=E2=84=A2?= ).

--
F ools
E gomaniacs &
M orons
A ssociation
MLOM - 30 Oct 2007 22:54 GMT
On Oct 30, 12:43 am, necromancer
>  MLOM:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Well, mount the camera somehow and don't mess with it while driving and
> it is less dangerous.

Of course.  Got to avoid being nominated for a krl rgrz award.

> > 5) You determine that the worst hazards on the road are drivers and
> > cops.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> M orons
> A ssociation

I'm not sure what newsreader you use, but Google handled it fine.  Saw
other buggy results in some of the text (the trademark sign came up in
your reply as â=3F¢ (weird).  Looks to me like the subject line was
converted to HTML or some equivalent.

Another one came to mind as a possible #2 (bumping #2-10 to 3-11):
You watch a certain well-known TV court case show and refer to it as
*Aunt* Judy.

"The fastest way to lose 30 pounds is to take British currency to the
casino." -mlom
Scott in SoCal - 31 Oct 2007 02:21 GMT
>On Oct 30, 12:43 am, necromancer

>> BTW, what's up with the subject line? Usenet having a fit or an
>> allergic reaction to GPStroll's spit takes? I had to clean it up before
>> I could post the reply (this is what came through on my end:
>> =?utf-8?q?Tonight's_r=2Ea=2Ed_Top_Ten_list=E2=84=A2?= ).
>
>I'm not sure what newsreader you use, but Google handled it fine.  

It's that non-ASCII "TM" charcater you stuck on the end. Lots of
newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
and will puke on that.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 31 Oct 2007 03:07 GMT
>>On Oct 30, 12:43 am, necromancer
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
>and will puke on that.

Yeah, NNTP is a 7 bit protocol, not 8.

Signature

"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's homosexuallity:
the guys at the bath-house stopped laughing at my 3 inch weenie.

: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/168e8e621dd649fb?hl=en

"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's ability to operate a vehicle:
I must be doing something right to go 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash.
: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/a376114ee8a61824?hl=en
necromancer - 31 Oct 2007 03:29 GMT
Scott in SoCal:
> It's that non-ASCII "TM" charcater you stuck on the end. Lots of
> newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
> and will puke on that.

Looks like what my reader did.... :/

Signature

"Sheriff, do the letters 'F.O.,' mean anything to you?"
                              --Bandit

Arif Khokar - 31 Oct 2007 04:18 GMT
> It's that non-ASCII "TM" charcater you stuck on the end. Lots of
> newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
> and will puke on that.

In the source, the subject header line was encoded as a UTF-8 string.
This was also combined with the MIME header "Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8" which allowed my newsreader to properly interpret it.

I'll add a few extended ASCII characters to the subject line and see
what happens.  I suspect they'll be rendered without problems no matter
whether the news reader handles MIME types or not.
Scott in SoCal - 31 Oct 2007 05:11 GMT
>> It's that non-ASCII "TM" charcater you stuck on the end. Lots of
>> newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>This was also combined with the MIME header "Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="utf-8" which allowed my newsreader to properly interpret it.

But the MIME *headers* only refer to the *content* - after all, the
Subject: line is part of the header, and there's no MIME header for
the header. :)

>I'll add a few extended ASCII characters to the subject line and see
>what happens.  I suspect they'll be rendered without problems no matter
>whether the news reader handles MIME types or not.

I suspect that the results will vary from newsreader to newsreader.
MLOM - 31 Oct 2007 04:24 GMT
> >On Oct 30, 12:43 am, necromancer
> >> BTW, what's up with the subject line? Usenet having a fit or an
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> newsreaders can't handle special characters in the header of a post
> and will puke on that.

I guess at almost 44 lessons are still possible :|  The safe way in
the headers is use just the standard keys.  Thanks for the tip.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Distracted Driver (Hector Goldstein) - 31 Oct 2007 00:16 GMT
>Just for grins...top ten indicators you are a veteran of r.a.d:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>"You can't be serious!"  -- John McEnroe

ROTFLMAO.

Nice. Very nice.

Signature

"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's homosexuallity:
the guys at the bath-house stopped laughing at my 3 inch weenie.

: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/168e8e621dd649fb?hl=en

"Speeders And Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS" brags of it's ability to operate a vehicle:
I must be doing something right to go 3 1/2 years without a fatal crash.
: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/a376114ee8a61824?hl=en
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.