
Signature
"I no longer find MTR and RAD a useful medium"
Carl Rogers, 9 September 2007
Message-ID: <t01Fi.49620$Um6.14486@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
>>>> You drove 100 MPH along a one-lane rural road? With patches of wet
>>>> pavement, no less?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What about your sight lines to those trees? If something darted out of
> those woods in frnot of you at 100 MPH, you'd be toast.
Like what? Hitting a deer going 100 mph isn't going to kill you,
especially not in a 4th gen Camaro. Moose could be a problem, but there
aren't too many around these necks of the woods.
They're also
> pretty darn close to the sides of the road if the rear end gets a
> little squirrley.
Umm, hitting triple digits isn't going to send the car magically out of
control. You're beginning to sound more and more like you-know-who for
every day now...
>> What's the big deal
>> about driving triple digits on a rural road anyway? I was probably safer
>> there than I was on the freeway driving home in the dark.
>
> At least the freeway has multiple lanes and nice, wide medians and
> shoulders with good visibility.
Sure, but way more traffic too.
Ulf
Scott in SoCal - 09 Nov 2007 02:54 GMT
>>> Seriously, if you'd watched that clip carefully you'd see that I'm never
>>> outdriving my sight line.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Like what? Hitting a deer going 100 mph isn't going to kill you,
>especially not in a 4th gen Camaro.
Depends on how you hit it. :)
>Moose could be a problem, but there
>aren't too many around these necks of the woods.
All it takes is one.
>They're also
>> pretty darn close to the sides of the road if the rear end gets a
>> little squirrley.
>
>Umm, hitting triple digits isn't going to send the car magically out of
>control.
Tell that to this guy:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2340777137877158826

Signature
"I no longer find MTR and RAD a useful medium"
Carl Rogers, 9 September 2007
Message-ID: <t01Fi.49620$Um6.14486@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>